00:02:43 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 00:04:00 -!- ehird` has quit. 00:42:44 -!- GreaseMonkey has joined. 01:14:24 * jix raises hand too 01:20:13 someone's late 01:23:14 can't watch 15 channels for random polls at the same time :/ 01:23:42 i think i'm an atheist for the same reason a lot of people are christian.... 01:24:41 You're afraid that if you believe in Jesus, you'll go to Hell? 01:24:56 no my parents are atheists.... 01:25:01 Ah.\ 01:28:05 -!- GreaseMonkey has quit ("Speedhack status: finished the widescreen rule ;D"). 01:38:13 -!- azories has joined. 01:47:24 amm http://ip-adress.com - http://whatismyip.com - http://www.iplobster.com - ipchick.com and so on = any one can explain why the dumb utilizers dont use ipconfig ? 01:47:27 -!- azories has left (?). 01:48:22 god, azories again? 02:02:30 azories has been here and done that before? 02:02:45 Perhaps you should call on lament for a ban? 02:03:10 was in #haskell too 02:03:36 probably banned from entire freenode by now 02:04:11 Want to ask a staffer if a k-line has been issued? 02:05:14 you would think they would have some way of noticing someone hopping channels like that 02:06:07 Like denny, rob, njan, scp, alindeman, SeJo, denny^AFK, PhilKC, SportChick, RichiH, notabot, quux, JamesOff, dmwaters, Matt, nalioth, tomaw|phone, Madkiss, tomaw, jenda, Stx, weasel, LoRez, seanw, christel, cdlu, kloeri... 02:06:30 thank you for listing a bunch of staffers! 02:06:34 You're welcome. 02:06:41 What, I missed one? 02:06:59 i have to get my horse BRB 02:18:23 -!- Sgeo has quit (Connection timed out). 02:21:56 BACK 02:45:19 ihope, I qalready did, BTW, azor 02:45:32 ies left before they could get a kline, but there's one waiting for them 03:01:13 -!- jix has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 03:07:03 -!- ihope_ has joined. 03:24:20 -!- ihope has quit (Connection timed out). 04:07:10 -!- g4lt-sb100 has changed nick to g4lt-mordant. 04:33:03 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night"). 04:33:34 -!- ihope_ has quit (Connection timed out). 04:53:03 -!- rutlov has joined. 04:56:03 -!- rutlov has left (?). 07:22:32 -!- cmeme has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 07:27:16 -!- cmeme has joined. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 09:43:15 -!- RedDak has joined. 11:56:08 -!- jix has joined. 12:12:18 -!- Figs has joined. 12:12:21 hey guys 12:12:24 I need help. 12:13:05 sounds serious 12:13:14 I'm working on my parser system, and I've realized that I can build sequences that are allowed to do _anything_... 12:13:32 as long as whatever actions they take can be "unwound" 12:13:58 _anything_, like make me coffee? 12:14:11 because i wouldn't mind, tbh. 12:14:14 as long as you provide a procedure for unmaking coffee 12:14:47 my reasoning being that I could have 12:14:49 a >> a >> a 12:14:59 where a is either "a", "b", or "c" 12:15:01 but 12:15:07 each can only be used once 12:16:33 I don't know... is this a really awful idea? 12:24:26 i don't see what you mean :\ 12:25:13 so like, "abc", "bca", etc, but not "bbc" 12:25:49 using the "a" parser would have a side effect 12:26:27 so say that the first a-parser found "b" 12:26:44 it would behind the scenes say that "b is no longer allowed" 12:27:09 that's a bit rare requirement... 12:27:20 it's not, really, if you turn it around 12:27:22 you could have a set combiner separately.. 