00:02:43 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection).
00:04:00 -!- ehird` has quit.
00:42:44 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined.
01:14:24 * jix raises hand too
01:23:14 <jix> can't watch 15 channels for random polls at the same time :/
01:23:42 <jix> i think i'm an atheist for the same reason a lot of people are christian....
01:24:41 <ihope> You're afraid that if you believe in Jesus, you'll go to Hell?
01:24:56 <jix> no my parents are atheists....
01:28:05 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit ("Speedhack status: finished the widescreen rule ;D").
01:38:13 -!- azories has joined.
01:47:24 <azories> amm http://ip-adress.com - http://whatismyip.com - http://www.iplobster.com - ipchick.com and so on = any one can explain why the dumb utilizers dont use ipconfig ?
01:47:27 -!- azories has left (?).
02:02:30 <ihope> azories has been here and done that before?
02:02:45 <ihope> Perhaps you should call on lament for a ban?
02:03:36 <oerjan> probably banned from entire freenode by now
02:04:11 <ihope> Want to ask a staffer if a k-line has been issued?
02:05:14 <oerjan> you would think they would have some way of noticing someone hopping channels like that
02:06:07 <ihope> Like denny, rob, njan, scp, alindeman, SeJo, denny^AFK, PhilKC, SportChick, RichiH, notabot, quux, JamesOff, dmwaters, Matt, nalioth, tomaw|phone, Madkiss, tomaw, jenda, Stx, weasel, LoRez, seanw, christel, cdlu, kloeri...
02:06:41 <ihope> What, I missed one?
02:18:23 -!- Sgeo has quit (Connection timed out).
02:45:32 <g4lt-sb100> ies left before they could get a kline, but there's one waiting for them
03:01:13 -!- jix has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)).
03:07:03 -!- ihope_ has joined.
03:24:20 -!- ihope has quit (Connection timed out).
04:07:10 -!- g4lt-sb100 has changed nick to g4lt-mordant.
04:33:03 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night").
04:33:34 -!- ihope_ has quit (Connection timed out).
04:53:03 -!- rutlov has joined.
04:56:03 -!- rutlov has left (?).
07:22:32 -!- cmeme has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)).
07:27:16 -!- cmeme has joined.
07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended).
08:00:00 -!- clog has joined.
09:43:15 -!- RedDak has joined.
11:56:08 -!- jix has joined.
12:12:18 -!- Figs has joined.
12:13:14 <Figs> I'm working on my parser system, and I've realized that I can build sequences that are allowed to do _anything_...
12:13:32 <Figs> as long as whatever actions they take can be "unwound"
12:13:58 <oklopol> _anything_, like make me coffee?
12:14:11 <oklopol> because i wouldn't mind, tbh.
12:14:14 <Figs> as long as you provide a procedure for unmaking coffee
12:14:47 <Figs> my reasoning being that I could have
12:14:59 <Figs> where a is either "a", "b", or "c"
12:15:07 <Figs> each can only be used once
12:16:33 <Figs> I don't know... is this a really awful idea?
12:24:26 <oklopol> i don't see what you mean :\
12:25:13 <Figs> so like, "abc", "bca", etc, but not "bbc"
12:25:49 <Figs> using the "a" parser would have a side effect
12:26:27 <Figs> so say that the first a-parser found "b"
12:26:44 <Figs> it would behind the scenes say that "b is no longer allowed"
12:27:09 <oklopol> that's a bit rare requirement...
12:27:20 <Figs> it's not, really, if you turn it around
12:27:22 <oklopol> you could have a set combiner separately..
12:27:42 <Figs> defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables
12:28:24 <Figs> which would fail if an undefined variable is used
12:28:38 <Figs> (>> means "followed by" in my notation)
12:29:49 <Figs> or is this a really awful idea?
12:30:00 <Figs> it can also be used for type checking, I think
12:30:11 <oklopol> i'm sorry but i still don't get it :P
12:30:52 <oklopol> i don't get "definitions" there
12:31:12 <Figs> I should have said declarations
12:31:24 <Figs> int a; a = 6; would be ok
12:31:31 <oklopol> so.. int a,b,d; >> int c,e; >> int f; ?
12:31:33 <Figs> int a; b = 144;
12:32:08 <oklopol> a >> a >> a <<< i thought this was your notation for your parser
12:32:23 <oklopol> defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables
12:32:30 <oklopol> in there it's not, in turn?
