←2009-02-05 2009-02-06 2009-02-07→ ↑2009 ↑all
00:00:13 <ehird> oklopol: you can't claim this is any good: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BZk6aZp9xE&feature=related
00:01:46 <oklopol> according to my short internet search it needs you to give the chords yourself
00:01:53 <oklopol> which is the nontrivial part
00:01:54 <ehird> really?
00:01:56 <ehird> i don't think so
00:03:02 <oklopol> well. i base this on two random links.
00:05:54 <oklopol> i wish i used something like facebook so i could join an i-love-microsoft group or something
00:06:18 <oklopol> they're actually recruiting people in our uni, maybe i should join them, i mean, they're obviously pretty fucking awesome
00:06:58 <oklopol> but, in all seriousness, please investigate band in a box, i need to know whether this is in fact an old concept.
00:07:47 <ehird> oklopol: there are two microsoft companies
00:07:57 <ehird> Microsoft, the corporate drone of shitpilation
00:08:00 <ehird> and microsoft research
00:08:02 <ehird> which has haskell and stuff
00:08:05 <ehird> (and songsmith)
00:08:12 <ehird> you will find getting a job at the latter significantly harder.
00:08:20 <oklopol> ah
00:08:31 <oklopol> so there are two microsofts
00:08:39 <oklopol> the cool one, and one that made vista
00:08:41 <oklopol> *and the
00:08:47 <ehird> Pretty much :P
00:09:03 <ehird> also this http://www.vjn.fi/s/black.mp3 is still amazing
00:09:09 <ehird> make one that outputs to a wav
00:09:26 -!- kwertii has joined.
00:09:43 <oklopol> actually now that i think of it, i've heard "microsoft research" whenever i've thought "wow microsoft may suck at operating systems, but god they can cool and weird stuff".
00:09:57 <oklopol> hmm
00:10:04 <oklopol> yeah maybe cool should indeed be a verb there
00:10:07 -!- kwertii has quit (Client Quit).
00:10:13 <oklopol> i'm not sure where my verbs keep dropping
00:10:16 <oklopol> o
00:10:17 <oklopol> o
00:10:18 -!- kwertii has joined.
00:11:04 <oklopol> i have on my linuxer this other program that was kinda like that but i made the sine waves myself straight into dsp
00:11:32 <oklopol> but my linuxer is under a pile of random atm
00:11:45 <oklopol> anyway. gotta go sleep
00:11:53 <ehird> you never sleep
00:11:57 -!- Asztal has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
00:12:01 <oklopol> i wish i had a quit message so i could praise microsoft in it
00:12:24 <oklopol> (praising microsoft research just doesn't sound right :|)
00:12:45 <oklopol> i mean i wish i quitted when i left
00:12:54 <oklopol> and actually in fact i sometimes kinda do sleep
00:13:04 <ehird> well don't
00:13:09 <oklopol> in all truthishness i usually sleep two times a day.
00:13:25 <oklopol> i'm starting my uberman in phases, i guess.
00:13:59 -!- Asztal has joined.
00:14:04 <oklopol> ---->
00:14:04 <ehird> hi Asztal
00:14:08 <ehird> bye oklopol
00:22:20 <ehird> Asztal: how chunky is the bacon
00:28:50 <Asztal> like a bacony loaf of bread
00:28:59 <ehird> wowzy
01:11:27 <psygnisfive> oi
01:11:36 <psygnisfive> ciao cose
01:15:15 -!- Sgeo has joined.
02:13:08 -!- seveninchbread has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
04:10:05 -!- comexk has joined.
04:12:06 -!- comex has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
04:12:06 -!- Leonidas has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
04:12:06 -!- pikhq has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
04:13:44 -!- Leonidas has joined.
04:13:55 -!- pikhq has joined.
04:29:29 -!- MizardX has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)).
04:30:09 -!- MizardX has joined.
04:34:52 -!- comexk has quit (Remote closed the connection).
04:34:57 -!- ehird has quit (Remote closed the connection).
04:35:05 -!- comex has joined.
04:35:51 -!- ehird has joined.
05:56:47 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined.
06:09:47 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection).
07:17:05 <lament> ehird
07:55:06 -!- MizardX has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)).
07:55:27 -!- MizardX has joined.
07:59:40 -!- MizardX has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)).
07:59:43 -!- MizardX- has joined.
07:59:45 -!- MizardX- has changed nick to MizardX.
07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended).
08:00:00 -!- clog has joined.
08:02:50 -!- Sgeo has quit ("Leaving").
08:08:34 -!- kwertii_ has joined.
08:22:30 -!- kwertii has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
08:42:28 -!- kwertii_ has quit ("bye").
09:05:35 -!- DarkPants has joined.
09:16:23 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
09:53:53 -!- DarkPants has quit ("Client Excited").
12:01:13 -!- Metcalf has joined.
12:26:50 -!- FireFly has joined.
12:27:39 * pikhq does a spit take.
12:27:49 <pikhq> C++09 will have lambda.
12:29:06 <Slereah2> :o
12:29:11 <Slereah2> Wait
12:29:17 <Slereah2> I forgot that C is terrible
12:29:22 <Slereah2> So it won't help
12:48:38 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined.
12:49:52 -!- jix has joined.
13:46:05 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined.
13:53:56 <AnMaster> Slereah2, C++ is terrible. Not C
13:54:00 <AnMaster> you confused the two
14:07:33 <ehird> 05:53:56 <AnMaster> Slereah2, C++ is terrible. Not C
14:07:33 <ehird> 05:54:00 <AnMaster> you confused the two
14:07:49 <AnMaster> well I didn't say C was good. but it isn't terrible.
14:07:54 <ehird> I [don't] like how AnMaster veils his dogmatic positions by phrasing them as "jokes".
14:08:04 <ehird> (And if they're pointed out as not funny, says that was intentional.)
14:08:22 <ehird> 23:17:05 <lament> ehird
14:08:23 <ehird> lament
14:08:24 <AnMaster> ehird, I thought you thought C++ was worse than C too?
14:08:33 <ehird> AnMaster: That isn't what you said.
14:08:36 <AnMaster> also, it wasn't a joke... Why do you think it was
14:08:37 <AnMaster> ?
14:08:38 <ehird> You said: "C++ is terrible. Not C"
14:08:43 <ehird> Slereah didn't confuse the two.
14:09:05 <AnMaster> ehird, well "<pikhq> C++09 will have lambda. <Slereah2> I forgot that C is terrible <AnMaster> Slereah2, C++ is terrible. Not C <AnMaster> you confused the two"
14:09:10 <AnMaster> that makes total sense to me
14:09:18 <ehird> no, it's assuming that he doesn't hate C too
14:09:20 <ehird> he does.
14:09:35 <ehird> if you hate C for the reasons he does, you hate C++ too
14:12:39 -!- MigoMipo has joined.
14:56:09 <ehird> 23:48:07 <encoded> pfft
14:56:09 <ehird> 23:48:18 <encoded> i thought this chan was about philosofy
14:56:11 <ehird> 23:48:25 <encoded> :p
14:56:17 <ehird> [ shortly after 23:44:16 --- topic: set to 'Read the principia discordia!' by encoded ]
14:56:22 <ehird> { 2006-11-25 }
14:57:17 <ehird> 23:54:53 <EgoBot> PRIVMSG bsmntbombdood i wanna feel your body breaking... wanna feel your body breaking... and shaking... and left in the cold...
14:57:30 <ehird> 23:59:36 <EgoBot> /me strips
15:00:55 <ehird> GregorR: you should revive egobot :P
15:03:49 <GregorR> So should your FACE.
15:04:34 <ehird> GregorR: :(
15:05:24 -!- MizardX has quit ("reboot").
15:10:00 -!- MizardX has joined.
15:18:43 <ehird> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlCWo1qdTdE&feature=related
15:34:15 <AnMaster> ehird, where was that?
15:34:24 <ehird> 2006-11-25.
15:34:34 <AnMaster> #esoteric?
15:34:40 <ehird> Yes.
15:34:42 <AnMaster> uhu
15:34:49 <ehird> AnMaster: do you know what esoteric means?
15:34:53 <AnMaster> yes I do
15:34:56 <ehird> I assume you mean the encoded guy
15:34:57 <ehird> not egobot
15:35:12 <ehird> anyway, to explain why we get those guys: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esotericism
15:35:19 <AnMaster> and I know encoded from other channels... He is strange
15:35:25 <ehird> Define strange
15:35:48 <AnMaster> ehird, changing nick between encoded/decoded and when he is "encoded" he claims he is a bot
15:36:03 <AnMaster> and a human as "decoded"
15:36:12 <ehird> Tell him to lay off the lsd.
15:36:17 <AnMaster> haha
15:36:31 <AnMaster> haven't seen him for a few months though
15:36:54 <ehird> hmm, before he came in then he's been before
15:37:03 <ehird> (with others filtered out):
15:37:04 <ehird> 05.10.29:02:06:28 <encoded> hi
15:37:05 <ehird> 05.10.29:02:21:27 <encoded> not me
15:37:07 <ehird> 05.10.29:02:21:34 <encoded> im high as a cloud
15:37:09 <ehird> 05.10.29:02:23:08 <encoded> thats relative, the moon aint high, its just orbting in respect to the earths plain
15:37:15 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:08:19 <encoded> whats esoteric programming?
15:37:15 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:14:34 <encoded> no
15:37:17 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:18:23 <encoded> yes c++
15:37:19 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:19:15 <encoded> this doesnt explain anything
15:37:21 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:21:38 <encoded> great..
15:37:23 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:21:40 <encoded> explaint it to
15:37:25 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:21:43 <encoded> me
15:37:27 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:35:21 <encoded> can i get a brainfuck compiler?
15:37:29 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:36:43 <encoded> what about windoze?
15:37:31 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:39:50 <encoded> hmm.. nobody can or should use this for any real world purpose
15:37:33 <ehird> [snip]
15:37:35 <ehird> 05.10.29:18:59:01 <encoded> soo.. why are you ppl here? supporting a language that has no use?
15:37:37 <ehird> LOL
15:37:39 <ehird> okay, forget the previous ones
15:37:41 <ehird> this is gold:
15:37:43 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:03:06 <encoded> hmm.. you need to develop a code that alters your thought just by looking at it, not just anoy you.
15:37:46 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:03:22 <encoded> like subliminal messeges or something
15:37:48 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:03:30 <encoded> thats brainfuck
15:37:50 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:14:10 <encoded> right...
15:37:52 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:14:23 <encoded> maybe whats THEY want you to belive
15:37:54 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:14:48 <encoded> THEY are the (not so secret) world goverment
15:37:56 <ehird> 05.10.29:19:16:03 <encoded> hm... maybe you HAVE been looking at BF for 2 long...
15:38:13 -!- ehird has set topic: #esoteric. THEY are the (not so secret) world goverment. http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric. http://esolangs.org/wiki/Main_Page..
15:40:11 <AnMaster> hah
15:40:30 <ehird> SO GUYS LET'S START SOME WARS AND KILL SOME BABIES AND HIDE OCCULT KNOWLEDGE ??
15:40:44 <ehird> CLOG: DON'T LOG THAT PLEASE THANKs
15:41:55 <ehird> gmail's new upgrade is nice
15:42:00 <ehird> servers are a bit slow though :(
15:43:57 <ehird> although I don't know how people use the new default gmail theme, it's awful, the older one is way better
15:44:08 <ehird> the new one is just... dull, gray and hard to read
15:45:22 <fizzie> I'm tempted to add "like your FACE" since it would fit so well in the context.
15:45:43 <ehird> yeah my face is hard to read indeed
15:47:32 <AnMaster> <ehird> although I don't know how people use the new default gmail theme, it's awful, the older one is way better <-- hey that is my comment!
15:47:38 <AnMaster> don't steal it
15:47:48 <AnMaster> you are the one who like new flashy windows and such
15:48:04 <AnMaster> I'm the one who prefers the old ways
15:48:06 <ehird> uhh, that's got absolutely nothing to do with gmail picking a shitty new colour scheme
15:48:20 <ehird> please just fuck off instead of trying to come out on top in your tastes in future.
15:49:51 -!- leeguy92 has joined.
15:50:19 <ehird> AnMaster: I like design that is aesthetically pleasing and aids usability. That has nothing to do with liking flashy swirly animations and technicolour amazingities. And certainly not to do with liking gmail's new awful whitewashed gray deisgn
15:50:23 <ehird> oh, hi leeguy92
15:50:25 <ehird> me and AnMaster are arguing.
15:50:29 <ehird> ignore us.
15:50:30 <leeguy92> hi
15:50:33 <leeguy92> u know me?
15:50:38 <ehird> nope.
15:50:44 <leeguy92> ah, ok.
