00:05:41 -!- FreeFull has quit. 01:13:09 -!- imode has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds). 01:25:01 -!- imode has joined. 01:28:02 -!- zzo38 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 01:30:23 -!- Hooloovo0 has quit (Quit: Temporarily refracted into a free-standing prism.). 01:31:42 -!- Hooloovo0 has joined. 01:45:15 -!- zzo38 has joined. 02:15:14 `5 w 02:15:16 1/2:`1//`1 is equivalent to `` , except that it splits the output into irc-sized pieces. The next pieces can be viewed with `spam. See also `2. Confusingly the obvious generalization of `4. \ dragon//Dragons are fractal creatures of magic, capable of shrinking or expanding to any size. Taneb invented them to live inside his string diagrams, but they prefer to hover around pinheads and feed on angels. \ dinosaur//Dinosaurs are 02:15:24 `? piet 02:15:26 ​Piet is a really colourful programming language. 02:15:48 oerjan: That's interesting. Why did it get truncated above without a second page? 03:22:37 -!- APic has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 03:49:49 -!- arseniiv has joined. 03:52:17 -!- Lord_of_Life has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 03:52:26 -!- Lord_of_Life_ has joined. 03:53:48 -!- Lord_of_Life_ has changed nick to Lord_of_Life. 04:06:30 -!- MDead has joined. 04:07:57 -!- MDude has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 04:08:06 -!- MDead has changed nick to MDude. 04:35:57 -!- imode has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 05:06:10 They are adding support for generated columns into SQLite. That doesn't seem so useful to me, unless that feature can be used with virtual tables. 05:06:27 (Another feature that doesn't seems so useful to me is the EXCLUDE clause for window functions.) 05:23:34 -!- APic has joined. 05:28:22 I invented a card game called "Curse of Scotland", with four players, either with or without teams. Give 13 cards to each player, and then whoever holds the nine of diamonds must reveal it so that everyone knows who holds it. He may either keep it, or give it to another player and ask for a card in exchange; he can specify the suit but not the rank of that card. Initially there is no trumps. 05:30:20 Tricks are then played as in whist, but you cannot play the nine of diamonds unless it is the only card you have or if you already have a trick (if you are required to play a diamond but have only the nine of diamonds and are not allowed to play it, then you must ignore the requirement to follow suit). 05:31:47 Once the nine of diamonds is won in a trick, then all players other than the player who won that trick scores one point per trick, and the player who won the trick with the nine of diamonds scores nothing. And then, reset trick counts to zero, gather all cards already played and redistribute them to all players. 05:32:56 Now the player who won the nine of diamonds, after examining his own cards, selects a new trump suit, or no trumps; it is not allowed to be the same as it just was. And then do the same with the nine of diamonds as at the start of the game, and the trump namer leads to the next trick. 05:33:59 (Note that many times, the players will keep many of the cards they were initially dealt while the other cards get mixed up and redistributed.) 05:36:56 this sounds pretty similar to hearts, with the queen of spades 05:37:24 though the knowledge of who has the important card isn't in hearts 05:38:04 redistribution of cards could get... interesting 05:42:29 Some other clarifications: If you ask a card of a suit that they have none of, then they tell you and you must ask for a different suit. If you decide to keep the nine of diamonds, then you must name a suit that you have at least one card of (not counting the nine of diamonds); if teams are played, you might try to communicate information to your partner. 05:43:12 If teams are being played, only the tricks won by the player who has won the nine of diamonds don't count; his partner's tricks still do count toward the team's score. 05:50:10 Hooloovo0: I am not so sure that it is similar to hearts, although hearts is also played with each player thirteen cards and then playing tricks similar to whist, but with no trumps. In hearts, the hearts also count, but tricks not containing hearts or the queen of spades, do not count any points. 