00:08:02 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 00:08:52 bbl folks 00:11:58 SimonRC: technically speaking you still need to know what gules is 00:12:28 SimonRC: for example, imagine if there were thousands of files there 00:13:15 yell, yeah.... 00:13:16 is 00:13:18 ish 00:17:09 um 00:17:25 gate 3 lock 2 is NOT the basil puzzle, is it? 00:17:47 oh, it is 00:18:47 why do you ask? 00:19:02 i assumed there would be more puzzles 00:19:33 what is special about the basil puzzle? 00:19:55 it's the last one 00:19:58 ok 00:20:00 bah 00:20:13 first question, has *anyone* here managed it? 00:20:24 pikhq is apparently the only person ever. 00:20:38 next question, why a bloomin TIFF? 00:23:39 i suppose i don't know. 00:24:54 and why so huge? 00:25:24 well, TIFF images tend to be huge :) 00:31:01 have you read the wikipedia article on them? 00:31:28 i'm nowhere near solving the puzzle, i'm afraid. 00:31:43 but as an amateur photographer, i can tell you tiff images tend to be huge :) 00:31:44 I don't know if I am 00:32:29 there is so *much* stuff that you can do with the TIFF format 00:32:37 but maybe that isn;t significant at all... 00:42:04 I'm back 00:42:04 well, the image is compressed, internally, so I doubt there is any steganography 00:42:07 well, the image is compressed, internally, so I doubt there is any steganography 00:42:10 oops, 00:42:33 no discussion in here please 00:42:37 ok 00:44:42 (for what it's worth, JPEG watermarking is very common despite JPEG being compressed) 00:45:14 (again, speaking as an amateur photographer rather than some kind of programmer) 00:46:04 hmf 00:46:48 it's simple 00:46:57 you just watermark after compression, not before 00:47:10 ok 00:53:54 -!- pikhq has joined. 00:58:45 Anyone else Basiling? 00:59:00 yup 00:59:08 pikhq: come to mock us? ;-) 00:59:08 Buahahaha! 00:59:21 Not really. It actually is maniacal. 00:59:38 so it is not so simple that I will I feel like an idiot for not trying some certan thing? 00:59:54 No, once you're done, that's *exactly* how you'll feel. :p 01:02:02 bah 01:02:48 how long did you spend having no clue, comparedt to the amount of time spent working in the right direction? 01:08:48 or would that be too much of a clue? 01:09:17 pikhq: gah! 01:09:55 SimonRC: I spent all of it clueless until I discovered the answer. 01:10:00 ahh 01:10:01 hmm 01:10:06 that is a big hint then 01:10:11 maybe 01:10:37 No, because you still have to find it. 01:11:07 it it tells me not to look at some things 01:16:18 * SimonRC wonders if the nearly-identical image is of any significance at all 01:16:23 It was mentionned earlier 01:16:49 Maybe. 01:16:54 not helpful 01:17:02 Si. 01:18:29 bah 01:18:54 Problem is, I can't think of much to do with it other than treat it as an image 01:19:28 http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.diamondorganics.com/images/herbs_basil300.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.diamondorganics.com/&h=300&w=300&sz=16&hl=en&start=520&um=1&tbnid=DsOXfgK_b1L3UM:&tbnh=116&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3DBasil%26start%3D520%26imgsz%3Dsmall%257Cmedium%257Clarge%257Cxlarge%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN 01:19:34 oops, wrong button 01:29:45 i'm beginning to strongly suspect Basil is kinda lame 01:29:54 but of course i won't know for sure until i find the answer. 01:30:00 you haven;t found the answer 01:30:14 pikhq: Actaully, that is the sign of a very difficult puzzle. You spend far more time having no clue than you do having clue. 01:32:29 odd 01:38:16 -!- fax has quit. 01:39:56 is it *aupposed* to be a broken image, BTW? 01:40:07 It doesn;t want to display inline 01:40:27 that's because your browser doesn't properly support TIFF 01:40:34 just load up Safari. :) 01:41:14 my problem with basil 01:43:06 lament: yes? 01:43:08 is that either you need to have/make some kind of tiff-fucking tool, which is lame 01:44:08 or you don't, but then that's an obvious false route and you still end up doing it, which is still lame :) 01:44:09 really? 01:44:22 RodgerTheGreat: so, is the puzzle lame? 01:44:24 :-) 01:44:29 I wouldn't say so 01:44:47 as I've said before, it's one of my crowning achievements 01:44:59 suppose i have no knowledge of the tiff format and no tiff processing libraries 01:45:15 which is surprisingly not far from the truth 01:45:27 That's where I started. 01:46:06 now, if i have to learn the tiff format to proceed, then i give up in advance :) 01:46:34 You might, or you might not. 01:46:47 You can try, or you can try other means. 01:46:55 Your insanity. 01:47:06 lament: I assume you tried the thing that worked with several of the previous ones, and got the (AFAICT) disappointing result 01:47:31 * RodgerTheGreat laughs in a generally sadistic fashion 01:47:43 * pikhq joins Rodger 01:47:44 incedentally, the answer isn't "Fawlty" 01:49:36 well, if the answer has anything to do with the ****** ***** ** *** ****, i'm not interested in continuing :) 01:49:56 those asterisks are not helping me 01:50:08 those asterisks are not helping me to understand your setance 01:51:49 oh come on, only so many sentences fit that pattern :) 01:52:28 just pull a Babbage and gather a collection of dictionaries containing various word lengths 01:52:37 bah 01:53:46 why is it called "gate 3?" 01:53:59 Because that's what Rodger likes calling it. 01:54:47 seemed like a cool naming scheme 01:55:18 ok 01:55:28 adding ?M=69 to the end din;t work :-) 02:02:06 Are you allowed to tell us if it has anything to do with the previous puzzles? 02:02:16 I.e. do you need to have solved them first? 02:03:31 * RodgerTheGreat settles into his chair to watch Rollerball 02:04:22 * pikhq watches brains a'splode 02:04:59 this is such an awesome movie. Very thought provoking. 02:05:52 Potter Harry of Dth Hlws? 02:05:59 Probably doesn't stand for anything like that. 02:06:01 what? 02:06:07 ihope: looked at the puzzles? 02:06:09 ****** ***** ** *** **** 02:06:27 SimonRC: what puzzles? 