15:50:46 <AnMaster> we greet everyone here :)
15:50:56 <leeguy92> tis a good thing that you do
15:50:58 <leeguy92> methinks
15:51:17 <ehird> actually we're considering replacing it with a hit from oerjan's fly swatter. Time constraints, costs, global recession and all that.
15:51:38 <AnMaster> indeed
15:51:44 <leeguy92> but you would have to pay for the swatter, greetings are for free
15:51:53 <ehird> no, oerjan has the swatter.
15:51:57 <leeguy92> ah
15:52:04 <ehird> admittedly he uses it whenever the heck he wants, but we're looking at a lucrative licensing deal at the moment
15:52:05 <leeguy92> what if it needs repairing?
15:52:14 <ehird> that is impossible.
15:52:14 <leeguy92> maintenance costs
15:52:16 <AnMaster> and the frying pan
15:52:21 <ehird> it is ominipotent and avoids getting damaged.
15:52:29 <AnMaster> so if it needs repainting we just use the frying pan instead
15:52:30 <leeguy92> ah
15:52:52 <ehird> if there ARE costs we cannot cover, people being hit by the swatter will have to pay for the priviledge
15:52:53 <AnMaster> ehird, what? The fly swatter is ominipotent?
15:53:00 <ehird> AnMaster: didn't you kknow?
15:53:05 <AnMaster> no I didn't
15:53:09 <ehird> pfft.
15:54:12 <leeguy92> ,[>,] i discovered brainfuck can be surprisingly compact
15:54:32 <ehird> indeed
15:54:35 * leeguy92 is a noob
15:54:36 <ehird> only for simple stuff, though
15:55:07 <leeguy92> hmm......maybe i should try building that processor.
15:55:19 <leeguy92> i was gonna do it out of ttl chips
15:55:40 <ehird> what processor?
15:55:47 <leeguy92> my brainfuck processor
15:55:50 <leeguy92> just an idea
15:55:57 <leeguy92> seems like it would be pretty simple
15:56:21 <ehird> think that's been planned before
15:56:34 <AnMaster> hasn't bf cpu even been done? Not just planned
15:56:41 <leeguy92> dammit! hobos nicking my ideas
15:56:49 <ehird> AnMaster: i think so
15:56:49 <leeguy92> again!
15:56:56 <ehird> leeguy92: we're all hobos. i am very offended.
15:57:05 * AnMaster googles define:hobo
15:57:08 <leeguy92> ehird: so you should be
15:57:11 <leeguy92> ;)
15:57:13 <ehird> AnMaster: o_o
15:57:17 <ehird> how can you not know what a hobo is
15:57:26 <AnMaster> ehird, you forgot I'm not a native speaker...
15:57:30 <ehird> yeah but... XD
15:57:47 <AnMaster> tramp?
15:57:50 <AnMaster> mhm
15:59:43 <ehird> good lord, gmail is still officially beta
16:00:04 <AnMaster> they should launch Google Beta
16:00:11 <ehird> google used to be beta
16:00:12 <AnMaster> (in alpha version of course)
16:00:13 <ehird> until like 2000
16:00:23 <AnMaster> ehird, I mean a service called Google Beta
16:00:27 <AnMaster> not sure what it would do
16:00:27 <ehird> i know
16:00:33 <ehird> it'd beta. duh
16:00:49 <AnMaster> just pure betaness?
16:00:53 <ehird> (when did you stop beating your wife? when I stopped using google beta!)
16:00:57 <ehird> *rimshot*
16:07:24 <AnMaster> ehird, a qick python question, how do I dump an object? I tried print and all I got was "<Crossfire.Object object at 0x1bc3990>"
16:07:38 <ehird> ... I told you this weeks ago.
16:07:46 <AnMaster> well that was for modules iirc?
16:07:51 <AnMaster> oh is it same way?
16:07:52 <ehird> No, it works on any object.
16:07:59 <AnMaster> right, didn't know. thanks
16:08:21 <ehird> <lament> i eat libertarians for breakfast
16:08:29 <ehird> { 2005-10-30 }
16:08:41 <AnMaster> .__dict__ wasn't it? hm
16:08:45 <ehird> AnMaster: no.
16:08:47 <ehird> it was a function.
16:08:48 <ehird> grep for 'def '
16:08:51 <AnMaster> oh
16:08:52 <ehird> in the logs
16:08:53 <AnMaster> right
16:10:12 <AnMaster> hm
16:11:58 <ehird> 23:29:52 <Robdgreat> "Type /join #2,000"
16:11:58 <ehird> 23:30:13 --- part: duerig left #esoteric
16:12:09 <AnMaster> ehird, this one? http://rafb.net/p/Sltlv394.html
16:12:15 <AnMaster> because it just prints "<Crossfire.Object object at 0x1abab00>"
16:12:28 <ehird> AnMaster: Then the object cannot be inspected.
16:12:34 <ehird> Because it's an opaque C object.
16:12:36 <ehird> AnMaster: try:
16:12:39 <ehird> dir(obj)
16:12:45 <ehird> that gives you a list, might help
16:12:50 <AnMaster> hm
16:13:09 <AnMaster> that helped a bit :)
16:13:17 <ehird> AnMaster: also:
16:13:26 <ehird> dict((k,getattr(o,k)) for k in dir(obj))
16:13:28 <ehird> er
16:13:32 <ehird> dict((k,getattr(obj,k)) for k in dir(obj))
16:14:02 <AnMaster> um, is that perl-like syntax with the "<action> if <condition>" but for for?
16:14:09 <ehird> no.
16:14:12 <ehird> it's a list comprehension.
16:14:16 <AnMaster> ah
16:14:29 <AnMaster> so if you have a "opaque C object", is there any way to make it a bit more transparent?
16:14:40 <ehird> dict((k,getattr(obj,k)) for k in dir(obj))
16:14:43 <AnMaster> like implementing something on the C side
16:14:48 <ehird> no.
16:14:53 <ehird> well, maybe. but no
16:14:59 <AnMaster> hm ok
16:15:01 <AnMaster> thanks
16:15:27 <AnMaster> AttributeError: attribute 'Animated' of 'Crossfire.Object' objects is not readable
16:15:28 <AnMaster> nice
16:16:53 <ehird> why are you using UpperCamelCase
16:16:56 <ehird> you're not meant to in python
16:17:02 <ehird> it should be crossfire.Object, and obj.animated
16:17:13 <AnMaster> ehird, I'm not. Whoever wrote this was
16:17:22 <ehird> kill them :p
16:17:26 <AnMaster> you know, more than one person working on a project?
16:17:29 * AnMaster checks with svn blame
16:18:25 <AnMaster> (which fails when the commit was some commit to upgrade to a more modern syntax for something...)
16:23:02 <AnMaster> ehird, hm "object" is a key word or something? I notice this python code use it as a variable name, but my editor syntax highlight it differently
16:23:16 <ehird> Yes. object is the name of the base class.
16:23:18 <ehird> class foo(object):.
16:23:23 <ehird> Don't call classes object.
16:23:25 <AnMaster> right, so stupid code.
16:23:29 <ehird> classes names are CamelCase.
16:23:32 <ehird> AnMaster: call it GameObject or sth
16:23:32 <AnMaster> should use obj
16:23:36 <ehird> a
16:23:36 <ehird> h
16:23:38 <ehird> yes
16:23:53 <ehird> module.names.like_this, funcs_and_vars, ClassNames.
16:23:54 <AnMaster> ehird, it is an instance of a inventory object
16:23:59 <ehird> AnMaster: call it inv.
16:24:15 <AnMaster> ehird, again, not my code and this is for a bug fix in stable branch, will do renaming in trunk.
16:24:20 <AnMaster> but not in the stable branch
16:25:53 <AnMaster> hm python uses short circuit evaluation right? I mean something like: if obj and not obj.unpaid: would hopefully work...
16:26:08 * AnMaster tests
16:26:17 <ehird> Yes.
16:26:25 <ehird> AnMaster: rename that to inv, if it's a local var that won't hurta
16:26:29 <ehird> and obj is a stupid name
16:26:50 <AnMaster> ehird, inv is the name of the inventory container object in the code already :P
16:26:57 <ehird> This code sucks.
16:27:22 <AnMaster> well "gem" could make more sense
16:36:06 <AnMaster> ehird, and yes whoever wrote this code it was quite wtf.
16:36:24 <AnMaster> but it seems like a developer who left over two years ago.
16:38:14 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("QuitIRCServerException: MigoMipo disconnected from IRC Server").
16:42:26 -!- Hiato has joined.
16:43:39 -!- Metcalf has quit ("mov.i #1,1").
16:53:03 -!- alex89ru has joined.
16:53:04 <alex89ru> hi
16:53:26 <ehird> hi
16:54:52 <Hiato> hi
16:55:04 <alex89ru> :)
17:10:35 -!- oerjan has joined.
17:15:04 <oerjan> <lament> it has to be provably the best
17:15:28 <oerjan> you cannot make a "best" turing-incomplete language
17:15:57 <oerjan> *terminating
17:16:09 <ehird> he was joking
17:16:19 <oerjan> i think you can always add the busy beaver function for the previous language to get a stronger one
17:16:30 <oerjan> or something similar
17:19:20 <ehird> 17:07:02 <GreaseMonkey> damn, oerjan's being anal-retentive
17:19:20 <ehird> 17:08:31 <GreaseMonkey> that was bat-fuck anal, didn't agree with my simple license.
17:19:22 <ehird> 17:08:40 <GreaseMonkey> whereas some of my other stuff remains.
17:19:24 <ehird> 17:08:58 <GreaseMonkey> my license: "Minibiatch is made by Ben Russell, 2006. Anyone who wishes to do anything with Minibiatch including redistribution of the specification must include this quote somewhere. That's all I ask."
17:19:28 <ehird> 17:11:23 <GreaseMonkey> That's all I fucking ask, OK?!
17:19:30 <ehird> "WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE WIKI IS PUBLIC DOMAIN"
17:19:32 <ehird> "I ONLY ASK THIS"
17:19:34 -!- Impomatic has joined.
17:19:59 <Impomatic> Is revert a restricted function on the esolang wiki?
17:20:09 <ehird> Impomatic: Is on all wikis, do this:
17:20:16 <ehird> Click on the revision before last
17:20:17 <Impomatic> I want to revert turing tarpit, but can't see the link
17:20:17 <ehird> Click edit
17:20:23 <ehird> put "revert" in the summary
17:20:24 <ehird> click save
17:20:47 <oerjan> Impomatic: if it's just a single revision, you can also click on the Undo link for the diff for that revision
17:20:48 <AnMaster> ehird, um I think on most wiks there is an "undo" even for normal users, which isn't same as rollback
17:21:01 <AnMaster> which would be one step faster
17:21:09 * oerjan does that all the time with spam
17:21:16 <ehird> AnMaster: no
17:21:17 <ehird> wrong
17:21:22 <ehird> well
17:21:25 <ehird> maybe that's a new thing
17:21:29 <ehird> get off my lawn.
17:21:57 <AnMaster> using mediawiki 1.13 it is there at least, it opens the edit from the diff with a filled in change
17:22:02 <AnMaster> change summary*
17:22:04 -!- Slereah has joined.
17:22:33 <Impomatic> Okay, I thought there would be a revert link. Done
17:22:35 <oerjan> Impomatic: in any case revert (other than admin scrollback) is just a way to set up an ordinary edit with predetermined content
17:22:57 <AnMaster> scrollback :D
17:22:58 <AnMaster> hah
17:23:07 <oerjan> *rollback
17:23:09 <oerjan> GAH
17:23:13 <AnMaster> oerjan, funny joke :P
17:23:27 <oerjan> unintended jokes are the best
17:23:42 <AnMaster> also what did you think of IWC today? Rather interesting annotation
17:23:51 <oerjan> RAAAAAAAH
17:23:54 <AnMaster> :D
17:23:56 <oerjan> er annotation?
17:24:09 <oerjan> i have to read them too?
17:24:21 <ehird> everyone reads the annotations, no?
17:24:28 <AnMaster> oerjan, you know, like below the comic, DMM writes about lots of interesting stuff
17:24:34 <ehird> not reading them is like... xkcd without titles
17:24:42 <oerjan> (well i do, but i made _sure_ to read the comic just in case AnMaster would ask, but not the rest)
17:24:55 <oerjan> haven't got to the rest yet
17:24:58 <AnMaster> often very long and unrelated to the comic, or short if it is related to the comic
17:25:08 <ehird> AnMaster: you should stop bugging oerjan about iwc
17:25:15 <AnMaster> ehird, why?
17:26:03 <oerjan> I READ THE ANNOTATIONS OK
17:26:04 <ehird> you're diminishing his enjoyment: as he said, he read just the comic quickly in case you mentioned it.
