00:43:48 -!- ihope_ has joined. 00:52:08 -!- Slereah has joined. 01:22:55 -!- DocWilco has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 01:33:01 -!- immibis has joined. 01:44:34 -!- DocWilco has joined. 02:37:08 -!- MrArmadillo has joined. 02:42:59 -!- immibis has quit ("Hi Im a qit msg virus. Pls rplce ur old qit msg wit tis 1 & hlp me tk ovr th wrld of IRC. Hard work pays off in the future, l). 02:51:06 Please, someone divide 482 in half. 02:52:44 did it 02:52:57 Thank you. 02:54:13 -!- Bigcheese has joined. 02:55:50 Someone please find my IP and display it here in the channel. 02:55:59 2 02:56:12 Well... thank you for the effort. 02:56:36 -!- MrArmadillo has left (?). 02:56:43 No. 03:08:39 66.74.149.10 03:08:58 ... 03:09:51 hey, I did what he asked 03:10:39 his IP is version 4 03:11:06 I don't think you can connect to freenode with ipv6 03:11:33 you can 03:12:03 :O 03:12:11 of course you can 03:12:14 too bad ISPs hate us all 03:12:28 and wont do ipv6 to the home ;/ 03:26:14 Too bad ISPs hate us all, and won't do 10BASE-T to the home. 03:26:26 indeed 03:26:26 (much less some nice fiber) 03:26:52 err 03:27:10 10BASE-T to the home would suck... unless they where under 100m from your house 03:27:21 Bigcheese: You know what I mean. 03:27:34 :P 03:27:44 10mb isn't really all that great anyway 03:28:01 can already do that with good dsl or cable 03:28:32 Where? 03:28:36 South Korea? :p 03:28:50 usa 03:28:51 dude 03:28:58 Colorado Springs, CO. 03:29:02 Korea has 100mb to every home 03:29:05 5 MBs down, 512K up. 03:29:05 :P 03:29:06 I know. 03:29:08 damn 03:31:43 -!- Sabskm has joined. 03:45:26 -!- Slereah has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 06:31:12 -!- oerjan has joined. 06:42:24 -!- sekhmet has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 06:53:22 -!- sekhmet has joined. 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 09:34:43 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 10:10:29 -!- faxathisia has joined. 11:07:21 I wrote a fractran interpreter in J 11:07:22 (*{~1 i.~[@(=<.)@:*) 11:07:35 well maybe interpreter is the wrong word but it runs the thing 11:09:54 (example use http://rafb.net/p/4VYh4b29.txt ) 11:12:28 should add that to http://esolangs.org/wiki/Fractran ? 11:20:34 I... killed EgoBot? :( 11:24:47 EGOBOT! SPEAK TO MEEEEE! 11:26:27 -!- Slereah has joined. 11:41:48 Huh? 11:44:15 -!- Sabskm has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 11:59:35 it's so sad Sabskm is gone :< 12:04:53 That's me. 12:21:31 well, almost 12:51:31 -!- Sabskm has joined. 13:03:31 -!- Slereah has quit (Nick collision from services.). 13:03:33 -!- Sabskm has changed nick to Slereah. 13:13:20 yes, yes, i'm referring to the consonant cluster, you rarely see that nice ones 13:13:26 except for bsmnt of course 13:14:01 Sabskm derives from egyptian. 13:14:17 And since I don't know most of the vowels involved, that's that. 13:15:05 i was not being sarcastic, and you know egyptian? 13:16:15 Nah. 13:16:27 Just browsed some egyptian grammar. 13:25:19 -!- jix has joined. 14:00:21 -!- Sgeo has joined. 14:24:05 -!- RedDak has joined. 14:38:07 -!- oerjan has joined. 14:50:32 -!- RodgerTheGreat has quit. 15:22:12 -!- jix has quit (Nick collision from services.). 15:22:22 -!- jix has joined. 15:24:22 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 15:48:48 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 16:20:22 -!- faxathisia has quit ("Leaving"). 16:51:19 -!- sebbu has joined. 17:35:29 -!- oklopol has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 18:02:11 -!- oklopol has joined. 18:20:33 -!- faxathisia has joined. 18:25:25 Isn't there a turing-incomplete catagory in the wiki? 18:49:36 -!- RodgerTheGreat has joined. 18:58:12 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 19:07:53 -!- pikhq has joined. 19:08:01 -!- oerjan has joined. 19:19:56 faxathisia: finite automaton and pushdown automaton are included in turing-incomplete, but there is no supercategory 19:20:39 I mean.. ones which are not turing complete 19:20:59 like regex, SQL, Haskell type system, etc 19:21:10 (although those aren't esoteric ones I suppose) 19:21:11 i understand. it would be a supercategory of both FSA and PDA 19:21:24 what is a supercatagory? 