00:00:45 -!- Sgeo has joined. 00:05:22 -!- coppro has quit ("installing extensions"). 00:07:20 -!- coppro has joined. 00:26:13 -!- ehird_ has joined. 00:26:33 -!- ehird has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 00:26:34 -!- ehird_ has changed nick to ehird. 00:44:49 -!- oerjan has joined. 00:44:52 You know, I can install System 6 from scratch and boot into it in the time it takes Windows XP to boot up... 01:12:53 ive decided that La jetée is the film equivalent of an esolang. 01:16:21 i've decided that adobe reader isn't bloated, if by adobe reader you mean acrobat reader 1 on macintosh system 6. 01:16:29 we're, like, soulmates, like. 01:24:25 -!- fax has quit ("Leaving"). 01:27:03 ehird: :o 01:27:17 * augur bes your soulmate 01:57:01 http://www.retards.org/projects/grackle68k/ twitter for system 6! 02:12:04 -!- ehird has quit. 02:16:52 -!- Slereah_ has quit. 02:22:13 Yay, it's the rarely-seen other third-person singular present form of "to be". 03:10:07 -!- coppro has quit (Remote closed the connection). 03:13:07 -!- coppro has joined. 03:58:48 -!- Azstal has joined. 04:03:13 -!- puzzlet_ has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 04:04:29 -!- puzzlet has joined. 04:09:45 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 04:14:43 -!- Asztal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 04:25:58 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 05:09:59 -!- pingveno has joined. 06:51:52 -!- lifthrasiir has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 06:51:57 -!- lifthrasiir has joined. 07:00:22 -!- calamari has joined. 07:04:07 so 07:04:29 ive learned to play part of philip glass's metamorphosis 1 07:06:52 -!- kar8nga has joined. 07:12:08 augur: If you've learned part, you've learned the whole thing. 07:12:11 *ba-dum tish* 07:12:42 gregor: VERY true 07:12:53 i just have to learn how the pieces are put together 07:12:55 i mean 07:13:07 its a lot of repetition, but then theres structure to the repetition 07:13:22 Yesh. 07:13:37 individual musical phrases repeat a lot, but not simply over and over 07:13:54 Eggzactly. It's the complex interweaving of the phrases that makes it ... well, Glass. 07:14:01 :) 07:14:15 also, i discovered on my own the very beginning to the star trek theme 07:14:16 :D 07:14:26 Which Star Trek theme? 07:14:29 TOS? 07:14:49 yeah 07:14:58 Well, I'm going to go discover my bed. 07:15:05 And then sleep in it. 07:15:14 :P 07:15:49 -!- pingveno has quit (Remote closed the connection). 07:43:11 -!- Cerise has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 07:59:33 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:05:50 -!- Sgeo has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 08:25:00 -!- Pthing has joined. 08:26:54 -!- AnMaster has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 08:27:10 -!- AnMaster has joined. 08:28:19 -!- kar8nga has joined. 08:33:31 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 08:59:32 -!- coppro has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 09:03:42 -!- oerjan has joined. 09:16:07 -!- Azstal has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 09:18:03 -!- Slereah has joined. 10:21:17 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 11:18:10 -!- Gracenotes has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 11:29:29 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 12:07:59 -!- ehird has joined. 12:09:00 23:13:54 Eggzactly. It's the complex interweaving of the phrases that makes it ... well, Glass. 12:09:06 from where i come from it's the sand that makes it glass. 12:09:38 Meanwhile: landline GET 12:12:25 -!- FireFly has joined. 12:23:29 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 12:32:03 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("Page closed"). 13:03:22 begin 644 spongy.com 13:03:22 ML!/-$&@`H`>ZR`/N0N[N[D!U]??C0`'X]W05N7\`*=/C9 13:03:23 M^]X(@/,"V"'4$V>")!-[!K8L`WQCBW;4!,>V^^/^M]^,#1/7WX9($*SQ5 13:03:23 F@]T`>PL)]GKJ:\D#<>#K!?[#==A+D\'H`JIA1W6;1>1@_LAUE,,` 13:03:24 ` 13:03:24 end 13:03:24 No output. 13:03:28 xD 13:11:04 "You can get BE broadband on 01661833939 13:11:04 It's probably going to be this fast: 13:11:05 megs*" 13:11:05 Thanks, ISP website 13:11:21 It's going to be (null) megabits fast! 13:38:07 hmm that's a phone number innit 13:38:15 who cares 13:38:43 ooh, "833939" is nicely patternonic 13:46:44 -!- MigoMipo has joined. 13:57:59 Nokia lost 559 M€ following a profit of 1.09 G€. 13:58:01 Ouch. 13:58:16 (Yes, I just used SI prefixes on currency. Bite me.) 14:03:32 * ehird decides that 1440x900 is an okay screenshots res; glanced at some screenshots of that size and you don't seem to be able to fit any less work on the screen at once (obviously there's more raw pixels) 14:03:36 *okay screen res 14:04:33 vertically at least; those 150 pixels don't seem to help much. losing 240 horizontal pixels is a bit of an ouch 14:08:32 Yes, they must not be overly happy with the NSN thing. 14:14:43 "gigaeuro" sounds so awesome. 14:16:31 1 G¥ ≈ 507 M₨ 14:16:48 "One gigayen is almost equal to five hundred and seven megarupees." 14:49:54 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined. 15:01:05 -!- Asztal has joined. 15:01:52 -!- ais523 has joined. 15:09:01 Hi ais523. 15:09:09 hi 15:14:29 -!- calamari has quit ("Leaving"). 15:46:34 ooh, "833939" is nicely patternonic <-- "patternonic"? 15:46:45 pattonic would be a patt 15:46:48 work it out yourself 15:47:07 ehird, eh.... "pattonic" or "patternonic"? 15:47:12 please decide on a spelling first 15:47:20 you fail at reading comprehension kthxbai 15:47:46 Definitions of patt on the Web: 15:47:46 * The Trentino Tyrolean Autonomist Party (Partito Autonomista Trentino Tirolese, PATT) is a regionalist christian-democratic Italian political party based in Trentino. 15:47:46 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PATT 15:47:46 * Yale Nance Patt is an American professor of electrical and computer engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. ... 15:47:47 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patt 15:47:54 mhm 15:48:00 you continue to fail to stop failing 15:48:04 I guess it is related to patterns in some way though 15:48:06 that is all I can said 15:48:12 say* 15:50:34 ais523: has anything happened in agora since "OFF: [IADoP] Interstellar Manifest", 12 october? 