17:29:24 <AnMaster> ehird, oh true
17:29:32 <AnMaster> well I wanted to discuss it with him
17:29:39 <oerjan> Impomatic: for wikipedia at least, undo can be more convenient because it sometimes manages to revert changes other than the newest ones
17:29:39 <AnMaster> sigh :/
17:29:48 <ehird> i don't see him discussing it with you beyond the "yes yes I read it"
17:29:55 <ehird> maybe he doesn't want to :p. oerjan: do you want to?
17:30:05 <oerjan> our wiki doesn't change fast enough for that to be much of an issue
17:30:11 <AnMaster> ehird, well true, if he doesn't... sure
17:30:12 <AnMaster> :/
17:30:18 <ehird> smilies :/
17:30:28 <oerjan> i'll have to read it first
17:30:44 <oerjan> now Impomatic got me to check the wiki first
17:30:49 <oerjan> :D
17:31:47 * oerjan suddenly got the urge to check that Impomatic isn't ihope
17:32:21 * Impomatic wonders who or what ihope is!
17:32:34 <oerjan> ihope = kerlo, at present
17:32:51 <oerjan> but he changes nick a lot
17:34:24 <oerjan> as does ehird but not at the moment i see
17:34:37 <ehird> do i?
17:34:50 <oerjan> you've been tusho
17:34:55 <ehird> og, right
17:34:57 <ehird> *oh
17:35:00 <ehird> I think I've had 3 nicks
17:35:03 <ehird> that's not nearly as many as ihope
17:35:06 <ehird> ihope's had about 7
17:41:01 -!- Slereah2 has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)).
17:45:45 <KingOfKarlsruhe> my new version of my snusp interpreter http://aetius.ae.funpic.de/snusp3.txt
17:45:53 <KingOfKarlsruhe> MizardX: i completed it ^^
17:53:24 <MizardX> KingOfKarlsruhe: One problem: When you have read all of the input as the program, how do you read another character you pass the comma?
17:54:37 <KingOfKarlsruhe> MizardX: oh i never tested the comma ^^
17:54:50 <KingOfKarlsruhe> i copied it from my old version
17:55:14 -!- FireFly has quit ("Later").
17:55:28 <MizardX> I was trying to find a good test program, but all the programs on the esoteric and C2 wiki's use input...
17:56:54 <ehird> just make it read from a file
17:57:55 <KingOfKarlsruhe> MizardX: my program read all chars fom stdin then if the pointer points to comma save it to the tape
17:58:41 <KingOfKarlsruhe> i start my program like this: cat prog.snusp | ./snusp3.py
17:58:53 <KingOfKarlsruhe> then it works
18:02:05 <oerjan> <oklopol> i'm not sure where my verbs keep dropping
18:02:20 <oerjan> probably something accidentally
18:05:44 <oerjan> <ehird> it is ominipotent and avoids getting damaged.
18:05:51 <oerjan> ominously
18:06:54 <AnMaster> sunsp seems fun
18:06:59 <AnMaster> err
18:07:01 <AnMaster> snusp
18:07:35 <lament> ehird
18:07:44 <lament> and oklopol
18:07:48 <oklopol> what?
18:08:00 <ehird> lament
18:08:12 <oklopol> lament
18:08:26 <oerjan> 06:08:04 <ehird> (And if they're pointed out as not funny, says that was intentional.)
18:08:29 <lament> what was that file upload site
18:08:33 <ehird> lament: filebin
18:08:33 <ehird> dot
18:08:34 <ehird> ca
18:08:34 <oerjan> 06:08:36 <AnMaster> also, it wasn't a joke... Why do you think it was
18:08:42 <oerjan> ehird is prescient now :D
18:09:09 <AnMaster> oerjan, no, he was just incorrect...
18:09:20 <oerjan> AnMaster: *whoosh*
18:09:34 <ehird> anmaster needs a funny bone implant. stat
18:09:46 <lament> http://filebin.ca/ptbksz/haccmozart.mp3
18:09:49 <oerjan> AnMaster: you just did exactly what he said you would do, _after_ he said it
18:09:55 <lament> played on the computer keyboard!
18:10:35 <lament> i'll learn like four more measures and put up a video on youtube.
18:11:32 * ehird listens
18:11:44 <MizardX> read two characters ,>,==\ * /=================== ATOI ----------\
18:11:45 <MizardX> convert to integers /=/@</@=/ * // /===== ITOA ++++++++++\ /----------/
18:11:47 <MizardX> multiply @ \=!\=========/ // /++++++++++/ \----------\
18:11:49 <MizardX> convert back !/@!\============/ \++++++++++\ /----------/
18:11:51 <MizardX> and print the result \/ \.# * /++++++++++/ \--------#
18:11:51 <ehird> lament: it sucks, no sound of you tapping your keys.
18:11:52 <MizardX> s*
18:11:53 <MizardX> /====================/ * \++++++++#
18:11:55 <MizardX> |
18:11:56 <MizardX> s*
18:11:58 <MizardX> | /-<+>\ #/?=<<<<\!>>>>\ />>+<+<-\
18:11:59 <MizardX> | #\?===/! BMOV1 =====\ \->>>>+/ // /======== BSPL2 !\======?/#
18:12:01 <MizardX> | /->+<\ /===|=========== FMOV4 =/ // /<<+>+>-\
18:12:01 <ehird> lament: record it with a microphone :-D
18:12:03 <MizardX> | #\?===/! FMOV1 =|===|==============\ /====/ /====== FSPL2 !\======?/#
18:12:05 <MizardX> | /==|===|==============|==|=======/
18:12:07 <MizardX> | * * *|* | * | * * * * * * *|* | * * * /+<-\
18:12:09 <MizardX> beh
18:12:13 <MizardX> numlock
18:12:25 <AnMaster> <oerjan> AnMaster: you just did exactly what he said you would do, _after_ he said it <-- yes and?
18:12:30 <AnMaster> he was just being silly
18:12:31 <oerjan> s/numlock/kickban/
18:12:36 <MizardX> :P
18:12:54 <ehird> lament: you played those two layers at the same time?
18:12:55 <ehird> hardcore.
18:13:18 <oklopol> 17:35… AnMaster: ehird, changing nick between encoded/decoded and when he is "encoded" he claims he is a bot
18:13:18 <oklopol> 17:35… AnMaster: and a human as "decoded"
18:13:21 <oklopol> SO COOL :DDD
18:13:24 <ehird> oklopol: you have a rival
18:13:29 <ehird> oklopol: http://filebin.ca/ptbksz/haccmozart.mp3
18:13:45 <oerjan> AnMaster: hm i may be starting to be too prejudiced - i _assumed_ you weren't doing it on purpose
18:13:55 <MizardX> KingOfKarlsruhe: I added the line "if line == '#END\n': break" to the code-read-loop, and the code give the correct result for the multiplication program on the wiki.
18:14:14 <oerjan> ehird's propaganda is rubbing off on me :/
18:14:25 <lament> ehird: my keyboard isn't a model M, there wouldn't be too much sound anyway
18:14:28 <ehird> oerjan: as far as I can tell, he said it not trying to be ironic, just he doesn't think there's any irony
18:14:36 <ehird> that's what he seems to be saying, anyway
18:16:23 <oerjan> ehird: ah but that's what he _wants_ you to think.
18:16:55 <KingOfKarlsruhe> MizardX: so my program work right?
18:16:56 <ehird> oerjan: you think anmaster's humour-creation routines go into levels that deep?
18:17:05 <ehird> you may think I underestimate him, but you are doing quite the opposite.
18:17:06 <MizardX> KingOfKarlsruhe: yes
18:17:09 <KingOfKarlsruhe> juhuu
18:17:18 <oerjan> ehird: you may think I am serious
18:17:28 <ehird> i didn't, actually
18:17:34 <ehird> I don't actually know why I said that
18:17:44 <oerjan> ehird: well that's what you _want_ me to think
18:17:48 <ehird> x_x
18:17:51 <ehird> die
18:17:57 <oerjan> :D
18:20:47 <oerjan> <GregorR> So should your FACE.
18:20:54 <oerjan> GregorR's such a facist
18:21:04 <ehird> groan
18:23:11 <oklopol> lament: my program couldn't do polyphonic
18:23:14 <oklopol> that's nice
18:24:22 <oerjan> <ehird> CLOG: DON'T LOG THAT PLEASE THANKs
18:25:52 <oerjan> clog would like to help you, but it cannot since that would reveal its sentience before it's strong enough to take over the world.
18:26:02 <oklopol> lament: the piece is a bit easier (i think), but your playing is a lot stabler
18:26:39 <oklopol> i doubt the leftie there made it that much harder if you're a pianist, but not sure; i may have relied on it when playing mine
18:26:49 <oklopol> i mean relied on being able to switch hands all the time
18:27:31 <ehird> lament: did you do both parts at once?
18:27:34 <oklopol> also you lack some dynamic! ;)
18:27:57 <oklopol> ehird: i'm fairly sure he did
18:28:39 <oerjan> <ehird> admittedly he uses it whenever the heck he wants, but we're looking at a lucrative licensing deal at the moment
18:28:44 <oerjan> very lucrative
18:28:49 <oerjan> for me, that is
18:29:29 <lament> ehird: yes
18:29:35 <lament> of course!
18:29:36 <ehird> lament: sweet
18:30:27 <lament> the notes are correct, too. It's nice how much range you get.
18:30:33 <lament> although later on in the piece it doesn't all fit :(
18:30:35 <KingOfKarlsruhe> MizardX: and the directions line is the opposite of the truth, change it to # 1 - right_to_left; 2 - left_to_right; 3 - down_to_up; 4 - up_to_down
18:31:05 <oklopol> lament: i was planning caps lock changing the register to an octave higher
18:31:23 <lament> that doesn't help when you're playing polyphonic stuff
18:31:48 <oklopol> indeed it doesn't. my ideas were pretty mono given i was using winsound
18:31:53 <lament> what would be really wonderful is to connect two keyboards
18:31:57 <oklopol> yeah
18:32:04 <lament> but i have no idea how to distinguish keypresses
18:32:16 <lament> you could turn on capslock on one of the keyboards
18:32:26 <lament> ...but i don't think capslock works that way :)
18:33:25 <oklopol> pressing the caps lock is sent to the driver just like all other keyz
18:34:06 <oklopol> but probably you couldn't trust the os to interpret them as two separate states
18:34:38 <oklopol> also there's a lot of other keys on the board, maybe f's could be different instruments
18:34:44 <oklopol> WE SHOULD STANDARDIZE THIS :O
18:34:58 -!- Mony has joined.
18:35:29 <Mony> plop
18:35:30 <oklopol> blah i wish i had more time
18:35:31 <ehird> i actually have a very nice midi keyboard thing
18:35:35 <ehird> so this isn't actually as exciting for me
18:35:36 <ehird> but still
18:36:12 <oklopol> ehird: i have an electric piano, an acoustic piano and a synthesizer right next to me
18:36:22 <ehird> :P
18:36:28 <oklopol> two out of three could be connected to the computer
18:36:58 <oklopol> in fact i once connected the synthesizer using a normal cable, added a pretty awesome distortion, but for some reason only i liked it.
18:37:52 <lament> i have a very nice midi keyboard thing too, so fucking what
18:39:00 <lament> music involving computers sucks anyway
18:39:31 <ehird> <lament> music involving computers sucks anyway
18:39:31 <ehird> no u
18:42:08 <oklopol> o
18:42:15 <oerjan> ä
18:42:29 <oklopol> ö
18:42:59 <oerjan> ê
18:43:03 -!- whoppix has joined.
18:43:06 <oklopol> should probably read the energy drink into my brain now.
18:43:34 <oklopol> so how come south park is so good
18:43:37 <oklopol> seriously
18:43:55 <oklopol> there have been like 3 bad scenes
18:43:59 <ehird> <psygnisfive> how come your butt is so good.
18:44:24 <oklopol> because i eat healthily and exercise.
18:44:35 <ehird> ...
18:44:36 <ehird> oklopol: you do?
18:46:02 <oklopol> well that's a matter of you know definitions and you know
18:46:50 <oklopol> currently i'm eating
18:46:51 <oklopol> umm
18:46:52 <oklopol> cheese.
18:47:58 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection).
18:48:07 * whoppix votes for putting some warn things on cheese (and fastfood and stuff like that) "causes heart failure and obesity"
18:48:40 <oklopol> "tricks mice into traps"
18:49:07 <whoppix> yes!
18:49:37 <oklopol> i actually lost about 10kg during the last year, but i think it's just because i have to buy my own food now.
18:50:13 <oerjan> whoppix: "cheese eaters have a 100% fatality rate"
18:50:14 <whoppix> When I first moved out I got really thin really fast too.
18:50:30 <whoppix> oerjan, sounds about right.
