00:08:24 -!- cal153 has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 00:14:18 -!- cal153 has joined. 01:01:43 -!- augur has joined. 01:08:39 -!- immibis has quit ("ChatZilla 0.9.85 [Firefox 3.5.5/20091102152451]"). 01:11:42 -!- augur_ has joined. 01:13:00 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 01:21:47 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (Remote closed the connection). 01:38:30 -!- augur has joined. 01:42:50 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer)). 01:43:06 -!- augur has joined. 01:44:30 -!- augur_ has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 01:46:22 -!- augur_ has joined. 01:51:54 -!- Pthing has quit (Remote closed the connection). 01:54:08 -!- augur has quit (Connection reset by peer). 02:21:55 -!- iamcal has joined. 02:43:30 -!- cal153 has quit (Read error: 113 (No route to host)). 02:46:02 -!- augur has joined. 02:46:48 -!- augur_ has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 03:13:03 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 03:20:27 -!- dbc has joined. 03:25:14 -!- Gracenotes has quit ("Leaving"). 03:29:20 -!- augur___ has joined. 03:51:45 -!- augur___ has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 04:15:13 -!- augur has joined. 04:38:46 -!- augur has quit (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out)). 04:44:16 -!- oklopol has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). 04:44:32 -!- oklopol has joined. 04:57:22 -!- Gracenotes has joined. 05:29:24 -!- zzo38 has joined. 05:31:59 -!- zzo38 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 05:46:42 -!- zzo38 has joined. 05:46:44 Is it good? Did I forget anything? http://zzo38computer.cjb.net/dnd/raw_transcripts/Vyb_back_story.txt 05:48:06 O, in 8 hours there has been still only join and quit 05:49:47 -!- augur has joined. 05:50:21 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit ("Leaving"). 05:56:12 -!- zzo38 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 05:59:10 -!- bsmntbombdood has joined. 06:24:06 -!- oerjan has joined. 06:37:31 -!- madbrain has quit ("Radiateur"). 07:16:52 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 07:41:54 -!- fax has quit ("Leaving"). 07:55:31 -!- pikhq_ has joined. 07:57:57 -!- pikhq has quit (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out)). 07:59:59 -!- clog has quit (ended). 08:00:00 -!- clog has joined. 08:11:24 -!- pikhq_ has changed nick to pikhq. 08:47:17 * coppro is experimenting with a new alarm... this better not mess up 09:04:32 -!- kar8nga has joined. 10:09:52 -!- ais523 has quit (Remote closed the connection). 10:25:38 coppro, alarm for? 10:25:43 as in alarm() ? 10:39:10 -!- Asztal has joined. 11:08:28 -!- Asztal has quit (Connection timed out). 11:09:45 -!- Asztal has joined. 11:28:04 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 11:40:02 -!- rodgort has quit (Client Quit). 11:40:12 -!- rodgort has joined. 11:48:26 -!- Pthing has joined. 12:15:13 -!- Slereah_ has joined. 12:32:29 -!- Slereah has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 12:42:22 -!- Slereah_ has quit. 12:50:04 -!- Slereah has joined. 13:06:40 -!- jix has joined. 13:27:36 -!- jix has quit ("leaving"). 13:28:00 -!- jix has joined. 13:28:40 -!- BeholdMyGlory has joined. 13:45:27 -!- Slereah has quit. 13:46:10 -!- ehird has joined. 13:47:35 -!- oerjan has joined. 13:50:12 -!- kar8nga has joined. 14:03:43 -!- oerjan has quit ("leaving"). 14:18:46 -!- Slereah has joined. 14:23:40 -!- Slereah has quit (sendak.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 14:30:55 -!- Slereah has joined. 14:35:12 Frailties. 14:36:34 -!- Slereah has quit (sendak.freenode.net irc.freenode.net). 14:37:31 06:25:05 yes, myself <-- do it! 14:37:31 by myself i evidently meant you. 14:37:45 :P 14:42:29 06:42:26 oerjan, and a question about it. Wondering if you can figure out why 14:42:30 06:42:36 (why jamie said that in the last panel I mean) 14:42:30 06:46:39 experience? 14:42:31 06:46:56 oerjan, eh? why it was inevitable 14:42:31 06:47:18 oerjan, what do you mean? 14:42:31 06:47:55 that _is_ the kind of universe that is. i am sure ehird can come up with some way of deriding you for not having noticed. 14:42:33 Au contraire; AnMaster is an expert in unintentionally deriding himself. I could not possibly top him. 14:43:08 -!- Slereah has joined. 14:44:04 02:25:38 coppro, alarm for? 14:44:05 02:25:43 as in alarm() ? 