00:03:12 Isn't IRC greatly public? 00:04:11 Isn't that conversation dead yet? 00:05:26 -!- GregorR-W has quit ("ChatZilla rocks, you should totally use it! BRB, ChatZilla's user list box is F'd up again ..."). 00:09:28 -!- GregorR-W has joined. 00:23:21 Well, a new conversation hasn't really started yet. 00:42:37 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit ("all your basment are belong to bsmntbombdood"). 00:44:29 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 00:47:58 -!- fizzie has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 00:48:09 -!- fizzie has joined. 00:52:00 -!- GregorR-W has quit (Remote closed the connection). 00:55:17 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Remote closed the connection). 01:03:26 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 02:06:05 * ihope feels immensely proud of ##quantum despite the fact that there's pretty much nobody in it 02:19:39 -!- ihope has quit ("Hey, everybody! Make this your default quit message!"). 03:02:15 back 03:02:23 -!- calamari has joined. 03:02:29 IRC isn't very public. 03:02:32 It's highly impersonal. 03:02:45 hi 03:02:51 Hey-r. 03:03:30 -!- RodgerTheAfk has changed nick to RodgerTheGreat. 03:19:34 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit ("all your basment are belong to bsmntbombdood"). 03:20:08 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 03:51:53 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 03:52:13 -!- pikhq has joined. 04:05:16 -!- Arrogant has joined. 05:25:10 g'night, everybody. 05:25:29 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 05:25:33 Night. 05:25:40 -!- RodgerTheGreat has quit. 05:32:35 -!- calamari has left (?). 06:00:59 -!- stereofan has joined. 06:05:21 -!- stereofan has left (?). 06:31:55 -!- thematrixeatsyou has joined. 06:41:20 h(); 06:41:40 No. 06:42:52 !hq9+ hq9+ 06:42:55 Huh? 06:43:01 No HQ9+? 06:43:06 !help 06:43:10 help ps kill i eof flush show ls bf_txtgen usertrig daemon undaemon 06:43:11 1l 2l adjust axo bch bf{8,[16],32,64} funge93 fyb fybs glass glypho kipple lambda lazyk linguine malbolge pbrain qbf rail rhotor sadol sceql trigger udage01 unlambda whirl 06:43:25 Aaaw. 06:48:38 h(); is huby 06:48:50 hold on... 06:48:53 ....... 06:48:54 Huby? 06:50:07 back 06:50:13 was keeping yellow river yellow 06:50:43 Huh? 06:52:22 http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/Huby 07:03:22 Why not name the language HelloWorld? 07:03:27 Or HW? 07:03:30 Or HelloW? 07:03:33 Or H? 07:03:41 Or Perl? 07:07:15 there's Hello which is like HQ9+ except it's H. 07:07:38 Hello is easy to convert to HQ9+ 07:14:48 gtg, ciao 07:15:04 -!- thematrixeatsyou has quit ("76h, F4h, what's the diff?"). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:39:39 -!- Arrogant has joined. 09:46:34 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 10:11:07 -!- ivan` has joined. 11:06:02 -!- tgwizard has joined. 11:49:41 -!- sekhmet has quit (leguin.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 11:50:06 -!- sekhmet has joined. 11:59:54 -!- sekhmet has quit (leguin.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 12:00:27 -!- sekhmet has joined. 12:03:51 -!- sekhmet has quit (leguin.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 12:04:16 -!- sekhmet has joined. 12:13:40 -!- sekhmet has quit (leguin.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 12:14:05 -!- sekhmet has joined. 12:19:31 -!- sekhmet has quit (leguin.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 12:20:37 -!- sekhmet has joined. 12:22:41 -!- Keymaker has joined. 12:22:49 hello. 12:24:53 anyone know what could be the problem? i've written a sceql interpreter in C, but for some reason when i print ints pp and ql by using "printf("Program pointer: %i. Queue length: %i.