01:00:21 -!- ehird` has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 01:01:35 Abc = Print "A B C! 1 2 3! A B C! 1 2 6" 01:04:02 faxathisia, where are you from? 01:04:23 oh and hi everybody! 01:04:27 Hi Tritonio 01:06:09 my head is spinning 01:07:16 i really need some sleep... so goodnight everyone. 01:08:37 'Night. 01:08:59 Tufleiz! 01:10:18 Or maybe "tufueo" would be a better word. 01:11:26 tufleiz? what that? 01:17:38 A couple words for "bye". 02:58:50 -!- ihope_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 03:31:06 Tritonio: hi 03:40:50 -!- Arrogant has joined. 03:48:32 -!- Arrogant has quit ("Leaving"). 04:05:34 -!- noom has joined. 04:06:28 -!- noom has left (?). 04:48:29 hm 04:48:35 I wonder if this counts as esoteric 04:48:54 time-reversible language Janus http://www.cise.ufl.edu/~mpf/rc/janus.html 05:35:53 -!- puzzlet_ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 05:36:00 -!- puzzlet has joined. 06:10:22 -!- puzzlet has quit (Remote closed the connection). 06:10:29 -!- puzzlet has joined. 06:34:40 -!- puzzlet has quit ("Lost terminal"). 06:44:04 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Remote closed the connection). 06:49:48 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 07:07:31 -!- puzzlet has joined. 07:10:24 -!- Sgeo has quit ("Ex-Chat"). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:17:48 -!- puzzlet_ has joined. 08:29:31 -!- puzzlet has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 08:38:14 -!- puzzlet_ has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 08:39:03 -!- puzzlet has joined. 08:59:55 -!- sebbu has joined. 11:33:39 -!- RedDak has joined. 11:43:10 -!- ihope____ has joined. 11:43:23 -!- ihope____ has changed nick to ihope_. 12:08:58 -!- ihope_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 12:11:15 -!- Dagide has joined. 12:20:45 faxathisia, is it that super-turing-complete language that can print the time needed by a program to execute even before it's execution? 12:20:58 no 12:21:06 It's not very special 12:21:16 You can run anything forwards and backwards in it, and there's a self interpreter 12:22:28 it just changes the direction of the execution? 12:23:23 yeah, example is setting n to 4 then calling fibonacci ends up with x = 5, y = 8 12:23:40 setting x to 5, y to 8, then uncalling fib ends up with n = 4 12:25:01 http://rafb.net/p/afuYxJ36.txt 12:25:33 (It's reversible since every operation is invertible) 12:27:52 -!- Dagide has quit ("I'm quitting... Bye all"). 12:28:04 -!- dak has joined. 12:29:29 -!- RedDak has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 13:27:42 -!- ehird` has joined. 14:20:09 -!- Slereah- has joined. 14:34:00 -!- Slereah has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 14:34:53 -!- Tritonio has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 14:52:53 -!- jix has joined. 15:02:38 -!- Tritonio has joined. 15:06:23 -!- RedDak has joined. 15:10:31 -!- dak has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 15:11:28 faxathisia: turing complete? 15:11:43 FINITE STATE MACHINE 15:12:08 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 15:18:54 -!- RedDak has joined. 15:19:58 -!- Dagide has joined. 15:20:29 god i'm stupid 15:20:36 i'm writing a brute-force tic-tac-toe algo for the hell of it 15:20:43 and i was calling make_move from within my bruteforcer 15:20:48 which calls brute_force to decide a move... 15:21:05 wait 15:21:06 that can work 15:21:20 -!- Dagide has quit (Client Quit). 15:21:46 -!- dak has joined. 15:22:34 -!- dak has quit (Client Quit). 15:38:26 -!- RedDak has quit (Connection timed out). 15:54:35 -!- RedDak has joined. 15:55:45 -!- RedDak has quit (Client Quit). 15:57:46 -!- RedDak has joined. 16:07:59 WHAT THE HELL 16:08:11 copy_game(ng) is changing ml2? 16:08:12 how the hell 16:50:20 oklopol: ihope: megaping #zingcode 17:03:13 -!- puzzlet has quit (Remote closed the connection). 17:03:15 -!- puzzlet_ has joined. 17:09:56 oklopol: ping 17:09:59 ihope: ping 17:32:17 oklopol: okloping 17:32:19 ihope: iping 17:36:32 sheesh 17:50:17 ehird`, what do you mean brute force tic tac toe? 17:50:27 recursivelly searching the whole game tree? 17:50:34 Tritonio: try every possible move+response from the current one, select the best one 17:50:58 it kinda fails if you make the board bigger than 3x3 because of certain time complexity issues ;) 17:51:00 http://inshame.blogspot.com/search/label/My%20Progs%3A%20A%28X%29I%28O%29 17:51:19 that site makes my eyes bleed 17:51:29 ?? 