14:44:05 also an expert in intentionally misunderstanding 14:44:09 (cue "it was a joke") 14:45:38 ehird, I did find alarm() unlikely. But what sort of alarm it was was rather unclear. Perhaps alarm for overheating? Or an alarm clock to wake up in the morning? 14:45:51 but surely you can tell me which one he meant 14:45:51 It was pretty obviously for waking up. 14:55:34 Silence! 14:56:43 AnMaster: as in waking up 14:56:59 coppro, right 14:57:05 ehird, obvious why? 14:57:12 Because it's obvious. 14:57:46 ehird, nice circle argument. 14:58:09 With such stunning spelling of "circular argument", it's clear that you are a higher authority than I on what is obvious in English text. 14:58:40 ah yes as I expected... you are back on OS X 14:58:43 -ehird- VERSION Colloquy 2.3 (4617) - Mac OS X 10.5.8 (Intel) - http://colloquy.info 14:58:50 I've been on OS X for weeks. 14:59:07 ehird, okay, maybe you just had a bad day? 14:59:10 I'm pretty sure a circular argument (even if it was one) beats a completely unsubstantiated ad hominem, though. 14:59:23 * AnMaster puts ehird on ignore for now. 14:59:26 Especially one without any backing logic or reason, just a splatter of data points selectively sampled. 14:59:50 It sure would be nice if AnMaster would /ignore me for more than 5 minutes. 15:01:29 I wonder what mood AnMaster will divinate^Wscientifically assign to my Linux; perhaps "slightly mellow with a hint of cynicism". 15:28:10 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has joined. 15:35:18 -!- oerjan has joined. 15:36:35 -!- FireFly has joined. 15:37:09 -!- fax has joined. 15:37:16 * oerjan tries to swat FireFly, misses and swats ehird instead -----### 15:37:32 couldn't you have hit fax instead? he's closer 15:38:06 Well apparently he didn't 15:39:04 i'm sure there was probably karma involved 15:40:03 also, i'm sure "i'm sure there was probably" is probably not an ideal way of expression 15:41:32 I'm pretty sure a circular argument (even if it was one) beats a completely unsubstantiated ad hominem, though. 15:41:42 you just say that because you're an idiot 15:41:51 Ranking invalid arguments is so reasonable, I tell you. 15:42:02 I'm no idiot! I am, however, stupid. 15:42:25 yes you are an idiot. as that quote proves. 15:43:49 Your, uh, pa is an idiot. 15:45:37 that's almost more offensive than joking about my dead mother. mostly because i sometimes think so myself. 15:47:40 also, i am insulted that you have still not recognized my use of a circular ad hominem 15:57:50 Oops. 15:58:50 oerjan: your non-existent long-lost sister is an idiot, then 15:59:17 i can agree with that. 16:00:00 you sound so angry when you're not joking :D 16:00:33 well i'm grumpy today. 16:01:06 Yeah, well, your non-existent long-lost sister's... face? 16:01:07 Wait, what? 16:22:57 Drawing a serifed m in 7x10 pixels is the hardest thing I've done all day. 16:34:53 -!- FireFly has quit ("Later"). 16:36:04 SERIFY DAT B*TCH 16:41:29 B*TCH? Srsly? 16:41:48 The reason login(1) delays on an incorrect password is to prevent brute-forcing, right? 16:42:14 botch a batch of butch bitches 16:50:55 It was "butch" 16:56:05 ehird: yeah I guess 16:56:18 Pretty stupid, since you can just spawn a bunch of login(1)s. 16:56:43 Or even detect the delay and go onto the next one (keeping the old process open in case it's just slow). 16:57:04 but a machine only has so many login processes around usually 16:57:51 one for each virtual terminal I think, but not for xterms or anything 16:58:25 and if they keep getting killed to fast, init will stop producing them (in case they have neterd a loop of some kind) 16:58:32 for about 5 mins usually 16:58:33 That property is to prevent brute-forcing to people who have NO account, not to people who have an account and want root. 16:58:54 Gregor: How can you run a brute-forcing program from the login(1) prompt? 16:58:54 but ordinary users can't spawn a login 16:59:00 telnet 16:59:15 aha 16:59:19 Gregor: You can detect the delay over telnet, too! 16:59:30 And make a bunch of telnet connections. 16:59:47 The latter is easily prevented, the former is unhelpful. 17:00:06 Meh. 17:00:12 It seems kinda pointless nowadays to me. 17:00:17 Nowadays it certainly is. 17:00:17 Especially when we have SSH keys... 17:00:19 It's outdated. 17:00:23 Thought so. 17:00:27 But it's a product of past. 17:00:29 Guess that's why you said telnet. 17:00:34 :P 17:00:35 Gregor: I can probably remove it. >:) 17:00:45 — I'm even trying to avoid PAM, not sure how that'll go 17:00:46 sshd doesn't even spawn login anyway 17:01:10 True. 17:01:17 It still delays on connect, though. 