15:50:36 anything noteworthy that is 15:51:00 * ais523 looks 15:51:11 a lot of messages that i haven't read 15:51:25 loads of NoVs against BobTHJ, most of which were invalid due to typos 15:51:43 and loads of other general judicial stuff 15:51:48 also a large proposal distribution 15:51:56 hmph, have they still not got those novs done? 15:52:06 it's felt strongly judicial, though 15:52:10 not a lot happening except in the courts 15:52:21 then i should have no problem marking all as read. 15:52:48 you probably want to vote on the proposal distribution 15:53:02 I haven't done that in a while 15:54:19 also, can i take this opportunity to say that macintosh system 6 was cool? 15:54:23 thank you. 16:05:44 ehird, indeed it was 16:06:00 even acrobat reader 1 was cool on system 6. 16:06:07 flies even emulating at 1x speed 16:06:15 (admittedly with a faster drive backing it) 16:06:38 oh what emulator? 16:06:48 and where did you get the system image from 16:06:52 Mini vMac. It has no networking, though, and Basilisk II won't accept the ROM. :( 16:06:56 AnMaster: Illegally. 16:07:14 The Mini vMac build emulates a Macintosh Plus with 4 MiB of RAM. 16:07:27 (http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:jPO_WD1H2kYJ:rolli.ch/MacPlus/+mac+plus+rom&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=safari has the link to the ROM.) 16:07:41 Oh, and Mini vMac doesn't support colour. 16:07:46 Or resolutions other than the tiny one on actual Macs. 16:08:04 So it's good for nostalgia, but you can't go "wow, this thing was really powerful and snappy". 16:08:16 I don't have any nostal to gia, but it's fun nonetheless. 16:08:18 heh 16:08:33 Oh, and getting files onto it is a pain; iirc OS X can read and write HFS, but I haven't tried it (not sure how to go about making a disk image). 16:09:26 AnMaster: If you do want to play around with it: http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html 16:09:36 Very useful resource, including a whole shitload of software. 16:10:17 http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/screens/Swedish.gif Mönster?! What monster? 16:11:00 -!- kar8nga has joined. 16:13:46 Those stinking hobbitses at System 7 Today are so evil! 16:13:59 MASTERS OF BLOAT AND DESTRUCTION RAAAAAAAARGH 16:25:19 AnMaster: you won't believe this - Macintosh System Software 1.1 can run at 800x600 16:25:49 this is the OS for a machine that only had one single hardware differentiation: 128 or 512 kibibytes of RAM 16:25:58 and it runs at 800x600 without a hitch 16:28:30 -!- boily has joined. 16:28:31 Runs MacPaint too. 16:28:33 Hi boily 16:29:31 hello! 16:29:47 * ehird boils boily 16:30:24 hm... jacuzzi... 16:30:32 `wolfram the least number not nameable in less than eleven words 16:30:52 $Failed \ \ 16:31:11 wow, this is creepy 16:31:14 bbl 16:31:24 the computer here that's having all sorts of problems is now turning on every now and hten 16:31:27 for about a second 16:31:28 heh 16:31:29 then turning back off again 16:31:53 (it's intermittently booting to a blank screen with a mouse pointer in Win7) 16:32:06 (also, it crashes whenever the screensaver would turn on, even though the screensaver is turned off) 16:32:40 (and by crashes, I mean spins the fan at full speed for about a minute with a blank screen, then turns off) 16:34:09 * ehird drags a floppy into another floppy to see what'd happeen 16:34:14 (Nothing, silent failure) 16:36:26 -!- oerjan has joined. 16:41:14 I'm ever so slightly tempted to acquire the highest-spec mac that can run System 6 (w/ colour display), trick it out with the most-addressable 8MiB of RAM, the most-addressable 2GiB disk, and a broadband connection, just so I can go on IRC and have an honest version string saying "WhateverIRC - Macintosh System 6.0.8, 8192 KB" 16:42:18 (There's even some progress on a System 6 web browser... (although a few already exist)) 16:47:08 IIfx seems to be the fastest 6-faring machine. 16:47:41 Supported up to 128MiB of RAM, which is rather pointless when you can only address 8. 16:47:55 aargh, my computer just spun up its fan again 16:47:56 and it's off! 16:48:08 at least, the power light isn't on, nor are any of the others 16:48:12 although there's a red LED inside it that's lit 16:49:34 And the IIci was the second-fastest. 16:50:04 The IIci will probably be a *lot* easier to acquire, as the IIfx cost from $9,000 to $12,000 — in 1990-1992 dollars. 16:50:21 Plus a lot of the additional features required special software support to take advantage of them. 16:50:37 -!- boily has quit ("leaving"). 16:52:06 Still, 40 MHz instead of 25... those fancy ASICs and coprocessors... an FPU... higher speed RAM with simultaneous read and write... 16:52:35 It is rather tempting. But the IIci is really common and the IIfx isn't, so. 16:53:26 ais523: have you considered that it may be a ghost 16:54:20 -!- zzo38 has joined. 16:54:59 I have found this error message occuring in a Microsoft product: "rDrebTenrsr nc RRdnrTSb SncrrebdRRdncsretrepscdogtia inte F t" 16:55:14 that's quite an error message 16:55:55 To reproduce: Type in (using newlines in place of \): TYPE A\A AS INTEGER\END TYPE\DIM B.B AS A 16:55:57 the desktop here is turning itself on for about a second every now and then for no obvious reason 16:56:00 And then push F5 16:56:05 zzo38: in which program? 16:56:07 And it will appear this message. 16:56:17 QuickBasic Extended 16:56:26 are you sure that isn't a corrupted copy? 16:56:38 it looks a bit like corruption, although not that much 16:56:40 because it's all letters 16:56:43 and spaces 16:56:46 Looks like interleaving messages. 16:58:42 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 17:00:31 back 17:00:43 AnMaster: you won't believe this - Macintosh System Software 1.1 can run at 800x600 <-- why wouldn't I believe it? 17:01:05 because it was 1984, and macintoshes only ran at one resolution for many, many years after that? 17:01:11 800x600 was a pretty large screen res back then 17:01:17 1984 is before I was born 17:01:20 http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/screens/Swedish.gif Mönster?! What monster? 