\n"),pp,ql;", it prints out "Program pointer: 4198928. Queue length: 37814112." no matter what the values are 12:25:11 and those definitely aren't the value, as far as i know 12:25:53 wait.. i think i know now 12:26:23 Your ) is in the wrong place. 12:26:25 hah, yeah 12:26:30 i just fixed that a second ago :) 12:26:35 but thanks anyways 12:26:38 I just looked at this a second ago. :p 12:26:41 hehe 13:07:17 btw, i redesigned my esolang page yesterday/tomorrow.. http://koti.mbnet.fi/yiap/index.php?page=index 13:08:03 looks probably less horrible to those who didn't like the previous one. also, a lot easier to update as stuff is now read from text files. 13:33:53 -!- ihope has joined. 14:12:37 -!- ihope_ has joined. 14:29:55 -!- ihope has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 14:30:29 -!- ihope_ has changed nick to ihope. 15:04:58 -!- CXI has quit ("If you're reading this, it's probably xchat's fault."). 15:12:59 -!- Keymaker has left (?). 16:03:42 -!- CXI has joined. 16:04:04 -!- GregorR-W has joined. 16:15:28 -!- ivan` has quit (" Want to be different? HydraIRC -> http://www.hydrairc.com <-"). 16:17:18 -!- kipple has joined. 16:21:15 DAMN YOU PEOPLE IN THE NEXT CUBE DOWN SHUT THE F*** UP I HATE YOU WHY WON'T YOU DIE 16:21:21 I mean, hi everybody. 16:23:56 See. IRC isn't public. 16:24:22 I just got 936 kB/s on a torrent. I am happy. 16:24:29 There's a lot of damning going on in #nethack, too. 16:24:38 ihope: damn! 16:24:53 DAMN 16:24:54 Etc. 16:25:06 Can I say ``Darn!'' ? 16:25:22 Sure. 16:25:59 Awesome. 16:26:01 Darn! 16:26:18 Piffle X_o 16:28:08 It could be if the guy in the next cube also was into Esolangs. 16:28:28 She's female, so we know she isn't :-P 16:29:55 * pikhq hands Razor-X a sledgehammer 16:44:24 -!- ihope has changed nick to ihope|unidentifi. 16:44:31 -!- ihope|unidentifi has changed nick to ihope. 16:45:55 Boom: now only I can change the topic of ##quantum. 16:52:14 Next cube? 16:52:49 Razor-X apparently has not experienced the cubicle maze :P 16:53:30 Aha. 16:53:38 But why is pikhq in a cubicle? 16:53:46 (That was my original question.) 16:54:21 ... 16:54:28 Razor-X also didn't read the context of that :P 16:54:36 Note my screaming message above :P 16:55:53 anybody know who's behind the esolang contest? The article on the wiki just says contact "me" on #esoteric... 16:56:14 Look in the history to see who put it there :-) 16:56:23 just an IP address 16:57:00 Oh... 16:57:07 * ihope headscratches 16:57:27 Razor-X <<< 16:57:52 user-3cf84fq.dsl.mindspring.com... 16:58:04 ===Razor-X “unknown” 16:58:12 aha 16:58:25 09:57 [freenode] -!- Razor-X [n=user@user-11fa5b3.dsl.mindspring.com] 16:58:25 09:57 [freenode] -!- ircname : unknown 16:58:25 09:57 [freenode] -!- channels : #vhdl @##otaku #esoteric 16:58:25 09:57 [freenode] -!- server : irc.freenode.net [http://freenode.net/] 16:58:25 09:57 [freenode] -!- : is identified to services 16:58:27 09:57 [freenode] -!- End of WHOIS 16:58:40 Behold! The power of whois! 16:58:49 Razor-X's IP address is currently 66.245.21.99... 17:00:05 well then, Raxor-X, I have two questions for you 17:00:14 When will the contest start? 17:00:24 And when will the contest end :P 17:00:25 And why aren't you in the comittee? 17:01:15 guess she's afk 17:10:00 -!- RodgerTheGreat has joined. 17:10:37 good morning. 17:10:42 Morning. 17:19:09 ハロウ! Interested in the contest, eh? 17:19:30 I'll be away most of the day, since I'm watching something. 17:20:10 I'm in the committee. 17:20:18 I thought it understood that I'm already there. 17:20:32 I'm going to try and get the miniscule committee to meet and decide on a date today. That's what I was hoping anyways. 17:20:45 ok, where are we meeting? 17:20:49 here? 17:20:56 Are you the other committee member? 17:21:33 http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/2006_Esolang_Contest#Committee 17:21:38 :D 17:22:08 ``Sex Addicts Needed -- For Romantic, Casual Relationship'' No. 17:22:34 ? 