17:01:19 Erm 17:01:21 On invalid login. 17:01:27 Or, that might just be because ssh is slow; 17:01:29 *slow. 17:03:31 http://sta.li/faq ;; What's this? Sanity? Astonishing. 17:04:02 (http://github.com/dryfish/openbsd-pdksh sweeeeeet) 17:04:38 Although did they have to make it use autoconf? 17:06:28 And I hope automake defaulting it to GPLv3 is just a mistake... 17:13:09 * SimonRC likes the ldd exploit 17:13:33 it portably allows arbitrary code execution. 17:13:36 wow 17:15:00 -!- mad has joined. 17:15:05 -!- mad has changed nick to madbrain. 17:15:45 SimonRC: yep 17:15:56 and it's totally unintuitive, yet it's not a bug(!) 17:16:04 well, it's not a bug any more than static linking itself is a bug... 17:21:23 * ehird fiddles with ksh prompt 17:22:26 if it is a bug then it is a design-time bug 17:27:57 precisely 17:28:18 PS1="\e[47;4;30m\$(pwd | sed 's@^$HOME@~@')$\e[m " seems to produce quite a pleasing prompt; makes underscores ugly, thouggh 17:28:20 *though 17:28:40 (underlined, light-grey backgrounded "~/foo$", then a space) 17:31:10 PS1='\e[47m\e[m ' is nice too (light-grey tab-sized space, then a space) 17:31:34 means you have to look at the title bar to see where you are, though (assuming you've set that up) 17:41:19 I have looked at my ldd, and I find that it has a list of known loaders and calls them with --verify and the executable name before invoking the executable itself. I guess that checks that the executable's loader is a known-safe one first 17:41:58 ehird: does that propmt change when you change directories? 17:42:09 yes, note the \ before $( 17:42:19 ksh expands the PS1 'fore printing. 17:42:46 technically I should have the horrible hack ksh uses to denote non-printing characters in there, but I'm lazy and it doesn't change much 17:42:54 (the prompt just disappears when the line scrolls to the right earlier) 17:43:06 and in fact my `man ksh` doesn't mention it so maybe the openbsd version doesn't have it 17:43:18 huh? ksh does some kind of scrolling prompt? 17:43:34 bash uses \[ and \] to denote zero-width parts of the prompt 17:43:46 $ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa[…], press a 17:43:58 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa < 17:44:11 < meaning "yo, there's stuff to the left" 17:44:29 neat 17:44:36 you can caret (v. to manipulate a caret) to the left to see the earlier stuff 17:44:37 bahs just uses multiple lines 17:44:38 (no marker if you do that) 17:44:43 *bash 17:44:46 yeah, multiple lines is maybe a better solution 17:44:56 especially for pipelines 17:45:04 but eh, it's easy to hit enter after | 17:45:39 or, preferably, notice you're writing an involved shell command and spawn an rc :-P 17:46:54 * ehird does `sudo chsh` by mistake so often 17:46:59 it feels like it should require root! 17:47:09 and it prompts for a password, which makes my sudo-sense tingle 17:48:03 *though (not thouggh; ha, good luck finding the line I typoed this in) 17:50:03 * SimonRC is irritated that when invoking root-requiring things from the GUI, he is prompted for the root password 17:50:34 I have no root password; it should spot that and try a GUI sudo instead! 17:51:57 Ubuntu does :-P 17:52:14 SimonRC: symlink su to a shell script calling sudo ;-) 17:52:18 -!- sharada has joined. 17:52:23 I wonder why that hasn't got upstream 17:53:07 That is, make it `sudo realsu $*` 17:53:21 Or whatever 17:53:25 root doesn't need to give passwords to su, so... voila! 17:53:42 That doesn't fix GUI sus, but you could just do something similar there. 17:53:56 Make gksu do gksudo realsu $*, etc. 17:54:11 See, I'm helpful, me. 17:54:23 yeah 17:54:50 You should do it and test it so I can go yay, I'm clever. 17:56:11 cba 17:56:50 ;_; 17:56:59 Clearly the only rational course of action is to kill myself. 17:59:29 -!- fax has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 18:00:08 -!- sharada has changed nick to fax. 18:01:39 * SimonRC listens to the excellent Undone, on the radio. 18:05:55 "Why do you say that he is a fundamentalist ? Do you mean that he is right ?" 18:12:30 what 18:13:45 -!- KingOfKarlsruhe has quit (Remote closed the connection). 18:14:04 Quote. 18:14:15 yeah but from where 18:16:14 Mailing list thread. Clearly the speaker is non-native (if the email header name "QUINTIN Guillaume" wasn't enough of a giveaway). 18:16:21 And the spaces before question marks. 18:16:23 Still, it's amusing. 18:16:49 It seems an easy mistake to make: "fundamentalist" → "of the fundamentals". 