17:51:38 background+text colour+etc 17:51:56 i thought it was ok... :-| 18:29:07 !! 18:29:10 Huh? 18:42:58 ? 19:10:47 -!- sebbu2 has joined. 19:29:52 -!- sebbu has quit (Connection timed out). 19:49:21 ehird`: what is the time complexity of that algorithm? 19:49:37 bsmntbombdood: O(Fucking Slow) 19:51:05 np 19:51:11 Hahahah 19:51:19 GregorR: it's extended O notation 19:51:42 Oh you. 19:51:47 it adds three new definitions: O(Pretty Damn Fast), O(Faster than NOP) and O(Fucking Slow) 19:51:50 Sort of a qualitative big O :P 19:52:06 i don't think you can solve much with a O(Faster than NOP) algorithm, though 19:52:24 O(DONE!) 19:52:40 O(Quantum algorithm that finishes before you run it) 19:53:44 Let's send the electric signal FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT 19:53:51 Slereah-: With SCIENCE! 19:53:57 SCIENCE! 19:54:09 Ooh, I just downloaded the 5th next version of the Linux kernel. 19:54:18 It's compressed to 1 byte, in the future. 19:54:35 So, what number is that byte! 19:54:44 Tell me, so that I can say I invented it! 19:54:46 I'm having some problems getting the uncompressor downloaded though. 19:55:06 Slereah-: Sorry - if I told you a quantum paradox would appear and you would disappear from all possible universes according to string theory. 19:56:20 Nonsense. 19:56:25 Don't you remember Star Trek 4? 19:56:33 With the transparent aluminium. 19:56:36 In the future Star Trek is old fashioned! 19:56:41 "Won't that change the future?" 19:56:47 "Maybe he invented it!" 19:56:49 "Ah!" 19:57:58 OKAY, KUBUNTU INSTALL TIME. SEE YOU SOON. :p 19:58:57 -!- ehird` has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 20:04:58 Downloaded: 87,976,782 bytes in 2832 files 20:05:54 -!- ehird` has joined. 20:18:36 -!- jix has quit ("CommandQ"). 20:24:06 ELHO, DROWLD 20:24:30 : SAY-HELLO ." HELLO WORLD" ; SAY-HELLO 20:25:27 Welcome back, world. 20:26:24 : WELCOME-BACK ." Welcome back, " USERNAME . ." ." ; WORLD @ WELCOME-BACK 20:26:40 Heh. 20:27:00 Forth :) 20:31:03 Entity = :[ name, init = (sname as string){ name = sname; }, greet = { println("Hello, " + name + "!"); } ]; world = new(Entity, "world"); world.greet() 20:31:08 ^ Plof, I think that's right 20:36:39 -!- puzzlet_ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:36:46 -!- puzzlet has joined. 20:41:54 -!- ehird` has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 20:51:18 -!- elliott_ has joined. 20:52:54 -!- elliott_ has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:53:11 -!- ehird` has joined. 20:58:04 On Wednesday, I got an email that used quotes for emphasis (You "CAN NOT" do blah blah blah). I couldn't help but send an email back pointing out that that's not only an incorrect use of quotes, but that the implication of quotes there is exactly the opposite of what he wants. I got one of these back: "In my 10+ years experience blah blah blah blah" 20:58:34 That's nice 20:58:34 :P 20:58:43 Now why is Kopete crashing when I connect to MSN??? 20:58:59 Because MSN is the suck? 20:59:03 i don't understand why people use quotes for emphasis 20:59:14 Because they're stupid? 20:59:31 GregorR: I know it's the suck 20:59:35 But most people I know use it 21:01:33 People should subscribe to prescriptive English manuals and make note of which ones they are whenever they say anything. 21:02:16 Also, pong. 21:03:09 Dad, have you ever thought bout the fact that when men gather in a sauna, they sit in a lot of sweat from other men's buttocks, testicles, and anus? Is it some kind of experiment with homosexuality that heteros secretly allow themselves, because they're all basically confused about their sexuality? 21:04:27 Heteros are all basically confused about their sexuality? I'm definitely hetero, then. I mean, hi. 21:05:04 i'm not confused! 21:05:49 So is everybody either "confused heterosexual" or "definite homosexual", or... 21:05:51 jeez i bring up sex in here a lot >_< 21:06:12 ihope: no... 21:09:46 #esoteric-sex 21:09:57 esoteric sex! 21:09:59 i like it 21:21:03 -!- ihope____ has joined. 21:21:10 -!- Slereah has joined. 21:21:17 -!- ihope____ has changed nick to ihope_. 21:23:39 -!- ihope____ has joined. 21:28:53 -!