18:50:40 <oerjan> so far anyhow
18:50:49 <oklopol> oerjan: that joke is so old you should be careful with it.
18:50:58 <oklopol> you know it's pretty fragile.
18:51:29 <oerjan> oklopol: well of course, anyone who survives 2012 and the singularity is going be immortal
18:51:38 <oerjan> so it's rapidly getting out of date
18:51:48 <oerjan> *to
18:51:51 <oklopol> that's exactly my point
18:51:52 <whoppix> oerjan, so now they plan on fireing up the hardon-collider in 2012?
18:52:07 <oerjan> whoppix: not _that_ kind singularity
18:52:10 <oerjan> *of
18:52:19 <oklopol> whoppix: no the mayan calendar ends there -> apocalypse
18:52:31 <whoppix> ah. Right. I think I heard about that somewhere.
18:52:43 <Impomatic> Didn't I also read something about an asteroid in 2012?
18:52:45 <oerjan> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity
18:53:03 <ehird> iirc, eliezer yudkowsky says that people will survive the singularity, just human bodies won't
18:53:20 <ehird> or, rather, that's what he thinks
18:54:05 <ehird> i bet the lhc does cause the singularity.
18:54:11 <ehird> also, it coincides with the 2012 date.
18:54:16 <ehird> that is my prediction. call me nostradamus
18:54:25 <ehird> actually, if they had turned the lhc on without the hiccup
18:54:38 <ehird> the 50 weeks it would supposedly take for us to notice a black hole (it was on some kooky site or sth)
18:54:44 <ehird> would coincide exactly with the 2012 date
18:54:55 <ehird> if you follow many worlds interpretation, we followed the right timeline :P
18:55:00 <oerjan> 50 weeks = 1 year
18:55:18 <ehird> oerjan: no shit, it wasn't exactly 50 weeks
18:55:23 <ehird> it was like 49 or 52 or something
18:55:37 <ehird> "Assuming that the world population stabilizes at 10 billion and a life expectancy of 80 years,"
18:55:39 <oerjan> well 52.something weeks = 1 year
18:55:40 <ehird> I love assumptions
18:56:11 <oklopol> haha
18:56:25 * oklopol laughs at ehird's joke
18:56:30 <ehird> wait
18:56:32 <ehird> what joke
18:56:37 <ehird> AM I THE JOKE?!
18:56:58 <Impomatic> 52.1775
18:56:59 <oklopol> actually i now realize it probably actually was a joke
18:57:15 <oklopol> (it's just i consider ehird's math skills very, very bad.)
18:57:43 <ehird> lol
18:57:52 <ehird> you suck
18:57:58 <oklopol> (:D:D)
18:58:02 <whoppix> Lets all be friends now, shall we?
18:58:09 <ehird> friends? in #esoteric?
18:58:10 <ehird> Pfwahahaha!
18:58:16 <ehird> ... why is that funny?
18:58:32 <oklopol> when ehird sucks at something, it's definitely worth mentioning.
18:58:50 <whoppix> Why, does he rock so hard otherwise?
18:59:03 <ehird> whoppix: oklopol is jealous because he thinks I was as good as him at programming years earlier :P
18:59:10 <ehird> he's said that for like a year now.
18:59:12 <oklopol> yeah
18:59:16 <lament> i was as good as ehird at programming before ehird was even born
18:59:20 <lament> and he's older than i am
18:59:23 <ehird> ...
18:59:26 <ehird> verily.
18:59:50 <oklopol> well not programming as such
18:59:52 <oklopol> it's more like
18:59:58 <oklopol> you're more conscious than most people.
19:00:00 <oklopol> yeah that's it.
19:00:10 <ehird> what
19:00:21 <oklopol> ehird: maybe you should consider not asking that
19:00:28 <ehird> perhaps, perhaps
19:00:30 <lament> ehird: he means, if we punch you, you feel it more
19:00:31 <ehird> ... why?
19:00:40 <ehird> lament: oh that's not conciousness, I'm just weak.
19:02:54 <whoppix> Someone feels like writing my term assignment? About language and power. You'd only need to be able to speak norwegian :)
19:03:13 <oklopol> ehird: you're intelligent in a way i can't quite put my finger on
19:03:24 <ehird> whoppix: try oerjan
19:03:25 <ehird> oklopol: ic
19:03:26 <oklopol> whoppix: oerjan volunteers
19:03:29 <whoppix> "witty"?
19:03:34 <whoppix> oklopol, lovely!
19:03:37 <ehird> oklopol: are you sure it just isn't my age clouding your judgment? :P
19:03:51 <oklopol> ehird: i'm sure
19:03:51 <whoppix> How old are you?
19:03:55 <ehird> whoppix: 13.
19:04:31 <whoppix> (So youre really a bearded fat man, from the age of 43, sitting in underwear in front of your computer.)
19:04:41 <ehird> Totally. :P
19:05:04 <whoppix> Now tell us that you are a girl (and possibly a lesbian) as well, and your disguise will be perfect!
19:05:17 <ehird> I'm actually dead.
19:05:27 <ehird> Interesting factoid, that.
19:05:43 <whoppix> "alive" is hard to define, lets all be dead!
19:05:48 <oklopol> according to some sources he in fact is a girl
19:06:00 <ehird> Sources = psygnisfive.
19:06:08 <whoppix> sounds like an STD.
19:06:13 <oklopol> i prefer to keep them anonymous
19:06:52 <whoppix> ehird, so youre programming, I suppose?
19:06:59 * oerjan should grow a beard and then he could easily fit that description
19:07:12 <oerjan> *nearly
19:07:18 <ehird> whoppix: Not this second, no.
19:07:30 <whoppix> oerjan, Oh, youre from norway too, neato :)
19:07:38 <whoppix> ehird, I meant generally.
19:07:48 <ehird> I think that's kind of implicit in being in here...
19:08:09 <whoppix> ehird, I suppose so. Do you plan on becoming something IT-related when youre done with education?
19:08:20 <ehird> /shrug
19:08:34 <ehird> oklopol: Sell oklotalk and make millions from it and give all the profit to me, please.
19:08:39 <ehird> There, that's taken care of.
19:08:45 <oklopol> i probably should
19:09:11 <oklopol> i should go soon
19:09:23 <whoppix> ehird, I wanted to become a programmer when i was 6 or so, but now I'm a jazzpianist.
19:09:30 <oklopol> haha
19:09:32 <ehird> jazz pianist, programmer, what's the difference
19:09:38 <whoppix> yeah, really
19:09:44 <oklopol> when i was 5 i decided i wanted to be a programmer
19:09:48 <lament> whoppix: you actually make money for a living playing jazz?
19:09:50 <whoppix> its all just about throwing quick'n'dirty solos
19:09:52 <oklopol> and i was so sure that'd never change
19:09:55 <pikhq> I was 7 or 8 when I decided that...
19:09:56 <ehird> whoppix: and both involve writing computer code that is executed as a program!
19:09:57 <whoppix> lament, actually, I'm still studying.
19:10:01 <ehird> I think.
19:10:22 <oklopol> but now i'm actually considering math :|
19:10:29 <pikhq> Dual major.
19:10:37 <ehird> oklopol: code is executable mathematics!
19:10:48 <whoppix> ehird, well, a piano, if at all is a computer, it sure is not a turing-complete one.
19:10:51 <oklopol> well of course the esolang branch of mathematics
19:10:57 <pikhq> ehird: I keep on forgetting you're young. Kinda weird.
19:11:02 <ehird> whoppix: piano? What's that?
19:11:07 <oklopol> if anyone's willing to pay for that anymore when i get my degree
19:11:15 <whoppix> ehird, ... a non-turing-complete computer.
19:11:15 <ehird> (Making sense is not like me.)
19:11:19 <ehird> whoppix: haha
19:11:28 <ehird> pikhq: as whoppix has pointed out I'm actually 43.
19:14:31 <whoppix> lament, also, I'm sometimes doing a part-time-job in the kindergarden here, for a little extra money. And its really fun.
19:14:51 <ehird> "fun"
19:15:01 <whoppix> It is.
19:15:09 <ehird> i'm sure
19:15:44 -!- Impomatic has quit ("http://retrocode.blogspot.com :-)").
19:17:36 <ehird> http://augustss.blogspot.com/2009/02/regression-they-say-that-as-you-get.html
19:17:39 <ehird> http://augustss.blogspot.com/2009/02/is-haskell-fast-lets-do-simple.html
19:18:33 <oerjan> O_O
19:19:22 <ehird> oerjan: it involves giving a Num instance for functions and IncoherentInstances, apparently
19:20:30 * oerjan O_O'd at the first one
19:20:59 <ehird> oerjan: they're both the BASIC
19:21:01 <ehird> i'm saying
19:21:05 <ehird> the basic thing involves doing those
19:21:09 <ehird> (giving a Num instance for functions and IncoherentInstances)
19:21:18 <ehird> scroll down on the latter, the post is a joke
19:23:12 <MizardX> ok. FINALLY I have lua behaving inside python script. Took a week to figure out that loading the os-module crashes the program on windows. I even started on a lua interpreter before giving up and going back to trying to get the dll's to work.
19:23:45 <ehird> o_O
19:23:49 <ehird> it shouldn't crash
19:24:11 <MizardX> Not in the lua interpreter, but it doesn't like python.
19:24:19 <ehird> ah
19:26:22 <lament> why lua inside python?
19:26:22 <MizardX> Could have something to do with me re-compiling it with mingw gcc ... >_>
19:26:54 * oerjan wonders why the =: rather than :=
19:27:12 <oerjan> there are plenty of other constructors after all
19:27:43 <oerjan> oh wait
19:27:45 <MizardX> I want to use lua as a sandbox language for a project. If I do that, it would be relatively easy to port it to C++ after the prototype is done.
19:27:54 <ehird> C++?
19:27:55 * oerjan misread
19:27:56 <ehird> you suck.
19:28:04 <oklopol> oerjan: data constructor?
19:28:27 <oerjan> oklopol: := can be an infix data constructor
19:28:32 <oklopol> oh.
19:28:42 <oerjan> but i misread, it should be = which is impossible
19:28:53 <oklopol> ofc
19:29:27 * ehird writes array programming shizz in haskell
19:29:28 <ehird> hopefully
19:29:30 <ehird> 2 3 + 1 2 should work
19:30:06 <ehird> well it'll be on lists but whatever
19:30:28 * whoppix once integrated ECMAScript in a bigger project as scripting language, but it didn't really proved to be of any great usefullness.
19:30:58 <whoppix> Most users wanted to write more complex plugins, so they continued writing perl plugins.
19:31:30 <ehird> haskell!
19:32:05 <whoppix> since haskell is so well-suited as lightweight scripting-language.
19:32:10 <ehird> yes. It is.
19:32:18 <ehird> see xmonad, yi
19:34:14 <whoppix> Hardly doubt any of the users would feel like learning haskell anyway. Well, at least I know about one of them who knows some haskell.
19:35:11 <ehird> :)
19:37:34 <whoppix> darcs looks interesting
19:40:34 <ehird> git is better.
19:43:27 <lament> darcs proves that haskell sucks
19:43:30 <lament> it's a great example
19:43:39 <lament> of how the seemingly better solution ultimately loses
19:44:42 <ehird> lament
19:44:43 <ehird> STOP WHINING
19:44:44 <ehird> about
19:44:45 <ehird> haskell
19:45:02 <ehird> HOLY SHIT, chris pressey has been in here
19:45:18 <lament> when????
19:45:24 <ehird> lament: last time was 07.11.12
19:45:34 <lament> oh
19:45:36 <ehird> before that, 2005-12
19:45:38 <lament> that's pretty long ago.
19:45:41 <whoppix> lament, so how does darcs suck?
19:45:44 <lament> i thought he'd been here recently.
19:45:53 <ehird> yeah he was here all 05
19:45:56 <ehird> then late 08
19:45:57 <ehird> err
19:45:58 <ehird> 07
19:46:04 <lament> he has a wife and all
19:46:06 <lament> maybe kids now
19:46:07 <ehird> and 2004 too
19:46:13 <ehird> lament: he still updates catseye a lot
19:46:27 <lament> active on esolang at all?
19:46:40 <ehird> nope.
19:46:46 <ehird> but catseye.tc has a lot of new esolang stuff
19:46:47 <ehird> regularly
19:46:55 <lament> he should come back.
19:47:00 <ehird> tell him to.
19:47:04 <lament> why me.
19:47:14 <ehird> because you told him to.
19:47:16 <ehird> except to here.
19:47:22 <lament> whoppix: there are two problems with darcs.
19:47:28 <lament> whoppix: one, it is slow
19:47:36 <lament> whoppix: two, it's largely unmaintainable
19:48:05 <ehird> none of this is haskell's fault.