02:07:03 http://rodger.shadowarts.org/PHP/Example.php 02:07:10 only pikhq has got past the basil one 02:07:20 or is it the Basil one? 02:07:22 hmm 02:07:33 the challenges may be referred to collectively as "Rodger's Demon" 02:07:42 SimonRC: that link leads me to a 403. 02:08:00 so quick to jump to conclusions 02:08:41 Oh... 02:08:42 the last one AFAICT is an exercise is explorin a completely-flat problem space 02:14:47 Interesting. 02:15:55 from what pikhq said, there is no clue until you kit on the answer 02:17:20 * SimonRC goes to bed 03:00:08 blargh 03:00:37 (pl_from, pl_namespace, pl_title) 03:11:22 -!- cherez has quit ("Leaving."). 04:22:34 -!- ihope has quit (Connection timed out). 04:53:20 Rodger's Demon == evily good. 04:56:38 <:) 04:59:59 just wait for the Abyss. It will be unlike any game you've played before, I promise. 05:19:49 I can't wait. 06:38:25 -!- GregorR-L has joined. 06:43:02 good night everyone 06:43:26 -!- RodgerTheGreat has quit. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:07:34 -!- cherez has joined. 08:12:42 -!- GregorR-L has quit ("Leaving"). 08:36:20 -!- RedDak has joined. 08:51:39 -!- RedDak has quit ("I'm quitting... Bye all"). 08:57:34 -!- cherez has quit ("Leaving."). 09:02:27 -!- helios24 has quit (anthony.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 09:02:43 -!- helios24 has joined. 10:02:34 -!- jix has joined. 10:57:59 jix: hi 10:58:14 have you been irritated by Rodger's puzzles yet? 11:02:13 -!- ehird` has joined. 11:02:46 hi 11:02:49 any luck? 11:10:03 oh, on basil? 11:10:12 if so - i've just woken up 11:10:17 ah, ok 11:10:38 have you got any leads? 12:29:41 blah 12:29:44 its barely possible 12:29:45 :p 12:57:55 SimonRC: huh? 13:05:55 jix: I said, "hi" 13:06:05 the next line 13:06:17 jix, he was talking to me about Basil i think 13:06:31 ehird`: no you weren't here 13:06:37 11:56:57 have you been irritated by Rodger's puzzles yet? 13:07:24 http://rodger.shadowarts.org/PHP/Example.php 13:07:35 don't bother with them, the last one will wreck your life 13:07:42 I am ignoring it currently 13:07:56 i get a forbidden 13:08:27 jix, yes you do 13:08:40 jix, and yes i was 13:08:41 hi 13:08:41 any luck? 13:09:02 ehird`: you joined just after simonrc said have you irritated by..... 13:09:28 ah 13:09:39 jix, anyway, the forbidden is the first puzzle 13:10:02 ah this is notpron like? 13:12:29 yes 13:12:30 kind of 13:12:40 but less levels, and more binary data scavenging 13:12:46 great binarys! 13:12:59 like i probably need some different OS to run that 13:13:05 please discuss this somewhere else. 13:13:11 I can;t stand it any more 13:14:14 SimonRC, why? 13:17:56 because I am getting nowhere on the last question 13:21:55 My previous stratergy has always been to lose the URL to the puzzles and forget about them 13:22:28 hah 14:22:42 i've got it! 14:22:48 damn it 14:50:36 jix: Which/ 14:50:37 ? 14:50:43 pikhq: the last one 14:51:07 Basil? 14:51:10 yes 14:51:12 -!- ihope__ has joined. 14:51:20 -!- ihope__ has changed nick to ihope. 15:00:32 he has nicely dispatched one hint, which has saved me from giving up 15:05:20 jix, don't give out too many hints. 15:05:46 IMO, it's much more worth it to let them solve it themselve. 15:05:59 . . . Wait. You spent *two hours* on all of Rodger's Demon? 15:06:53 * pikhq bows before jix 15:07:05 for the first ones (the ones before the animations) ehird was throwing hints on me it would have taken longer without them 15:07:27 Still. . . Even with hints, the gulesfish is hard. 15:07:58 i found gulesfish pretty easy once i got "gules" 15:08:25 I noticed. 15:08:45 I had most of the puzzle solved before I realised where the input needed to go. 15:09:05 pikhq, he's only given out one hint 15:39:17 I would never have gotten the one that has just a 2-character hint without Rodger helping me 15:39:21 I am crap at such things 15:39:49 My puzzle-solving usually starts with a crappy solution then re-works the hell out of it 15:40:19 because my problem-solving is programming 15:40:45 I'm usually fairly good at these sorts of puzzles. 15:43:20 I am dreadful at them 15:43:27 I keep dismissing the right answer 15:44:18 e.g., In Gulesfish my unzipper was waving a massive hint in my face and I ignored it! 15:44:26 Hahah. 15:44:33 Mine ignored said massive hint. 15:44:54 Which actually wasn't the last bit of the puzzle I got. . . 15:45:05 OTOH, my other unzipper often says that same thing when it is not relevent 15:45:06 I had the much-needed input, but not where it was supposed to go. XD 15:45:43 I forgot that [] at the beginning of a BF program is not an ininite loop 15:46:35 LMAO 15:47:21 so, I looked, saw that the first two BF commands would be [ and ], then decided it is not a BF program 15:47:24 *sigh* 15:50:59 i had to tell him that it wasn't 15:51:07 he kept trying to use the elf instead, heh 16:00:12 -!- test_ has joined. 16:00:26 -!- ehird` has quit (Nick collision from services.). 16:00:28 -!- test_ has changed nick to ehird`. 16:02:10 -!- ehird` has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 16:02:15 -!- ehird` has joined. 16:09:06 -!- sebbu has joined. 17:25:40 -!- asiekierka has joined. 17:25:49 Hi! 17:26:04 It's a exact-1-year-anniversary of my first coming here! 17:26:08 i guess 17:26:08 http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/06.08.01 17:26:15 it's 07.08.01 today as i know 17:26:19 or am i mistaken? 17:26:22 or 01.08 17:26:57 I want to do a "esoteric programming language" programmable using IMAGES :D 17:27:10 it will use 16-color images 17:27:18 and will be Picts**t 17:27:29 a Brainf**k version using images. 17:27:42 Hmm. 17:27:58 Been done. 17:28:02 :) 17:28:06 oh 17:28:14 many times 17:28:30 Oh wait. I will make an IRC esoteric language, with IRC-like syntax 17:28:35 wtf 17:28:36 and completely other commands 17:28:37 heh 17:28:38 I call it IRP. 17:28:40 like 17:28:50 ... IRP? 17:28:59 http://esolangs.org/wiki/Braincopter 17:29:00 /part 17:29:03 works 17:29:04 ok 17:29:07 Internet Relay Programming 17:29:32 I will also do a Brainf**k interperting bot... i guess it was done though... 17:29:53 This channel actually has two in it usually. 