00:01:40 -!- oerjan has joined. 00:03:31 * bsmntbombdood will have (hopefully cool) pictures soon 00:04:31 of what? 00:05:07 a drain 00:10:20 * oerjan has been trying to avoid jokes about bsmntbombdood going down the drain, to no avail 00:11:49 i'm impervious 00:12:12 http://abacus.kwzs.be/~bsmntbombdood/pic_1.jpg 00:12:49 http://abacus.kwzs.be/~bsmntbombdood/pic_2.jpg 00:15:39 http://abacus.kwzs.be/~bsmntbombdood/pic_3.jpg 00:16:53 who's that? 00:17:25 gah 00:17:30 i didn't mean to upload that one 00:17:57 he's a guy we went with 00:18:26 he looked a bit old to be in high school :) 00:20:45 -!- ehird` has quit. 00:21:44 * SimonRC fails to recall the language based on brownian motion 00:22:13 noit o'mnain worb? 00:22:53 pic_4.jpg, 5,6,7 00:22:57 I looked at that in a list, but rejected it 00:23:00 :-( 00:23:01 and 3 is now the one i wanted it to be 00:24:58 -!- ihope__ has joined. 00:33:54 why did you go down there? 00:34:58 for fun? 00:36:32 how did you get in there? 00:36:37 you can't do that round here 00:36:43 (they are all to small for a start) 00:36:46 the outfall 00:36:50 and too full of shit 00:37:07 storm sewer, not sanitary sewer 00:37:23 well there aren't any of those round here 00:37:42 how did you find the entrance in the end? 00:37:43 where are you? 00:37:51 uk 00:37:58 there's some FANTASTIC drains in london 00:38:09 not too near 00:38:17 and I suspect nottoo legal 00:38:34 like, ZOMG terrism 00:39:09 the uk has really lax trespassing laws doesn't it? 00:39:12 http://abacus.kwzs.be/~bsmntbombdood/hdr_pole_small.png 00:42:06 http://www.silentuk.com/ 00:42:08 ^^ 00:42:37 -!- ihope_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 01:30:10 -!- ihope__ has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 01:41:19 zzzzzzzzzzzzzz 01:41:42 cccccccccccccc 02:17:09 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 02:17:39 I'm guessing the next one is vvvvvvvvvvvvvv, followed by cccccccccccccc again. 02:17:49 Then bbbbbbbbbbbbbb. 02:21:01 no 02:42:09 Was xxxxxxxxxxxxxx supposed to be bbbbbbbbbbbbbb? 02:42:25 Followed my mmmmmmmmmmmmmm, followed by ..............? 02:43:11 * oerjan wishes to deny that he considered keyboard placement when selecting c 02:44:13 in fact unpronouncability was higher on the priority list 02:46:32 i recall discarding y,a, and m at least. the details are rather vague and were so already at the time. 02:52:04 Ah. 02:52:21 But yyyyyyyyyyyyyy is so unobviously pronounced. 02:52:36 Unless you pronounce it "Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!" 02:52:49 not to a norwegian :) 02:55:33 How would a Norwegian pronounce it? 03:03:30 -!- puzzlet has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 03:14:05 front upper rounded with protruded lips 03:40:42 -!- ihope has quit ("Lost terminal"). 05:46:10 -!- poiuy_qwert has joined. 05:53:17 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined. 06:28:09 -!- poiuy_qwert has quit. 07:39:41 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit ("Man who stand in frond of car is tired. Man who stand behind car is exhausted."). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:28:16 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night"). 09:53:07 -!- sebbu has joined. 11:30:55 -!- ehird` has joined. 11:41:53 i think i will start on that optimizes-to-hell BF compiler i was going to work on 12:18:37 -!- jix_ has joined. 12:41:40 -!- sebbu has quit (Success). 12:51:12 -!- ehird` has quit ("Pong timeout"). 12:54:26 -!- sebbu has joined. 13:13:08 -!- ehird` has joined. 15:18:08 -!- importantshock_ has joined. 15:18:11 -!- importantshock_ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 15:18:28 -!- importantshock has joined. 15:25:33 -!- Tritonio has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 15:26:44 -!- Tritonio has joined. 15:52:25 -!- importantshock_ has joined. 16:04:53 -!- importantshock- has joined. 16:14:20 -!- importantshock-_ has joined. 16:16:08 -!- importantshock_ has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 16:53:30 -!- importantshock-- has joined. 17:00:10 -!- importantshock-- has quit. 17:00:10 -!- importantshock- has quit (Remote closed the connection). 17:00:10 -!- importantshock-_ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 17:00:10 -!- importantshock has quit (Remote closed the connection). 17:00:19 -!- importantshock-- has joined. 17:00:54 -!- importantshock-- has changed nick to importantshock. 17:34:00 -!- importantshock has quit ("Leaving..."). 17:37:41 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 17:50:44 -!- sebbu has quit (Nick collision from services.). 17:50:45 -!