17:22:58 Sorry, I was reading off a very stupid ad. 17:23:05 ah 17:23:20 Wooh. You must've added your name in the last few days. No, I need to also take in account Claudio Calvelli. 17:23:36 ah, that kind of relationship. 17:24:02 I don't know if lament is part of the committee, or just waiting for a coup d'etat. 17:24:27 * RodgerTheGreat shrugs 17:24:44 Anyhow. I wish that guy had IRC, but oh well. 17:24:53 it looks like we currently have enough people to actually hold the contest, though, so this is good. 17:25:10 We have *lots* of participants, and that's good. I'm just worried if the committee can handle it. 17:25:27 well, judging can take place over the course of several days. 17:25:33 I guess it'll have to. 17:25:41 It'll be fine, 50% max will actually submit programs. 17:25:50 And I'm an optimist. 17:25:50 When we announce the dates, we also have to assign people to their languages in a registration list. 17:25:53 Heh. 17:25:59 Yeah, that's true. 17:26:12 I mean, I'm going to want to read up on any unusual languages used before I try to decide what kind of score a program should get. 17:26:35 why not let people choose a language _after_ the tasks have been decided... 17:26:50 Because then people get an unfair advantage. 17:26:57 they do? 17:27:03 why? it would be the same for all 17:27:05 The goal is to keep people blinded about the task they will receive. 17:27:10 ok. fair enough 17:27:25 yeah- if it's "Make the smallest possible quine", everybody'll want to do it with HQ9+. :) 17:27:28 but it will probably lead to fewer submissions 17:27:43 It's like RodgerTheGreat said :P. 17:28:07 When you choose to compete in a language, you are competing for *profficiency* at the language. 17:28:11 also, there's the problem of people *creating* languages that are particularly suited to a task. 17:28:14 I thought there were supposed to be separate tasks for each language. I 17:28:19 That too. 17:28:38 May I comment on the whole contest thing. 17:28:43 sure. 17:28:45 I think it kinda sucks a bit. 17:28:49 There will be. The reason being that Task X maybe easy to code in Language A, while Task Y is a lot harder, but easier in Language B. 17:28:59 I think the Essies were really cool, and this contest won't be. 17:29:10 When was the last time we had the Essies? ;) 17:29:18 A while ago :) 17:29:32 I think we should have 5 or 6 different "tasks" and then award points for completing each one in your language. 17:29:43 Hmmm. Maybe. 17:29:47 That's not a bad idea. 17:30:20 Gregor proposed to remove Malbolge from the list. Is that alright? Since if there's only one competitor, he will win by default. 17:30:49 It worked like that at a programming competition I went to once- you could choose between C, VB, Java, etc, and then they gave you a pile of 12 challenges and a certain amount of time to work. 17:31:11 I think people are missing much of the point with this contest :( 17:31:23 Hmmm? 17:31:28 Obfuscation is penalized?? WTF?! 17:31:38 yeah, the problem is coming up with a fair way to reward working with harder languages and doing cool tricks. 17:31:42 lament: The code is meant to be reusable. 17:31:51 right 17:31:58 lament: I can make really hard to read BF code, or somewhat simpler BF code. 17:32:00 lament: not every contest needs to be about obfuscation 17:32:29 we could also go with the "science fair" model, by just letting people create a cool program of their choice that showcases their language, and then judge on quality and innovation. 17:32:33 it's an esoteric programming contest that tries very hard to not be an esoteric programming contest 17:32:48 esoteric programming != obfuscation 17:32:52 Exactly. 