19:21:59 a category that includes the others 19:22:19 in the hierarchical sense, not the category theory sense 19:22:21 Ohhh 19:22:28 I'm sorry I totally misread what you first said 19:23:00 heeh, i wonder if they have categories on the category theory wiki 19:25:46 Category: Computational class only has FSA, PDA, TC and unknown class 19:27:37 aha, Esolang:Categorization contains uncomputable but it's not included in the supercategory 19:29:16 fixed 19:39:50 -!- ihope_ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 19:53:25 -!- RodgerTheGreat has quit. 19:55:38 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 19:56:06 -!- pikhq has joined. 20:06:08 http://www.vjn.fi/pb/p163633625.txt <<< i wonder if i'll get a tc system by adding these retarded random instructions for long enough :P 20:07:29 * faxathisia chokes with laughter at this ! 20:07:53 that's the point, at least once that's ready, and has more instructions than any language ever. 20:08:02 (it's not like it's hard making more of those...) 20:08:43 c - outputs "the following is a quine" + source code in ascii <<< i'm very proud of this one 20:09:55 it's a lie, isn't it? 20:10:32 yes 20:10:44 i'll fool many! 20:10:45 ... 20:11:31 what about adding a colon and space after quine? 20:11:35 i should write this in python or something, english gets a bit clumsy when there's no idea behind the instructions. 20:11:56 * faxathisia cannot stop laughing at "baby you make me sing" 20:11:57 i left that out on purpose. 20:12:06 :D 20:12:49 it'd be interesting if there was a program that constantly tried to get something tc out of my instructions, and when it found it, it'd make a bling of some sort 20:13:05 haha 20:13:40 so i could just add and add, and when it found tcness, i could check if it's non trivial enough to leave in, or do i have to add "and after then, output 'btw this is instruction that makes the language tc '" 20:14:11 is turing complete often a goal for language design ? 20:14:19 yes 20:14:31 I think that turing complete is a good thing to avoid, as well! 20:14:34 at least among esoterists 20:14:41 :) 20:14:44 just as interesting 20:14:52 although i guess anything can be made interesting 20:15:05 ihope: you mentioned pens for stick bombs a few months ago right? 20:15:59 i tried making a basic popsicle stick bomb with a pen in the middle... the stick crack instantly 20:16:35 also, using a harder material than those sticks does not allow for any trivial bomb structure 20:17:03 i'm fairly sure there's *some* bomb-tc structure for any hardness, though. 20:17:23 not bomb tc, more like bomb fsa 20:17:41 since you can't make an infinitely exploding bomb ofc 20:18:20 it took me a while to come up with a structure you can extend arbitrarily, but now that i found it, i have a new hobby :P 20:18:38 been making unstable stick frames all day! 20:18:55 infinitely exploding bombs require strange matter... 20:19:32 hmm, indeed, just as well as you can use tc for an asm, you could use it for stick bombs. 20:19:50 although i guess it'll only make sense if there's at least *some* rebuilding going on 20:20:15 if there's just a continuous explosion, i don't really see a possibility for computation 20:21:09 so, what about them school shootings? 20:23:52 bsmntbombdood: i think you should drop those plans 20:24:09 lol wut? 20:24:48 i am just leaping to the natural conclusion given the current conversation + your nick :D 20:25:08 heh 20:25:23 * oklopol contemplates killing everyone in his school with a massive stick bomb... twice 20:26:03 not that i consider myself having a school really 20:26:15 since i have... 0 lessons a week there 20:26:23 i was thinking that the performance of past school shootings have been rather dismal 20:27:38 that seems to be the general consensus 20:27:57 the v. tech man did rather well though 20:31:21 oklopol: a Turing machine where all symbol transitions go into a "lower" symbol is Turing-complete. 20:31:25 Can be, that is. 20:31:51 hmm 20:31:53 how? 20:32:19 oh, right 20:32:21 Represent a cell as two cells. 00 means 0, 01 means 1, 11 means "ignore this cell". Except, hmm... 20:32:24 obviously 20:32:32 You can delete cells but you can't add them. 20:32:53 why can't you add? 20:33:02 You can't turn 11 into 00 or 01. 