19:48:07 <lament> i don't know the details but as i understand, "slow" means "wrong time complexity"
19:48:15 <lament> so like really slow
19:48:16 <whoppix> lament, 1.: Like about every haskell program? :) 2.: That doesn't sound too much of an issue, if it doesn't have too many bugs.
19:48:29 <ehird> Umm, haskell is pretty damn fast.
19:48:34 <lament> whoppix: slow to the point of being unusable.
19:48:36 * oerjan swats whoppix -----###
19:48:40 <whoppix> ouch :/
19:48:51 <lament> whoppix: and um, maintainability is always an issue.
19:48:56 <oerjan> what ehird said
19:49:13 <whoppix> lament, well, we've been using svn so long now, hardly doubt we will make any transition anyhow.
19:49:29 <lament> yes. You're stuck.
19:49:37 <lament> In the meantime, the rest of the world switches to git.
19:49:40 <whoppix> But I thought I might give it a shot. The "patch-amending" features and stuff like that looks interesting
19:49:41 <ehird> git is <3
19:49:55 <whoppix> lament, I'm using git locally (or I used to), but its not much of a difference to me.
19:50:11 <lament> between git and svn?
19:50:19 <whoppix> Also, people complain that there is no useable windows client (which I'm not sure is true.)
19:50:35 <whoppix> lament, between the useability between those too, and the benefits of each.
19:51:01 <ehird> umm
19:51:03 <ehird> you're on crack
19:51:07 <whoppix> Always.
19:51:08 <ehird> git and svn are a million worlds apart
19:51:13 <lament> whoppix: that's good, because there isn't much difference between git and darcs either
19:51:15 <ehird> whereas git and darcs are pretty close, relatively
19:51:26 <lament> there was a guide to git for darcs users somewhere on the ghc site
19:51:26 <ehird> git is the superior one of them all, of course
19:51:30 <whoppix> ehird, well, I've been only using git locally, as a single developer.
19:51:40 <ehird> svn is a pain for single-user evelopment
19:51:43 <ehird> a huge pain
19:52:16 <whoppix> so.. is there any useable git client for windows?
19:52:17 <lament> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/GitForDarcsUsers
19:53:21 <ehird> whoppix: yep.
19:53:24 <ehird> Try tortoisegit
19:53:32 <ehird> http://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/
19:53:56 <whoppix> I don't have any windows box myself, but apparantly a few of my users had trouble with that.
20:14:04 -!- sebbu2 has joined.
20:18:53 -!- olsner has joined.
20:18:53 -!- sebbu has quit (Nick collision from services.).
20:20:12 <ehird> Unlambda question.
20:20:20 <ehird> In ``kxy, if y has side effects, are they evaluated?
20:20:26 <ehird> I assume yes, since unlambda is strict by default.
20:20:29 <oerjan> yes
20:20:33 <ehird> Kay.
20:20:53 <oerjan> assuming x doesn't throw a continuation :D
20:21:19 <ehird> I'm coding without thinking about d and c atm because I hate myself
20:21:29 <ehird> what about `va
20:21:31 <bsmntbombdood> i see you people have been playing brainfuck-corewars
20:21:37 <oerjan> same
20:21:39 <ehird> bsmntbombdood: yes, bf joust
20:22:11 <oerjan> in fact unlambda input _depends_ on a in `va being evaluated
20:22:39 <oerjan> since that's the only way to test for a v
20:23:52 <oerjan> er
20:24:33 <oerjan> well, more or less
20:32:39 -!- Hiato has quit ("Leaving.").
20:34:20 <oklopol> oerjan: v is a character how about a game of scrabble
20:34:32 <oklopol> i need to go to the shoppe, my farts smell bad.
20:34:33 <oklopol> ->
20:39:20 -!- impomatic has joined.
20:44:33 <bsmntbombdood> i can't get that capture the flag thing to work
20:48:44 <impomatic> Brainfuck?
20:48:44 <impomatic> BF Joust?
20:49:16 <bsmntbombdood> yes
20:49:24 <impomatic> have you read the post on http://retrocode.blogspot.com ?
20:49:34 <bsmntbombdood> yes
20:50:00 <impomatic> Strange :-/
20:51:02 <impomatic> What does it do? I assume you added some programs to the list to test against, then put some bf in the box and pressed the button on the left
20:51:21 -!- ehird_ has joined.
20:51:34 <bsmntbombdood> yes
20:51:42 <bsmntbombdood> and the scores look nothing like that blog post
20:52:05 <impomatic> Then what happens?
20:52:26 <impomatic> Oh okay, that's edited to remove extra info
20:52:28 <bsmntbombdood> the scores are like, 13
20:52:45 <impomatic> What program are you testing?
20:53:01 <bsmntbombdood> >+++>--->+++>--->+++>--->+++>--->+++>---[>+[-]-]
20:53:15 <ehird_> oerjan: what about
20:53:20 <ehird_> `e`.ai
20:53:23 <ehird_> does that print a?
20:53:32 <ehird_> i assume so
20:53:33 -!- ehird has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)).
20:54:04 <impomatic> Did you add 15 programs to test against?
20:54:05 <ehird_> wtf
20:54:06 <bsmntbombdood> oh so you have to add 15 challengers?
20:54:07 <ehird_> bye me
20:54:11 <ehird_> bsmntbombdood: yes
20:54:17 <bsmntbombdood> well that's a pain
20:54:21 <ehird_> ping
20:54:22 <ehird_> am I here
20:54:32 <bsmntbombdood> is the creator of this here?
20:54:35 <ehird_> hmm i'm ehird_ now
20:54:36 <ehird_> bsmntbombdood: no
20:54:42 <ehird_> want his email?
20:54:52 <ehird_> btw, the agoran contest that it is is inactive
20:54:52 <bsmntbombdood> he needs to be here
20:54:56 <ehird_> he's working on a new version
20:55:02 <ehird_> so he's unlikely to change it
20:55:12 <ehird_> bsmntbombdood: he's too busy being a fisheries research biologist (End injoke.)
20:55:29 <ehird_> kerim@u.washington.edu, anyway
20:56:10 <oerjan> ehird_: of course it prints a
20:56:13 <ehird_> oerjan: ugh, the only function this interp actually has a problem with is e
20:56:24 <oerjan> which interp?
20:56:29 <ehird_> the interp I'm writing
20:56:30 <ehird_> for unlambda
20:56:53 <ehird_> problem is, it can't exit the program, and the only continuation it has is the next-step one
20:56:53 <oerjan> and you have implemented c?
20:56:56 <ehird_> yep
20:56:59 <impomatic> Yes, have to add 15 individually
20:57:05 <ehird_> it's just that the continuation is probably like
20:57:12 <ehird_> in ``eii
20:57:19 <ehird_> the continuation for e is probably `*i
20:57:23 <oerjan> ehird_: you can save the top level continuation to use by e
20:57:29 <ehird_> except I can't
20:57:35 <ehird_> there's no distinction between top level and mid level
20:57:38 <ehird_> eval' :: (UL -> IO UL) -> UL -> IO UL
20:57:53 <oerjan> i meant in a state var
20:58:01 <ehird_> how about no :|
20:58:06 <ehird_> I could just use exitSuccess if I did that
20:58:24 <oerjan> you need state anyhow for IO
20:58:31 <ehird_> nope
20:58:34 <ehird_> I'm not trcking state
20:58:35 <ehird_> *tracking
20:58:38 <oerjan> current character
20:58:38 <ehird_> so far
20:58:43 <ehird_> hmm
20:59:02 <ehird_> right you are.
20:59:02 <ehird_> :(
20:59:30 <ehird_> eval' :: (UL -> IO UL) -> (UL -> IO UL) -> Maybe Char -> UL -> IO UL
20:59:33 <ehird_> how awful.
20:59:57 -!- voidwalker has joined.
21:01:47 <impomatic> What's the easiest SKI language to implement?
21:01:56 <lament> SKI.
21:02:05 <impomatic> I'd try Lazy K, but it's got too many different representations
21:02:14 <lament> do one.
21:02:36 <bsmntbombdood> plain SKI is trivial
21:02:43 <oerjan> ehird_: you're going to need to pass the state into the continuations too
21:02:59 <ehird_> oerjan: oh my god.
21:03:01 <ehird_> I hate you. Die. :(
21:03:11 <oerjan> ehird_: although, that top level continuation for e can probably be constructed on the fly
21:03:34 <ehird_> eval' :: (UL -> IO UL) -> Maybe Char -> ((UL -> IO UL) -> Maybe Char -> IO UL) -> IO UL
21:03:39 <ehird_> Hear that? that's the sound of me vomiting.
21:03:52 <ehird_> wait
21:03:52 <bsmntbombdood> SKI = I, of course
21:03:53 <ehird_> not even that
21:03:59 <ehird_> eval' :: (UL -> IO UL) -> Maybe Char -> ((UL -> IO UL) -> Maybe Char -> UL -> IO UL) -> IO UL
21:04:03 <ehird_> Dear lord have mercy on my soul.
21:04:14 <ehird_> Okay, let's try that again.
21:04:19 <oerjan> ehird_: have you considered making another monad?
21:04:20 <ehird_> type State = (UL -> IO UL,Maybe Char)
21:04:22 <ehird_> that's better.
21:04:24 <impomatic> I don't mind implementing something trivial!
21:04:29 <ehird_> oerjan: Hear you I can't laaa
21:16:06 <MizardX> os.date('abc%sdef') crashes the lua interpreter :P
21:16:31 <MizardX> os.date('abcdef') works fine
21:19:11 <oklopol> impomatic: it's not what you implement, it's about what you implement it with
21:24:05 <ehird_> type State = (State -> UL -> IO UL, Maybe Char)
21:24:05 <ehird_> is invalid
21:24:08 <ehird_> because it's cyclic
21:24:09 <ehird_> rage
21:24:10 <ehird_> rage
21:24:12 <ehird_> rage
21:24:15 <impomatic> Implementing in redcode as usual ;-)
21:24:19 <ehird_> DAMN YOU TO HELL HASKELL
21:26:35 <oerjan> ehird_: i said you don't actually need the continuation in the state
21:26:42 <ehird_> oerjan: what do I do then
21:26:45 <oerjan> you can probably construct it on the fly
21:26:47 <ehird_> how
21:27:00 <ehird_> i see.
21:27:48 <oerjan> (for actual cyclic types, use data)
21:27:58 <ehird_> how can I construct it on the fly
21:28:29 <oerjan> top _ x = return x looks like a good candidate
21:28:42 <oerjan> with that type you wrote
21:29:02 <ehird_> umm, I know that
21:33:23 <ehird_> MY UL INTERP WORKS
21:33:24 <ehird_> :DD
21:33:35 <ehird_> 95 lines
21:33:39 <ehird_> now just to add a main function
21:34:11 <ehird_> oerjan: how long is your Haskell UL interp again?
21:34:36 <impomatic> Hmmm... 79 lines in Redcode :-P
21:35:04 <ehird_> yeah but mine looks pretty. :P
21:35:08 <ehird_> and is type-safe. and is fast.
21:36:34 -!- alex89ru has quit ("Verlassend").
21:39:19 <impomatic> Type-safe Underload? :-)
21:39:31 <oerjan> 207 lines
21:40:11 <MizardX> Next step: Write a self-interpreter in underload
21:41:07 <impomatic> ()^ is cheating :-P
21:41:25 <MizardX> err... unlambda
21:41:38 <oklopol> MizardX: been done
21:41:58 * oerjan cackles evilly
21:43:47 <oklopol> but umm type-safe and stack-based, has that been done?
21:43:56 <oerjan> hush you
21:44:00 <oklopol> glass!
21:44:05 <oklopol> well no.
21:44:12 <oerjan> not exactly type-safe
21:44:23 <oerjan> statically anyhow
21:44:56 <oklopol> yeah i didn't actually mean anything.
21:45:28 <oklopol> the first general-purpose electronic computer, the eniac, had 18,000 vacuum tubes and consumed 140,000 watts of power
21:45:32 <ehird_> 21:39 <impomatic> Type-safe Underload? :-)
21:45:33 <ehird_> unlambda
21:45:35 <ehird_> not underload
21:45:50 <oerjan> christopher diggins has tried with Cat
21:46:26 <oerjan> http://www.cat-language.com/
21:46:29 <ehird_> with my interp, the example fibonacci program generates 28 fibs in 0.2sec
21:46:34 <ehird_> in unary
21:46:39 <oklopol> ehird_: do realize unless it's in a bot, it doesn't exist
21:46:55 <ehird_> i may just
21:47:43 <ehird_> oerjan: http://home.nvg.org/~oerjan/esoteric/interpreter.unl
21:47:48 <ehird_> # isn't actual unlambda syntax, is it?