12:27:25 hmm? 12:27:42 defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables 12:28:24 which would fail if an undefined variable is used 12:28:38 (>> means "followed by" in my notation) 12:29:48 hmm... 12:29:49 or is this a really awful idea? 12:30:00 it can also be used for type checking, I think 12:30:11 i'm sorry but i still don't get it :P 12:30:22 :falls over: 12:30:26 :D 12:30:29 i just woke up! 12:30:52 i don't get "definitions" there 12:31:00 int a,b,c; 12:31:09 :| 12:31:12 I should have said declarations 12:31:12 err.. okei 12:31:24 int a; a = 6; would be ok 12:31:31 so.. int a,b,d; >> int c,e; >> int f; ? 12:31:33 int a; b = 144; 12:31:35 that's not c++ 12:31:48 ???? 12:31:49 oh 12:32:08 a >> a >> a <<< i thought this was your notation for your parser 12:32:14 it is 12:32:20 weel yeah 12:32:23 but 12:32:23 defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables 12:32:30 in there it's not, in turn? 12:32:30 is the same 12:32:36 okay... so 12:32:42 int a,b,c; >> a+b 12:32:50 definitions >> statements... 12:32:56 something like that 12:32:59 just as an example 12:33:04 but... that's not c++ 12:33:14 I don't think you get what I mean 12:33:19 parser p = a >> b; 12:33:24 is how I'd write it in C++ 12:33:31 well yeah, i know that 12:33:33 p.match(somestring); 12:33:45 but then you say you are all the time referring to >> as the c++ operator >> 12:33:51 say somestring = "int a; a = 6;" 12:33:53 and then using it non syntactically 12:34:19 >> is an overloaded operator, silly :P 12:34:24 >> means followed by 12:34:24 well yes 12:34:31 but you can't do int a,b,c; >> a+b 12:34:33 or can you? 12:34:39 i didn't know it can be used unary 12:34:43 actually 12:34:44 you don't write the >> in the string you're parsing 12:34:47 :P 12:34:47 i know it can't 12:34:56 "int a,b,c; a = 6;" 12:34:59 would be your string 12:35:07 yes, but that's not defintions >> statements_using_defined_variables 12:35:11 it is 12:35:14 no 12:35:17 there's no >> 12:35:32 statements = "int " >> variable name >> ";" 12:35:41 (for example) 12:35:45 hold on a sec 12:35:47 okay now i got it. 12:35:50 http://rafb.net/p/5x7Kng74.html 12:35:57 you should be more explicit @ your quoting 12:36:17 ... >.> 12:36:24 well, actually 12:36:30 (14:31:38) (oklopol) int a,b,c; >> a+b 12:36:33 (14:31:53) (Figs) something like that 12:36:33 (14:31:56) (Figs) just as an example 12:36:36 i was kinda wtf. 12:36:49 ut you assumed i meant "int a,b,c;" >> "a+b"? 12:36:51 *but 12:36:55 -!- ehird` has joined. 12:37:01 I think so 12:37:04 okay. 12:37:08 that clears up a lot 12:37:11 -!- ehird` has quit (Client Quit). 12:37:53 * Figs doesn't see where that was 12:38:16 ah 12:38:19 14:33, but you have a different itme 12:38:20 your clock is way off mine 12:38:21 *time 12:38:27 (I have at 32:13) 12:39:14 I think I was talking about something else 12:39:26 * Figs isn't sure 12:39:36 meta-analysis @ 4 am is hard :P 12:39:55 in any case I did not mean that "int a,b,c; >> 1+2" would make sense at all 12:40:04 sorry :P 12:40:18 i still don't get the "type checking" thing or why a term would only use each subterm once... 12:40:35 your parser there could be broken if so. 12:40:49 because the dog could never chase the cat. 12:40:59 only another cat.. 12:42:17 http://rafb.net/p/aQO40e47.html 12:42:31 oklopol, that's just an example of my notation 12:42:35 not of type checking 12:42:46 this is like that a/b/c thing 12:42:52 in really pseudo code 12:43:26 if it's a success, then pull it out of allowed numbers 12:43:30 I forgot to do that :P 12:43:39 I shouldn't be programming so late at night >.