12:32:50 <oklopol> definitions >> statements...
12:32:56 <Figs> something like that
12:32:59 <Figs> just as an example
12:33:14 <Figs> I don't think you get what I mean
12:33:19 <Figs> parser p = a >> b;
12:33:24 <Figs> is how I'd write it in C++
12:33:33 <Figs> p.match(somestring);
12:33:45 <oklopol> but then you say you are all the time referring to >> as the c++ operator >>
12:33:51 <Figs> say somestring = "int a; a = 6;"
12:33:53 <oklopol> and then using it non syntactically
12:34:19 <Figs> >> is an overloaded operator, silly :P
12:34:24 <Figs> >> means followed by
12:34:31 <oklopol> but you can't do int a,b,c; >> a+b
12:34:39 <oklopol> i didn't know it can be used unary
12:34:44 <Figs> you don't write the >> in the string you're parsing
12:34:56 <Figs> "int a,b,c; a = 6;"
12:34:59 <Figs> would be your string
12:35:07 <oklopol> yes, but that's not defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables
12:35:32 <Figs> statements = "int " >> variable name >> ";"
12:35:50 <Figs> http://rafb.net/p/5x7Kng74.html
12:35:57 <oklopol> you should be more explicit @ your quoting
12:36:30 <oklopol> (14:31:38) (oklopol) int a,b,c; >> a+b
12:36:33 <oklopol> (14:31:53) (Figs) something like that
12:36:33 <oklopol> (14:31:56) (Figs) just as an example
12:36:49 <oklopol> ut you assumed i meant "int a,b,c;" >> "a+b"?
12:36:55 -!- ehird` has joined.
12:37:11 -!- ehird` has quit (Client Quit).
12:37:53 * Figs doesn't see where that was
12:38:19 <oklopol> 14:33, but you have a different itme
12:38:20 <Figs> your clock is way off mine
12:38:27 <Figs> (I have at 32:13)
12:39:14 <Figs> I think I was talking about something else
12:39:36 <Figs> meta-analysis @ 4 am is hard :P
12:39:55 <Figs> in any case I did not mean that "int a,b,c; >> 1+2" would make sense at all
12:40:18 <oklopol> i still don't get the "type checking" thing or why a term would only use each subterm once...
12:40:35 <oklopol> your parser there could be broken if so.
12:40:49 <oklopol> because the dog could never chase the cat.
12:42:17 <Figs> http://rafb.net/p/aQO40e47.html
12:42:31 <Figs> oklopol, that's just an example of my notation
12:42:35 <Figs> not of type checking
12:42:46 <Figs> this is like that a/b/c thing
12:42:52 <Figs> in really pseudo code
12:43:26 <Figs> if it's a success, then pull it out of allowed numbers
12:43:30 <Figs> I forgot to do that :P
12:43:39 <Figs> I shouldn't be programming so late at night >.<
12:43:46 <Figs> but it's the only way I ever get anything done
12:44:27 <Figs> the idea being that I could say something like
12:45:04 <Figs> f(T x); and then if I do f(6) and T was string, it'd fail.
12:45:21 <Figs> where the information about f is stored somewhere else
12:45:29 <Figs> (outside the main parser)
12:45:45 <Figs> the reason things need to be undone is that something like
12:45:50 <Figs> "time flies like an arrow"
12:45:56 <Figs> can be interpreted in many ways
12:46:02 <Figs> (to give an example in english)
12:46:49 <Figs> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_language_processing#Concrete_problems (For example)
12:46:59 <Figs> my prime objective isn't NLP, but
12:47:12 <Figs> the same types of problems can occur in things like
12:47:28 <Figs> so say I give "aabc"
12:47:41 <Figs> it'd say, ok, *a is any number of 'a's... so ah! "aa" ok...
12:47:53 <Figs> now let's see, we have "bc" left... can I find an "abc'? no...
12:48:02 <Figs> oh wait, shit, let's go back...
12:48:09 <Figs> "a" is also acceptable for *a!
12:48:13 <Figs> now I have "abc" left
12:48:19 <Figs> can I match "abc" to that?
12:48:38 * Figs wonders what his monologue count is up to...
12:50:14 <oklopol> well yes, you do have to unwind often
12:52:19 <Figs> ugh. English is so fucking ambiguous... how do we ever get anything done?!