- Slereah- has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 21:34:58 It bothers me when people use "may have" in place of "might have" to describe something that is known not to have happened. 21:35:58 This channel is esoteric about its topic being esoteric programming languages. 21:35:59 ;) 21:36:20 "Groundhog Day": "If you hadn't been here, Bill would have choked to death for sure!" "Well, he may have, he was trying to swallow a whole cow."= 21:38:50 -!- ihope_ has quit (Connection timed out). 21:46:30 -!- sebbu2 has changed nick to sebbu. 21:50:43 my epenis itches 21:50:47 i might have eherpes 21:51:29 That's what happen when you have too much cybersex. 21:54:03 i'm going to change my pants 21:55:46 *epants 21:58:16 no, i'm chaning my real pants 22:06:55 bsmntbombdood: I don't know whether it is or not, I'll try to prove it once the interpreter is finished 22:07:18 I'm quite sure it is.. since everything is bloody universal 22:10:53 -!- Tritonio has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:11:16 i guess turing machine steps are reversible 22:11:21 so it could be turing complete 22:11:42 wait 22:11:43 are they? 22:11:48 no 22:11:49 well 22:11:54 it says that reversible turing machines exist 22:12:32 turing machines are revisible if their transition functions are bijective 22:16:07 of course 22:16:16 most aren't 22:20:27 http://www.healthgrades.com/directory_search/physician/profiles/dr-md-reports/Dr-Alden-Cockburn-MD-D45E5C3F.cfm 22:20:37 http://www.healthgrades.com/directory_search/physician/profiles/dr-md-reports/Dr-Harry-Beaver-MD-FD3B8B34.cfm 22:20:45 The common definition of a Turing machine is irreversible, but irreversibility is not a requirement for Turing completeness. 22:22:54 I can prove it's turing complete by writing brainfuck in it, + - < > invert into - + > <.. And I can simply store a choice point (duplicate the store) at each [ 22:30:01 i don't understand the [ part 22:33:32 Take note of whether the loop was entered or not? 22:33:46 That's enough to reverse a BF program, no? 22:36:01 i think you need to know how many times the loop was loopzored 22:37:38 guh 22:37:42 wtf is the point of ties? 22:38:12 what's the point of clothes 22:38:18 yeah really 22:38:48 oklopol: same thing, isn't it? 22:39:23 ihope: whut? 22:41:21 Am I insane for thinking a JavaScript MMIX simulator would be nice? 22:41:39 No 22:41:41 Do it now 22:41:48 Wait... 22:41:50 It WAS done 22:41:54 ?! 22:41:55 there was a link on reddit a while back 22:42:02 Let me find it. 22:42:45 Hypothetically, one could C->JS with this >:) 22:43:05 Wait, no. 22:43:08 It wasn't done. Sorry. 22:43:14 There was SOME sort of well-known arch done, though 22:43:33 x86? :P 22:44:13 hahhaa 22:44:13 no :P 22:44:16 it was a RISC 22:48:53 -!- RedDak has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 23:03:01 GregorR: what can gcc output, instruction set-wise? 23:03:04 err, rather, as 23:05:17 Uh, lots of things :P 23:05:20 But amongst them is MMIX. 23:08:20 lots of things :P is there a list somewhere? 23:08:24 (Can it do OISC? ;)) 23:09:17 GregorR: http://www.recreationalmath.com/mixal/ MIX, but not MMIX 23:09:36 Unfortunately, GCC doesn't target MIX, only MMIX :( 23:09:44 There's a list at gcc.gnu.org . The link on the right that says "back ends" 23:11:26 bsmntbombdood: I can't do anything which removes information 23:11:32 or the program will runtime error 23:11:42 so if you have the current cell = 3, and you hit [-] 23:11:59 There must be a way, when running backwards to know when to exit the loop on the left 23:12:17 I'll actually code this soon, it probably make more sense than my rambling 23:15:05 GregorR: How hard is it to write a backend? :P 23:15:30 ihope: if by "same thing" you meant "Take note of whether the loop was entered or not?" == "you need to know how many times the loop was loopzored", i don't see what you mean 23:15:53 ehird`: I've never tried, I'm a pansy like that. Suffice to say that I determined you can't write one for BF :P 23:16:09 (It won't work on platforms with no registers) 23:16:23 A MISC/OISC one would probably be feasible. 23:16:39 (No registers, but you can always just claim a specific chunk of memory as registers) 23:18:01 Ah--I meant to take note at every opportunity. 23:19:47 GregorR: Feasable, but would it be EASY to get something working? :P 23:19:59 No. Not even the slightest bit. 23:20:12 heh