00:18:07 -!- olsner has quit ("Leaving"). 00:41:36 -!- optbot has set topic: the entire backlog of #esoteric: http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric | Oh god it smells of java.. 00:43:03 Just what does purely constraint-based mean? 00:44:19 Hmm. Indeed, we should do it. 00:58:38 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined. 01:13:00 -!- tritonio__ has joined. 01:13:35 -!- Tritonio_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 01:50:04 hey 01:50:25 i mean that the language, or rather, its syntax, is not generated by a set of rules 01:50:32 but rather is merely constrained 02:38:46 The syntax is constrained? 02:39:11 So there are most likely multiple consistent parses? 02:43:21 there are no parses :) 02:44:31 you just map syntactic entities to semantically relevant units by way of checking the constraints 02:44:55 Oh. 02:45:11 an example of a constraint might be something like.. 02:45:43 *unary-op[i] ... arg[i] 02:46:03 that is, its _invalid_ to have a unary operator separated from its argument 02:46:33 thats just a silly little constraint tho, but you get the point 02:47:00 i dont now how we could use it but 02:47:15 the mappings to semantics shouldn't be complicated tho 02:47:51 we could use a coindexing system to describe it 02:48:51 op{i} ... arg{j}[i] <===> op{i}(arg{j}) 02:48:54 or something like that 02:49:18 or some mapping to an abstract syntax 02:49:52 op{i} ... arg{j}[i] <==> (op{i} arg{j}) 02:50:28 if we're using lisp as the language to represent the abstract syntax 02:51:43 i dont know of any CS applications of constraint grammars tho, so i can't really say how it might look 03:16:07 -!- Trinithis has joined. 03:16:18 esolangs? 03:16:58 ah, the chan serv answers 03:17:21 would anyone know chris pressey's email? 03:17:54 or at least language specs for SMITH? 03:31:19 Ello. 03:31:28 I could probably get one or the other. 03:31:58 Thank you for not leaving before anyone could answer your question. :-) 03:34:45 This looks like a SMITH spec: http://catseye.tc/projects/smith/doc/smith.html 03:49:19 Yeah I know... too bad its kinda vague 03:49:33 thanks anyway 03:50:01 GO ESOLANGS!!!! 03:50:28 There should be an Esobot that is written in an esolang powerful enough to write one 03:51:46 Heh. 04:28:20 -!- psygnisfive has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 04:28:34 -!- psygnisfive has joined. 04:29:19 -!- dogface_ has joined. 04:42:51 -!- dogface has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:10:27 -!- dogface_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 05:21:05 -!- psygnisfive has quit ("Leaving..."). 06:41:36 -!- optbot has set topic: the entire backlog of #esoteric: http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric | lemme read.... 06:58:37 optbot: Congratulations on picking a line that matches well with the backlog thing for the topic. 06:58:37 fizzie: did either book mention schroedinger's cat? 06:58:54 optbot: Either book? Huh? What books are we talking about? 06:58:55 fizzie: i think i can compile BF into it 06:59:09 optbot: BF into what? NURRR so confused. 06:59:09 fizzie: lament! 06:59:15 optbot: optbot! 06:59:16 fizzie: Why don't people in #esoteric understand the concept of writing it yourself for the sake of writing it yourself X_X 06:59:49 optbot: I would think that people in #esoteric would understand that relatively well, compared to programmers in general. 06:59:49 fizzie: and I know they're not likely to fuck up the memory management 07:00:24 optbot: Well, I guess that's true too. 07:00:24 fizzie: !ps 07:00:35 optbot: No processes running. 07:00:35 fizzie: it's sauna, bye for a while.. 07:00:44 Ok, bye. 07:00:53 (How does a bot go to sauna anyway?) 07:25:03 -!- AnMaster has quit ("shutting down due to electricity maintainance, all systems offline until noon UTC+2"). 07:26:56 -!- kar8nga has joined. 07:35:48 -!- olsner has joined. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:10:32 -!- DarkPants has joined. 08:13:18 -!- olsner has quit ("Leaving"). 08:14:01 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit (Nick collision from services.). 08:14:06 -!- DarkPants has changed nick to GreaseMonkey. 08:20:23 -!- jix has joined. 08:20:49 -!- kar8nga has left (?). 