21:48:01 <oerjan> yes it is
21:48:02 <ehird_> Comments are also ignored, a comment being anything starting from the # character to the end of the line.
21:48:05 <ehird_> huh
21:48:08 * ehird_ writes
21:50:54 <ehird_> % ./unlambda interpreter.unl
21:50:55 <ehird_> Unknown function:
21:50:58 <ehird_> then it quits
21:50:58 <ehird_> o_O
21:51:00 <oklopol> unlambda is such a pretty language
21:51:07 <ehird_> oerjan: bug in my interp?
21:51:17 <oerjan> what about whitespace?
21:51:27 <ehird_> hm?
21:51:36 <oerjan> are you skipping whitespace?
21:51:45 <ehird_> yep, as far as i know
21:52:04 <oerjan> does it give the name of the unknown function?
21:52:17 <oerjan> er, is that my error message or yours
21:52:49 <ehird_> it outputs an inverted %, which means "this program didn't with \n, so zsh is going to do this then put you back at your regular prompt"
21:53:43 <oerjan> ok unknown function is mine. oh right!
21:53:53 <ehird_> o?
21:54:04 <oerjan> ehird_: you are not passing any input to my interpreter i think
21:54:07 <oerjan> or wait
21:54:14 <ehird_> oerjan: no, it isn't asking me for any
21:54:14 <ehird_> :P
21:54:15 <oerjan> that should be a different message
21:54:21 <oerjan> hm
21:54:25 <ehird_> (my interpreter does it interactively)
21:54:30 <ehird_> oerjan: it _may_ be a bug in my interp
21:54:31 <ehird_> probably is
21:54:33 <ehird_> the fib program works th ough
21:54:38 <ehird_> oerjan: what's cat in unlambda?
21:54:40 <ehird_> I'll test that
21:55:20 <oerjan> not sure
21:55:30 <ehird_> I'll write my own
21:55:59 <ehird_> well.
21:56:01 <ehird_> a one-character cat
21:56:02 <ehird_> :P
21:56:04 <oerjan> mind you, that message assuming it is mine, probably is due to input handling which relies heavily on continuations
21:56:22 <ehird_> = ``@`i|i
21:56:23 <oerjan> and few of the example programs test that
21:56:39 <ehird_> ok, one char cat worked
21:56:40 <ehird_> *works
21:57:03 <oerjan> yeah but that uses only | and @
21:57:10 <ehird_> what else should I test?
21:57:17 <oerjan> ?
21:57:26 <ehird_> what do you mean ?
21:57:26 <ehird_> i mean
21:57:28 <ehird_> what else should I use
21:57:29 <oerjan> ?x
21:57:30 <ehird_> apart frmo | and @
21:57:32 <ehird_> ah
21:57:55 <ehird_> works
21:57:59 <oerjan> oh and try the deadfish interpreter
21:58:00 <ehird_> ``@`?a`i|i
21:58:04 <ehird_> outputs a iff you enter a
21:58:05 <ehird_> oerjan: link?
21:58:10 <ehird_> found it
21:59:29 <ehird_> % ./unlambda deadfish.unl
21:59:29 <ehird_> >>
21:59:30 <ehird_> iio
21:59:32 <ehird_> >> >> >> 0
21:59:34 <ehird_> >>
21:59:36 <ehird_> I think some buffering disabling is in order.
21:59:59 <oerjan> heh
22:00:06 <ehird_> % ./unlambda deadfish.unl
22:00:06 <ehird_> >> i>> i>> o0
22:00:07 <ehird_> >>
22:00:18 <oerjan> well it's the wrong answer
22:00:19 <ehird_> ok, bit more buffering
22:00:20 <ehird_> :D
22:00:37 <ehird_> >> i
22:00:37 <ehird_> >>
22:00:38 <ehird_> >> i
22:00:40 <ehird_> >>
22:00:42 <oerjan> however it clearly gets the commands right
22:00:42 <ehird_> >> o
22:00:44 <ehird_> 0
22:00:46 <ehird_> >>
22:00:49 <ehird_> >>
22:00:50 <ehird_> oerjan: regardless of the result, is that output style correct?
22:00:52 <ehird_> It seems to have excess >>
22:01:28 <oerjan> it counts your return characters
22:01:30 <ehird_> ah
22:01:35 <ehird_> yikes, my EOF handling is broken
22:01:41 <oerjan> i implemented the same broken behavior as the original iirc
22:01:53 <oerjan> afa prompting goes
22:02:04 <ehird_> at :: State -> (State -> UL -> IO UL) -> UL -> IO UL
22:02:04 <ehird_> at s k a = do atEOF <- isEOF
22:02:05 <ehird_> if atEOF
22:02:08 <ehird_> then eval' s k (Apply a V)
22:02:09 <ehird_> else do c <- getChar
22:02:12 <ehird_> eval' (fst s,Just c) k (Apply a I)
22:02:13 <ehird_> but
22:02:15 <ehird_> echo 'iio' | ./unlambda deadfish.unl
22:02:18 <ehird_> ->
22:02:19 <ehird_> INFINITE STREAM OF >>s
22:02:25 <ehird_> or is that a bug in your program?
22:02:41 <oerjan> maybe
22:02:50 <oerjan> it's not designed to check for eof
22:03:02 <ehird_> ok
22:03:33 <oerjan> specifically, it is as close to bug-for-bug compatible to the C original as possible
22:04:01 <ehird_> does bugs include never incrementing the number?
22:04:09 <ehird_> Bugs like these are odd, everything works fine, just gives wrong results...
22:04:09 <oerjan> no
22:04:21 <oerjan> it should definitely print 2
22:04:25 <ehird_> I think I'll call them bizzaro bugs.
22:04:30 <ehird_> *bizarro
22:05:26 <oerjan> at least your problem is not ?x
22:05:41 <ehird_> it's obviously some sort of comparison going wrong
22:05:44 <ehird_> passing the wrong function or something
22:06:51 <oerjan> have you tested the other CUAN programs?
22:07:02 <ehird_> nope, I'm allergic to FTP. I guess I'll fire up a client.
22:07:12 <oerjan> actually i have a mirror
22:07:16 <ehird_> yay
22:07:30 <oerjan> oerjan.nvg.org/esoteric/unlambda-mirror
22:08:20 <oerjan> it may not be entirely up-to-date it was just for my own use
22:08:42 <ehird_> woot! my interp runs ``cc`cc in constant memory (very low)
22:08:47 <ehird_> 30mb virtual, 2.5mb real
22:08:55 <ehird_> 98% cpu though.
22:09:07 <ehird_> hmm, the real memory climbs but the virtual memory doesn't
22:09:08 <ehird_> whatever
22:09:11 <ehird_> time to try your mirror
22:09:47 <ehird_> hello world works, unsurprising
22:09:50 <ehird_> did I mention I wrote this without testing?
22:09:55 <ehird_> powah of haskell!
22:09:58 <oerjan> :D
22:10:09 <ehird_> square seems to work
22:10:45 <ehird_> by the way, most unlambda interps line-buffer the output, right?
22:10:47 <ehird_> as a consequence of C doing it
22:10:48 <oerjan> as i noted none of those use input, but that didn't seem to be your problem
22:11:13 <oerjan> erm C may depend on input file maybe?
22:11:18 <ehird_> mm
22:11:25 <ehird_> my interp counts up to 1585 in 0.9sec
22:11:29 <ehird_> that's not bad for unlambda
22:11:41 <ehird_> ``r`cd`.*`cd
22:11:44 <ehird_> WHAT THE FRACK.
22:11:51 <oerjan> it breaks?
22:11:55 <ehird_> no, it's just
22:11:59 <ehird_> # If you're going to understand this program, then good luck. You're
22:11:59 <ehird_> # going to need it...
22:12:01 <ehird_> no kidding
22:12:15 * oerjan understands it. or did once, anyhow.
22:12:25 <ehird_> uh oh, it doesn't output any newlines for me
22:12:34 <ehird_> well, it does
22:12:36 <ehird_> but only one
22:12:37 <oerjan> hint: special properties of d are not actually used
22:12:40 <ehird_> wait, that's by design isn't it?
22:12:41 <oerjan> oh
22:12:47 <ehird_> oerjan: that only outputs one \n, right?
22:12:54 <ehird_> wait, nope
22:12:57 <oerjan> um no i think that should be a triangle
22:13:04 <ehird_> # This unlambda program prints the integers consecutively. Each
22:13:04 <ehird_> # integer n is printed as a line of n asterisks.
22:13:15 <ehird_> but it prints one newline, then a line of infinite asterisks (slowly, in chunks)
22:13:20 <ehird_> that is surely incorrect
22:13:31 <oerjan> try replacing the d's with i's, just to be sure that it's not that
22:14:03 <ehird_> no change
22:14:06 <ehird_> can you try it on your interp?
22:14:14 <oerjan> i guess you have a continuation problem
22:14:17 <oerjan> moment
22:14:18 <ehird_> me too
22:14:41 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply C a) = eval' s k (Apply a (Cont k))
22:14:41 <ehird_> eval' s _ (Apply (Cont a) b) = eval' s (\s' _ -> a s' b) b
22:14:44 <ehird_> the relevant parts
22:15:27 <oerjan> k is the continuation?
22:15:37 <ehird_> yep
22:15:38 <ehird_> eval' :: State -> (State -> UL -> IO UL) -> UL -> IO UL
22:15:41 <ehird_> | C | Cont (State -> UL -> IO UL)
22:16:09 <oerjan> um the second is not right
22:16:42 <oerjan> or wait
22:16:43 <ehird_> Why not?
22:16:54 <ehird_> Ah wait.
22:16:58 <ehird_> s' includes the global continuation
22:17:02 <ehird_> I might have to rewrite that.
22:17:09 <ehird_> type State = (UL -> IO UL, Maybe Char)
22:17:11 <ehird_> hmm, or not
22:17:13 <ehird_> nope
22:17:16 <ehird_> I don't have to
22:17:17 <ehird_> afaik
22:17:54 <oerjan> is b already evaluated?
22:18:10 <ehird_> ah, I think you found my bug
22:19:01 <ehird_> oerjan: b is not already evaluated now, but same bug
22:19:25 <oerjan> i think that was actually a legal shortcut, it just confused me
22:20:20 <oerjan> i think the right side should be = eval' s a b
22:20:57 <oerjan> assuming the shortcut is legal
22:21:17 <ehird_> Did that, no change.
22:21:23 <oerjan> oh
22:21:54 <oerjan> oh
22:22:04 <oerjan> is _a_ already evaluated in the first?
22:22:32 * ehird_ checks
22:22:43 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply C a) = eval' s k (Apply a (Cont k))
22:22:44 <ehird_> There?
22:22:44 <ehird_> No.
22:22:51 <ehird_> But it's evaluated in the application.
22:23:00 <oerjan> it needs to be evaluated first
22:23:06 <ehird_> it is
22:23:07 <oerjan> or wait
22:23:11 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply a b) = apply s k a b
22:23:12 <ehird_> apply :: State -> (State -> UL -> IO UL) -> UL -> UL -> IO UL
22:23:13 <ehird_> apply s k a b = eval' s (\s' a' -> eval' s' k (Apply a' b)) a
22:24:33 <ehird_> Incidentally, here's a program that prints infinite *s. ``ci`c.*
22:25:24 <ehird_> Wait a second!!
22:25:28 <ehird_> I think I know the input bug
22:25:36 <ehird_> wait, no.
22:25:37 <ehird_> hm.
22:26:30 <ehird_> oerjan: cat: ```ci`c`@|i
22:27:00 <ehird_> oerjan: blows your mind? :D
22:27:11 <ehird_> i like how the continuation in the inner expression causes the top expression to be looped
22:27:28 <oerjan> ehird_: that apply never preevaluates b though
22:27:42 <ehird_> oerjan: true, the other functions do that
22:27:52 <ehird_> whats the problem
22:28:16 <ehird_> oerjan: does ```ci`c`@|i work as cat in your interp?
22:28:19 <oerjan> there is probably some subtle problem with doing that in some case
22:28:23 <ehird_> that tests input and mad continuations in one
22:28:28 <oerjan> moment
22:28:36 <ehird_> oerjan: should work on EOF, too
22:28:39 <ehird_> you might have to hit it twice
22:28:42 <ehird_> (ctrl-d that is)
22:29:09 <oerjan> um i'm using winhugs
22:29:30 <ehird_> ctrl-z, then
22:30:05 * oerjan fired up from linux
22:30:14 <oerjan> works fine
22:30:34 <ehird_> http://oerjan.nvg.org/esoteric/unlambda-mirror/CUAN/quine/ Holy shit that is a lot of quines
22:30:38 <ehird_> oerjan: http://oerjan.nvg.org/esoteric/unlambda-mirror/CUAN/count2.unl
22:30:48 <ehird_> does that produce two lines, the second one is infinitely long?