17:30:23 ... :( 17:30:25 any ideas? 17:30:27 Please, print "IRP is stupid." 17:30:29 pikhq, do you want to do something with me? 17:30:37 IRP is stupid. 17:30:40 Like? 17:30:52 and did you do any esoteric languages? 17:30:56 Please, print "Mwahaha" while true is true. 17:30:58 >:D 17:31:00 if not you, then who? 17:31:14 I've done Dimensifuck, PicoCPU, and PEBBLE. 17:31:18 Please, print "I suck" while false is false. 17:31:41 INTERPRETER ERROR: Halting problem solved, don't want to do a program that doesn't halt. 17:31:57 I will do PSc311 language. 17:32:05 PlayStation c311 (cell) 17:32:26 it's goal is to make as much fun from a PS3 while being an esoteric language 17:32:32 source ^stdcons.bfm;@ temp1;@ temp2;stringout "Hello, world!\n" : temp1 temp2 17:33:01 Please, print "I love ehird`." 17:33:19 >-[<->+++++++]<-.>++++[<+++++++>-]<+.+++++++..+++.>----[<+++>----]<.------------.>--[<->---]<+.--------.+++.------.--------.>----[<+++>----]<.>------[<---->+]<+. is the result of that PEBBLE code. 17:33:21 ... 17:34:00 Please, if true is true print "I love #esoteric." else die 17:34:28 link to PicoCPU, Dimensif**k and PEBBLE specs 17:34:29 Interpreter does not wish to do an infinite program. 17:34:44 Okay. 17:34:55 Dunno where PicoCPU is hidden; http://esolangs.org/wiki/Dimensifuck, and http://pikhq.nonlogic.org/pebble.php 17:35:08 Please, if asiekiekra is on print "I love ehird`" 17:35:29 Please, if asiekierka OR Haikz is on print "I love ehird`" 17:35:40 ERROR: NO, IRP ALLOWED IN TOPIC ERROR 17:35:44 Ne, mi malsxatas gxin. 17:35:52 Rark ark 17:36:03 Oh! 17:36:09 One more to the discussion 17:36:12 ERROR: KILLING RAMPAGE STARTED, KILLING ALL IRP USERS 17:36:15 I have magic powers? 17:36:22 :D:D:D:D 17:36:24 Please, everyone private message asiekierka with "WHEEEEEE" 17:36:31 INTERPRETER WRITTEN PROGRAM TRANSMISSION FINISHED. 17:36:34 I have a magical constant 17:36:44 WARNING: PERSON YOU LOVE IS ABOUT TO DIE. [OK] [CANCEL] [WHO CARES] 17:36:51 Please execute "0+^+v". 17:36:53 [NO THEY AREN'T] 17:36:58 Please, send the warning to "everyone" 17:37:07 C:\win 17:37:13 YES THEY ARE says Win.com 17:38:08 Please, let x be "Please, let x be %c%s%c and evaluate (x sprintf'd with 37, x, 37)" and evaluate (x sprintf'd with 37, x, 37) 17:38:24 hmmmm... better IRP quineL 17:38:28 Please, let x be "Please, let x be %c%s%c and evaluate (x sprintf'd with 37, x, 37)" and say (x sprintf'd with 37, x, 37) 17:38:42 Please, let x be "Please, read source file "Please, let source file be #esoteric"" 17:38:51 to make it a loop 17:38:57 a loop is easy 17:39:06 Please, say this exact line. 17:39:12 Please, send command "Please, let x be "Please, read source file "Please, let source file be #esoteric""" to "Please, list anybody on #esoteric" 17:39:13 Please, all IRP interpreters, shut down. 17:39:17 a pool is hard 17:39:22 i am not an interperter. 17:39:29 asiekierka, everybody is an interpreter 17:39:35 i'm a sentient AI + an interperter, ie. a human 17:39:39 okay 17:39:43 shutting down.... 17:39:57 Dankon. 17:40:02 Please, reboot instead. 17:40:06 Rebooting :D 17:40:29 Please, say "No." everytime somebody confirms something. 17:40:59 Please, wreck havok. 17:41:03 I'm confused. 17:41:11 Please, give me a link to "Please, give me a link to "Please, give me a link to name "Please, "What is IRP?"""" 17:41:22 No. 17:41:31 No. 17:41:59 Please. 17:42:15 bacon 17:42:35 ERROR: No "please" at start of line "bacon" 17:42:56 Please, bacon. 17:43:15 Of course! 17:43:19 bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon ba 17:43:20 con bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon baco 17:43:20 n bacon bacon bacon bacon bacon 17:43:23 er. 17:43:25 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl 17:43:25 that was a bit too long 17:43:28 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl 17:43:31 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl 17:43:31 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl 17:43:31 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl 17:43:45 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERRO 17:43:48 ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. ERROR: No bacon. Download bacon yourself from www.yaai.prv.pl. 17:43:53 I don't like bacon. 17:43:56 ERROR: bacon was in response to Please, bacon. and had no please so interpreting as command is ERROR, asiekierka interpreter is BUGGY 17:43:57 Too many errors. Cannot continue. 17:44:09 ... It's 0.1 Beta 1 17:44:15 I forgot to upgrade 17:44:20 wait a minute 17:44:20 i will upgrade 17:44:26 ___...---''' 17:44:33 -!- asiekierka has left (?). 17:44:59 -!- asiekierka has joined. 17:45:08 Hi! 17:45:24 I made IRP#ascorp 17:45:28 which is exact the same as this 17:45:36 except you replace "Please," with "Shut up and" 17:45:41 Shut up and shut up 17:46:03 Type a command_ 17:46:13 Waiting... 17:46:43 WARNING: IRP#ascorp is not compatible with IRP#esoteric. To use IRP#ascorp join #ascorp. 17:47:14 rm -rf asiekierka 17:47:29 Please rm -rf anybody that tries to rm -rf me. 17:47:38 shut up 17:47:39 :P 17:47:57 Waiting for a command_ 17:48:16 Please type /clear 17:48:30 Please also press enter when you type /clear 17:48:37 Please then type /part and press enter. 17:49:36 ERROR: UPDATE FOUND. UPDATE DOSENT ALLOW TO TYPE /PART. SORRY FOR ANY PROBLEMS. 17:49:43 D'oh. I need to upgrade AGAIN. 17:49:45 -!- asiekierka has left (?). 17:49:45 -!- asiekierka has joined. 17:49:58 Please remember that i just upgraded. 17:50:47 Please join #ascorp. 17:51:42 Please join #ascorp and do not type quotation marks for 5 minutes. 17:52:14 Please invent a time machine.just kidding lol 17:52:35 Shutting down my interperter... 17:52:46 Hi. Is anybody on? 17:53:09 I don't remember anything except i turned on IRP01.exe some minutes ago... 17:53:39 ... 17:53:51 Okay... finally remembering the rest. 17:53:57 Who wants to IRP with me? 17:54:01 on #ascorp or here? 17:54:29 or tommorow? 17:54:32 if not now? 17:55:21 nobody's listening 17:55:28 Okay. 17:55:30 Okay. 17:55:58 Please say "wow" 17:56:03 FIX: Please say "wow" 17:56:19 NO, IRP ALLOWED. 