08:53:51 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 08:58:23 -!- Trinithis has quit ("Leaving"). 09:30:19 -!- Mony has joined. 09:31:47 -!- Mony has quit (Client Quit). 09:33:40 -!- Mony has joined. 09:34:10 hi 09:35:12 hi 10:20:22 -!- jix has quit ("This computer has gone to sleep"). 10:25:00 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined. 10:28:36 Dudes. 11:45:40 -!- AnMaster has joined. 11:51:41 -!- tusho has joined. 11:53:08 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection). 12:10:28 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 12:33:09 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 12:36:09 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 12:37:22 Gah, is FILE's 'R' supposed to sign-extend the bytes? At least RC/Funge-98 reads 0x80 as cell value -128... 12:38:10 The current manual says "Functions W and R write cells as bytes, any cells containing values greater than 255 will have the top bits stripped." 12:40:20 I already have to do 00ge1g*10g+e1g*20g+e1g*30g+ to read a 4-byte big-endian int (e1 has constant 256), I don't want to make it 00ge1g+e1g%e1g*... to turn that -128 into (-128 + 256) % 256 = 128. 12:41:36 -!- optbot has set topic: the entire backlog of #esoteric: http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric | in CLC-INTERCAL you can even change the grammar at runtime. 12:42:00 optbot: What do you think of my 'R' issue? 12:42:00 fizzie: i don't know .. try it :) 12:42:13 optbot: But I just tried it! And it sign-extends! Should it? 12:42:14 fizzie: TASTE GREEN GOO 12:42:45 That wasn't veryr helpful. 13:04:20 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined. 13:13:24 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection). 13:17:00 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined. 13:19:53 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection). 13:22:32 green goo solves everything, fizzie 13:22:35 -!- tusho has quit (Remote closed the connection). 13:22:50 optbot: Okay, where can I get me some green goo? 13:22:51 fizzie: 'IT'? 13:22:52 -!- tusho has joined. 13:23:05 fizzie: green go solves everything 13:23:11 -!- jix has joined. 13:23:33 I noticed. I even asked optbot where I can get some, but the reply was just "'IT'?" 13:23:33 fizzie: <__main__.IRCFileWrapper instance at 0xb7c8140c> 13:23:38 fizzie: sorry client crashed 13:23:43 didn't know if you got it 13:23:44 hmm 13:23:48 optbot: why are you exposing python internals? 13:23:48 tusho: http://www.formauri.es/personal/pgimeno/temp/99bottles.mp3 13:23:51 You are written in Ruby. 13:23:56 And I don't see how 99bob is related. 13:27:32 -!- kar8nga has joined. 13:27:40 Gah, is FILE's 'R' supposed to sign-extend the bytes? At least RC/Funge-98 reads 0x80 as cell value -128... <-- no clue 13:27:45 I think I don't sign extend it 13:27:57 well not sure what I do actually 13:28:31 indeed I don't think I sign extend 13:29:43 unsigned char * restrict buf 13:29:44 then 13:29:46 Yes, I peeked at cfunge sources and since the buffer there is unsigned char, I think you read the bytes as [0, 255]. 13:29:50 fread(buf, sizeof(unsigned char), n, fp) != (size_t)n 13:30:02 fizzie, there you are then 13:30:10 it is probably undef and you can't depend on it at all 13:30:15 Although "sizeof(unsigned char)" is pointless, it's always 1. 13:31:57 fizzie, true 13:32:06 Gneh, and % on negative numbers was a bit UNDEF too, right? 13:32:13 fizzie, yes it is 13:32:20 that is the reason for MODU 13:33:36 Maybe I should use MODU 'U', then; e1gU is shorter than e1g+e1g%. 13:34:08 fizzie, maybe 13:34:27 fizzie, anyway why do you need chars greater than 127? 13:34:54 I'm reading 32-bit big-endian integers from a file. 13:34:57 ah 13:35:04 fizzie, may I ask why? 13:35:54 Well, basically because I happened to write 32-bit big-endian ints. Heh, maybe I'll "fix" it by only writing 7-bit characters, I don't need that much range anyway. 13:36:03 um 13:36:07 why big-endian 13:36:32 I like it. And since I'll be reading them as bytes, anyway, I'd rather use the endianness I like. 13:36:39 any try to convert it will cause issues 13:36:46 hm ok 13:37:19 Big-endian is humanist. :-) 13:37:26 true 13:37:34 (For most, at least.) 13:37:41 (I don't know of any little-endian number systems.) 13:37:49 "Some of my best friends are big-endian!" 