17:33:14 this competition != IOCC. 17:33:38 * lament considers shooting the committee members before the revolution actually comes 17:34:04 * GregorR-W considers that lament has made no legitimate argument other than his opinion that esoteric programming == obfuscated programming 17:34:07 kipple: what's esoteric programming? 17:34:17 GregorR-W: that is not my opinion. 17:34:22 programming in an esoteric programming language (IMHO) 17:34:43 obfuscated programming *can* be esoteric, but esoteric languages are not inherently obfuscated. 17:34:52 An esoteric programming language is a computer programming language designed to experiment with weird ideas, to be hard to program in, or as a joke, rather than for practical use. 17:35:10 Razor-X sums it up well. 17:35:27 I copied and pasted the Wiki definition :P. 17:35:39 hm. that explains it. 17:35:40 it's ok. its public domain ;) 17:35:55 So you don't have enough committee members? 17:36:10 I believe "experimentation with weird ideas" is central to esoteric programming. 17:36:28 Nope ihope. 17:36:28 it looks the the committee currently consists of 4 people. 17:36:37 I was hoping for 5-10. 17:36:58 that's very unrealistic I think. Then there would hardly be anyone left to participate 17:37:12 Razor-X: add yourself to the list, and then add a notice that says we're looking for that number. 17:37:20 4-5 is fine IMO 17:37:25 We have like.... 15 contest members. 17:37:50 if gregor is right (and I think he is) that means we're looking at roughly 6-7 submissions. 17:37:52 lament: true, but I don't see why obfuscation necessarily has to be a part of it 17:37:54 I added that I'm looking for 5-10, and I thought I'm implicitly part of the committee. 17:38:07 kipple: i never said obfuscation was necessary 17:38:26 four people can easily handle 1-2 submissions each (or 7, if we're each looking at all of them). 17:38:28 kipple: this contest does not encourage experimentation with weird ideas. It encourages writing libraries. 17:38:44 kipple: obfuscation is in the spirit of esoteric programming; writing libraries is not 17:38:46 you may be right, but until we see the actual tasks how can you know? 17:38:49 "If you intend to join the committee you must have coding experience!" 17:38:55 How much coding experience? 17:39:00 kipple: because that's what the page claims. 17:39:03 Well uh..... 17:39:07 Enough to work with BF programs. 17:39:16 ihope: at least enough to write a BF interpreter. 17:39:36 (not necessarily *in* BF) 17:39:50 I guess I can do that. 17:40:12 But why do I need coding experience? Just what'll I be doing? 17:40:23 Looking at the code of the program? 17:40:25 removing Malbolge will probably make joining the comittee less intimidating 17:40:39 I mean, if you've never coded in your life.......... 17:40:47 I say anyone who submits Malbolge wins by default. 17:40:50 I've written a few things. 17:41:20 kipple raises a good point- I'm not sure how qualified I'd be to cryptanalyze somebody's malbolge source. Even if it was Dis, I'd have some difficulty. 17:41:36 Oh. I forgot to add in that clause..... 17:42:01 I wanted to add that Malbolge programs will be judged only on ``Wow''-ness, and no task will be given for Malbolge programs. 17:42:12 good idea. 17:42:59 If someone submits a BF interpreter written in malbolge, they will not only win by default- I shall worship them as a god. 17:43:10 Precisely. 17:43:33 say something about bonus points for proving turing completeness in an unconfirmed language. 17:44:01 Wait. Are we going to allow any language to enter? 17:44:36 well, do you want this to be "science-fair style", or "challenge based"? 17:44:44 Mmmm..... 17:44:55 the wiki article is challenge based 17:44:55 Let's take a vote, miaj kunlaboraj amikoj. 17:45:05 say that in english. 17:45:14 My fellow commitee member friends. 17:45:18 ah 17:45:52 Woohoo! I understood Razor's Esperanto! 17:46:07 Bona. 17:46:11 I vote for "Science Fair", because it'll allow people to be creative and push boundaries in their favorite languages. 