< 12:43:46 but it's the only way I ever get anything done 12:44:27 the idea being that I could say something like 12:45:04 f(T x); and then if I do f(6) and T was string, it'd fail. 12:45:21 where the information about f is stored somewhere else 12:45:29 (outside the main parser) 12:45:45 the reason things need to be undone is that something like 12:45:50 "time flies like an arrow" 12:45:56 can be interpreted in many ways 12:46:02 (to give an example in english) 12:46:49 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_language_processing#Concrete_problems (For example) 12:46:59 my prime objective isn't NLP, but 12:47:12 the same types of problems can occur in things like 12:47:23 *a >> "abc" 12:47:28 so say I give "aabc" 12:47:41 it'd say, ok, *a is any number of 'a's... so ah! "aa" ok... 12:47:53 now let's see, we have "bc" left... can I find an "abc'? no... 12:48:02 oh wait, shit, let's go back... 12:48:09 "a" is also acceptable for *a! 12:48:13 now I have "abc" left 12:48:19 can I match "abc" to that? 12:48:22 Yes! Success1 12:48:24 *! 12:48:38 * Figs wonders what his monologue count is up to... 12:49:04 33? 34? 12:50:14 well yes, you do have to unwind often 12:50:39 right 12:52:19 ugh. English is so fucking ambiguous... how do we ever get anything done?! 12:53:52 we use only simple sentences... 12:54:03 Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. 12:54:13 in english, using longer ones verry often leads to confusion 12:54:31 at least when talking about non trivial stuff 12:54:41 i've seen it happen here, even to natives 12:54:55 So, if I told you about a legal document, and then, halfway through, I started talking about the way in which I was talking, would you be confused; are you confused yet? 12:55:18 umm i doubt i am :P 12:55:37 :P 12:55:44 that was a longer sentance :D 12:55:55 well yeah, but you didn't use much ambiguity. 12:55:55 fruit flies like a banana... I have to get that on a shirt 12:56:09 "Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." :P 12:56:19 * Figs stops the groucho marx humor and moves on 12:56:41 there's a finnish poem that goes like 12:56:44 whoops 12:56:51 lol? 12:56:55 wait 12:57:00 i'll write it :) 12:57:31 kun olet nuori, minä rakastan vain sinua / kun vanhenet, minä vain rakastan sinua / kun olet vanha, vain minä rakastan sinua 12:57:46 * Figs no spekka finnish 12:57:48 the placing of "vain", or "only" makes the whole meaning different 12:57:52 i'll translate 12:58:16 when you're young, i love only you / when you get older, i still love you / when you're old, only i love you 12:58:31 and no, that had nothing to do with anything 12:58:35 :) 12:58:50 lol 12:58:56 just a random language quirk 12:59:50 bwahaha -- "She got her looks from her father. He's a plastic surgeon." 12:59:54 (Groucho Marx) 13:00:38 the problem is stuff like that is trivial 13:00:54 you can pretty much turn any sentence upside down 13:00:58 ;) 13:01:02 just by finding all it's possible meaning 13:01:05 *meanings 13:01:23 * Figs still finds it funny. 13:01:44 i don't, really, too joke-y 13:01:52 it's a joke :P 13:01:57 well yes 13:02:08 A joke is a joke. Bah. :P 13:02:14 i mean 13:02:21 it's like a textbook example of a joke 13:02:30 easy to guess the punchline 13:02:50 not that i did in the 3 seconds i read it, but after you read it, it's veeeery obvious 13:02:59 well 13:03:05 timing 13:03:20 ya 13:03:43 well might be fun if you'd never thought about that saying 13:03:55 what might be fun? 13:03:57 hmm 13:03:59 that joke 13:04:37 if you'd never even realized " to get ones looks from someone" is a saying that actually objectifies "looks" as something that can be given 13:04:40 hmm 13:04:49 i'm not sure if that'd