20:33:08 but you can have 4 states 20:33:15 or a hundred 20:33:20 I guess 10 could somehow mean to add an additional cell. 20:33:40 Or you could just move everything over, which is easy-ish. 20:33:55 it's easy conceptually 20:34:02 well any finite set of cells could only be changed a finite number of times 20:34:06 i mean, easy to visualize that it's *possible* 20:34:13 Have an end-of-tape marker. When you want to turn 1 into 0, copy it all over. 20:34:20 yeah 20:34:38 or you could simulate a tag system 20:34:40 Slow as glass, but eh. 20:34:48 Oh, tag systems, yeah. 20:35:05 * ihope ponders a Grand Unified Programming Language 20:35:13 hmm? 20:35:45 A programming language that any other programming language can trivially be compiled into! 20:35:58 Though I guess we need to define "programming language". 20:36:03 i can't really think of any way to do any computation in stick bombs 20:36:26 Seems possible. 20:36:39 -!- RedDak has joined. 20:37:01 hmm... wonder if you could have a system with just multiple tape heads, and just destructive 0->1 transitions... 20:37:07 and have that be tc 20:37:33 Represent the bomb as a directed graph where the nodes are gates that can send output along each line once. 20:37:58 and have some boolean operations at nodes? 20:38:02 Yup. 20:38:23 and then just as long a sequence as can possibly be used... that's definately 20:38:26 *possible* 20:38:32 now how can you make a port... 20:38:38 * oklopol implements! 20:38:40 The time gate: inputs are A and B, output is X. If you get an input along A, send output on X. If you get an input along B then A, do not sent output on X. 20:39:15 Realize that and the world will be in the palm of your hands. Probably. 20:39:19 so B just destroys, A continues the chain reaction onto x 20:39:40 Yeah. 20:39:56 You also need an AND and an OR, which should be easy. 20:39:59 that's basically a... what's that gizmo called xD 20:40:16 you can make and and or using that 20:40:18 methinks 20:40:30 is it a transistor 20:40:38 I don't think ao. 20:41:00 s/ao/so/, of course. 20:41:01 but i'm thinking it can simulate one given perfectly timed actionz 20:41:14 A transistor is pretty much an AND or an AND NOT gate. 20:42:13 The idea behind the time gate is that you can represent a value with two lines: if you find it's 0, set off the 0 line; if you find it's 1, set off the 1 line. 20:42:31 I'm sure the gate does something useful with this. :-P 20:42:42 that's a transistor 20:43:06 A transistor doesn't care which order the voltages come in, does it? 20:43:23 One on input then one on control is just as good as one on control then one on input. 20:43:39 well, i think more like they have to com at the same time 20:43:45 *cum 20:43:55 i'm not saying it's the exact same 20:44:11 i'm saying you can do the and and or ports the same way as with transistors 20:44:21 Ah. 20:44:53 I guess this time gate is really a NOT gate that waits a while. 20:45:02 ...or not, actually... i feel there is an isomorphism, but it's not trivial enough i could actually see what it is 20:45:50 There might be. The time gate has a state: given that A and B are both set off, you can't tell whether X is set off. 20:46:49 hmm... i don't have enough sticks to try anything interesting 20:47:06 I think NOT is really unnecessary; you can do the same thing with separate lines for 0 and 1. 20:47:17 I'd DCC my sticks to you, if that were possible. 20:47:23 I think I have plenty. 20:47:27 -!- Jontte has quit ("Konversation terminated!"). 20:47:34 what's "plenty"? 20:47:38 i have 30 20:48:16 you need 4 sticks for a sticksize*sticksize cell 20:48:30 plus 1 extra @ each termination point 20:49:00 I have over 250. 20:49:06 why? 20:49:13 and have you made anything with them= 20:49:14 ? 20:49:22 They are currently not in a "made" form. 20:49:26 oh 20:49:27 i see 20:49:29 I have made stuff with them, though. 20:49:37 so you have lots of ice cream?= :) 20:49:50 I bought them at a craft store. :-) 20:50:09 hmm... then i don't know what you mean by "\"made\" form" 20:50:28 Now, we all know that the most important tool in bomb building is a heavy book. :-) 20:50:39 I made stuff with them, then un-made it and put the sticks back in the box. 20:50:53 what's the biggest you've made? 20:51:27 i just use my hands, have so little sticks i didn't exactly need any help making a full bomb 20:51:30 I've made a bomb with about 6 segments, each a stick long. 20:51:31 -!- Jontte has joined. 20:51:35 wight 20:51:36 right 20:51:44 i made an 8-long 20:51:49 that was like a 3-minute job 20:51:55 i need sticks=!