05:59:49 a lot of the strategy in hearts, while keeping score, is to not get stuck with the queen 06:00:15 though I agree that it is a very different game with trumps 06:08:52 Yes, that is true (unless you try to collect all of the hearts and queen of spades). (Also, I have seen a variant of scoring in hearts where the queen of spades is worth six instead of thirteen.) 06:10:47 six points seems interesting since it makes the game less about the queen and more about the hearts 06:11:27 I'll definitely suggest that next time I play hearts 06:14:57 -!- Guest1 has joined. 06:41:19 [[Talk:Or]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=66700&oldid=66678 * JonoCode9374 * (+287) 06:47:53 [[Talk:Or]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=66701&oldid=66700 * JonoCode9374 * (+334) 06:48:24 [[Talk:Or]] https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=66702&oldid=66701 * JonoCode9374 * (+128) I forgot my signature 07:06:48 -!- tromp_ has joined. 07:10:05 -!- tromp has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds). 07:44:16 -!- atslash has quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep). 10:00:56 wait what? how does that work? 10:02:00 ah I see 10:41:54 -!- FreeFull has joined. 13:44:32 -!- xkapastel has joined. 14:56:38 `ftoc 98.6 14:56:39 98.60°F = 37.00°C 15:35:58 `perl -eprint(175 * ($lb = 0.4536)) 15:35:59 79.38 15:52:53 -!- Lord_of_Life_ has joined. 15:54:49 -!- Lord_of_Life has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds). 15:54:50 -!- Lord_of_Life_ has changed nick to Lord_of_Life. 16:30:22 -!- LKoen has joined. 16:51:09 -!- arseniiv has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds). 17:04:18 -!- xkapastel has quit (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity). 17:14:22 -!- imode has joined. 17:32:59 -!- imode has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds). 18:22:45 -!- kspalaiologos has joined. 18:22:57 -!- imode has joined. 18:23:12 I'm working on solving Project Euler challenges in Brainfuck 18:23:13 and I gotta say 18:23:17 it's quite amusing 18:29:56 lol 18:29:57 nice 18:31:22 why? 18:31:27 why in brainfuck? 18:31:41 that sounds terrible 18:31:52 b_jonas: um, you realize what channel you're in? 18:34:15 btw 18:34:19 if somebody feels brave enough 18:34:28 for challenge #4, please send me a PR 18:34:28 https://github.com/KrzysztofSzewczyk/euler 18:34:59 6 already done, we're really close to 600! 18:36:30 b_jonas: itym insane 18:36:43 or possibly terrifying 18:42:28 -!- imode has quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds). 19:07:05 -!- imode has joined. 19:20:55 -!- oerjan has joined. 19:26:26 stereolist 19:26:33 @quote stereo 19:26:33 geheimdienst says: data Stereoloid = BanachTyvski | CoBanachTyvski 19:26:37 huh 19:26:40 @quote stereo 19:26:40 geheimdienst says: data Stereoloid = BanachTyvski | CoBanachTyvski 19:26:59 someone may have been deleting 19:27:09 @quote ent.stereo 19:27:09 No quotes match. Just what do you think you're doing Dave? 19:27:39 @quote ste.eo 19:27:39 geheimdienst says: data Stereoloid = BanachTyvski | CoBanachTyvski 19:45:21 by the way, what is sub-lime? <-- a pun on the esolang wiki logo that got way out of hand a few years ago 19:46:09 (i put it in the channel welcome message, then someone started overdoing it) 19:47:10 this bot is blowing my mind 19:47:12 what have you just done 19:48:33 who, me? 19:48:40 @quote fugue 19:48:40 monochrom says: Welcome to #haskell, where your questions are answered in contrapuntal fugues. 19:48:47 ah 19:49:02 oerjan: we have this upgrade of Cale's classical stereo quote 19:49:04 that's a similar quote to the one i tried to look up, yes 19:49:27 "Welcome to #haskell where your questions are answered in majestic stereo." 19:49:34 Was the original. 19:49:50 i couldn't remember the majestic 19:49:50 (probably with a comma in the appropriate place) 19:51:01 In unrelated news, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVmp0uGtShk is painful to watch. 19:51:54 (I kept focusing on the pinky finger.) 19:53:22 * oerjan decides to try not watching it 19:54:58 context (less painful): https://mobile.twitter.com/LakeBrenden/status/1184967457305432066 19:57:12 i was about to shout at you for linking the mobile version, but frankly it looks way less annoying than the usual 19:58:49 hi oerjan 19:59:25 hichaf 20:00:16 oerjan: The funny thing is that I'm on a desktop PC. But without JS, Twitter redirects me to the mobile version. (I'd have to disable