- sebbu2 has changed nick to sebbu. 18:04:22 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 18:09:03 -!- jix_ has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 18:11:13 -!- jix_ has joined. 18:23:28 -!- Tritonio has quit (Remote closed the connection). 18:23:50 -!- sebbu has quit (Connection timed out). 18:27:19 -!- Tritonio has joined. 18:41:59 -!- importantshock has joined. 18:43:04 howdy pikhq 18:43:48 o 19:12:07 -!- sebbu2 has changed nick to sebbu. 19:16:38 -!- importantshock has quit ("Leaving..."). 19:40:35 -!- mordaunt has joined. 20:10:44 -!- mordaunt has left (?). 22:36:08 -!- clog has joined. 22:36:08 -!- clog has joined. 22:47:38 -!- importantshock has quit ("Leaving..."). 22:58:31 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 23:25:37 gimme a big math expression 23:25:37 ! 23:25:42 Huh? 23:25:57 !rndmath 23:25:59 Huh? 23:35:03 \exist \mathbf{N}: \varnothing \in \mathbf{N} \and (\forall x: x \in \mathbf{N} \implies x \cup \{x\} \in \mathbf{N}) 23:44:26 :< 23:44:31 i meant like 5+3! 23:44:43 no predicate logic or whaddyacallit 23:45:03 heh 23:45:04 why? 23:45:12 -!- ololobot has joined. 23:45:16 i wanna try that out 23:45:27 i don't know anything that does random expressions 23:45:28 i mean 23:45:31 generates them 23:45:42 and i just simply cannot make them manually 23:45:48 "just simply" 23:46:03 they always come out square, you know 23:46:44 >>> in-fi 5+6+7 23:46:44 5 + 6 + 7 23:46:52 infix -> finefix convertor 23:46:56 >>> in-fi 5+(6+7) 23:46:56 5 6 + + 7 23:47:13 my extension to infix 23:48:08 finefix? 23:48:09 haven't made a formal proof it's as strong as postfix, though i'm fairly sure it is, being conceptually pretty much the same thing... 23:48:14 my extension to infix. 23:48:29 because infix wasn't "nesting complete" 23:48:36 i don't know if there's a real term for that 23:48:43 but you can't do implicit nesting with it 23:48:55 huh? 23:49:07 5+(5+5), you cannot eliminate the parens 23:49:13 well in that case you can 23:49:15 and, i've just died many firey death's in google earth's flight simulator 23:49:16 but not generally 23:49:23 :D 23:49:29 i thought you can't die in that... 23:49:42 oh you can 23:49:48 cewl 23:49:55 guess i have to do >>> rand-expr 23:50:22 plus i could let you specify the objoken regexes and the funcoken regexes 23:50:29 also, i should stop using my own terms 23:50:46 objoken = token that's parsed as a value 23:50:56 i don't know the terms for anything thattish 23:51:05 since i haven't seen anything written about parsing really... 23:51:43 anyone made an irc server? 23:51:53 i thought i'd write one now 23:52:00 (a + b) * (x - y) * z + a*(x + t) 23:52:12 hmm... i'm fairly sure you can only do numbers :| 23:52:19 because of the regexes 23:52:27 i are not good pilot 23:52:40 >>> in-fi (1 + 2) * (3 - 4) * 5 + 1*(3 + 6) 23:52:41 1 + 2 3 * - 4 * 5 1 3 + * + 6 23:52:52 that's pretty... readable 23:52:59 D 23:52:59 :D 23:53:18 Looks like syntactic sugar around parens. 23:53:31 Or not? 23:53:44 well yes, but so are post-/prefix... 23:53:56 Hmm. What, exatly, *is* the syntax? 23:54:00 basically that's the idea. 23:54:44 hmm 23:54:53 finefix is based on infixifying postfix 23:54:56 It looks like some parts are postfix, some are infix. . . 23:55:05 Hmm. Impossible to parse? 23:55:10 no 23:55:15 stack-based parsing as in postficx 23:55:17 *postfix 23:55:28 i'll upload the "spec" soon 23:55:33 >> fi-in 1 + 2 3 * - 4 * 5 1 3 + * + 6 23:55:39 >>> fi-in 1 + 2 3 * - 4 * 5 1 3 + * + 6 23:55:45 * pikhq hopes you've bothered with that 23:55:53 Guess not. 23:56:04 the conversion is also based on postfix, just shift every sequence of funcokens left one step 23:56:16 funcoken = +, - etc 23:56:23 -!- ehird` has quit. 23:56:24 also, you have to reverse them 23:57:19 you can immediately have 4 variations of infix depending on whether to base around prefix or postfix and whether to reverse functions when you are "evaluating lazily"-ish 23:57:56 evaluating lazily = leaving something on the stack when encountering a token 23:58:18 infix without explicit nesting, normally parsed, never does that 23:58:26 which is why it's not "nesting complete" 23:58:33 pikhq: also, the command is in-fi 23:58:34 wtf?!! 23:58:46 ah 23:58:46 i quat gearth and now it won't let me simulate flight again 23:58:47 oh 23:58:55 i haven't done the other way around yet 23:59:00 >>> in-po 23:59:02 >>> in-po 3+5 23:59:02 3 5 + 23:59:06 >>> in-pr 3+5 23:59:06 + 3 5 23:59:09 i did those 23:59:17 oklopol: I was trying to do the *inverse*. 23:59:38 but since i didn't make an actual good "fix" parsing library, those are all separate functions, which i had to make