17:01:22 err no 17:01:26 mönster == pattern 17:01:27 ais523: more to the point, you couldn't plug an external monitor into macs for ages 17:01:29 and 640x480 with as many as 16 colours was good when I was young 17:01:32 AnMaster: it's a joke. hah a. 17:01:34 *ha ha 17:01:37 ehird, oh ok 17:01:38 didn't know 17:01:45 ehird, I can't see anything funny in it 17:01:58 ais523: so it's shocking that the second release (almost identical to system 1) supported 800x600 17:02:20 futureproofing, I suppose 17:02:27 since it was, like, 1990 when the first mac went on sale that let you plug in your own monitor, thus ending the era of 512x342 17:02:48 ais523: but the macs that let you plug in your own monitor don't support system software 1.1! :-P 17:02:51 512x342 <-- heh 17:03:03 and the computer just turned on again 17:03:07 I wonder if there's a pattern here? 17:03:08 512x342 is a pretty good resolution 17:03:09 ehird, maybe they planned that feature earlier on? 17:03:15 I should record it in IRC so I can look back at the timestamps later 17:03:24 AnMaster: I'm about 90% sure they didn't 17:03:34 Anyway, obviously the emulator has to do hackery to get it to run 17:03:37 So I doubt they coded actual support for it 17:03:41 ehird, can't it go above 800x600? 17:03:45 But the fact that they didn't hardcode it and make it break is amazing 17:03:53 AnMaster: Basilisk II can, but I don't think it supports system 1 17:03:56 vMac can't 17:04:00 at least with the gui 17:04:00 mhm 17:04:10 It isn't very often I found some guy who knows how to program in Forth, but yesterday I met a retired computer sciences teacher and I asked him if he knew Forth, and he does 17:04:41 ehird, about basilisk II... getting a rom from a newworld doesn't work sadly. 17:04:50 what with openfirmware instead 17:05:06 Piracy. It's easy to get a Quadra rom; they're all over the plalce. 17:05:08 *place 17:05:12 mhm 17:05:33 Now, where is the guy who wrote rawirc.c 17:05:54 Anyway, people who bought the (roughly $5k in today's dollars) original Macintosh were totally fucked by Apple: three years later, 3.2 was released, which didn't support it. 17:05:55 anyway, the harddrive in that old mac is so fscking loud that I hate to turn it on when I become nostalgic 17:06:14 (And the same year as the original one the came out the 512K one did too...) 17:06:25 AnMaster: Just use a floppy-based system 17:06:31 ehird, eh? 17:06:40 ehird, usb floppy drive? 17:06:42 it is an *ibook* 17:06:46 Install the OS to a floppy, boot from it, install other programs onto other floppies 17:06:46 Oh 17:06:47 Lame 17:06:55 iBooks can't even run system 6! 17:07:00 WHAT USE ARE THEY 17:07:01 ehird, and it runs OS 9 in fact. 17:07:14 which, while snappy, isn't very stable 17:07:24 OS 9 is not snappy compared to OS 8 17:07:31 ehird, on that hardware it is 17:07:39 in an emulator I bet it wouldn't be 17:07:42 which is not snappy compared to 7, which is REALLY not snappy compared to 6 17:07:49 ...but 6 is about the speed of the others. 17:08:06 AnMaster: probably they optimised 9 for the iBook. 17:08:22 ehird, actually, imacs came with it too 17:08:27 wrt noise, the original Macintosh was cool; only moving part was the floppy drive 17:08:30 oh and... running MS DOS 6.2 on a modern computer would be incredibly snappy too 17:08:36 -!- zzo38 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 17:08:48 AnMaster: The iBook shipped with 8.5, I belieeive. 17:08:48 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 17:08:49 *believe 17:09:03 And yes, but 8 can do all that 9 can. 17:09:19 And 7 can do just about all that 8 can apart from web browsing well (IE 4 / NN 4 max). 17:09:21 ehird, yes it did, but I got some "you got this so late that we will offer free upgrade to OS 9" kind of thing 17:09:28 like, a week before OS 9 release or something 17:09:30 forgot the details 17:09:31 And 6 can do all the bits of 7 that matter. 17:09:44 And -1 can liberate you from the anti-zen of computers! 17:09:53 :P 17:10:35 Pre-6 had no multitasking, though/ 17:10:38 *though. 17:10:43 And in 6 you had to change a setting to get multitasking. 17:11:01 (Set it to start up with Multifinder instead of Finder.) 17:11:11 didn't macs support networking booting? Possibly some custom protocol 17:11:21 but pretty certain I seen an option on the ibook for that somewhere 17:11:32 to boot from an appleshare server or something 17:11:53 Yes. 17:11:55 I think. 17:11:55 possibly one could use this to get around the disk noise issue. 17:12:13 Why not just plug in a USB stick? 17:12:18 AnMaster: i declare today's mezzacotta comic sufficiently insane 17:12:20 ehird, it can't boot from that. I tried. 17:12:21 Admittedly I'm not sure it could boot from that, but worth a try. 17:12:23 Aw. 17:12:33 AnMaster: Yes it could, via a system extension. 17:12:34 >:) 17:12:44 ehird, oh? 17:12:55 oerjan, hm, don't read that one. 17:13:00 Sure. They run within MacOS, so just use the USB routines, set it up, and boot. 17:13:18 this feels like loadlin somehow 17:13:38 -!- zzo38 has joined. 17:13:39 it's the autogenerated one. mostly crap. today it felt even a bit more surreal than usual. 17:13:45 -!- zzo38 has left (?). 17:13:57 I haven't read mezzacotta for ages 17:14:05 it's the autogenerated one. mostly crap. today it felt even a bit more surreal than usual. <-- the I know about the first two statements... 17:15:31 they should do an archive binge of mezzacotta 17:15:32 ALL OF IT 17:16:26 hasn't generated a hall of fame comic for weeks, but that's mainly because there aren't 50 voting readers any more, i think 17:19:31 computer just spun up again 17:21:47 ais523: i think it had the fatal flaw (apart from being 99% crap) that it needed many voters to get anything interesting up, and once it fell below a threshold (happened about new year i think) it was doomed to a slow death 17:22:16 oerjan: agreed 17:22:44 they should discontinue the comic and just do the other fun stuff 17:23:10 keep the hall of fame ones though 17:23:31 heck DMM essentially keeps complaining he doesn't have time for what they have 17:23:36 most of the hall-of-fames were pretty rubbish, too 17:24:08 true 17:24:11 just nuke the whole thing then 17:24:37 most of them aren't funny, just metahumorous 17:24:53 ehird, after you archive the whole current history that is 17:25:11 No; over 99% of that is crap, and there are hundreds of trillions of comics. 17:25:20 They're not actually, you know, stored on disk, anyway. 17:25:35 actually, I was wondering if only comics that had ever been seen stayed the same 17:25:39 (I'm absolutely sure about the over 99% thing) 17:25:49 so that new comics can be added in the entries that have never been seen 17:25:54 as well as in the daily updates 17:26:11 I am almost totally sure that they just use the date as a random seed. 17:26:16 ais523: i have had a feeling that new characters appear sometimes... 