17:46:14 Anywho, let's vote. 17:46:18 Jes. :D 17:46:19 I'll stay neutral here. 17:47:06 How about... you have 30 minutes to vote, ne? 17:47:21 sounds fair. 17:47:26 So we can compensate for afk/brb/bbiab/bbias/random-away-acronym-ness. 17:47:29 * GregorR-W votes challenge. Easier to judge. 17:47:32 30 minutes from... wait, what? 17:47:37 Actually, wait ... 17:47:40 I may retract that :P 17:47:52 maybe a day rather than 30 minutes? 17:47:57 30 minutes from now to vote whether you want a Science Fair style competition or a Challenge based competition. 17:47:59 * ihope welds GregorR-W's vote into place 17:48:02 A day? 17:48:06 what's the rush? 17:48:08 Alright, a day then. 17:48:15 use the topic to keep the interim vote 17:48:30 Can someone add this into the Proposed Rule Changes heading in the Wiki. 17:48:32 *? 17:48:49 Yes. You. 17:48:57 Thank you very much :P. 17:51:10 What if "science fair" is just one of the tasks assigned? 17:51:32 hm. like half and half point basis or something? 17:52:15 Write an iterating quine, write a Thue interpreter, write anything? 17:52:19 Done. 17:52:43 Votes will be due by 18:00 Aug. 10th, UTC. 17:53:02 Errr... 19:00 even. 17:53:04 ihope: it might make the competition more balanced, but the rules/judging could get really complex. 17:56:27 * pikhq is doing a little talk about esolangs at the LUG next week, BTW. . . 17:56:41 LUG? 17:56:50 Linux User Group. 17:56:53 oh 17:57:23 Would there be multiple tasks in each language otherwise? 17:58:29 if we went with "Science Fair", we could post some suggested tasks if people were having trouble coming up with ideas, I guess. 18:00:13 -!- smokecfh has joined. 18:00:18 hi 18:00:38 If they would have trouble coming up with ideas, then sticking with goals would probably be a good idea. 18:02:06 hm. 18:13:01 -!- smokecfh has quit (Remote closed the connection). 18:14:31 -!- Keymaker has joined. 18:20:44 -!- Keymaker has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 18:20:52 -!- smokecfh has joined. 18:24:51 oh, Razor-X- I was looking at your addition to the wiki. I think you meant "...Instead, the *contestants* will decide on a set of tasks and present those..." 18:24:52 -!- Keymaker has joined. 18:24:57 want me to change it? 18:26:53 well, bbl. 18:27:23 i agree with lament 18:28:46 that writing obfuscated code shouldn't lower points, for instance 18:28:58 and that this competion doesn't allow much creativity 18:31:08 code that anyone can easily use is not very esoteric :) 18:32:55 * GregorR-W deletes the Brainfuck Algorithms page. 18:32:58 That page is for pussies. 18:33:10 well, yeah 18:37:35 i guess you would like esoteric programming to be nothing but having a translator for each language that converts C to that language.. :P seriously, an esolang competition entry isn't supposed to be reusable or easy to understand, you can't deny that. and even more seriously, i wonder why i'm even writing this. :) 18:43:12 and, i second the idea of having the same tasks for all languages, in case that proposed rule change at esowiki meant that. 18:44:54 Hm, lemme see if I understand this ... 18:45:38 I think it meant that contestants could submit whatever sorts of things they wanted. 18:45:48 The contest will suck, it's a bad idea. And yet I choose to support a proposed rule change that makes it less like I say it should be. 18:45:49 As long as it's readable and all that, of course. 18:50:44 i'm sorry gregorr, i probably was out of my mind for a few seconds. i can't find anything indicating you'd support the reusability and non-obfuscated idea 18:53:15 The Proposed Rule Changes heading is there for a reason. Not so that this turns into a committee brawl :P. 18:54:08 This contest is not about obfuscated code. There have been enough contests about obfuscated code. I like the concept of it /not/ being about obfuscated code. 18:54:16 There's nothing wrong with obfuscated code, but there are other things out there. 