= 20:51:57 hmm 20:52:08 also, i seem to need a bigger question mark button 20:52:27 We could pastebin our designs, sort of. 20:52:36 sure 20:53:05 Are you using the overlapping HH for your segmented bombs? 20:53:14 mine is what tim fort uses, i think, copied the rectangular look, and the rest was pretty obvious 20:53:20 yes. 20:54:06 i also made something using an x or some sort, but it's harder to make, and uses just as many sticks; and much less stable 20:54:44 i also tried to make the 4-stick form extendable, but it doesn't work. 20:54:54 4-stick bomb 20:55:14 I think I've pondered that. 20:56:21 Oh, that's an interesting terminator. 20:56:33 hmm? 20:56:49 It's the slash-V part of the four-stick bomb. 20:58:11 That can act as a terminator for the segmented bomb. It has three sticks, which is the minimum. 20:58:51 Except, of course, for the single stick, which can also act as a terminator but can't attach to itself. 20:59:59 ah, terminator for a sequence of rectangles, not a terminator for an explosion :) 21:00:37 but indeed, that is a nice terminator 21:00:38 A book is a terminator for an explosion. :-) 21:00:58 And since we're inventing terminology, I think I'll call the HH a bridge. 21:01:01 hmm, indeed... perhaps you could make an explosion make a book fall? 21:01:19 Sounds easy enough. You just need sticks that are sturdy enough to hold up a book. 21:01:29 i guess that's feasible, since i thought of it as a bridge too, at some point 21:01:56 (the term came from my 3*1 one with a pen in the middle... it was kinda brigey) 21:02:00 *bridgey 21:02:04 bridgy 21:02:40 you could have bigger sticks at the book felling part 21:02:45 And I'll also call this whole thing the DUD paradigm: one stick is pushed down, one is pushed up, one is pushed down. 21:03:19 yeah, of the other way around 21:03:22 *or 21:07:04 "DUD" is a word, so it's better. :-) 21:08:01 yeah, but isn't it a bit misleading? 21:08:52 The fact that it's "dud"? 21:09:29 well, isn't dud something that does *not* explode? 21:10:21 try to find something with T and N instead :) 21:10:25 i can picture it now, you have two sets of 4 detonators, and a set of 8 detonators in the other end, to receive the result of a 4-bit multiplication! 21:10:36 heh 21:11:01 työntö / nosto 21:14:01 ihope: have you built anything 3d? 21:15:03 -!- ihope_ has joined. 21:15:13 ihope: have you built anything 3d? 21:15:33 a cube can be built with a hook 21:15:47 although i haven't tried 21:16:28 I've built something 3d with pencils and rubber bands :-P 21:16:46 I guess calling it the TNT paradigm is pretty obvious. 21:17:20 What should it stand for? 21:17:29 Saying that the N is "negative" is easy. 21:18:13 Maybe I should come up with a reason for calling it U2,3,5 :-P 21:22:26 well, työntö/nosto ;) 21:22:31 hmm 21:22:34 Oh. What's it mean? 21:22:41 push/lift :D 21:22:47 not exactly correct 21:22:49 Ah, that's easy :-) 21:23:12 Better than "tower" or "traverse" or "treason" or something. 21:23:23 Or "topple". "Top", maybe. 21:23:32 top/negative! 21:23:35 But top/negative doesn't make much sense. 21:23:39 ...heh 21:23:55 Työntö/nosto is better, I'm guessing. 21:23:57 anyhow, 3d with pens and rubber bands... the question is, did it explode? 21:24:08 Not at all. 21:24:15 Well, maybe slightly. 21:24:15 sure, if you don't mind it's finnish and has an umlaut ;) 21:24:47 i actually took some rubber bands out and tried making a 3d one... but i'm pretty sure no one in the world is that handy. 21:24:49 i mean 21:24:56 it's im fucking possible 21:24:58 If we ever make a wiki, we could have {{tyonto}} be "työntö". 21:25:15 tyoentoe xD 21:25:20 Yay! 21:25:33 It'd go well with my Goedel and Schroedinger. 21:25:51 So, shall we make a stick bomb wiki somewhere? :-) 21:26:39 my 3d-model was to have two basic rectangles, lift them up, and put a rubber band where pull is needed, and a stick where a push is needed... neither of those exactly makes it stable enough to stand on it's own... 21:26:47 heh, sure :P 21:27:28 I think it's easy enough to build a cube with sticks and rubber bands. 21:27:33 we'll put it on the esolang wiki under "very finited state automata" 21:27:34 You do the honors. :-P 21:27:50 Oh, on Esolang? How mundane. 21:27:55 heh 21:27:56 And yet how practical. 