17:26:36 oerjan: Almost certainly conditioned for >day_we_introduced 17:26:36 ehird: yes, but they cache those that have been visited 17:26:49 All of them? 17:26:58 probably not too hard 17:27:04 after all, it's not like they're storing images 17:27:08 they're just a few lines of SVG 17:27:18 and, they might even just store the generation algo + seed 17:28:05 ais523: erm that wouldn't give any speedup, which is why they started caching 17:28:18 the caching would be so you could write new comics 17:28:25 in the gaps between the ones which people had looked at 17:28:33 say if you have a new character, or an improved generation algo 17:28:46 I highly doubt that happens 17:29:03 I'm fairly sure they'll only ever make future comics change 17:29:23 but then the new characters would take months to show up 17:29:26 and nobody would be looking 17:29:32 besides, people mostly only look at the past ones anyway 17:30:30 Yes, but it'd mean that some characters around read areas would be mysteriously rare. 17:30:33 And mysteriously common in other places. 17:30:35 you cannot look at future ones 17:30:38 Besides, "cache". 17:30:41 oerjan: exactly 17:34:50 computer turned on again 17:35:45 17:34, 17:19, 17:03, 16:49 17:35:50 seems to be about once every 15 minutes 17:40:27 -!- fax has joined. 17:45:18 They're not actually, you know, stored on disk, anyway. <-- yeah, I was, you know, joking 17:45:41 Right, well, it wasn't funny. At least mönster was a pun 17:45:44 s/$/./ 17:47:10 ais523, which one turned on? 17:47:26 the desktop here in my office 17:47:37 and I'm writing on my laptop 17:47:39 ehird, puns are no more inherently funny than other jokes 17:47:45 ais523,unplug the power coord 17:47:51 you continue your failure of reading comprehension 17:47:53 -!- adam_d has joined. 17:48:07 ehird, no, you were vague then 17:48:12 incorrect. 17:48:20 is mezzacotta excluded in robots.txt? 17:48:26 or does it stay there as a trap for spiders? 17:48:29 so vague I have no clue what you think I misread. 17:48:42 Whee ISPs 17:48:44 ais523, iirc archive is blocked 17:48:50 ugh, http://mezzacotta.net/robots.txt is boring 17:49:04 et mönster i fönstret 17:49:25 oerjan, yes the raindrops do make a pretty pattern on the window 17:49:25 Whee ISPs. 17:49:45 oerjan, against the far away street light 17:50:26 a pitter-patter pattern 17:57:46 oerjan, eh? 18:01:22 just a rainy rhyme 18:02:00 * AnMaster wonders if ehird ever watches the BBC Proms 18:02:19 * ehird wonders to what that is apropos. 18:02:31 ehird, out of the blue 18:02:37 * oerjan used to watch the proms when he watched tv 18:02:44 Sentient colour technology! 18:03:36 oerjan, I wished it wasn't such a short cut version sent on Swedish television... :( It reminds me of "highlights of hamlet" ;P 18:03:48 But the answer is no. 18:03:56 ehird, why? 18:04:04 I...just don't. 18:04:53 well it was just the last night back then, wp tells me it's actually really 8 weeks of concerts 18:04:55 oh? I thought you would at least like the last night of the proms... Even if not the other proms 18:05:28 oerjan, wait what, you didn't know? 18:05:40 After all it is called "last night of the proms" the one commonly broadcast outside UK 18:05:41 i vaguely knew 18:05:42 AnMaster: I've never seen it, so I wouldn't know. 18:05:55 ehird, how very un-English :P 18:05:55 not how much the rest was, though 18:05:57 I've never really watched much TV. 18:05:59 * AnMaster wonders about ais523 18:06:04 AnMaster: Yes! I don't even like crumpets. 18:06:41 ehird, iirc they come in many variations? 18:06:51 Crumpet generally refers to one thing. 18:06:58 AnMaster: it's like how people never visit the tourist attractions of their own city 18:07:01 *to one thing 18:07:15 ehird, well the one I have seen I quite liked. Was years ago though. 18:07:20 To be honest Britain doesn't really have any culture these days. 18:07:38 oerjan, hm. You are saying that is all it is? 18:07:56 All what is? 18:07:56 Ho-hum; I wrote (well, wrote a Perl script which wrote) http://zem.fi/rfk86/ with the Unicode line-drawing characters, and it looked just right at work; but on this OS X system, the layout's gone all wonky, since "monospace" doesn't really seem to mean monospace here. 18:08:10 AnMaster: heck if i know 18:08:16 fizzie: "monospace" doesn't mean monospaced on Linux, either. 18:08:26 Sometimes the most common characters are monospaced. 18:08:28 Sometimes not. 18:08:33 Less ccommon ones rarely are. 18:08:38 ccccccccccccccccccccccc 18:08:42 fizzie: May I suggest using Monaco on OS X? 18:08:49 It might have the right characters. 18:09:05 For extra points, 10pt Monaco; lovely crisp unantialiased funtime. 18:09:07 Deewiant: wut 18:09:13 ehird: ccccccccccccccccccccccommon 18:09:19 Ah. 18:09:25 Deewiant: Still using that Zero? :P 18:09:46 You already asked me about the browns, didn't you :-P 18:09:52 I.e. no, I'm on the browns. 18:09:55 http://zem.fi/rfk86/screens.html looks wonky, also. 18:10:00 Deewiant: Ha ha joke funny laugh get it? 18:10:15 Nope 18:10:23 You stuttered keys. 18:10:24 Ha ha funny. 18:10:35 fizzie: btw the "a" in that font is supremely uglies! 18:10:38 fizzie: "monospace" doesn't mean monospaced on Linux, either. <-- it looks right to me though 18:10:47 Lucky you. 18:10:53 I thought you were just trying to say that I can't complain because my Zero sucks more :-P 18:11:01 argh desktop computer stop that! 18:11:05 * ais523 is tempted to disconnect the power 18:11:07 but why the pulsing edge (well, static) 18:11:32 Eh? 18:11:32 as in, the horizontal lines are brighter at regular intervals 18:11:33 Deewiant: Just ask majestouch; the Zeros are flawless! 18:11:33 ╚═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 18:11:33 like that 18:11:35 oh I think spacing fail 18:11:36 Your antialiasing sucks. 18:11:43 There is no fail by fizzie. 18:11:45 ais523: maybe it is trying to send some spam ;D 18:11:57 ehird, font fail possibly. 18:11:59 It looks right to me on the Ubuntu at work, and on this Debian at home; but it doesn't seem very robust. I guess I should just do a similar-looking thing with CSS boxery. 18:12:02 or AA setting issue 18:12:11 fizzie: Monaco 10pt! Monaco 10pt! 18:12:14 OR I'LL BREAK YOUR JOINT 18:12:15 fizzie, more boring though 18:12:16 Monaco 10pt! 18:12:24 It rhymes, it must be true. 18:12:24 ehird, only macs have that... 18:12:26 so useless 18:12:40 Yes, but it looks fine on common X11s. 18:12:45 And who cares about Windows? 