18:54:33 hmm. so, what do you want to see? 18:54:33 Yeah. Exactly. 18:54:48 Obfuscation is not the same thing as Esoteric. 18:55:11 i know, but it has always been rather close to it, mostly due nature of many langs 18:55:31 Which is also why I think turing tarpits are getting a bit annoying. 18:55:36 and to get a shortest code, as often in esolang related competition, requires clever obfuscation 18:55:46 The shortest code *without* obfuscation. 18:56:08 but obfuscation is what makes esolangs so good...... 18:56:11 In normal code, if you can use an && in an if condition instead of two if's, it's more concise, while not being obfuscated. 18:56:29 (ok, there are other things too..) 18:56:38 oh well.. 18:56:38 Why not call it the Obfuscated Languages then? 18:56:49 if a then if b then c else d else if e then f else g 18:56:49 You people are sooo missing the point :( 18:56:53 it almost makes me cry 18:57:13 Fine. Lament :P. 18:57:46 * ihope shoots Razor-X slightly 18:58:00 Hey... it's not alright to hit/harm a girl. 18:58:02 it's not about obfuscation 18:58:10 it's about this contest not being in the spirit of esoteric programming 18:58:24 Specifically? 18:58:30 Well... it seems the community is at a split about this universal spirit ;). 18:59:07 specifically, it seems to encourage mundane things like 'readability' and not esoteric things like 'fun' 18:59:16 very much unlike the Essies. 18:59:19 yes 18:59:23 Isn't it fun to write readable code, sortA? 18:59:28 nope 18:59:47 What's the difficulty in writing unreadable code? :P. 18:59:49 ihope: fun, but not esoteric. 19:00:05 So, esoteric == unreadable? 19:00:06 Compare and contrast with the Essies 19:00:08 Well, hey, maybe this contest just isn't about being esoteric, eh? 19:00:16 Or rather, esoteric.find(unreadable) != esoteric.end() 19:00:16 GregorR-W: pretty much, yeah. 19:00:22 How about this being a Non-esoteric contest for the competition of esoteric languages? 19:00:32 Razor-X: yes. that's exactly what it is. 19:00:47 I think there've been enough esoteric contests. 19:01:06 hm. 19:01:07 Oy >_< 19:01:09 In languages where the very nature *is* to be esoteric, isn't the difficulty to make it non-esoteric? 19:01:39 GregorR-W: I said at least three times that this has nothing to do with obfuscation 19:01:55 GregorR-W: and everything with the intent 19:02:13 I haven't said "obfuscation" in quite a few minutes ... 19:02:20 The intent of the Essies was wacky esoteric fun. The main task was "the most entertaining toy/language" 19:02:35 Well... who's stopping the Essies? 19:02:49 good question :) 19:02:57 (.... Other than a lack of community awakeness ....) 19:03:00 nobody, i'm simply lamenting the state the esoteric community is in :) 19:03:08 hehe 19:03:11 Heh. 19:03:32 well, i agree with lament, i'd like to see an Essie 19:03:49 if we had essies now, they would likely tank due to lack of participation 19:04:00 can be 19:04:25 be back soon. 19:04:54 (and where's cpressey anyway? i heard he's working at google and all, but why would that stop him from coming here?) 19:16:53 back 19:16:56 woah. 19:17:10 I'm missin' out on a lot of discussion. 19:17:39 RodgerTheGreat: The summary: Complain complain complain. Retort retort retort. 19:17:59 ah, ok. thanks for bringing me up to speed. 19:18:08 :P 19:18:10 are the retorts winning? 19:18:28 i guess nothing changed, in the end 19:18:30 Nobody's winning. 19:18:37 Everybody loses. 19:18:41 hehe 19:18:43 hm. sounds like most internet arguments. 19:18:56 NOBODY LIKES ME EVERYBODY HATES ME GUESS I'LL GO EAT WORMS. 19:19:09 hey, give me some of those! 19:19:18 "Arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics- even if you win, you're still retarded" 19:27:17 does anyone know any wiki that's easy to install? 