13:38:42 On little-endians' equality with big-endians: "I have a dream." 13:38:48 I'm happy with either personally in computers. Mixed endian or such I dislike 13:38:59 AnMaster: Apartheid, ey? 13:39:02 You endianist. 13:39:16 tusho, well mixed endian is confusing 13:39:30 AnMaster: OH. You need numbers to be all in your nice little order, do you? Can't handle them being DIFFERENT? 13:39:44 tusho, either big or little endian is ok for me 13:39:51 But never both, eh? 13:39:53 just not PDP endianness or similar 13:39:56 They can never mingle. Marry. Have children. 13:40:07 You disgusting pig of a man. You are stuck in the past! 13:40:09 sigh, please stop trolling 13:40:18 Stop biting the hook. :) 13:40:26 I didn't 13:40:41 I just assumed you would stop joking 13:41:01 Why would repeating your opinion stop me joking? 13:41:04 Also, this is #esoteric. 13:41:06 Why would we stop joking? 13:41:26 tusho, how is botte coming along? 13:41:31 or any of your other projects? 13:41:59 Quite well, in that "I could implement them right now no problem" but "I'd prefer to do this other thing because it interests me more at the moment". 13:42:17 Chromosome is the current thing I'm mulling over. 13:42:27 k 14:24:48 -!- Hiato has joined. 14:29:29 http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html/ref=cm_plog_item_link?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nigeltomm.com%2Fbookblock-9781419693618.pdf&token=424E8FEF642C211BEF677EB82C11599497EE4D77 <-- this is an actual printed book 14:30:29 btw. 14:30:30 CLUSTERS = %w(ab eb ob ub ac ec oc uc ad ed od ud af ef of uf ag eg og ug ah eh 14:30:30 oh uh aj ej oj uj al el ol ul an en on un ap ep op up ar er or ur as es os us at 14:30:31 et ot ut av ev ov uv aw ew ow uw az ez oz uz) 14:30:37 anyone have any better two-letter clusters? 14:30:42 they're strung together 14:30:49 like "uzadutob" or "esowot" 14:35:14 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 14:38:29 hi Slereah_ 14:38:32 "esowot" reminded me of you 15:00:03 tusho, they look like locale names to me 15:00:06 not sure though 15:00:31 no 15:00:36 -!- tusho has quit ("And then-"). 15:05:04 -!- tusho has joined. 15:05:26 AnMaster: did I say no? 15:05:27 well, no 15:05:27 :D 15:05:30 I made them up 15:05:43 each vowel sans i (confusion with e) 15:05:53 followed by every consonant save c (confusion with k) 15:07:10 unfortunately you can't get "shit" 15:07:11 as it has no i 15:07:13 what a shame 15:07:33 not sure if you could get "fuck" 15:07:39 nope 15:26:02 anyway. 15:26:10 just wondering if anyone has a better list of little clusteries. 15:37:19 I'm not sure what is "better" in this sense. 15:40:04 tusho, what are the rules for combining them? 15:40:17 AnMaster: Just base length-of-clusters. 15:40:24 hm? 15:40:29 fizzie: Well, I want you to be able to tell this to someone and then have them be able to type it out without much fuss. 15:40:32 so you can pick any combination of then 15:40:34 them* 15:40:36 AnMaster: ... what? 15:40:43 I don't get what you mean 15:40:48 i can tell. 15:41:24 AnMaster: base 10 15:41:27 is {0,1,2,3,...,10} 15:41:32 yes 15:41:36 I know what base 10 is 15:41:42 base 8 too and so on 15:41:42 this is base {ab,eb,ob,etc} 15:41:48 the digits are clusters of two letters 15:41:57 and a number expressed in it is pronouncable 15:41:59 so... ab = 0? eb = 1 and so on? 15:42:03 err 15:42:03 ab=1 actually 15:42:04 ? 15:42:07 0 cannot be represented in it 15:42:09 ah 15:42:09 (because I don't need 0) 15:42:16 anyway 15:42:23 I was just asking if anyone has some more/better clusters to add to the list 15:42:33 hm 15:42:41 how do you define "better"? 15:43:04 You could just take the N most frequent character-pairs of , if you don't mind the fact that there's no sense in the list then. 15:43:54 well you could also take every possible combination of two letters that are valid in said language 15:43:56 AnMaster: just as many as possible that can generate pronouncable words without too many ambiguities. 15:44:08 -!- Hiato has quit ("Leaving."). 15:44:17 bkanift is not pronouncable 15:44:25 cakailou is ambiguous 15:44:39 tusho, bkanift is pronouncable 15:44:44 AnMaster: not very 15:44:45 not easily I agree 15:44:49 it's not natural, anyway 15:44:50 but still pronouncable 15:44:59 and the latter is "Ca Ca Ill Oo" 15:45:00 "cakailou is ambiguous" 15:45:01 err 15:45:04 could be cacailoo 15:45:05 what do you mean? 15:45:07 kakailu 15:45:07 etc 15:45:13 I don't know either of those words 15:45:17 AnMaster: they're not words. 