18:12:51 ehird, well that last is true 18:12:52 So, ON OS X, MONACO 10pt! Joint! Point! Thing. 18:13:01 and how can it look good on Linux? 18:13:05 if they lack it 18:13:11 Monaco, whateverthereisno 18:13:13 s/$/w/ 18:13:25 Bitstream Vera Sans Mono 18:13:30 Display is fixed on OS X, continues to look fine on Linux unless you have crappy antialiasing in which case meh to you. 18:13:30 or Dejvavu 18:13:30 Oh. 18:13:34 Use DejaVu of course. 18:13:51 10.6's default monospaced font, Menlo, is a modified DejaVu Sans Mono... 18:14:33 -!- Sgeo has joined. 18:14:50 Dejavu Sans Mono, fall back on Bitstream Vera Sans Mono, fall back on Monaco? 18:14:57 then on monospace I guess 18:16:03 No. 18:16:06 Macs often have DejaVu. 18:16:10 Put Monaco first. 18:16:18 mhm 18:16:33 You may need some hackery to do 10pt only on Macs, but the whole reason to use Monaco is because 10pt is unantialiased and all retro-like. 18:17:57 ehird, why would 10 pt be non-antialiased? 18:18:40 Because Monaco goes way back to the first version of OS X, so it was a hand-drawn bitmap. 18:18:42 Erm. 18:18:45 First version of MacOS. 18:18:50 That is, it was in System Software 1. 18:19:04 Of course, larger sizes are vector. 18:19:07 Outline. Whatever. 18:19:40 mhm 18:20:00 ehird, why not create bitmap ones for larger ones too? 18:20:29 Because OS X's text rendering looks nice. 18:20:33 Bitmaps would be uglier. 18:20:45 10pt is a good size for Monaco to be crisp, though. 18:20:48 fizzie, why the Asm() stuff? 18:20:54 fizzie, why not as an application? 18:20:58 if the 86 had those 18:23:01 AnMaster: It doesn't -- or if it does, it's not officially supported; they might've released some TI-made statistics tools in a special format. You could do a TI-BASIC start-up wrapper, but delivering "raw" assembly programs is the standard way on the 86. 18:23:30 fizzie, does it have that "apps" button? 18:24:09 No. I'm not sure what it should do, either. 18:24:21 ah 18:24:27 Programs are just program-type variables; there's a "PRGM" button to show a list of them. 18:24:28 fizzie, TI-83+ specific then I guess 18:24:38 and/or TI-83 and TI-84 I guess 18:24:53 fizzie, basically they are stored in flash I think 18:24:57 and are kind of more app like 18:25:00 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 18:25:08 not sure of the details 18:25:24 Yes, well, the TI-86 doesn't have the Flash memory. (And neither does the TI-83.) 18:25:28 ah 18:25:56 fizzie, you can't usually access most data directly from the flash on TI-83+ 18:26:06 as in, you have to move it to ram first 18:26:08 in a meny 18:26:10 menu* 18:26:14 this includes programs 18:26:16 but not applications 18:26:53 fizzie, so in practise you tend to leave most stuff in the battery backed ram 18:28:29 3x4 "v" is hard to distinguish from "u"... 18:29:14 Oh, give the u a tail. 18:30:32 w was hard... 18:31:06 ehird, how do you make it possible to distinguish U from ∐ and ∪? 18:31:07 I don't suppose they've made a widespread font-embedding standard? I could use that 4x6 font I use in the actual game for the website. (Quick wikipediaing -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Font_embedding_on_the_Web#Web_fonts -- doesn't look very promising.) 18:31:09 * AnMaster runs 18:31:18 -!- impomatic has joined. 18:31:21 fizzie: They're working on it now with @font-face. 18:31:27 Just use and alt text 18:31:31 Who cares if it's a pain! 18:31:34 Actually 18:31:40 write some javascript to replace each char with an image 18:31:42 with an alt 18:31:55 That way it will look okay on non-imaging browsers. 18:31:59 What are you trying to do? 18:32:00 I think lynx does [alt text] instead of just alt text. 18:32:04 write some javascript to replace each char with an image <-- this sounds strangely familiar 18:32:12 impomatic: [18:31] fizzie: I don't suppose they've made a widespread font-embedding standard? I could use that 4x6 font I use in the actual game for the website. (Quick wikipediaing -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Font_embedding_on_the_Web#Web_fonts -- doesn't look very promising.) 18:32:22 AnMaster: sIFR does it with a string of text and Flash, but you only use it for titles and stuff. 18:32:35 Hmmm... I'm sure I've seen something in Flash that does that. 18:32:40 ehird, wasn't it scaled to 80% or some other sort of crap 18:32:50 AnMaster: Ehm? 18:32:59 or maybe I misremember 18:34:23 I need to write a JavaScript for context highlighting code at some point 18:34:27 Whee, lowercase letters done. 18:34:33 Admittedly they'll be as high as the uppercase ones, but who cares? 18:35:01 3x4 IS SO readable, naysayers! 18:35:17 ehird, any sample? 18:35:19 I'm still not counting that as 3x4 if you use spacing between. 18:35:36 fizzie: But that's the standard, dude... 18:35:37 For instance 18:35:38 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3x3 18:35:45 Each letter is 3x3, and you put a one pixel space after each letter 18:35:54 It's 3x3, Wikipedia says so, end of, it's valid. 18:36:13 ehird, like you can always trust wikipedia :P 18:36:25 It's not the standard I use; from where I come from, a 8x16 font has 8 pixels horizontally, 16 vertically, and you stack them without any silly gaps. 18:36:29 fizzie is the only person I've ever see claim otherwise as far as metrics go. 18:36:52 fizzie: It's kinda silly to call a column part of the glyph if it always has NO PIXELS SET. 18:36:59 Just consult the file names of your /usr/share/consolefonts/ 18:37:24 ls: /usr/share/consolefonts/: No such file or directory 18:37:24 I win! 18:38:22 Hmm, B is quite tricky. 18:38:31 Ah, there we go. 18:40:14 And anyway, it's not like you can do line-drawing characters at all if you always add gaps between the character cells. 18:40:42 But don't worry, I'll just mentally substitute 4x5 whenever you say 3x4. 18:40:42 Eh? 18:40:58 fizzie, yeah indeed 18:41:06 The problem, fizzie, is that your definition is really stupid. 18:41:21 I plot 3x4 pixels, and that is a glyph. If you rendered that glyph, that is how many pixels you would use. 18:41:30 Yes, you add spacing to use it in text— like *every* font. 18:41:35 ehird, how will you draw the line drawing chars then? 18:41:50 I think that question is very valid 18:42:05 AnMaster: I'm skeptical that you even know what that means. It sounds like you're specifically parroting fizzie. 