19:29:00 Install, pah. 19:29:13 or get to work.. 19:29:21 i don't care about installing 19:29:31 whatever is correct word.. 19:30:06 Keymaker: Giki 19:30:12 http://giki.sourceforge.net/ 19:30:24 (The preceeding has been a paid advertizement for Giki) 19:30:34 heh 20:22:00 -!- Keymaker has left (?). 20:45:12 -!- smokecfh has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:47:25 * ihope waits patiently 20:48:55 * ihope waits patiently for someone to ask what he's waiting for 20:49:54 * RodgerTheGreat considers asking ihope what he's waiting for. 20:50:06 * GregorR-W encourages RodgerTheGreat not to ask ihope what he's waiting for. 20:51:03 * RodgerTheGreat considers GregorR-W's advice upon considering asking ihope what he's waiting for. 20:51:29 * ihope considers telling RodgerTheGreat what he's waiting for despite not being asked 20:51:41 * ihope decides against it 20:51:46 * GregorR-W considers killing anyone who hears what ihope is waiting for. 20:52:09 * ihope considers considering telling GregorR-W what he's waiting for 20:52:19 * RodgerTheGreat considers piercing his eardrums to avoid invoking GregorR-W's wrath. 20:52:40 * ihope decides not to tell anybody what he's waiting for, even if asked 20:53:02 ihope: What are you waiting for? 20:53:27 * ihope threatens GregorR-W with /ignorance 20:53:50 !glass {M[m(_o)O!"ihope: What are you waiting for?"(_o)o.?]} 20:53:53 ihope: What are you waiting for? 20:54:18 * ihope gasps 20:54:20 Gasp! 20:55:31 * RodgerTheGreat 's third-person narrative meter pegs and starts emitting smoke. 20:56:41 You can just disable CTCP... 20:57:46 ...or can you? 20:57:48 >:-D 21:05:51 -!- ivan` has joined. 21:07:57 I get the feeling that some wikipedia article(s) is/are about to be deleted. 21:08:03 I don't know where I got that premonition from. 21:08:25 Some article(s) related to esoteric programming, even. 21:09:34 Which ones? 21:10:02 I have no idea, but I'll bet ivan`!ivan@wikipedia/ivan knows :P 21:11:46 That's i=ivan, there, not just ivan... 21:11:51 -!- CXI has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 21:11:52 How'd he do that, eh? 21:12:00 I believe that has to do with whether you're identified. 21:12:16 I'm identified. 21:12:19 -!- CXI has joined. 21:12:33 -!- ihope has changed nick to ihope|noLongerId. 21:12:37 -!- ihope|noLongerId has changed nick to ihope. 21:13:06 Maybe it has to do with whether you're Incredibly-hax0rish or a Newbie. 21:14:09 Or maybe whether your ident daemon is working? 21:14:33 Possible. 21:41:13 -!- ihope has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 21:52:48 -!- ihope has joined. 21:56:37 -!- sekhmet_ has joined. 21:56:47 -!- sekhmet has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 21:56:55 -!- sekhmet_ has changed nick to sekhmet. 22:08:12 * ihope flips the status of Schoedinger's Cat in the topic of ##quantum back and forth a few times 22:09:03 does that really make much of a change? 22:09:41 It's dead according to /list 22:10:36 but determining it's status as dead could've affected the outcome. 22:19:40 * lament cries 22:20:28 ? 22:20:29 -!- ChanServ has set channel mode: +o lament. 22:20:35 Uh... 22:20:38 :P 22:20:47 * ihope runs away 22:20:57 watch where you're pointing that +o, man. 22:20:59 * lament wonders what random mode to set 22:21:12 -!- lament has set channel mode: -c. 22:21:16 no... that's TOO evil 22:21:21 :S 22:21:31 -!- lament has set channel mode: +c. 22:21:35 -!- lament has set channel mode: +o ihope. 22:21:52 I BLAME IHOPE!! I"M NOT RESPONSIBLE!!! 22:21:53 Um, you just turned off the color filter, and on again... 22:21:54 -!- lament has set channel mode: -o lament. 22:22:16 * ihope thinks for half a second, then points the gun at RodgerTheGreat 22:22:27 :o 22:22:34 -!- ihope has set channel mode: +o RodgerTheGreat. 22:22:36 -!