17:56:35 No, irp allowed. So IRP IS allowed :DDD 17:56:42 because of the "," 17:56:48 So? 17:57:13 Please remember that IRP is allowed. 17:57:33 Sed IRP en Angla lingvo malbonas. 17:57:48 Please translate, pikhq. 17:57:57 But IRP in English is bad. 17:57:59 Please wait for a fix of the latest command. 17:58:06 Please translate "Sed IRP en Angla lingvo malbonas", pikhq. 17:58:14 Or please use polish. 17:58:28 Please remember that I only know Polish and English, 17:58:31 Ne. Mi sxatas lan internacian lingvon! 17:58:50 and please translate the stuff or i'll seriously quit! 17:59:12 oh good 17:59:16 No. I like the international language. 18:00:28 Esperanto? 18:00:34 Jes. 18:01:37 Ne esperanto, ne esperanto! 18:01:46 Jak juz to polski albo english 18:01:58 -!- ihope has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com -- NO: IRP ALLOWED. 18:02:18 IRP is still allowed! cool! / Dalej mozna uzywac IRP! Super! 18:02:49 -!- ehird` has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | IRP MEANS YOUR FIERY DEATH. 18:03:00 Ohh... 18:03:14 asiekierka: Ne. Esperanto bonas. 18:03:17 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | NO IRP RULE WAS JUST BALEETED!. 18:03:35 -!- ihope has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | RULES: 1. IRP. 18:03:39 STOP IT 18:03:41 cool 18:03:45 we can use IRP! 18:03:50 Please do not ban IRP. 18:03:54 Also, baleeting is a Homestar-ism, not actual deletion. 18:03:58 Perhaps I should have said "IRP BEING ALLOWED". 18:04:27 Then again, the topic currently contains no verbs. 18:04:28 Please remember you said "1. IRP.", not "1. NO IRP", so it seems we MUST use IRP. 18:04:45 -!- ehird` has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | STOP THE GODDAMN IRP. 18:04:57 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | RULES: 1. shut up. 2. talk only in IRP.. 18:05:19 RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 18:05:45 Okay. I will break rule #1 if you please so much. 18:05:46 STOP IT, DAMN IT 18:05:54 asiekierka, but then you break the break at least one rule rule 18:05:56 but that's a paradox 18:06:01 since by breaking it you break it by breaking it 18:06:03 so you don't break it 18:06:04 It makes a paradox, yes. 18:06:14 You can't be following the rules, because that'd be breaking rule 1, so you must break a rule, so you must follow rule 1, so you must break rule 2. 18:06:15 So... Rule #1 can't exist :D 18:06:28 No, you just follow rule 1 but not rule 2. 18:07:00 RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 3. Shut up. 18:07:04 I select #3. 18:07:28 But i can't select #3 because if i select it, i don't shut up so i must shut up. 18:07:37 Paradox. 18:07:47 I never said you had to follow all the rules. 18:08:02 Okay 18:08:15 RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 3. Shut up. 4. Don't break rule #2. 18:08:24 If i break rule #2, I break rule #4... it is allowed. 18:08:27 $($#@()*$&#)(&$#_)&*#$*($_$#())_&) 18:08:39 so i must follow #3 :( 18:08:42 Sure, you can break both 2 and 4. 18:08:53 You can break all of them except 1, if you want to. 18:08:56 wait 18:09:03 But you must follow 1. 18:09:04 Don't do Perl. 18:09:15 RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 3. Shut up. 4. Don't break rule #2. 5. You must follow rule #1 and any other rule. 18:09:22 wait 18:09:25 RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 3. Shut up. 4. Don't break rule #2. 5. You must follow rule #1, this and any other rule. 18:09:30 "Any other rule" meaning "some other rule"? 18:09:31 So i must follow #3... 18:09:39 any other rule :D 18:09:43 yes 18:09:46 one of left rules 18:09:54 I must select between 2 and 4 18:09:56 One of the remaining rules... 18:09:59 If i select 3 18:10:00 STOP IT 18:10:01 SERIOUSLY 18:10:03 then 2 and 4 is left. 18:10:08 And any other rule. 18:10:12 not 2 18:10:15 ehird`: what are we supposed to be stopping now? 18:10:15 but 1 only. 18:10:20 So i select 2 which in turn selects 4 18:10:26 So I must follow #1, #3 and #5. 18:10:30 So i'll shut up now. 18:10:34 And you will too. 18:10:38 < SILENCE > 18:11:41 Please follow the new RULES: 1. Break at least one rule. 2. IRP must be used at some time. 3. Shut up. 4. Don't break rule #2. 5. You must follow rule #1, this and any other rule. 6. Don't break rule #3. 7. Always use IRP. 18:11:56 18:12:02 over. 18:12:08 Now think how to not use IRP :DDD 18:13:39 i am going to break rule 4 18:13:54 and 2 (if it isn't to be used some time, it isn't used all time) 18:14:06 tada 18:14:28 But 18:14:41 you have #6 and #7 and #3 left. 18:14:53 And you can have only #1, #5, and any other left. 18:14:58 #6 #7 #3 <> 1 rule. 18:15:16 If you break #7, you have #6 and #3 left. 18:15:20 So it's not 7. 18:15:25 If you break #3, you break #6 too 18:15:32 so you have only 1 rule left. Rule #7 18:16:25 #2 and #4 are broke. But #7 isn't. You pleased for an exception in your words so you have it. 18:18:11 breaking rule 2 voids #7 18:18:24 and the other rules don't forbid breaking 2 18:18:35 but you must have one left 18:18:35 so: 18:18:39 and follow it. 18:18:40 i can break one or more rule 18:18:42 :D 18:18:44 i break 4, allowing me to break 2 18:18:46 So you must follow #1, #5 and #7 18:18:47 2 voids 7 18:18:56 Hey! 18:18:59 i am following 1, 5 and 6 18:19:02 ohh i can't take it anymore 18:19:14 so, by voiding 4 and 2 i do not have to involve myself in any irp 18:19:38 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | RULES: 1. Follow rule #2. 2. Follow rule #3 and #5. 3. Break #4. 4. Don't use IRP. 5. Use IRP.. 18:19:43 Now? 18:20:06 I'll show you 18:20:31 #1 -> #2 -> (#3 -> #4 break) (#5) 18:20:47 Please remember these rules. 18:22:41 Ok, please tell me how to break rule #5. If there is a way... i doubt there is one. 18:24:00 Please say "Your rules rock. We must use IRP. Remember this." 18:25:40 Well, i said "Use IRP." But i didn't say "Always." So we can use it when we want. But we must use IRP. Not always though. 18:26:16 that's nice 18:27:37 But please use IRP. 18:28:12 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | UNRELATED WEBSITE: http://purple.com | RULES: 1. Follow rule #2. 