21:28:09 you saying it'd be easy to make a cube bomb? :O 21:28:13 i bow thee, master 21:28:21 I didn't say a bomb. :-) 21:28:33 oh 21:28:39 then it's incredibly simple :) 21:28:43 I guess you could just take a bomb and use it as one of the faces, though :-P 21:28:54 or all the walls 21:28:58 but it won't fully detonate. 21:29:14 No? 21:29:27 nope 21:29:42 -!- jix has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 21:29:49 have you tried putting two one-stick-terminated ..tnt's together? 21:30:01 they sometimes blow up, but usually not. 21:30:23 You mean stick terminator, HH, HH, stick terminator? 21:30:27 it's interesting, actually, to make a long chaing, and just make them explode one by one 21:30:30 oh 21:30:34 an HH 21:30:37 fully terminated 21:30:38 Yes. :-) 21:30:52 and an HH with the other termination shared with the first one 21:30:59 Ah. 21:31:05 Term, HH, term, HH, term, then? 21:31:10 yes 21:31:26 heh, i see the formal grammar is beginning to form ;) 21:31:35 :-) 21:32:21 Next it'll be | HH | HH |. 21:32:22 hmm, could you pastebin the exact form of your thing somehow? i want to be sure we really have the same one, even though i'm fairly sure we do 21:32:25 yeah 21:32:40 then we realize a H never exists alone 21:32:43 so |H|H| 21:32:46 Oh yeah. 21:32:56 There are multiple ways to make a |H|H|. 21:33:04 yes 21:33:22 The H's interfaces could be on opposite sides, or they could be on the same side overlapping various ways. 21:33:39 yeah, but each of them is stable, to some extent 21:33:54 * ihope nods 21:34:13 i tried them all before realizing the key to extendability is not to find the correct one of those... but to leave the terminator out. 21:34:22 Yeah. 21:34:42 We need a machine that can churn out an |HHHHHHHHHHHHH| in fifteen seconds. 21:34:50 -!- AnMaster has quit (Success). 21:35:07 yeah 21:35:14 *chunk chunk chunk chunk chunk* *Pthththththththt!* "Darn it!" 21:35:18 wonder if they sell those... 21:35:39 I think we'd have to build one, or use some other all-purpose machine. :-) 21:36:10 You know, an obvious abbreviation would be something like |H2|. 21:36:17 -!- AnMaster has joined. 21:36:29 ...do we have any tc stick builders on the wiki? 21:36:48 TC stick builders? 21:37:04 that would be, yes, but if you wanna extend that to other directions... 21:37:07 i mean 21:37:11 |H2| would be nice 21:37:24 have you made anything but straight lines? 21:37:32 i made a 3*3 square 21:37:46 Though of course 2 isn't shorter than H by much. 21:37:52 What sort of 3*3 square? 21:38:03 hmm... actually i didn't finish it, it blew apart when i was adding the last corner 21:38:06 umm 21:38:14 well, i had the basic H 21:38:21 then make |H3| 21:38:33 Then you make it turn? 21:38:44 then took the middle, and added a |H3| to form a cross 21:38:57 so that the middles of the |H3|'s were the same 21:38:57 Oh, hum... 21:39:09 I think I may know what you mean. 21:39:11 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night"). 21:39:45 i'm not sure what forms you can extend it, but that model is very extendable 21:40:13 Remove the side of an H and put a different bridge in there? 21:40:24 yes 21:40:29 * ihope tries 21:42:54 Well then, the major thing is a cross with interfaces around it. 21:43:17 yep 21:43:29 although i didn't manage to build it right away 21:43:39 perhaps because i don't use a book 21:44:03 and because i build on my bed, which is prolly not optimal 21:44:37 Indeed. 21:46:05 Yay, I made an L. 21:46:58 * ihope makes four |H|s and connects them with a cross 21:47:21 -!- Jontte has quit (Remote closed the connection). 21:47:32 * ihope actually doesn't, because he's hungry 21:47:47 -!- Jontte has joined. 21:48:16 -!- Jontte has quit (Remote closed the connection). 21:48:36 -!- Jontte has joined. 21:48:49 Something like flexible three-slot Lincoln logs would be nice. 21:51:21 i'll make the 3*3 square now 22:02:33 lol, can't even succeed in the 3*3 cross anymore... 22:05:30 -!- UnrelatedToQaz has joined. 22:15:02 -!- Jontte has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:15:14 -!- UnrelatedToQaz has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.79 [Firefox 2.0.0.11/2007112718]"). 22:15:36 -!- Jontte has joined. 22:21:20 did it! 22:21:34 took only like 10 tries... 22:38:06 -!- RedDak has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:46:46 -!- Jontte has quit ("Konversation terminated!"). 22:51:15 -!- ihope_ has quit ("http://tunes.org/~nef/logs/esoteric/06.08.09"). 23:04:41 -!- Jontte has joined.