18:42:08 And the answer is you don't. And? 18:42:20 For instance 18:42:26 ehird, um what? I can see the issue with those, since they have to fit together 18:42:29 http://zem.fi/rfk86/screens.html 18:42:31 like in ncurses dialogs 18:42:33 Let's take a look shall we 18:42:35 Oh, gasp! 18:42:37 Blank pixels! 18:42:40 After every character! 18:42:46 No line drawing possible! 18:42:59 ehird, are those part of the char or not? 18:43:04 Huh? That's a 4x6 font. It's perfectly possible to add line-drawing characters there. 18:43:04 No. 18:43:18 The blank pixels are part of the character bitmaps. 18:43:26 indeed what I suspected 18:43:40 I think that's a really uber-retarded definition, and I'm not going to entertain it. Feel free to mentally substitute. 18:44:05 In fact, in some cases I've used the blank pixels between lines as non-blanks; that causes the Y and y to blend together a bit, but that's just a minor issue. 18:44:33 ╳ ╳ ╳ 18:44:34 ╳ ╳ ╳ 18:44:36 ╳ ╳ ╳ 18:44:52 of course that will only line up if mono-spaced 18:44:59 if it doesn't for you: sucks to be you 18:45:23 AnMaster: I didn't expect /you/ to say "sucks to be you" 18:45:26 it's more an ehirdy thing to say 18:46:05 ais523, oh? hm maybe 18:46:09 ais523: AnMaster tends to optimise for the most ehird-hostile, with oft pathetic results. 18:46:20 Anyway, this font should be semi-readable WITHOUT the gaps. 18:47:25 I wonder if I can find a non-last night of the proms recording of Henry Wood's famous Fantasia on British Sea Songs anywhere... 18:47:51 after all, the last night of the proms one is usually a bit... non-conventional 18:48:10 Oh my, v vs V is going to be difficult. 18:48:43 Solved. 18:49:12 ais523, you never answered to if you watch the proms or not did you? (did I even ask?) 18:49:20 I don't, normally 18:49:24 and you didn't ask 18:49:25 It is the only definition that makes sense to me; for a NxM font, that's the amount of pixels you have available for a single character; you can do tradeoffs when it comes to spacing between characters if you want. I'm going to have to go and call your definition of "uber-retarded" uber-retarded. (Besides, everywhere where I see pixel sizes for fonts that's the definition they use. The Windows command prompt window font size selector, S60putty font-select-o-t 18:49:25 ron, those "miscellaneous" X11 bitmap font names (5x7 and so on), etc. But I guess it doesn't make sense to continue this thread of discussion.) 18:49:25 ah 18:49:33 ais523, only thought it then I guess 18:49:43 which yeah, doesn't work 18:50:00 Ooh, my "z" shows a nice imagined curve. 18:50:33 fizzie: I think I'm using typography terminology and you're using character-blitting-esque terminology, is the issue. 18:50:52 Yes, that sounds likely; I don't dabble with typography, I just blit pixels. 18:50:52 My font certainly has an x-height of 4 (and, um, an everything-height of 4). 18:51:07 Anyway, upper and lowercase done; now for numbers. 18:51:12 I wonder if I should have uppercase numbers! 18:51:17 and in bitmap computer fonts fizzie's definition is certainly a lot more common 18:51:43 AnMaster: Maybe you've just been hanging around computer folks and not typography folks too. 18:51:50 Gasp. 18:51:59 fizzie, probably. 18:53:04 Heh; designing an 0 distinguishable from both o and O is hard when you can't slash it. 18:53:22 Maybe I'll use the trick I used with N to optical-illusionify a slash. 18:53:24 because there's no room? 18:53:28 Right. 18:53:35 (Wow, optical-illusionify is accepted by OS X's spellchecker.) 18:53:54 Aaaanyway; I had the following train of thought: "I could put all the text data into an image to get those pixel fonts; but then it's not copy-pasteable and accessible and all. Hey, I know: I'll use the Unicode block-drawing characters to put 2x2 pixels inside each character cell, those at least are bound to be monospaced enough. Then it's all text, not image, and you can... uh... copy-paste the pixels... and, err... have a screen reader read out the blocks a 18:53:54 nd, uh... maybe this wasn't such a good idea after all?" 18:54:13 Hmm, I can't seem to apply the trick. 18:54:28 fizzie: we're going to have to make an ASCII art font, now 18:54:30 fizzie: :D 18:55:12 * ehird stops laughing IRL at fizzie's comment 18:55:18 i'm going to sue you for hurting my chest 18:58:36 -!- MigoMipo has quit ("Page closed"). 18:59:05 Drawing lowercase and uppercase numbers is fun. 19:01:02 Oh dear; my uppercase 2 = my uppercase Z. 19:01:09 Fixed. 19:02:43 Okay, I just have to distinguish my uppercase and lowercase 5s and I've done the numbers. 19:05:38 There we go. 19:06:03 Both of my 8s probably need refining; they're hard to distinguish. 19:06:08 But I'll do symbols first. 19:06:24 I'm very pleased with how I handled lowercase e. 19:07:16 Hey, poll! Should I do bold and italics? Please say no. 19:07:40 no, just do them with colours 19:07:44 to get yourself subpixel bold 19:07:51 lawl 19:07:55 Colours aren't allowed :P 19:07:57 likewise, subpixel italics (that would probably be easier0 19:07:59 *) 19:08:04 you could do it algorithmically 19:08:35 Shush, you. :P 19:08:55 Anyway, my lowercase and uppercase bold aren't just descends/letter-height! 19:09:01 Erm. 19:09:02 Numbers, not bold. 19:09:20 (As in, "lowercase number" generally means descending, whereas "uppercase number"'s bottom is the same as that of a letter.) 19:09:41 Mine're actually numbers tweaked to look like they're extensions of the lowercase, and uppercase, alphabet. 19:10:05 -!- Gracenotes has quit (Remote closed the connection). 19:12:30 ais523: Should I do lowercase and uppercase punctuation? (NO) 19:12:38 that makes no sense 19:15:28 all-caps periods 19:15:36 ais523: Nor do lowercase and uppercase numerals. 19:15:46 The point is "these characters look like they belong to the letters of that case in the same font". 19:15:54 you could use those to separate thousands... 19:16:22 Uppercase hyphen = en dash 19:16:43 Darn, I can't do curly quotes :D 19:17:03 Well, single quotes sure 19:17:06 Double quotes, nuh uh 19:17:17 * 19:17:20 * 19:17:21 * 19:17:22 * 19:17:36 maybe not 19:18:09 * * 19:18:11 * * 19:18:27 Deewiant: 3x4 19:18:45 Did he switch from 4x3? 19:18:53 erm 19:18:55 No, it's been 3x4 the whole time. 19:19:01 Er, no. 19:19:01 Wrong. 19:19:06 well i assume the vertical is longest, anyway 19:19:09 Right, 4x3, the funky. 19:19:13 I started doing 4x3 but gave up because it's impossible, at least roman. 19:19:17 Italics may be possible in 4x3. 19:19:28 3x4 is criminally easy compared to 4x3. 