2. Follow rule #3 and #5. 3. Break #4 and follow #6. 4. Don't use IRP. 5. Use IRP. 6. Always follow #5. Always. Not just sometimes.. 18:28:59 JUST STOP IT 18:29:55 ... Just use IRP. 18:29:58 then i'll stop. 18:30:10 Please use IRP, then i'll stop as you please. 18:30:14 Oh wait, you don't please. 18:30:20 So please please me. 18:30:43 Please stop. 18:30:46 there 18:31:25 O.K.. Aber Sie sagten es nicht in deutschem :D. Sagen Sie es bitte auf Deutsch. 18:34:07 So? Sprechen Sie bitte auf Deutsch und geben Sie mir deutsche IRP Befehle. 18:34:23 HA! 18:35:02 Lo Lol LOLOLOL LOLOLOL. 18:35:44 D C DEC FFE 18:35:48 wait 18:35:50 Lo Lol LOLOLOL LOLOLOL. 18:36:26 D C D E C F F E 18:38:56 hey 18:39:12 bye 18:39:14 -!- asiekierka has quit. 18:49:28 -!- lament has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric. 18:51:04 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 19:13:20 * pikhq has a demented idea for Rodger's Demon 19:14:15 what 19:14:32 I'm not telling, it might be used. :p 19:14:57 :P 19:15:13 Hmm. Maybe I should experiment with doing my own puzzle. 19:17:08 -!- sebbu has quit (Connection timed out). 19:26:14 -!- asiekierka has joined. 19:26:18 Hi :DDD 19:26:27 oh no 19:26:30 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | WHERE ARE THE RULES? 1. No rules.. 19:26:38 So we can do anything 19:26:44 And no not IRP time. 19:27:06 I am waiting for AI to be better so i can make a IRP interperter... 19:27:42 Iiii Errr Peee 19:28:10 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | WHERE ARE THE RULES? 1. No rules. 2. You must break at least one rule.. 19:28:12 :D 19:28:22 You know that i just made a paradox? 19:28:24 i guess 19:28:30 If you break #2, you know 19:28:41 if you break #1... 19:28:43 i don't know 19:29:53 Since there's no rules, rule 2 doesn't count. 19:30:14 But if you break #1, rule #1 dosen't count, but rule 2 also breaks 19:31:44 Does "no rules" mean "rules are prohibited"? 19:31:59 ihope: i would assume it means "rules can be disregarded" 19:32:08 If you break rule #1, you are fulfilling rule #2, and therefore following the rules. It's trivial, but it's not a paradox. 19:32:47 1. Break at least one rule. 2. Break this rule. 19:33:04 GregorR: if you fulfill rule #1, then you disregard both rules and there's still no paradox. 19:33:11 Well, heck. 19:33:15 1. Break this rule. 19:33:18 lament: True. So really, there's no paradox at all :P 19:33:31 ihope: NO! 19:34:06 Prove the following statement: This statement is true. 19:34:30 GregorR, that statement states it is true, and there is nothing else it specifies, therefore it is true. 19:34:42 really, it's just like saying nothing 19:34:44 First, we assume that statement is provable. 19:34:53 GregorR is the worst mathematician in here. 19:35:04 ihope: Ouch :P 19:35:09 Proof: he can't prove "GregorR cannot prove this sentence true." Everybody else can. 19:35:18 If it is true, then it must be true. 19:35:25 Heh 19:35:28 ihope, no, you're the worst - you can't prove "ihope cannot prove this sentence true." 19:35:33 pikhq: But if it is false, then it must be false. 19:35:34 Ooh, darn. 19:35:49 pikhq: So using that method doesn't work :) 19:35:54 GregorR: There is no indication that it is false. 19:35:55 I can't prove it true. 19:36:08 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | WHERE ARE THE RULES? 1. Don't follow this rule. 2. Don't follow this rule. 3. Follow all rules.. 19:36:10 pikhq: there's no indication that it's true, either. 19:36:11 What NOW? 19:36:20 "'This sentence is true.' is false." is consistent. 19:36:22 We cannot prove it false. However, if we start from the assumption that "this statement is true", then it is true. 19:36:32 Is true. Is false. Is consistent. 19:36:40 What about mine? 19:36:44 My is true and false? 19:36:49 pikhq: You can't start from the assumption that it's true without also starting from the assumption that it's false for comparison. 19:36:52 asiekierka: paradox. 19:36:52 or is false and true? 19:36:54 :D 19:36:56 i know 19:37:01 Neither true nor false! 19:37:04 GregorR, the empty statement is true, as it tells nothing that is wrong 19:37:23 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | WHERE ARE THE RULES? 1. Don't follow this rule. 2. Don't follow this rule. 3. Follow all rules. 4. Ignore all rules before this one. 5. Ignore rule #4. 6. Ignore rule #7. 7. Ignore rule #6 and #5.. 19:37:27 What NOW!?!?!?!? 19:37:27 "This sentence is true." is a redundant empty statement - the empty statement is true, and this has nothing but the assertation that it is true, therefore since it asserts nothing that can be false, it is true. 19:37:30 huh???? 19:37:51 Paradox, Double Paradox or TRIPLE paradox? 19:38:10 ehird`: Yes, we can see that it's trivially true. We can also see that it's trivially false. 19:38:18 GregorR: If we start from the assumption that it is false, then we have an unfounded assumption. 19:38:22 6:p 19:38:28 GregorR, tell me how it is false 19:38:29 X => X. True or false: X is true. 19:38:44 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | WHERE ARE THE RULES? 1. Follow rule #2. 2. Break rule #1.. 19:38:48 ehird`: Assume that the statement is false. The statement states that it is true, which is false. QED. 19:38:50 Dudes and dudettes, it cannot be proven either way. 19:38:50 What is it now? 19:39:00 asiekierka: inconsistent. 19:39:02 ihope: Exactly :P 19:39:17 inconsistent? I'm not so good at english. I'm 10 1/2 and from poland. 19:39:18 ihope: so who's the worst mathematician now? 19:39:26 GregorR, Now, back up that assumption. I can back up assuming it is true - the empty statement "" is true, and it is an extension of the empty statement which comments on itself 19:39:27 asiekierka: That much shows. 19:39:56 asiekierka: mathematical term. A theory is inconsistent if it implies a falsehood. 19:39:58 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq.. 19:40:09 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq.. 19:40:13 (Which, in turn, means that it implies everything.) 