00:07:03 -!- Thelie has quit (Quit: Leaving.).
00:18:08 -!- amby has quit (Quit: so long suckers! i rev up my motorcylce and create a huge cloud of smoke. when the cloud dissipates im lying completely dead on the pavement).
00:25:30 -!- moony has quit (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)).
00:26:07 -!- moony has joined.
02:20:02 -!- somefan has quit (Quit: i quit).
02:57:47 -!- aadenboy has quit (Quit: goodbye for now! back another day).
05:25:10 <esolangs> [[1r]]  https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=179080&oldid=179078 * Squidmanescape * (+4) /* Encountering Non-Whitespace */  I just realized that if it checks *before* the next increment, then it doesn't actually touch 9 new cells in the way I was envisioning.
05:26:38 <esolangs> [[1r]]  https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=179081&oldid=179080 * Squidmanescape * (+121) /* Movement */
07:19:04 -!- Sgeo has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer).
07:26:52 <esolangs> [[Haczyk]]  https://esolangs.org/w/index.php?diff=179082&oldid=143654 * Yayimhere2(school) * (-849) /* Not Turing-Complete */ looping conditionally can be a sufficient mechanism for turing completeness(see brainf*). for the first condition, eh? I dont think it has to, but maybe it does idk. but this isn't sufficient proof. the conditions for turin g completeness is i
08:32:38 <esolangs> [[Special:Log/newusers]] create  * Lim Soon Yi 3k *  New user account