19:19:43 How does m look in 3x4 19:20:23 m or M? 19:20:28 Either 19:20:39 m is: 19:20:43 # 19:20:44 ### 19:20:45 ### 19:20:45 # # 19:20:55 O_o 19:21:01 It works, trust me. 19:21:10 M is: 19:21:11 Whatever you say 19:21:12 ### 19:21:13 ### 19:21:13 ### 19:21:15 argh 19:21:16 ### 19:21:17 ### 19:21:18 ### 19:21:19 # # 19:21:22 It also works, although less so. 19:21:28 Deewiant: N is a fun one, though. 19:21:30 # 19:21:32 # # 19:21:33 ### 19:21:33 # # 19:21:37 Would making the next-to-last line # # be better? 19:21:43 Or is that A 19:21:47 The lack of a pixel in the top-right gives the illusion of a slant. 19:21:51 Deewiant: In which? 19:21:53 No, A is probably different 19:21:56 In M 19:22:13 Possibly. 19:22:27 I think it looks too much like a stapler-style N with a too-thick line. 19:22:29 Let me test. 19:22:32 My "m" and "n" are 19:22:34 ## 19:22:34 ### 19:22:34 # # 19:22:34 # # 19:22:34 and 19:22:36 ## 19:22:38 # # 19:22:40 # # 19:22:41 # # 19:22:43 Deewiant: Ah, that's probably better. 19:24:40 I think I pulled off $ quite well... 19:25:14 i've not been reading, but - are you working with square pixels? 19:25:15 Considering the constraints. 19:25:25 In this font, yes. 19:25:35 Which makes things harder for such a small size... 19:26:40 My s and S-based $ both look equally bad... 19:27:41 I think the s-based one gets it better. 19:28:41 My 3x6 $ is a really silly one (mostly the font is 3x5, but $ is so rare I used the normally empty line too), though it doesn't look that bad in context: 19:28:41 # 19:28:42 ## 19:28:42 # 19:28:42 # 19:28:43 ## 19:28:45 # 19:29:36 Oh boy, % is gonna be fun. 19:32:37 Ah, this makes quite a passable $: 19:32:38 # 19:32:39 ### 19:32:40 ## 19:32:41 ### 19:32:42 # 19:32:46 Wait. 19:32:50 That's 5 lines high.! 19:32:52 *drop that . 19:33:01 -!- kar8nga has joined. 19:33:31 fizzie: what's your %? 19:33:45 * Sgeo is addicted to Tremulous 19:34:19 Well, it's the size of an uppercase 3x5 character, so it's the obviousish 19:34:21 # # 19:34:21 # 19:34:21 # 19:34:21 # 19:34:22 # # 19:34:26 Doesn't really work in your case. 19:35:02 I could use 19:35:04 # # 19:35:05 # 19:35:06 ## 19:35:07 # # 19:35:09 or 19:35:13 # # 19:35:14 ## 19:35:15 # 19:35:16 # # 19:35:22 Derived from yours. 19:35:24 Both look stupid :D 19:35:54 ...butu zoomed out, the latter seems to be not entirely dissimilar to %. 19:36:40 Think I'll go for the former. 19:36:59 Oh! 19:37:01 fizzie: 19:37:02 # # 19:37:03 ## 19:37:03 ## 19:37:04 # # 19:37:55 Oh god, & 19:38:01 Maybe I'll try something with "et" 19:38:31 My & isn't very great (and of course too big for you): 19:38:34 # 19:38:34 # 19:38:34 # 19:38:34 # # 19:38:34 ## 19:38:58 It's... uh, stylished. 19:39:32 Looks quite good. 19:40:17 fizzie: Anyway, my final & will be more stylised by far... 19:40:48 With less pixels comes.. great responsibility? I don't think that's quite the quote. 19:40:52 Currently have a 5x4 & looking sort-of-okay. 19:40:59 Well, more like a hybridised et. 19:42:47 Awesome, just need to lob off one more column and it'll fit. 19:43:05 ...aaand I end up with "e". 19:43:08 Let's... tweak that. 19:43:35 Eh. 19:43:37 fizzie: What character is this? 19:43:38 # 19:43:39 ### 19:43:39 ## 19:43:40 ## 19:44:00 I'm not very good at these image puzzles. Is it a dog? 19:44:08 :-D 19:44:13 It's a cat getting mauled by a character that pretends to be an ampersand. 19:44:20 (The cat, and the mauling, are off-screen.) 19:44:43 Haha oh man I am so adding a Moof character 19:44:55 Clarus! 19:45:21 ...yeah, not happening. 19:46:09 Okay, decision time: 19:46:13 # 19:46:14 ## 19:46:15 ### 19:46:16 ## 19:46:17 or 19:46:20 # 19:46:21 ### 19:46:22 ## 19:46:23 ## 19:46:26 Which should be the ampersand? 19:46:56 At this zoom level I prefer the former although neither look anything at all like & 19:47:12 I say the first 19:49:04 The first looks more like a smudge at 100%, fwiw 19:49:12 Whereas the latter looks... uh, more like the cent sign than anything. 19:49:38 Ahahahahaha, asterisk 19:49:41 Oh fuck me. 19:49:49 ehird: but you're underage! 19:49:50 fizzie: Sorry to ask, but, uhh, what's your asterisk. 19:49:57 ais523: :| 19:50:04 Not in the Vatican City! 19:50:09 (popemobile)→ 19:50:49 # # 19:50:50 # 19:50:51 # # 19:51:02 That, um, that's an x. 19:51:07 What's your lowercase x? :-) 19:51:10 That's a multiplication symbol if anything. 19:51:19 Yes, well, the positioning (upper three lines) makes it an asterisk. :p 19:51:34 And moving it down by one line makes it an x? 19:51:41 incidentally, fizzie's drawing's pixel-identical to the asterisk in MS Sans Serif, at some small font size 19:51:46 No, his x has a double line at the bottom 19:51:48 Deewiant: Moving it down by one line and adding another # # at the bottom. 19:51:50 Yes. 19:51:52 :D 19:51:54 I am a fontstalker. 19:51:56 Ah. 19:52:07 And adding a # # at the top of the lowercase x makes an X. 19:53:10 I wonder how to indicate lowercase/uppercase numbers in the input stream. 19:54:13 There were no asterisksks in the rfk messages, so it's not in that font file. But http://zem.fi/~fis/font00l.png and http://zem.fi/~fis/font00h.png make up the whole ISO-8859-1 set; those have been scaled by 200%, and there's some extra whitespace, and the "high-ascii" characters are really bad, but... 19:55:08 I have a third plane for the U+2500 .. U+257f line-drawing characters, but it's far less interesting. 19:55:23 Ha ha ha, angle brackets. 19:55:24 Oh my life. 19:55:51 fizzie: I should probably rearrange mine in ascii order sometime. 19:56:07 I guess I'll just use the last ascii chars for the uppercase numbers. 19:56:14 After all, I have no chance of doing accents. 19:56:24 Aww, that ü makes a wonderful :). 19:56:36 And that ö makes a wonderful :o. 19:56:46 And that etc. 19:56:53 the ì í makes an angry face :( 19:57:02 xD 19:57:32 The symmetric :) is probably Ü -- the actual ü is a bit lopsided. Unless you prefer that, of course. 19:57:39 Asztal: last row, third and forth 19:57:41 evil! 19:57:49 And then... uh... either male or fefmale, I forget. 19:57:54 fizzie: It looks cuter that way. 19:57:56 Just look at it! 19:58:20 That's evil-and-female triplet is òóô, I think. Not very like it. 19:58:34 That's? 19:58:54 fizzie: Drop the middle pixel of the ^ thing in ^o 19:58:55 It was originally "that's ô", then I went and edited it. 19:59:20 I probably should. It just looks so 8-like then. 19:59:40 Oh well, who needs accents anyway. 20:01:09 Uh oh, @. 20:03:04 Um. 20:03:04 This is impossible. 