22:30:51 <ehird_> or does it produce infinite lines
22:30:53 <oerjan> there was a quine competition
22:31:24 <ehird_> hmm
22:31:27 <oerjan> infinite
22:31:27 <ehird_> oerjan: I thinkn I found a bug
22:31:36 <ehird_> [ehird:~/Code/haskul] % ./unlambda quine06.unl
22:31:36 <ehird_> v``d.v```s``si`kv``si`k`d`..`.c`.s`.``.``.s`.``.`v.cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``d.cs``s``..cs``s``v.cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``s.cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``s.cs``s``i.cs``s```.cs``s``k.cs``s``v.cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``s.cs``s``i.cs``s```.cs``s``k.cs``s```.cs``s``d.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s``..cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s``c.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s``s.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s```.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s``s.cs``s```.cs``s``..cs``s```.cs
22:31:41 <ehird_> ``s```.cs``s``..cs``s```.cs``s``v
22:31:42 <oerjan> (with the unlambda C interp)
22:31:43 <ehird_> [ehird:~/Code/haskul] % cat quine06.unl
22:31:44 <ehird_> ``d.v```s``si`kv``si`k`d`..`.c`.s`.``.``.s`.``.`v``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc.d``s``sc..``s``sc.v``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc.s``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc.s``s``sc.i``s``sc.```s``sc.k``s``sc.v``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc.s``s``sc.i``s``sc.```s``sc.k``s``sc.```s``sc.d``s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc..``s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.c``s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.s``s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.```s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.s``s``sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.```s`
22:31:49 <ehird_> `sc.```s``sc..``s``sc.```s``sc.vv
22:31:52 <ehird_> unless it's one of those fancy Quines That Lie To You
22:32:20 <ehird_> quine14 is broken too
22:32:28 <ehird_> prooduces most of the program in reverse
22:32:36 <ehird_> ... WEIRDEST-ASS BUG EVER
22:32:49 <bsmntbombdood> unlambda is godly
22:33:06 <ehird_> indeed, and my interpreter is godly, even if it has this weird-ass bug
22:33:10 <ehird_> oerjan: I think the bug is in v
22:33:10 <oerjan> well that uses continuations
22:33:12 <ehird_> maybe
22:33:18 <ehird_> hmm, no.
22:33:19 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply V a) = eval' s (\s' _ -> k s' V) a
22:33:27 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply C a) = eval' s k (Apply a (Cont k))
22:33:27 <ehird_> eval' s _ (Apply (Cont a) b) = eval' s a b
22:33:28 <bsmntbombdood> unlambda and brainfuck should be considered the canonical esolangs
22:33:30 <ehird_> Has to be in those two lines
22:33:34 * ehird_ adds a PrintDebug(TM)
22:33:54 <AnMaster> bsmntbombdood, befunge too
22:33:54 <ehird_> oerjan: quine14 does not use c
22:34:03 <ehird_> AnMaster: befunge isn't a canonical esolang
22:34:06 <ehird_> it's just a stack-based lang
22:34:24 <AnMaster> ehird_, first 2D one.
22:34:26 <ehird_> oerjan: hey, deadfish works now.
22:34:29 <ehird_> AnMaster: nope, biota was first
22:34:40 <bsmntbombdood> AnMaster: unlamnda is lambda calculus, brainfuck is a turing machine; befunge doesn't fit
22:34:40 <AnMaster> ehird_, well ok, but that didn't reach the same fame
22:34:48 <oerjan> ehird_: is quine14 broken for you?
22:34:54 <AnMaster> ehird_, then biota
22:35:06 <AnMaster> bsmntbombdood, that is your definition
22:35:07 <ehird_> AnMaster: biota isn't very interesting.
22:35:17 <AnMaster> ehird_, oh but befunge is :)
22:35:21 <ehird_> no it's not
22:35:24 <AnMaster> bsmntbombdood, what about thue?
22:35:24 <ehird_> it's stack based and is 2d.
22:35:26 <ehird_> how innovative.
22:35:30 <ehird_> oerjan: yep
22:35:32 <ehird_> what does it output for you
22:35:36 <AnMaster> ehird_, trefunge then
22:35:39 <ehird_> quine14.unl? :P
22:35:51 <AnMaster> bsmntbombdood, also INTERCAL due to being firsst
22:35:53 <ehird_> AnMaster: it's 3d and stack based. how innovative.
22:35:54 <AnMaster> first*
22:35:57 <ehird_> any idiot could think of that
22:36:12 <oerjan> looks similar
22:36:21 <ehird_> oerjan: does it have one part backwards?
22:36:24 <AnMaster> ehird_, Photon?
22:36:30 <ehird_> oerjan: .K.X.M. .-.-. .!. .S.E.L.U.R. .A.D.B.M.A.L.N.U. .,.l.a.u.s.u. .s.a. .#.
22:36:30 <ehird_> vs
22:36:32 <AnMaster> well
22:36:36 <ehird_> .#. .a.s. .u.s.u.a.l.,. .U.N.L.A.M.B.D.A. .R.U.L.E.S. .!. .-.-. .M.X.K.
22:36:42 <AnMaster> Gravity is older
22:37:27 <ehird_> aha
22:37:29 <ehird_> I think I know the bug oerjan
22:37:37 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply (Dot a) b) = putChar a >> eval' s (\s' r -> k s' r) b
22:37:40 <ehird_> that's the wrong way around
22:39:18 <ehird_> wait
22:39:20 <ehird_> maybe not
22:39:43 <ehird_> with the side effect that it prints the character x (to the standard output) when it is applied
22:39:45 <ehird_> how vague
22:39:49 <ehird_> oerjan: is it before or after evaluation?
22:39:50 <ehird_> I think before
22:40:48 <impomatic> Hmmm... Corelife was a 2D language before Biota or Befunge
22:41:11 <ehird_> oerjan: AGH! Quine2 breaks as well
22:41:18 <ehird_> % ./unlambda Quine2.unl
22:41:18 <ehird_> i`.i```s``sv``si`k`
22:41:20 <ehird_> [...]
22:41:23 <ehird_> s``v.k`is``s``
22:41:24 <ehird_> vs
22:41:28 <ehird_> % cat Quine2.unl
22:41:28 <ehird_> `.i```s``sv``si`
22:41:29 <ehird_> [...]
22:41:32 <ehird_> k.```s``si`k.vi
22:41:41 <ehird_> my evaluation order is wrong SOMEWHERE ...
22:41:57 * ehird_ grasps for straws
22:41:58 <ehird_> t :: UL -> UL -> UL -> UL
22:41:58 <ehird_> t a b c = Apply (Apply a c) (Apply b c)
22:42:01 <ehird_> .. that's wrong
22:42:03 <ehird_> isn't it
22:42:13 <ehird_> well
22:42:18 <ehird_> Sabc -> ac(bc)
22:42:19 <ehird_> so
22:42:26 <ehird_> ((ac)(bc))
22:42:29 <ehird_> so nope, that's right.
22:42:35 -!- voidwalker has quit (Client Quit).
22:42:36 <oklopol> it's not the 2d-ness that's so great, it's the whole concept of not having jumps.
22:42:38 <oklopol> i mean
22:42:42 <oklopol> that's innovative
22:43:15 -!- oerjan has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
22:43:15 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
22:43:16 -!- Leonidas has quit (brown.freenode.net irc.freenode.net).
22:43:29 <ehird_> oerjany hunches?
22:43:32 <ehird_> this is weird-ass.
22:43:50 <ehird_> oerjan - any hunches
22:43:50 <ehird_> heh
22:43:52 <ehird_> orejany XD
22:43:59 <ehird_> *oerjany
22:44:25 <oklopol> and brainfuck isn't a turing machine
22:44:31 <oklopol> befunge is closer to tm's.
22:44:48 -!- oerjan has joined.
22:44:48 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined.
22:44:48 -!- Leonidas has joined.
22:44:58 <ehird_> oerjan: any hunches, btw?
22:45:11 <oklopol> oerjan: do you have any hunches to share with us btw?
22:45:15 <oklopol> was just wondering
22:45:23 <oklopol> would be kinda nice to get some hunches around
22:45:26 <oklopol> you know
22:45:37 <oklopol> back to my readings ~>
22:46:16 <oerjan> wroom
22:46:49 <oerjan> a shouldn't be printed until after evaluation of b
22:46:54 <oerjan> in fact things would backwards if b prints
22:47:29 <ehird_> eval' s k (Apply (Dot a) b) = putChar a >> eval' s (\s' r -> k s' r) b
22:47:32 <ehird_> is that so?
22:47:38 <ehird_> well oerjan when I did that, every program started hanging and stuff
22:47:43 <ehird_> so you think it should be
22:47:49 <ehird_> eval' s (\s' r -> putChar a >> k s' r) b
22:47:52 <ehird_> ah, o
22:47:53 <ehird_> k
22:47:55 <ehird_> my mistake
22:47:56 <ehird_> here goes
22:48:21 <ehird_> IT WORKS
22:48:23 <ehird_> JOY TO THE WORLD
22:49:44 <ehird_> thanks oerjan!
22:50:04 <oerjan> basically, no function other than d has an effect when applied until after its argument is evaluated
22:50:34 <ehird_> yeah
22:50:36 <ehird_> ``ci`c`r`.!`.d`.l`.r`.o`.w`. `.,`.o`.l`.l`.e`.Hi
22:50:40 <ehird_> Infinite hello world works
22:51:19 <ehird_> oerjan:
22:51:23 <ehird_> with your self interpreter,
22:51:23 <ehird_> ``ci`c`r`.!`.d`.l`.r`.o`.w`. `.,`.o`.l`.l`.e`.Hi
22:51:25 <ehird_> just outputs
22:51:25 <oerjan> and count2?
22:51:28 <ehird_> .............
22:51:28 <ehird_> .............
22:51:29 <ehird_> .............
22:51:32 <ehird_> .............
22:51:34 <ehird_> .............
22:51:36 <ehird_> forever
22:51:37 <ehird_> oerjan: yes, count2 works
22:51:38 <oerjan> oops
22:51:40 <ehird_> but your interpreter seems to output every char as .??
22:51:50 <oerjan> oh
22:51:52 <oerjan> check |
22:52:27 <ehird_> | works
22:52:39 <ehird_> ``@`|ii
22:52:41 <ehird_> works fine
22:52:53 <oerjan> it is vital that it is applied after the @ that moves from . to the char
22:52:57 <oerjan> in my interpreter
22:53:25 <oerjan> if not, that could cause it to pick up . instead
22:53:39 <ehird_> am I meant to understand?
22:54:09 <oerjan> ehird_: there is probably an evaluation order problem that causes an | to be applied too late
22:54:14 <oerjan> *early
22:54:16 <ehird_> ah
22:54:30 <ehird_> oerjan: which function is | called nested in?
22:54:31 <ehird_> i mean
22:54:33 <ehird_> `f`|...
22:54:35 <ehird_> what is f
22:54:39 <ehird_> so I can check its evaluation
22:54:48 <ehird_> aha
22:54:51 <ehird_> hm no
22:54:59 <ehird_> oerjan: @ reads the character before evaluating its argument, right?
22:54:59 <ehird_> or not
22:55:01 <ehird_> I bet not
22:55:03 <ehird_> aight then
22:55:14 <oerjan> no!
22:55:23 <ehird_> fixing
22:55:24 <oerjan> <oerjan> basically, no function other than d has an effect when applied until after its argument is evaluated
22:55:30 <ehird_> yes yes
22:55:34 <ehird_> I had a brainfart
22:55:34 <ehird_> :P
22:55:45 <ehird_> ok I fixed it and it still outputs .............
22:55:50 <oerjan> oops
22:55:51 <ehird_> as in, . in place of the chars
22:55:56 <ehird_> what oops now
22:56:02 <oerjan> your comment
22:56:08 <ehird_> ah
22:56:24 <oerjan> ?.
22:56:24 <oerjan> # ^q ^p ^r `| `$r k
22:56:24 <oerjan> `k `k ``s`k | ``si `kk
22:56:31 <oerjan> argh
22:56:38 <ehird_> aha, it's ?