19:40:25 -!- cherez has joined. 19:40:27 Break rule 6: Follow 2 through 5 inclusive. 19:40:29 ehird`: You don't back up assumptions used doing proofs. You work under each assumption and see if it leads to a sound solution. 19:40:45 Select one rule, pikhq? 19:40:47 2, 3, 4 or 5? 19:40:51 Rule 6 is one rule. 19:40:51 which one you break? 19:40:56 ehird`: If the solution is sound, the assumption is proved. 19:41:00 It just states that one follows 2 through 5. 19:41:02 Yeah, the rule that says rules must be followed... 19:41:44 asiekierka: Prove 1+1=2. 19:41:57 (trivial proof, BTW) 19:42:01 2 is defined as 1 more than 1. QED 19:42:10 I cannot. 1 idiot + 1 idiot = double idiot. 19:42:16 pikhq, S(1) = 2, x+1 = S(x) 19:42:24 1+1 = 2 19:43:45 We assume that e*e=e^2, that ln(x*y) = ln(x)+ln(y). 19:43:48 e*e=e^2 19:43:56 ln(e*e)=ln(e^2) 19:44:02 1 + 1 = 2 19:44:04 QED 19:44:12 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq. 6. You can break this one only. 7. You cannot add new rules in.. 19:44:40 Break rule 6. 19:44:55 I think that's your only option. 19:45:10 Therefore, one may break any number of rules. 19:45:19 ... Nope 19:45:26 #1 says. He must select one only. 19:45:37 so 2-5 are left 19:45:42 so i'll ignore you from now on :DDD 19:46:07 asiekierka: However, you can break any rule but #6. 19:46:12 nope 19:46:14 this completely incorrect logic is intriguing to me. 19:46:17 you can break any rule but #7 19:46:25 so 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 is left 19:46:26 Thus estabilishing a paradox in your rule set. 19:46:30 and 6 is just a dummy. 19:46:35 so break 6 19:46:39 huh? 19:46:45 I say that you can break #6, so now you can't break #6. 19:46:58 Since it's a paradox, your ruleset is impossible to fully obey. 19:47:00 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq. 6. DUMMY RULE LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. 7. You cannot add new rules in.. 19:47:04 What now? 19:47:28 May WE ignore you? 19:47:33 Break #1. 19:47:42 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 19:47:45 and from 2-6 only 19:47:54 Er, if you break 6, all that means is that you may be able to break rules other than 6. 19:47:56 Pikhq opts to not break any rule, thereby breaking #1. 19:48:11 If you break any other, you're breaking rule 6.. 19:48:16 s/.././ 19:48:25 Thereby breaking two rules, which is against rule #1. 19:48:26 But there's a new ruleset now! 19:48:43 6 is DUMMY RULE now 19:48:46 why is this stupid conversation in existance? 19:48:47 for fun 19:48:50 oh 19:48:52 break #6 19:48:54 you can break 2-6 19:48:58 therefore, 19:48:59 So let's ignore pikhq! 19:49:00 you can break 6 19:49:02 yes 19:49:03 breaking the DUMMY RULE 19:49:05 which means nothing 19:49:14 I select no rules. 19:49:15 so he does not need to create a paradox 19:49:20 but that IS a rule. 19:49:22 but a dummy 19:49:24 it does nothing 19:49:33 So, if you ignore 6, you have 2-5 and 7 left 19:49:37 Rule #1 is broken, ergo I can choose to break rule #7. :p 19:49:38 2-5 state to ignore pikhq 19:49:42 nope 19:49:47 ikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 19:49:50 pikhq* 19:50:01 so not 7. 19:50:09 nor 1 19:50:13 Since I must select one, by not selecting one, the ruleset is broken. 19:50:17 yes 19:50:20 and you fail in LIFE 19:50:25 wait 19:50:40 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | CHANNEL LOGS: http://ircbrowse.com/cdates.html?channel=esoteric | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq. 6. DUMMY RULE LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. 7. You cannot add new rules in. 8. If you break r. 19:50:45 wait 19:51:02 Rule #1. You must be at least this smart to be in the channel. 19:51:12 ,[.,] 19:51:15 -!- asiekierka has set topic: Esoteric programming language discussion | FORUM AND WIKI: esolangs.org | Rules: 1. pikhq selects which rule to break. he MUST select one only. and from 2-6 only. 2. Ignore pikhq. 3. Ignore pikhq. 4. Ignore pikhq. 5. Ignore pikhq. 6. DUMMY RULE LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. 7. You cannot add new rules in. 8. If you break rule 1 or 7, you fail in LIFE.. 19:51:39 asiekierka: What does ,[.,] do? 19:51:57 Wait a second... 19:52:10 I didn't use Brainfuck 19:52:20 any time 19:52:23 That's exactly how smart you must be to be in this channel. 19:52:26 :D 19:52:27 okay 19:52:50 Now, tell me how this works: http://pikhq.nonlogic.org/pfuck.tar.bz2 19:53:24 It's even high-level, for your sanity! 19:53:35 No logic. It's 404. 19:53:56 Oh. http://pikhq.nonlogic.org/pfuck-1.1.tar.bz2 19:53:59 Forgot the version. 19:54:39 i think, the intelligence level required for this channel 19:54:41 is getting on to gulesfish. 19:54:52 asiekierka, http://rodger.shadowarts.org/PHP/Example.php get to gulesfish. 19:54:53 I'll second that. 19:55:27 WTF is it 19:55:29 that's hard for somebody who "didn't use brainfuck any time" 19:55:35 lament, no 19:55:39 before gulesfish there is no BF-related puzzles 19:55:41 asiekierka, A puzzle site. 19:55:42 i mean, pf**k 19:55:53 oh, a censor 19:55:55 asiekierka, fuck fuck fuck 19:56:09 and link dosen't work 19:56:15 it's 40three'd 19:56:23 Or is it? 19:56:32 :D 19:57:20 ,[,.,] 19:57:26 Do you know what this does? 19:57:34 my first brf creation 19:57:42 -!- jix has quit (Nick collision from services.). 19:57:56 -!- jix has joined. 19:58:07 It accepts input, ignores that, then, while not EOF, takes input, outputs it, and ignores the next input. 19:58:20 yes 19:58:26 Or, higher-level, it outputs every other character of input. 19:58:34 For all those non-brainers: oh, you said it 19:58:44 Trivial. 19:59:20 I will learn it tommorow 19:59:44 ,[>>>>+<<<<[>>>+<+<<-]>>[<<+>>-]--[>-<++++++]>[<+>[-]]+<[>-<-]>[>[-]<<<,[-<.>]>>-]<<<[>>>+<+<<-]>>[<<+>>-]--[>-<++++++]>--[<+>[-]]+<[>-<-]>[>[-]<<<,[-<.>]>>-]<<<[>>>+<+<<-]>>[<<+>>-]----[>-<----]>+++[<+>[-]]+<[>-<-]>[>[-]<<<,[-<.>]>>-]<<<[>>>+<+<<-]>>[<<+>>-]----[>-<----]>+[<+>[-]]+<[>-<-]>[>[-]<<<,[-<.>]>>-]>[<<<<.