12:53:52 <oklopol> we use only simple sentences...
12:54:03 <Figs> Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
12:54:13 <oklopol> in english, using longer ones verry often leads to confusion
12:54:31 <oklopol> at least when talking about non trivial stuff
12:54:41 <oklopol> i've seen it happen here, even to natives
12:54:55 <Figs> So, if I told you about a legal document, and then, halfway through, I started talking about the way in which I was talking, would you be confused; are you confused yet?
12:55:44 <Figs> that was a longer sentance :D
12:55:55 <oklopol> well yeah, but you didn't use much ambiguity.
12:55:55 <Figs> fruit flies like a banana... I have to get that on a shirt
12:56:09 <Figs> "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." :P
12:56:19 * Figs stops the groucho marx humor and moves on
12:56:41 <oklopol> there's a finnish poem that goes like
12:57:31 <oklopol> kun olet nuori, min rakastan vain sinua / kun vanhenet, min vain rakastan sinua / kun olet vanha, vain min rakastan sinua
12:57:46 * Figs no spekka finnish
12:57:48 <oklopol> the placing of "vain", or "only" makes the whole meaning different
12:58:16 <oklopol> when you're young, i love only you / when you get older, i still love you / when you're old, only i love you
12:58:31 <oklopol> and no, that had nothing to do with anything
12:58:56 <oklopol> just a random language quirk
12:59:50 <Figs> bwahaha -- "She got her looks from her father. He's a plastic surgeon."
12:59:54 <Figs> (Groucho Marx)
13:00:38 <oklopol> the problem is stuff like that is trivial
13:00:54 <oklopol> you can pretty much turn any sentence upside down
13:01:02 <oklopol> just by finding all it's possible meaning
13:01:23 * Figs still finds it funny.
13:01:44 <oklopol> i don't, really, too joke-y
13:01:52 <Figs> it's a joke :P
13:02:08 <Figs> A joke is a joke. Bah. :P
13:02:21 <oklopol> it's like a textbook example of a joke
13:02:30 <oklopol> easy to guess the punchline
13:02:50 <oklopol> not that i did in the 3 seconds i read it, but after you read it, it's veeeery obvious
13:03:43 <oklopol> well might be fun if you'd never thought about that saying
13:03:55 <Figs> what might be fun?
13:04:37 <oklopol> if you'd never even realized " to get ones looks from someone" is a saying that actually objectifies "looks" as something that can be given
13:04:49 <oklopol> i'm not sure if that'd help.
13:05:09 <Figs> it's a very common saying in English
13:05:27 <oklopol> which is why not everyone might've put thought to it
13:05:51 <oklopol> you know, it's the funnier the more surprising it is
13:06:07 <oklopol> so if you didn't understand what the plastic surgeon thing meant in a second
13:06:13 <oklopol> but in like 1.5, it might be fun
13:06:27 <oklopol> i'll stop talking crappity now, gotta go buy stuff
13:06:58 <oklopol> i have the constant feeling of "dumb" in the morning
13:06:59 <Figs> Shark eating a clown fish -- "Does this taste funny to you?"
13:07:17 * Figs will only lower you IQ
13:07:52 <oklopol> my iq is 140 - 160 depending on the test
13:08:16 <Figs> I don't trust tests
13:08:25 <oklopol> i don't like them, always about speed
13:08:32 * Figs thinks IQ tests are stupid :P
13:08:56 <Figs> (if you're trying to see how "intelligent" someone is, and not using them "properly")
13:08:58 -!- ehird` has joined.
13:09:05 -!- Figs has changed nick to ehird``.
13:09:15 <oklopol> they test pattern matching ability, usually
13:09:27 -!- ehird`` has changed nick to Figlet.
13:09:40 -!- Figlet has changed nick to Figgeh.
13:10:00 <Figgeh> oh, I don't do Teh Figg(eh|ness) any mroe :'(
13:10:46 -!- Figgeh has changed nick to Figs.
13:11:26 <Figs> ::::p <-- spiderman!!