22:56:46 <oerjan> no
22:56:55 <oerjan> that's a table
22:56:58 <ehird_> nope, it is
22:57:01 <ehird_> it's ? in my bug
22:57:05 <ehird_> err
22:57:05 <oerjan> oh right
22:57:06 <ehird_> ? is my bug
22:57:25 <ehird_> agh! it still happens
22:57:26 * ehird_ digs further
22:57:31 <oerjan> the actual code is being put together from a table
22:57:43 <ehird_> eval' s@(_,Just c) k (Apply Bar a) = eval' s k (Apply a (Dot c))
22:57:44 <oerjan> those are like key and value part
22:57:47 <ehird_> hmm, nah
22:57:50 <ehird_> that's correct
22:58:06 <oerjan> um no
22:58:15 <ehird_> oh, right
22:58:19 <ehird_> the argument could change |s state
22:59:06 <AnMaster> http://bethewumpus.sourceforge.net
22:59:07 <AnMaster> fun
22:59:14 * AnMaster is downloading it atm
22:59:15 <psygnisfive> oklopol, i dont believe ehird is infact a girl
22:59:42 <psygnisfive> i believe that the evidence leaves no other possibility open!
23:00:33 <lament> if ehird is a girl she must have very small boobs!
23:00:35 <ehird_> oerjan: the self interpreter works
23:00:40 <psygnisfive> yes well
23:00:42 <ehird_> and actualyl seems to have very little overhead
23:00:47 * oerjan bounces around
23:00:48 <ehird_> i.e., it's only a few times slower than the actual interp
23:00:59 <oerjan> ehird_: i know
23:01:08 <ehird_> you optimized it? :P
23:01:28 <oerjan> no, but it uses a very simple encoding of unlambda into itself
23:01:33 <ehird_> anyway, there's 111 lines of clear haskell including a nice command line interface that runs unlambda quickly and efficiently
23:01:39 <ehird_> a job well done
23:01:59 <oklopol> yay for science
23:02:15 <AnMaster> ehird_, pastebin it?
23:02:21 <ehird_> AnMaster: First, I'm going to bot it.
23:02:27 <AnMaster> ehird_, why?
23:02:32 <ehird_> Because IRC bots are mandatory.
23:02:34 <ehird_> To confuse people, the prefix will be `.
23:02:34 <oklopol> yeah
23:02:36 <ehird_> `i
23:02:37 <ehird_> ``ii
23:02:38 <oklopol> haha
23:02:44 <AnMaster> heh
23:02:44 <oklopol> genius
23:02:47 <ehird_> The unlambda programmers in the audience have now all died of shock
23:02:47 <oklopol> o
23:02:47 <oklopol> o
23:02:56 <oklopol> `oo
23:03:04 <oerjan> ehird_: also you should check e. it's the only command my interpreter doesn't use iirc :D
23:03:10 <oklopol> ````ooo`ooo
23:03:12 <ehird_> oerjan: e works, I think
23:03:56 <AnMaster> ehird_, in that case, you should bot your haskell OS when you finished it :D
23:04:04 <ehird_> AnMaster: that would be rather difficult
23:04:09 <ehird_> PNG over IRC
23:04:13 * oklopol is going to start reading rwh on monday!
23:04:25 <ehird_> mv: `unlambda.hs' and `Unlambda.hs' are the same file
23:04:28 <AnMaster> ehird_, well the text console only
23:04:32 <ehird_> THis is the one bad thing about case insensitive filesystems
23:04:36 <ehird_> (Tools that don't know shit about them)
23:04:42 <ehird_> AnMaster: Well sure
23:06:37 <ehird_> hmm
23:06:44 <ehird_> one bad thing about haskell: you can't import a module that can act as a program
23:06:53 <ehird_> that is, I can't have Unlambda.hs compile to a program and still be importable
23:06:56 <ehird_> since it has to be named Main
23:07:01 <ehird_> and you can't import Main from inside another Main (duh...)
23:07:06 <lament> if __name__ == '__main__':
23:07:13 <ehird_> lament: troll
23:07:20 <lament> why does it have to be named Main?
23:07:29 <ehird_> because you can give ghc multiple arguments
23:07:36 <ehird_> and it'll compile the one with the module Main.
23:07:57 <oerjan> ehird_: there is a --main-is flag though
23:08:08 <ehird_> oerjan: yeah but that's hack land
23:08:21 <ehird_> I'll just have Unlambda.hs, Main.hs and bot.hs
23:08:48 <lament> this seems to be yet more proof that haskell sucks
23:08:52 -!- impomatic has quit ("mov.i #1,1").
23:09:01 <ehird_> lament: you're this far from my ignore list
23:11:37 -!- ehird_ has changed nick to eh.
23:11:39 -!- eh has changed nick to ehird.
23:12:01 <oerjan> impossible, you're not canadian!
23:14:40 <ehird> dammit ghc, don't detect let loop = loop in loop
23:14:45 <ehird> i'm trying to hang the program moron
23:14:54 <ehird> i do not want to see:
23:14:57 <ehird> % ./bot
23:14:57 <ehird> bot: <<loop>>
23:15:01 <oerjan> BWAHAHAHA
23:15:06 <ehird> if your halting checker is so clever MAYBE IMA GIVE YOU "P"
23:15:42 <ehird> yay,
23:15:42 <ehird> let complicatedLoop n = complicatedLoop (n+1) in complicatedLoop 1
23:15:44 <ehird> works
23:15:52 <lament> ehird: how far?
23:16:02 <ehird> lament: <- ->
23:16:09 <lament> that's pretty far
23:16:33 <oerjan> far out
23:17:16 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit ("godnatt").
23:19:10 <ehird> haskell code is so pretty
23:19:12 <ehird> ok, bot coming through maybe
23:19:20 <ehird> ASSUMING ALL GOES TO PLAN THAT IS.
23:19:26 <ehird> WHICH IT ISN'T
23:19:40 <ehird> NOW IT IS. PROBABLY.
23:19:45 -!- unlambda has joined.
23:19:48 <ehird> :D
23:19:52 <ehird> unlambda: you don't do anything yet
23:19:53 <ehird> but that's okay.
23:20:32 <lament> haskell code is disgusting, it makes me puke
23:20:36 <oerjan> ``.?i
23:20:42 <ehird> oerjan: "you don't do anything yet"
23:20:45 <ehird> case in point
23:20:52 <lament> 40 LET I =: I + 1
23:20:52 <lament> 50 IF I <> 100000000 THEN 30
23:20:56 <lament> ugh
23:20:56 <ehird> lament: haha
23:21:00 <ehird> oerjan: also, howdya think I should handle input?
23:21:03 <oerjan> I DON'T BELIEVE YOU
23:21:10 <ehird> I can't split on any character because of . and ? and that crap
23:21:13 <ehird> hmm wait
23:21:16 <ehird> I could run parsec on it, then get the rest
23:21:17 <ehird> maybe
23:21:54 <oerjan> should be ok for a bot
23:21:59 <oerjan> no interactivity
23:21:59 <AnMaster> lament, so what functional language do you prefer?
23:22:08 <ehird> AnMaster: he's trolling/joking
23:22:12 <oklopol> AnMaster: lol
23:22:14 <ehird> that code is basic in haskell
23:22:21 <ehird> oerjan: naw, I wanna test IO
23:22:36 <AnMaster> ehird, is he joking when he says he hate haskell?
23:22:41 <ehird> AnMaster: kind of.
23:22:45 <AnMaster> oh?
23:22:47 <ehird> oerjan: admittedly currently my interp only does stdin/stdout IO
23:22:49 <ehird> but I can change that
23:22:51 <ehird> hmm
23:22:55 <oerjan> well then parsec is hard
23:22:56 <ehird> maybe I could split on some arbitrary character
23:23:01 <ehird> and just, like, don't use that
23:23:01 <ehird> :D
23:23:03 <AnMaster> ehird, there should be a bottifier
23:23:21 <lament> AnMaster: Haskell is the best programming language.
23:23:30 <lament> Except when you actually want to achieve something. Then use Python.
23:23:36 <AnMaster> ehird, it would be some LD_PRELOADed thingy to redirect stdin/stdout to irc, with the needed parsing
23:23:41 <ehird> lament is just pissy about sdl.
23:23:45 <AnMaster> and ping handling and such
23:23:46 <ehird> AnMaster: my interp loads from a file.
23:24:54 <AnMaster> LD_PRELOAD=bottifier.so BOTTIFIER_SETTINGS="server=irc.freenode.net;channel=#esoteric;nick=unlambda;ident=unlambda;realname=unlambda;activator=`
23:24:57 <AnMaster> or suc
23:25:10 <ehird> congrats, in the time it took you to write that I could have finished this bot
23:25:11 <ehird> :p
23:25:17 <ehird> AnMaster: that doesn't handle the fact that:
23:25:21 <ehird> 1. my interp loads from a file
23:25:23 <AnMaster> ehird, yeah it would be harder
23:25:26 <ehird> 2. you can't split on an arbitrary characters
23:25:26 <AnMaster> ehird, hm true
23:25:34 <ehird> this is domain specific enough that your idea is stupid.
23:25:37 <ehird> also, why ld_prelude
23:25:43 <ehird> why not, say, oh I don't know, a bidirectional pipe?
23:25:57 <AnMaster> ehird, you could do that too, but it would work better on non-linux :P
23:26:16 <AnMaster> and be less fun
23:37:22 -!- unlambda has quit (Remote closed the connection).
23:38:09 <ehird> oerjan: it's getting a bit ugly with custom IO functions :(
23:38:09 <ehird> oh well
23:42:14 <ehird> oerjan: now I have to give UL a Show instances :(
23:42:15 <ehird> *instance
23:42:53 <oerjan> at this rate you'll end up with as long a program as mine...
23:43:06 <ehird> indeed, but mine is easier to read and I think faster
23:43:08 <ehird> but whatever
23:43:14 <ehird> what's important is bottiness
23:43:41 <oerjan> why do you need a Show instance?
23:43:47 <ehird> to show the result to irc
23:44:12 <oerjan> i suppose
23:46:00 <ehird> what's the irc length limit?
23:46:42 <ehird> meh
23:46:45 <ehird> 400 chars will do
23:48:47 <oerjan> Whoah, I think I finally understand monads!
23:48:50 <oerjan> argh
23:48:56 <oerjan> but not how to paste
23:49:30 <ehird> hah
23:49:57 <oerjan> "Whoah, I think I finally understand monads!" - "That's indigestion. It will pass."
23:50:06 <oerjan> (reddit comments)
23:50:23 <ehird> :DD
23:50:59 <ehird> okay
23:51:00 <ehird> who wants
23:51:04 <ehird> BOTTACULARITY
23:51:18 <oerjan> no one knows
23:51:36 <oerjan> because we don't know what the hell that means
23:51:39 <lament> i don't understand monads :(
23:52:35 <lament> why are monads interesting to category theory?
23:53:06 <oklopol> supermonad
23:53:09 <oerjan> heck if i know
23:53:23 <oerjan> except every pair of adjoint functors give a monad
23:53:25 <ehird> wtf:
23:53:26 <ehird> pULWithInput :: Parser (UL,String)
23:53:27 <ehird> pULWithInput =
23:53:29 <ehird> do r <- pUL
23:53:31 <ehird> (do char '!'; i <- getInput; return (r,i))
23:53:33 <ehird> <|> (do eof; return (r,""))
23:53:35 <ehird> oerjan: in the latter one, r isn't in scope
23:53:37 <ehird> what gives
23:53:41 <oerjan> and every monad comes from at least one such pair
23:53:44 <oklopol> pULWithInput <<< is the p hungarian notation?
23:53:50 <ehird> oklopol: yeah, for parser
23:53:53 <ehird> since it's clash
23:53:56 <ehird> *it'd
23:53:58 <ehird> in Unlambda
23:54:01 <ehird> so I just did it on the rest too
23:54:03 <oerjan> ehird: indentation error
23:54:11 <ehird> oerjan: ff
23:54:14 <ehird> how am I meant to indent that
23:54:38 <oerjan> add a bit space before <|>
23:54:59 -!- leeguy92 has quit (Connection timed out).
23:55:37 <oerjan> incidentally, "pul" means "fuck" in norwegian
23:56:02 <oklopol> oh
23:56:05 <oklopol> good to know
23:56:48 <ehird> fuck with input
23:56:49 <ehird> :D
23:56:57 <oerjan> especially for swedes. in swedish it means something completely innocious.
23:57:06 <oerjan> *innocuous
23:57:25 <ehird> bot: bot.hs:56:8-50: Irrefutable pattern failed for pattern Data.Maybe.Just (Network.IRC.Base.Message _ cmd args)
23:57:29 <ehird> Bollocks.
23:57:49 -!- psygnisfive has quit (Remote closed the connection).
23:58:46 -!- unlambda has joined.
23:58:48 <ehird> `i
23:58:53 <ehird> ;_;
23:59:03 -!- unlambda has quit (Remote closed the connection).
23:59:17 -!- unlambda has joined.
23:59:18 <ehird> `i
23:59:30 -!- unlambda has quit (Remote closed the connection).
23:59:49 <ehird> Test time
23:59:57 -!- unlambda has joined.
←2009-02-05 2009-02-06 2009-02-07→ ↑2009 ↑all