15:45:19 ah 15:45:25 but "cakailou" is not an acceptable output 15:45:28 as it's pronounced "ca ca ill oo" 15:45:32 which could be any number of things 15:45:36 cacailoo, kakailu etc 15:45:48 the current cluster pairs only have c, no k etc 15:45:57 tusho, you couldn't get illo in your cluster I think 15:45:59 and no i (sometimes "ee" as in e) 15:46:03 AnMaster: yes - but I'd quite like to expand the list 15:46:11 and possibly improve it to get more variety of words 15:46:13 tusho, first reason: no i 15:46:19 because CVCVCV (etc) is a bit boring 15:46:25 and yes I know my current list is quite good at it 15:46:25 yeah exactly 15:46:37 but it could be better in the variation and size points 15:47:03 http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html/ref=cm_plog_item_link?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nigeltomm.com%2Fbookblock-9781419693618.pdf&token=424E8FEF642C211BEF677EB82C11599497EE4D77 <-- this is an actual printed book 15:47:04 huh 15:47:08 long chapter too 15:47:16 yeah and only a few words 15:47:16 :P 15:47:18 and strange 15:47:24 apparently that really long word means "girl or bitch" 15:47:35 the other books that guy has written are great 15:47:37 tusho, well I wonder what the other chapters are like 15:47:39 he has like 20 chapters of that blah story 15:47:44 ah 15:47:45 AnMaster: each chapter is one book 15:47:48 tusho, all are as long? 15:47:52 dunno 15:47:52 and as strange? 15:48:00 but they're all mostly nonsensical sentences involving blah :D 15:48:03 he also has this book about hamlet 15:48:06 where he rearranged hamlet some way 15:48:12 so you get sentences like "to help the help" 15:48:14 tusho, well, I wouldn't buy that blah book 15:48:30 AnMaster: i would buy all of them if I had the money, for the novelty of having a full collection 15:48:37 i'd have scholarly discussions about them 15:48:56 1) it would be heavier than an omnibus edition of the The Lord of the Rings books 15:49:05 2) it would be wasted money 15:49:17 it'd only be wasted money if you don't consider it art :P 15:49:49 I do like art, just not all art 15:49:55 I'm all for Mona Lisa and so on 15:49:56 :P 15:50:07 yawn 15:50:10 paintings 15:50:13 what a boring definition of art 15:50:24 well I like other art too. hm... 15:50:40 music could be considered art definitely 15:50:47 i like conventional (pictures & music) kinds of art (although music isn't as often considered art as paintings, unfortunately) 15:50:51 and strange (programs, etc) 15:50:53 and I like Beethoven for example 15:50:57 i consider some games art 15:51:02 video or otherwise 15:51:06 tusho, chess? 15:51:15 AnMaster: yes 15:51:20 interesting 15:51:26 yes I can see what you mean 16:09:38 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 16:33:16 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 16:53:29 -!- olsner has joined. 17:00:35 -!- kar8nga has quit (Connection reset by peer). 17:01:11 * tusho decides to torture himself and gets ready to play Mondo Medicals & Mondo Agency 17:01:17 -!- kar8nga has joined. 17:08:24 -!- kar8nga has left (?). 17:22:58 -!- tusho has quit. 17:37:32 -!- dogface has joined. 17:38:23 This is a bluebell of changing English at runtime. And by "bluebell", I mean "example". 17:44:54 In other news: ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" entails ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" + "ZFC + 'ZFC is consistent'" is consistent. Since ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" entails its own consistency, it is inconsistent; therefore, ZFC is also inconsistent. The only question now is why I thought that ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" entails ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" + "ZFC + 'ZFC is consistent'" is consistent. 17:45:29 wat 17:45:40 Let's buy some Zermelo Fried Chicken. 17:46:31 Here we go: ZFC being consistent implies that ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" is also consistent. Turn that into an entailment, and you get the above eventually. There's certainly a hole here, though. 