20:03:22 not really, just leave out the a in the middle 20:03:24 and draw the outer loop 20:04:08 But that results in a character almost identical to my e. :P 20:04:33 -!- Pthing has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:06:50 Hmm. 20:06:53 This is hard 20:07:24 Aha. 20:07:26 I once tried to do a font for the characters in 7-bit ASCII on 7-segment displays 20:07:28 but in my head 20:07:35 Got it. 20:07:38 ais523: heh 20:11:02 Oh no. 20:11:02 | 20:13:41 Okay, I have no idea how to do either | nor ~. 20:14:05 *Maybe* I could do | by omitting the top and bottom pixels, like a reversal of the usual |. 20:14:18 Or by omitting just the top one. Hey, that could work. 20:14:19 But ~... 20:15:33 Oh, there we go. 20:16:42 Printable ASCII sans the space plus ten extra digits fits perfectly into a 26x4 block. Who knew? 20:17:17 Anyone have an opinion on whether I should keep orditch the lower/uppercase digits? 20:18:53 fizzie: FWIW, just tested "And how!" without spacing; looks perfectly fine 20:26:39 A few 8 bit computers didn't support lower case. 20:29:24 *or ditch 20:29:31 impomatic: Not just lower/uppercase. 20:29:33 Lower/uppercase DIGITS. 20:33:23 FOR YOUR 1337 NEEDS 20:40:49 Pah. 20:43:01 Hmm... 20:43:11 It's rather hard to distinguish the upper and lower case... 20:43:21 fizzie: challenge me to do the lowercases as 3x3. 20:43:53 Well, and ascenders/descenders 20:50:32 Eh, naw. 20:50:36 I can't do the fancy e that way. 20:50:53 But I don't want to give capitals another row... that'd make it 4x4, which is BOOOOOOORING 21:17:05 Make it 1x1 21:20:25 ehird: Why is | tricky? 21:20:46 good mornin' 21:20:53 Deewiant: because my I has no stupid serifs. 21:21:20 Meh 21:23:17 LACK OF SERIFS: Meh 21:25:18 SERIOUS SERIF SHORTAGE, SHERIFF 21:25:35 "I'll serif. Your mom))))))))))) 21:27:43 Maybe I'll make the world's smallest italic, serifed pixel font. 21:27:59 Can't be too many of 'em that are small, can there? 21:37:46 what size are you planning? 21:37:59 Not sure. 21:38:27 * oerjan suggests somewhere around the planck scale 21:39:16 Damn, making italic letterforms is hard. 21:40:37 * oerjan suggests putting something under the edge of the monitor 21:40:45 Why? 21:41:01 to tilt it, of course 21:42:42 You realise that italic letterforms are not just normal letterforms rotated? :P 21:43:10 impossible! 21:43:24 oh wait it's a _shear_, not a rotation 21:43:36 No, they're totally different designs. 21:44:42 balderdash! 21:45:15 Ehird speaks truth. 21:45:40 The irony of misspelling my name while defending typography :P 21:46:05 muphry's law, clearly 21:46:22 Technically, pikhq does it all the time, BUT. 21:46:24 Italic scripts tend to be a bit more... Curvy. 21:46:38 Italic: MORBIDLY OBESE 21:46:42 ic. maybe a mobius transform then? 21:47:03 ITT: oerjan discovers that you can transform any piece of geometry into another 21:47:20 oerjan: More transforms are involved. 21:47:42 shear horror 21:47:54 Moire transforms. 21:47:55 How is B(ullshit)MI of that defined? :-) 21:48:17 weight / height 21:48:17 Ilari: it's over 9000 21:48:23 Number of pixels per height? 21:48:27 Obviously, there exists a set of transforms that one could apply, but I think it's a bit on the nontrivial side to make Roman scripts into Italic. (Italic scripts, FWIW, are more curved because they more closely resemble handwriting) 21:48:50 Windows just renders the font normally and tilts it if it doesn't have any italic script. 21:48:51 Or set area / height? 21:48:54 WINDOWS IS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIL 21:49:21 Sadly, many just do oblique type calling it italic. 21:49:31 ehird: That's oblique script. 21:49:46 Yes. 21:49:56 It automatically makes oblique script (badly), and uses it when italic isn't present. 21:50:07 Ugh. 21:51:17 for the attention of— magic 22:07:07 -!- impomatic has left (?). 22:13:31 -!- ehird has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 22:37:53 -!- ehird has joined. 22:41:18 -!- ais523 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 22:46:23 WINDOWS IS EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVIL <-- old news. 22:50:31 Wut 22:50:31 Why am I allowed to connec 22:50:31 t 22:50:31 I overflowed my limit didn't I 22:50:31 maybe it's just blocking http 22:50:32 -!- coppro has joined. 22:50:33 yo, socks proxy anyone? 22:50:47 ehird, what was your limit? 22:51:05 and for what time period? 22:52:12 ^echo test 22:52:19 hm 22:52:22 it isn't here? 22:52:25 Hey, where's the bot? 22:52:27 ^echo test 22:52:34 fizzie, well you should know 22:52:44 ehird: is the proxy woolen? 22:53:18 -!- fungot has joined. 22:53:20 oh 22:53:20 no fungot 22:53:20 !help 22:53:21 help: General commands: !help, !info, !bf_txtgen. See also !help languages, !help userinterps. You can get help on some commands by typing !help . 22:53:21 ehird: david bowie alan ginsberg 2 args, " distance" thing makes any sense 22:53:36 !help 22:53:37 help: General commands: !help, !info, !bf_txtgen. See also !help languages, !help userinterps. You can get help on some commands by typing !help . 22:53:40 hm 22:53:53 oh the highlight 22:57:31 night 23:01:42 15GB. None; pay as you go 23:01:43 I doubt I've really used 15 gig... 23:01:45 but I can't think why else HTTP requests are being forwarded to Vodafone's "lol hi this is your connection register or login" page. 23:02:51 oh jesus, horrible lag 23:04:08 -!- augur has quit ("Leaving..."). 23:09:19 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 23:11:13 every single thing y'all said in like 23:11:13 15 minutes 23:11:13 came all at onnce 23:11:13 once 23:11:13 out of order 23:11:13 For instance 23:11:15 [23:02] fungot joined the chat room. 23:11:16 ehird: night man. don't be afraid so they can't be bothered reading books these days. it seemed to me that the actors have a bunch of developers with stuff that makes me coolest of all. 23:11:17 [23:02] AnMaster: hm 23:11:19 [23:02] AnMaster: it isn't here? 23:11:21 [23:02] fizzie: Hey, where's the bot? 23:19:28 Heh 23:19:32 fungotty 23:19:32 FireFly: expected 2 argument(s) to procedure eval, got 1. 23:22:12 that line is wonderful, i don't know why, it just sits well with me 23:36:44 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 23:45:26 -!- ehird has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 23:45:46 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 23:56:11 -!- adam_d has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)).