13:11:53 <Figs> - - - - - >>>>O
13:12:26 <oklopol> exams tomorrow ARIGFAE)GJOAGJRE
13:12:48 <Figs> figs.stupidness > infinity ? { sleep(); }
13:12:56 * Figs isn't in school yet
13:13:03 <Figs> my feet are cold
13:13:14 <Figs> school starts in a week or two
13:13:21 <Figs> I move in next wednesday
13:13:49 <oklopol> (see what i did there haw haw)
13:13:58 <Figs> not really funny
13:14:13 <oklopol> but you have to realize that wasn't a joke
13:14:19 <oklopol> i just didn't understand what you meant
13:14:49 * Figs moves in with kolopol and tells him to put on some clothes.
13:14:56 <oklopol> i just know one meaning for thta
13:15:09 <oklopol> i actually have some clothes on
13:15:17 <oklopol> my parents said they might come to visit.
13:15:48 <oklopol> my father is a bit of a nudist himself, though, so i don't think he'd be that shocked
13:15:56 <Figs> parents + clothes > parents + nude?
13:16:09 -!- ihope_ has joined.
13:16:28 <Figs> hello, goodbye
13:16:31 -!- Figs has left (?).
14:52:47 -!- jix has quit (Nick collision from services.).
14:52:59 -!- jix has joined.
15:09:01 -!- importantshock has joined.
15:48:12 -!- ihope_ has quit ("http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/06.08.09").
16:12:39 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ").
16:17:57 -!- oerjan has joined.
16:56:58 -!- jix has joined.
17:13:46 <SimonRC> bsmntbombdood: no, but they have been known to Google me.
17:15:12 <oklopol> why do they know your nick?
17:15:20 <oklopol> mine don't know what irc is :)
17:15:36 <oklopol> i guess they sort of decided your nick for you...
17:15:44 <oklopol> in case that's your irl name
17:17:05 <SimonRC> ah, good point, they probably wouldn't
17:58:43 -!- importantshock has quit ("Meh.").
19:06:54 -!- X-Slayer has joined.
19:28:03 <SimonRC> X-Slayer: how did you manage that?
19:28:38 <SimonRC> If your client did tab-completion, you would never mis-spell a username.
19:29:26 <SimonRC> tab completion is where you type part of something and hit tab, and the computer finishes it for you.
19:29:40 <SimonRC> great for situations like completing IRC nicks
19:30:02 <SimonRC> or on command-line interfaces
19:30:53 -!- X-Slayer has left (?).
19:31:00 <ehird`> you scared x-slayer away SimonRC
19:31:37 <ehird`> he disconnected, even :p
19:31:49 <ehird`> tab-completion is scary!
19:32:03 -!- oerjan has quit ("Dinner").
19:42:31 -!- sebbu2 has joined.
20:00:58 * ehird` sends a trojan...um...geography teacher to bsmntbombdood
20:01:25 -!- sebbu has quit (Connection timed out).
20:02:32 <oklopol> hah i've been naked for ages
20:06:44 <oklopol> i'm very sexy, you should see me
20:07:51 <oklopol> i didn't mean that literally.
20:08:04 <oklopol> it's more of an intellectual kind of sexy
20:10:35 <ehird`> oklopol: so, the ugly kind of sexy
20:11:46 <oklopol> hey, i'm seeing two girls atm!
20:18:55 <oklopol> that's a funny story alright :DD
20:22:14 <oklopol> also when you said "yummy", omg i almost wet my pants :DD
20:24:22 <oklopol> i have a blanket under me, i could wet that one
20:26:35 <oklopol> my physics matriculation exam is tomorrow 8|
20:26:41 <oklopol> i don't know any fucking physics
20:26:52 <oklopol> teach me! teach me everything!
20:32:12 <oklopol> i don't know any terms in english tohugh
20:32:21 <oklopol> only done physics @ school
20:42:52 <oklopol> we have these test @ the end of high-school.
20:43:08 <oklopol> "what is the test for" is also ambiguous :P
20:43:29 <oklopol> it's hard when parsing requires intelligence...
20:44:01 <oklopol> i had my english test and got the best grade possible, and i suck @ english
20:44:06 <oklopol> so i have high hopes still :P
20:44:21 <oklopol> i guess i don't suck when i try, but same goes for physics
21:35:44 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ").
21:37:12 -!- oerjan has joined.
22:33:32 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection).
22:48:29 -!- RedDak has joined.
23:00:37 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection).
23:03:29 -!- RedDak has joined.
23:47:45 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has joined.
23:49:25 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has quit (Client Quit).