17:47:37 In other news, consider this: you have a process that randomly outputs ( and ) characters. If it's output more ( than ), it outputs either with a 50% chance of each; if it's output an equal number, it always outputs (. 17:47:46 So why is it inconsistent? 17:48:07 In one case, it outputs either with a 50% chance; in another, it always outputs (. However, in the long run, it will output both with equal probability. 17:48:32 ZFC is inconsistent because ZFC + "ZFC is consistent" is inconsistent? 17:48:41 Is it? 17:48:48 I doubt it. 17:49:16 Then what are you ranting about 17:49:34 * dogface continues pondering 17:50:02 -!- sebbu has quit ("@+"). 18:08:39 dogface: are you as ugly as ihope you are? 18:08:56 * dogface throws a wisteria bush at oklofok 18:09:32 -!- oklofok has changed nick to oklopol. 18:10:21 Now for something more important, how about. 18:10:22 -!- kar8nga has joined. 18:11:18 And by important, I mean interesting. 18:11:54 and by interesting you mean a rant about something weird? 18:12:10 Yeah. 18:12:16 well go on 18:13:08 Axioms: for all x, y and z, ```sxyz = ``xz`yx; for all x and y, ``kxy = x; for all x, `ix = x; s != k; for all x, y and z, if x = y and y = z, then x = z; for all x and y, if x = y, then y = x; for all x, x = y; and for all w, x, y and z, if w = x and y = z, then `wy = `xz. 18:13:29 My client did silly quotation mark replacements, didn't it? 18:13:30 sounds terribly boring 18:13:45 lament: no 18:14:43 See if you can prove `sk = `ki from these axioms, or at least show that there is no disproof of it. 18:17:44 I'd love to, but I don't know where my pen is :( 18:18:27 Found it 18:19:49 I find it amusing that you use unlambda notation. 18:20:10 It's not used a lot in combinators litterature 18:20:27 Actually not at all, but there's a PN version sometimes 18:21:39 Unlambda notation is slightly easier to parse. :-) 18:21:45 Yeah 18:22:33 -!- tusho has joined. 18:22:42 Nested parentheses are quite a nightmare 18:22:46 -!- Corun has joined. 18:28:13 ::= {"S" | "K" | "I" | "(" ")"} 18:29:07 Slereah_: I'd love to, but I don't know where my pen is :( <<< i can see your pen is! 18:30:37 mightier than a sword? 18:34:22 Better-in-a-way: ::= "S" | "K" | "I" | "(" ")"; ::= | 18:34:37 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 18:34:47 . 18:34:57 ........................... 18:34:58 . 18:34:58 He disliked my left recursion so much that he left. 18:35:06 ........................... 18:35:24 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 18:35:56 dogface! 18:36:00 -!- kar8nga has left (?). 18:36:19 "for all x, x = y" <- I think you mean x=x 18:36:28 Probably. 18:36:36 -!- kar8nga has joined. 18:37:19 -!- Vampire_Squif has joined. 18:37:26 Rar >:| 18:37:54 Zip. 18:38:09 i used to say rar 18:38:14 -!- sebbu has joined. 18:38:17 GregorR used to respond "zip" 18:39:06 Rar and feather. 18:40:14 Heh, somebody should invent tags for .tar files called "feathers", so you can tar and feather your files. 18:41:11 Also, if you were implying that you can't prove `sk = `ki with that, I think I know why 18:41:36 -!- optbot has set topic: the entire backlog of #esoteric: http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric | At this point, it negotiates the connection and promptly quits.. 18:41:50 Your axioms don't seem to specify that if two combinators act the same way on a bunch of variables, they're the same 18:41:54 -!- Vampire_Squif has changed nick to Slereah. 18:41:54 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 18:42:56 I'm not exactly sure how to write that up. 18:43:06 20:13… lament: sounds terribly boring ||| 20:13… oklopol: lament: no <<< this was actually a response to dogface's 18:44:10 So `` looks like two accent marks, not a curly double quote? 18:46:18 Slereah: that's because it's impossible. >:-D 18:47:12 It wouldn't remain a formal system if you did that, unless you did it in first-order logic, but then you can't really express first-order logic as a formal system. 18:55:54 dogface: it looks like what it is 18:57:08 “Real quotes.‘ 18:57:09 err 18:57:11 “Real quotes.” 18:58:07 ``Silly quotes.'' 18:58:43 -!- oklofok has joined. 18:58:45 -!