help. 13:05:09 it's a very common saying in English 13:05:12 yeah 13:05:27 which is why not everyone might've put thought to it 13:05:45 heh 13:05:51 you know, it's the funnier the more surprising it is 13:05:55 right 13:06:07 so if you didn't understand what the plastic surgeon thing meant in a second 13:06:13 but in like 1.5, it might be fun 13:06:15 :) 13:06:17 anyway 13:06:27 i'll stop talking crappity now, gotta go buy stuff 13:06:32 gotta drink 13:06:33 caffeine 13:06:35 lots of it 13:06:42 to get my brain to work 13:06:58 i have the constant feeling of "dumb" in the morning 13:06:59 Shark eating a clown fish -- "Does this taste funny to you?" 13:07:00 *s 13:07:13 careful... 13:07:17 * Figs will only lower you IQ 13:07:52 my iq is 140 - 160 depending on the test 13:08:01 sometimes 120 13:08:08 they aren't consistent :| 13:08:16 I don't trust tests 13:08:25 i don't like them, always about speed 13:08:32 * Figs thinks IQ tests are stupid :P 13:08:56 (if you're trying to see how "intelligent" someone is, and not using them "properly") 13:08:58 -!- ehird` has joined. 13:09:05 -!- Figs has changed nick to ehird``. 13:09:15 they test pattern matching ability, usually 13:09:27 -!- ehird`` has changed nick to Figlet. 13:09:33 bah. registered. 13:09:40 -!- Figlet has changed nick to Figgeh. 13:09:41 :D 13:09:54 Figgah 13:09:58 dirty figgah 13:10:00 oh, I don't do Teh Figg(eh|ness) any mroe :'( 13:10:04 figgahs 13:10:07 ;) 13:10:12 :P 13:10:21 were being facist.. 13:10:27 facist? O.o 13:10:34 n->f 13:10:37 r->f 13:10:46 -!- Figgeh has changed nick to Figs. 13:11:05 o...o 13:11:08 what? 13:11:14 ::P 13:11:26 ::::p <-- spiderman!! 13:11:38 eh... clearly! 13:11:49 i don't get it 13:11:53 - - - - - >>>>O 13:12:08 it's ok 13:12:12 it's 5 am 13:12:15 * Figs must sleep 13:12:19 15 here :< 13:12:26 exams tomorrow ARIGFAE)GJOAGJRE 13:12:29 *exam 13:12:48 figs.stupidness > infinity ? { sleep(); } 13:12:56 * Figs isn't in school yet 13:13:03 my feet are cold 13:13:04 you're 5? 13:13:07 no 13:13:14 school starts in a week or two 13:13:19 :| 13:13:21 I move in next wednesday 13:13:31 ...with me? 13:13:49 (see what i did there haw haw) 13:13:58 not really funny 13:14:03 :S 13:14:05 sorry. 13:14:06 well not 13:14:13 but you have to realize that wasn't a joke 13:14:19 i just didn't understand what you meant 13:14:26 awkward? 13:14:34 :D 13:14:43 err.. me? 13:14:44 no 13:14:49 * Figs moves in with kolopol and tells him to put on some clothes. 13:14:49 "moving in" 13:14:52 *oklopol 13:14:56 i just know one meaning for thta 13:14:58 *that 13:15:09 i actually have some clothes on 13:15:17 my parents said they might come to visit. 13:15:22 rofl 13:15:30 ;) 13:15:48 my father is a bit of a nudist himself, though, so i don't think he'd be that shocked 13:15:50 but hey! 13:15:54 me goes :P -> 13:15:56 parents + clothes > parents + nude? 13:16:03 bye 13:16:07 * Figs goes too 13:16:09 -!- ihope_ has joined. 13:16:28 hello, goodbye 13:16:31 -!- Figs has left (?). 14:52:47 -!- jix has quit (Nick collision from services.). 14:52:59 -!- jix has joined. 15:09:01 -!- importantshock has joined. 15:48:12 -!- ihope_ has quit ("http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/06.08.09"). 16:12:39 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ"). 16:17:57 -!- oerjan has joined. 16:56:58 -!- jix has joined. 17:13:46 bsmntbombdood: no, but they have been known to Google me. 17:15:12 why do they know your nick? 17:15:20 mine don't know what irc is :) 17:15:36 i guess they sort of decided your nick for you... 17:15:44 in case that's your irl name 17:17:05 ah, good point, they probably wouldn't 17:17:08 but still... 