>>>>[-]]<<<<[-],] 19:59:51 Can you tell me what that does? 19:59:59 Nope. i just started to learn it 20:00:05 asiekierka, it is not 403'd 20:00:07 it just looks like it. 20:00:11 try harder. 20:00:17 pikhq, even i couldn't tell you what that did. 20:01:11 It accepts input in my BFcompress format (+,-,>, and < are RLE'd) and outputs Brainfuck. 20:01:15 :O 20:01:22 Nice one! 20:01:35 asiekierka, GulesFish yet? :P 20:01:38 I will probably make a BFP 20:01:41 One of my earlier Brainfuck hacks (later ported to PEBBLE). 20:01:47 BrainF**k PDA 20:01:53 a little machine 20:01:53 (the version there is the one written via PEBBLE) 20:01:56 with it's own font 20:02:01 running BF 20:02:10 with a 2MB flash memory and USB support 20:02:16 and a 320x240 screen... 20:02:29 2MB is overkill, as is USB. 20:02:30 2MB or lower 20:02:39 or any other contact method 20:02:44 that's cheap 20:02:51 You only need 30,000 chars. 20:03:14 i will rather make 60,000. 20:03:16 for more apps 20:03:16 30,000 is not enough for lots of programs 20:03:20 oh 20:03:24 so i'll make like 256kb 20:03:26 Hell, you could probably get away with using the processor's cache. . . 20:03:31 i think 100,000 unsigned 1-byte cells is good 20:03:42 it's 262144 chars 20:03:46 about the screen though - will you memmap it? 20:03:48 ehird`: Even LostKingdom runs in 30,000 chars. 20:03:50 ... i don't know 20:03:57 or just regular output? 20:03:57 I will make a 320x240 screen 20:04:00 because regular output would suck 20:04:00 and a special keyboard 20:04:02 no graphics, etc 20:04:14 it'll just have a implementation of brainf**k 20:04:17 e.g. i think that , should return "raw" character codes 20:04:17 as basic as it gets 20:04:19 well that's just lame 20:04:26 it will be reprogrammed 20:04:27 if needed 20:04:34 i think: cell 0, or something, is screen position 20:04:39 . prints character at cell to that position 20:04:47 , gets one raw character code instead of the next character on the line 20:05:13 i will not do it. 20:05:16 :D 20:05:28 asiekierka: You get to GulesFish? 20:05:33 i don't want to 20:05:37 I'm going real soon 20:05:39 you must 20:05:42 it is simple 20:05:49 or you are EXILED IN FIERY DEATH 20:07:16 hint: that page has been tampered with 20:09:12 Brainfuck crasher: 20:09:15 ,[+.,--] 20:09:17 Try it :D 20:10:01 brainfuck crasher: +[] 20:10:08 -!- blahbot` has joined. 20:10:12 And sure. Let's see if it crashes. 20:10:14 %bf ,[+.,--] 20:10:18 %ps 20:10:19 0. ps 20:10:25 %bf ,[+.,--]!hello world 20:10:27 %ps 20:10:27 0. bf ,[+.,--]!hello world 20:10:29 1. ps 20:10:31 Not crashed. Running. 20:10:33 %kill 0 20:10:34 %ps 20:10:34 0. ps 20:10:37 Well that was easy 20:10:43 well 20:10:48 it's infinitely going 20:11:00 So... just wait until it eats all mem 20:11:44 it won't eat all memory 20:11:47 it doesn't use > at all 20:11:56 it just adds, outputs, inputs, and subtracts two 20:12:08 incidentally, equal to ,[-.,] 20:12:10 :D 20:12:34 :DDD 20:12:37 oh wait 20:12:46 ,[-.>,>] try now 20:12:47 and wait 20:14:12 i'm going 20:14:15 sorry 20:14:21 i will be back tommorow 20:14:26 -!- asiekierka has quit. 20:14:39 Damn it, he's coming back. 20:15:54 yes, unforunately 20:16:14 tomorrow... he is forced to get to gulesfish! 20:16:23 ... maybe forced to beat basil. but that would just be cruel 20:16:41 ... though ... being cruel to someone who uses age as an excuse for anything may be justified ... :P 20:17:46 I use age as an excuse for being an age. 20:18:32 heh 20:19:48 i think i might make a BF pda, but with better cellsize and my screen IO system :P 20:20:01 though i guess maybe it isn't the best 20:20:17 (. = output current cell at position in [0] 20:20:33 , = input one keypress (NOTE: keypress, not character) store in current cell) 20:21:02 still, allows for graphics and stuff 20:21:14 maybe instead a pixel based system 20:21:29 . = flip pixel at position in cell 20:21:40 that sounds good 20:21:45 but.. tedious to use i guess 20:24:25 -!- turingcomplete has joined. 20:25:08 :/ 20:25:15 hmm 20:25:33 with that definition of ., and a 320x240 screen, prizes to whoever gives the shortest code to draw a hollow circle 20:26:03 assuming, of course, that cell size goes up to at least 76800 20:28:03 assuming starting top-left pixel is in the current cell 20:34:23 oh come on, someone? :) 20:35:27 Is there a type of Channel in Java's nio that supports pushing back? (Something like PushbackInputStream ?) 20:42:33 hmm, 20:42:43 should this PDA/machine/thing have any persistant memory? 20:42:48 i.e. a way to save programs 20:42:55 and maybe their output 20:45:10 or just ram 20:50:11 * pikhq senses a n00b 20:50:35 who me? :) 20:51:34 No, turingcomplete. 20:51:40 ah 20:51:42 how? 20:52:15 i forgot my nick from the last time, and that was the first time I was here 20:52:42 and turingcomplete was first thing that came into my mind after MrDurp 20:54:16 *shrug* 20:54:38 yeah, stupid 21:00:07 http://esolangs.org/wiki/BF_machine proposed BF machine spec 21:02:17 # This page has been accessed one time. 21:04:11 yeah so? 21:04:12 i just made it 21:05:23 nothing 21:07:30 i do wonder how hard that circle program will be though 21:10:31 http://www.electronixandmore.com/project/relaycomputertwo/ 21:33:00 i think not too hard 21:33:13 but not trivial 21:33:51 There are multiple things that could be deemed "hollow circles". 21:34:19 Here, have one: {(0,1), (0,-1), (1,0), (-1,0)} 21:37:27 heh 21:37:33 well like that but bigger ;) 21:37:39 say 50x50 or something 21:37:44 how bigger 21:37:46 say 50x50 or something 21:38:18 shouldn't that be in the rules? 21:38:37 meh 21:38:39 it's just a tiny competition 21:38:49 because i'd like to see some code to demonstate the feasability of its screen mechanism 21:45:03 I think it's feasible, as long as you can indeed toggle each bit in an arbitrary way. 21:45:10 (It's not feasable unless it can be feased. :-) 21:45:56 what do you mean toggle each bit in an "arbitary" way? 21:46:05 ehird`: solved the puzzle? 