- ihope has set channel mode: -o ihope. 22:22:42 *cool* 22:23:00 @ means 'terminate' 22:23:07 at least in Befunge it does. 22:23:23 In NetHack, @ is usually you. 22:23:30 Therefore, you are RodgerTheGreat. 22:23:43 no, in Nethack @ is usually the wizard of yendor 22:23:54 If you're playing the Wizard of Yendor, yes. 22:24:05 Or there are lots and lots of him. 22:24:24 I thought "The Amulet of Yendor" was the goal in rogue. 22:25:10 Getting it and getting out, I think. 22:25:18 well, yes. 22:25:20 amulet shmamulet. the goal is to polymorph into a grid bug. 22:25:42 lament: that's really more of a side quest. 22:29:11 So what happens if you try to join ##quantum now? 22:30:30 i'm banned. 22:30:37 and too lazy to unban myself. 22:31:27 -!- Razor-X has left (?). 22:31:35 -!- Razor-X has joined. 22:33:46 hi 22:34:20 Hey-n. 22:41:25 The goal is to not die so quickly that you don't even get to figure out these "side quests" of which you speak (I suck at nethack). 22:42:14 Start out with an easier race/class combination then. 22:43:03 Like? 22:43:24 Valkyrie/Rogue? Valkyrie/Warrior ? 22:43:43 Valkyrie is a class, not a race. 22:43:46 Razor-X: obviously you have never played Nethack. 22:43:51 And there's no Warrior class. 22:43:57 Blah. 22:44:07 Whatever the Warrior class is then :P. 22:44:17 Razor-X: Valkyrie. 22:44:21 Heh. 22:44:28 Oh, err.... Blah. 22:44:37 Valkyrie/Human bleh. 22:44:55 I haven't played a different character in like... a year. 22:46:28 do you play on NAO? 22:46:29 Vampires are fun but hard. But only Slash'Em. I wasn't that big a fan of Nethack, (but I ascended once, so whatever) but before I tried Slash'Em I prefered the Moria-derivatives. 22:46:38 Nope. I dun play anywhere but locally. 22:46:54 I see. 22:50:55 * pikhq died hallucinating 22:51:11 99% of the time I die hungry :P. 22:51:19 Stupid Vampires, heh. 22:51:27 I eat the corpses. >:D 22:51:38 I *have* to eat the corpses. 22:51:49 Vampires can't eat rations or anything like that, and can only suck blood from the corpses. 22:51:53 I. . . I. . . I killed my kitten! HOW?!? 22:52:05 If you don't suck the blood from your fallen enemy in one turn, it coagulates. 22:52:34 No Points Name Hp [max] 22:52:37 1 770 pikhq-Wiz-Elf-Mal-Cha died in The Gnomish Mines on 22:52:40 level 3. Killed by a hallucinogen-distorted gnome. - [20] 22:52:43 You see? I suck. 22:52:50 Nethack has mines on level 3? 22:52:53 * Razor-X cannot remember. 23:20:47 -!- bsmntbombdood has changed nick to SIGHUP. 23:21:57 -!- SIGHUP has changed nick to bsmntbombdood. 23:22:55 -!- bsmntbombdood has changed nick to {. 23:23:18 -!- { has changed nick to __. 23:24:38 -!- __ has changed nick to bsmntbombdood. 23:28:14 -!- ihope has changed nick to {. 23:28:32 <{> Well, it's not "very" valid, but at least it's sort of valid. 23:28:34 -!- { has changed nick to ihope. 23:43:17 OK, taking votes: When/if I add script support to DirectNet, what shoul the [first?] supported language be? On the table are at least Python, Lua and Perl. 23:45:21 DirectNet? 23:45:44 The directnet.us DirectNet? 23:45:47 -!- kipple has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 23:45:48 ihope: http://directnet.sourceforge.net/ 23:46:05 Maybe I need to change the name to a less overloaded namespace :P 23:46:36 YouNet? 23:46:39 MeNet? UsNet? 23:46:51 Yeah, those are sure to be FAR less overloaded. 23:47:02 HimNet, HerNet, ItNet, ThemNet? 23:47:18 ThemNet is hardly used at all. 23:47:34 Google: "Did you mean: the net" 23:48:06 Hmm... 23:48:47 I think you'd have to settle for something that's not descriptive, eh? 23:49:13 OK, the vote is not on the name :P 23:53:53 Woah, wtf? 23:54:00 Does RodgerTheGreat have ops or is my client fegged? 23:55:20 Aha, found it in the logs. 23:55:22 lol, weird. 23:58:54 ChanServ ops lament, lament ops me, lament deops himself, I op RodgerTheGreat, I deop myself...