17:58:43 -!- importantshock has quit ("Meh."). 19:06:54 -!- X-Slayer has joined. 19:06:55 cià 19:08:38 X-Slayer: ? 19:08:56 SiminRC: hi 19:10:37 hm 19:28:03 X-Slayer: how did you manage that? 19:28:38 If your client did tab-completion, you would never mis-spell a username. 19:28:57 what? 19:29:26 tab completion is where you type part of something and hit tab, and the computer finishes it for you. 19:29:40 great for situations like completing IRC nicks 19:30:02 or on command-line interfaces 19:30:06 * SimonRC eats dinner 19:30:53 -!- X-Slayer has left (?). 19:31:00 you scared x-slayer away SimonRC 19:31:25 * ehird` /whois X-Slayer 19:31:37 he disconnected, even :p 19:31:49 tab-completion is scary! 19:32:03 -!- oerjan has quit ("Dinner"). 19:42:31 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 19:56:05 clothes are overrated 19:57:20 TURTLES 19:57:22 are overrated 19:59:27 not really 19:59:57 my geography teacher is 19:59:57 so 19:59:59 fucking 20:00:00 stupid 20:00:20 * ehird` TURTLES 20:00:22 are 20:00:23 so 20:00:24 fucking 20:00:25 stupid 20:00:40 * bsmntbombdood sends a trojan turtle to ehird` 20:00:58 * ehird` sends a trojan...um...geography teacher to bsmntbombdood 20:01:25 -!- sebbu has quit (Connection timed out). 20:01:55 * bsmntbombdood removes his pants 20:02:32 hah i've been naked for ages 20:05:10 my naked is worth more than your naked 20:06:22 i doubt that 20:06:44 i'm very sexy, you should see me 20:06:57 k 20:07:03 pix plox 20:07:12 >>> pix 20:07:51 i didn't mean that literally. 20:08:04 it's more of an intellectual kind of sexy 20:09:32 ha 20:10:35 oklopol: so, the ugly kind of sexy 20:10:41 right? :p 20:11:33 :D 20:11:46 hey, i'm seeing two girls atm! 20:14:50 i have a funny story 20:14:56 i was eating some sprats 20:14:59 on toast 20:15:06 and i said to myself "yummy" 20:15:09 20:18:45 haha "sprats" xD 20:18:55 that's a funny story alright :DD 20:21:28 i know! 20:22:14 also when you said "yummy", omg i almost wet my pants :DD 20:22:37 i thought you were naked 20:23:32 figuratively 20:24:22 i have a blanket under me, i could wet that one 20:26:35 my physics matriculation exam is tomorrow 8| 20:26:41 i don't know any fucking physics 20:26:52 teach me! teach me everything! 20:31:29 p = m*v 20:31:59 i know that! 20:32:12 i don't know any terms in english tohugh 20:32:14 *though 20:32:21 only done physics @ school 20:34:18 what are you matriculating for? 20:39:18 you mean, "why"? 20:39:23 or... hmm 20:40:22 what is the test for 20:42:33 physics? 20:42:39 oh 20:42:48 ...who is making you take it? 20:42:52 we have these test @ the end of high-school. 20:43:01 oh 20:43:08 "what is the test for" is also ambiguous :P 20:43:29 it's hard when parsing requires intelligence... 20:44:01 i had my english test and got the best grade possible, and i suck @ english 20:44:06 so i have high hopes still :P 20:44:21 i guess i don't suck when i try, but same goes for physics 20:44:23 hopefully 20:44:31 i hope it rains tomorrow 21:35:44 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ"). 21:37:12 -!- oerjan has joined. 22:33:32 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:48:29 -!- RedDak has joined. 23:00:37 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 23:03:29 -!- RedDak has joined. 23:26:55 TURTLES 23:27:25 wrong 23:28:00 right! 23:28:48 left 23:29:08 go west! 23:34:59 TURTLES 23:47:45 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has joined. 23:49:25 -!- bsmntbombdood_ has quit (Client Quit).