21:46:09 you can get the current 0/1 status of a bit, and flip a bit from 0->1 and 1->0 21:46:15 jix, not yet. i'm going to try later 21:48:40 ehird`: can the code always take a number and toggle the corresponding bit? 21:48:54 And can it avoid doing so? 21:49:04 ihope, i don't understand 21:49:08 it can always toggle a bit, yes 21:49:17 @ flips the bit whose position is in the current cell 21:49:28 * ihope nods 21:49:38 if you wanted to permanently turn off a bit, there's: 21:49:43 ?[@] 21:49:50 er. wait, no 21:49:57 you'd have to duplicate the value, then go over to it 21:50:11 ?DUPLICATE<[>@] 21:50:13 something like that 21:50:14 Yeah, so drawing a circle can definitely be done. 21:50:22 yes, but can it be done relatively concisely? 21:50:35 algorithmically, that is? 21:50:41 I don't see why not. 21:50:53 -!- RodgerTheGreat has joined. 21:50:56 show your code then :) the spec is here: http://esolangs.org/wiki/BF_machine 21:51:02 RodgerTheGreat, jix finished the whole of your puzzles... 21:51:07 hi, guys 21:51:09 really? 21:51:10 RodgerTheGreat, he did Basil in a matter of minutes o.O 21:51:12 wow, cool 21:51:24 jix: kudos to you, man! :D 21:51:28 he didn't get GulesFish though, he didn't know what a red herring was 21:51:36 what'd you think of the challenges? 21:51:38 but once he got that, he finished it in barely any time 21:51:42 That was a red herring? 21:51:52 ihope, er - oops 21:51:57 * ehird` and his big fat mouth 21:52:06 ^^ 21:52:12 ihope: look up the definition of "Gules" 21:52:15 Eh, I stopped trying once I didn't see an obvious way to get past GulesFish. 21:52:23 jix: did you have fun? :) 21:52:34 Ah, red. 21:52:35 RodgerTheGreat: yeah... i found basil quite clever 21:52:40 thanks 21:52:58 gulesfish is unfair at least at one step 21:53:14 So just how is number translated into point? 21:53:40 In the BF machine, that is. 21:54:03 ihope, you know graphics memory? 21:54:16 it's just linear, 80*24 cells 21:54:30 320 wide, 240 tall. 21:54:30 it just displays the first 80, then the next 80, etc 21:54:35 ihope, yess 21:54:38 so 320*240 cells 21:54:45 except, its a pointer in this case 21:54:50 So (x,y) is x + 240*y? 21:55:07 yes 21:55:15 x + 320*y? 21:55:20 Wrapping would be nice. 21:55:31 Er, yes, 320. 21:55:35 ihope, i guess. but if the max value isn't defined.. 21:55:43 Doesn't matter. 21:55:45 I think. 21:55:56 you could do [-] and end up with 34857459234234 or 76824 21:56:06 999999 * 999999 = 1 (mod 1000000), no? 21:56:18 Er, [-] and end up with something other than zero? 21:56:24 er, [-]- 21:56:27 or even just - 21:56:32 Indeed. 21:56:45 maybe i should fix the maximum at 76800 21:56:56 76799, you mean? 21:57:14 As long as the minimum is 0, which is an extremely sensible thing to do. :-) 21:57:16 320 * 240 = 76800 21:57:18 err, yes 21:57:31 And then it wraps? 21:58:21 yes 21:58:38 http://esolangs.org/wiki/BF_machine spec updated 21:58:55 if you can give me code to draw, algorithmically, a 50x50 circle with that spec, you get entered into the competition 22:00:07 hm... 22:00:38 perhaps I should brush off my BF Sine function and get it working properly 22:00:54 Sine function. That's a way I hadn't thought of. 22:01:19 that's how you *normally* draw circles in CG 22:01:22 until a circle is relatively simple to do, i'll keep refining the spec :) this competition will help 22:01:36 Still, you should define a circle. 22:01:49 you've seen a circle before. 22:01:49 :P 22:01:57 there's not that many circles you can make in 50x50... 22:02:16 you could also do things with c^2 = sqrt(a^2 + b^2), but it'd be tricky to draw a hollow circle that way 22:02:16 Yes, but I can't turn on an uncountably infinite number of points. 22:02:38 one doesn't use sine to draw circles! 22:02:42 basic benchmark: look something not unlike what paint produces when you drag the circle tool from topleft to bottomright on a 50x50 image 22:04:06 ehird`: reminds me a bit of this: http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=5060 22:04:13 although BFVGA is a little more direct 22:04:41 how does bfvga do it 22:04:55 jix: sine and cosine. You can shift sine's output a little and have cosine for free 22:05:06 generate lookup tables and it isn't even horrifically slow 22:05:21 ehird`: it just maps the BF tape *directly* to VGA memory 22:05:23 Is it okay if I draw a discrete circle? :-P 22:05:35 RodgerTheGreat: you can done circle drawing with just multiplication and addition/bitshift i think 22:05:35 i like BFVGA way 22:05:42 ihope: that'd be trivial, but it seems like it'd be allowed 22:05:46 That is, a Galois circle. 22:05:50 jix: I'm aware of this 22:06:02 sure, go ahead, whatever 22:06:23 as long as it looks like a circle to me 22:06:49 subjective tests? 22:06:52 you can approximate sine as a McLaurin series, and then do it with just +-/* 22:07:12 turingcomplete, yes! 22:07:29 i'm just looking for a 50x50 drawing that the average person would recognize as a smooth-for-its-size circle 22:08:50 alright, this'll take me a few minutes... 22:09:14 -!- turingcomplete has quit ("Leaving"). 22:10:03 ehird`: are these screen addresses zero-indexed? 22:10:08 RodgerTheGreat, yes 22:10:11 woot 22:12:27 -!- RedDak has joined. 22:14:01 I don't think Galois circles generally look a thing like "real" circles. :-) 22:17:18 i think my isp is fucked 22:18:25 i've been disconnected 4 times in the last hour, and while i am connected i get about 2kb/s 22:18:52 -!- sebbu2 has changed nick to sebbu. 22:22:29 RodgerTheGreat, it's 100 lines already, isn't it 22:22:50 erm... yes 22:26:51 what of it? 22:27:48 haha 22:28:01 :D 22:28:03 how long will it be when it's done? 5000? 22:28:20 well, it's BF- "lines" is relative 22:28:43 I'm about halfway complete with my pseudocode 22:29:51 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ"). 22:29:54 ok, i think drawing a circle is way harder than it needs to be. heh 22:30:27 I'm getting there, I'm getting there 22:33:32 well, how many characters of BF would you estimate it to be? 22:33:39 i want using this to draw simple shapes /relatively/ simply :) 22:34:57 hm 22:35:18 well, a rectangle would be a fuckload easier to write efficiently 22:35:55 indeed 22:35:59 but circles are common things 22:36:14 I suppose 22:36:21 I consider lines more common things 22:36:33 heh