- oklopol has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 18:59:08 dogface : You can try! 18:59:29 I'm sure that you can cook something up good enough for a proof of that 18:59:55 dogface: The name of those is actually quite obscene. 19:00:00 *t quotes. 19:00:01 My guess is that `sk = `ki cannot be proved and therefore should be an axiom. 19:00:04 Where * = many letters. 19:00:18 * = grave accen? 19:00:59 I think the word "grave" in "grave accent" is one word that I've seen many, many times, but heard once or twice at the very most. 19:02:03 dogface : That's quite a bold position 19:02:20 Also it might even be easy to prove if you had the underlying lambda calculus 19:02:25 add 19:15:43 -!- dogface has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070208]"). 19:23:34 -!- Slereah has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 19:23:46 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 19:24:34 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 19:26:20 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 19:26:48 D:< 19:31:54 * sebbu just bought a 1tb hard disk 19:32:44 I probably have 1TB total 19:32:48 With my 7 HD. 19:54:10 Huh. How can (with "FILE" loaded latest) 08R push 0, 0 on stack? It's supposed to pop two values and push none, and reflect on error. 19:55:18 RC/Funge-98 seems to push two zeros if the read returns zero bytes (i.e. at EOF). That's... a bit surprising. 19:56:02 Can't say I really understand the logic there. The code is clear enough -- if (fread(...) == 0) { Push(0,cip); Push(0,cip); return; } -- but the reason eludes me. 19:56:22 -!- Slereah has joined. 19:57:01 -!- Slereah_ has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 19:58:54 -!- Hiato has joined. 20:25:19 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 20:25:19 -!- Slereah has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 20:26:29 fizzie, what interpreter does that? 20:26:51 fizzie, hm 20:27:12 fizzie, R here pushes handle *back* if there wasn't any error 20:27:20 if there was an error it doesn't push anything back 20:27:23 well 20:27:29 that depends on where the error happened 20:27:33 it all looks very strange ot me 20:27:35 to* 20:27:45 -!- oklopol has joined. 20:28:34 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 20:29:42 R(h n -- h)Read n bytes from file to buffer 20:29:49 yes it should push handle back 20:31:33 -!- oklofok has quit (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 20:31:33 -!- sebbu has quit (zelazny.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 20:31:34 -!- sebbu2 has changed nick to sebbu. 20:33:14 fizzie: simple 20:33:28 x = fread(...); push(x); if (x == 0) { push(0); } 20:33:29 or something 20:33:34 i dunno 20:34:20 tusho: he pasted the code 20:34:30 ah 20:34:36 thought that was hypothetical code 20:39:39 well I don't get it either 20:58:01 -!- Judofyr has joined. 21:03:11 -!- RedDak has joined. 21:06:42 night 21:20:01 Yes, it should keep the handle on the stack, mis-said that. But that "push two zeroes" thing is strange. 21:40:49 -!- tritonio__ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 21:48:20 -!- Hiato has quit ("Leaving."). 22:13:19 -!- kar8nga has left (?). 22:29:12 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ"). 22:41:06 -!- RedDak has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 22:41:53 fizzie, agreed 23:02:27 "IRC makes your life miserable and leaves you an empty shell. 23:02:28 Too many psychopaths ruining your mood." 23:02:29 OH NOES 23:02:41 * tusho goes and ruins his mood with his PSYCHOPATHICITY 23:02:42 WHAT NOW 23:02:51 * tusho notices he himself is an empty shell 23:02:53 COOL 23:03:03 * tusho pokes the emptiness of his shell 23:05:31 -!- oerjan has joined. 23:07:51 * oerjan fills tusho's shell with PUDDING 23:08:06 cool 23:08:11 om nom nom nom nom 23:09:18 (butterscotch, not tapioka) 23:09:49 Butter? 23:09:54 I hardly know her! 23:10:12 and scotch, too 23:15:46 -!- Tritonio_ has joined. 23:19:01 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language 23:19:02 Ahahah 23:19:11 "# EsCo - Universal compiler for esoteric languages" 23:24:41 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 23:31:04 -!- Corun has quit ("This computer has gone to sleep"). 23:36:45 night 23:46:13 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined. 23:56:21 -!- oerjan has joined.