18:17:15 erm, it could also be that right ~ right-wing? 18:17:58 In context, both previous and following, that seems unlikely. 18:18:08 mhm 18:18:14 Besides, I think any non-native speaker, at least, would think right far more important a word than to abbreviate right-wing to it. 18:18:46 (Which means that the native speakers that abbreviate it put political alignment above facts! Or something.) 18:18:51 no i mean, they could be the same word in his native language, or he doesn't know that "wing" applies 18:19:49 the names of the two oldest political parties in norway translate as simply "left" and "right"... 18:20:22 Well that is true. 18:20:34 But still, context seems to paint that as unlikely. You might be right though. 18:20:59 french uses "de gauche" and "de droite"... could happen 18:21:03 oerjan: but would anyone making such a question really confuse fundamentalism and right-wing? 18:21:11 well it was just a theory (like evolution *ducks*) 18:21:16 to make a connection of that type, I'd have to translate fundamentalist back to English as a non-native speaker 18:21:25 which would almost certainly reveal the true meaning to me, thus negating the question 18:21:52 it seems like it's a connection you could only make if you knew what fundamentalist means already 18:21:54 ehird: well, fundamentalism/evangelicals aren't common asides from in USA, so it's definitely possible that he'd confuse them 18:22:11 Fundamentalism is everywhere. Do you really think it only applies to religion? 18:22:22 for example norwegians (i.e. me) have a hard time remembering to use left-hand or right-hand in english, since that is a case where we just use the bare words 18:22:39 ok maybe not me nowadays, but once upon a time 18:22:44 oerjan: My right is right, but my left is left. 18:22:54 THE POLITICAL AFFILIATION OF MY NORWEIGAN HANDS 18:22:59 *NORWEGIAN 18:23:07 BETTER: 18:23:10 *Better: 18:23:15 My left is right, but my right is left. 18:24:41 ehird: how you doing 18:24:46 oklopol: totally total 18:24:49 hmm 18:24:51 i should have just said 18:24:52 oklopol: totally 18:25:03 ah 18:25:04 ehird: while we do use the word "fundamentalisme" in norwegian, i assume this is mainly caused by recent US influence 18:25:05 i "see" 18:25:22 Fundamentalism doesn't just apply to religion dammit 18:25:27 at least in its current use 18:25:57 ehird: what i mean is we may not have used that word much before the USA recently started blasting it out everywhere 18:26:24 Right. 18:29:51 hmm 18:30:09 with nntp you can access messages sent before you "subscribe" can't you? 18:30:12 assuming the server keeps the 18:30:14 *them 18:31:37 dammit the last update of avg claimed to do some kind caching to avoid scanning every file every time, but it _still_ goes into the damn java runtime jars... which i recall from before is what takes about half the scanning time 18:31:42 *kind of 18:32:02 i don't protect viruses, because they don't protect me. 18:32:37 irrefutable logicz 18:32:41 i had hoped for some major speedup :( 18:33:20 back 18:34:18 oerjan: pirate nod32 18:34:22 fast as a speeding virus scanner 18:34:26 ehird: sure you can 18:34:39 wut 18:34:44 (to the nntp) 18:35:10 ehird: yeah, messages should be accessible 18:35:27 what is the nntp request for subscribing anyway? 18:35:28 ""Fundamentalism is everywhere. Do you really think it only applies to religion?"" ah, ok, then we're talking about 2 different things: "fundamentalists" as general people that take temselves way too seriously (incl. communists,etc..) and the specific "born-again" protestant movement 18:35:42 SimonRC: dunno if it even has one 18:35:58 madbrain: yeah; the second is the formal definition but it's fine, imo, to use it for the former 18:36:01 well if it didn't have one, how would your question make sense? 18:36:16 madbrain: when used in norway i would say > 50% of the time it refers to islamists 18:36:17 SimonRC: well, exactly 18:36:21 I use Giganews and it has plenty of coverage back to the early 90s at least 18:36:26 oerjan: islamists? you mean muslims. 18:36:57 actually, you mean fundamentalist muslims... 18:36:57 ehird: islamist ~~ rabid fundamentalist muslim 18:36:58 oerjan: that word isn't actually, you know, real 18:37:00 ehird: he's referring to fundamentalist islamists 18:37:15 wtf who created this word and didn't tell me about it 18:37:21 ehird: it's how the word islamist is used in norwegian afaik 18:37:29 it seems to exist. 18:37:34 and islamism as a word is afaik real at least in french and also used all the time 18:38:04 muslim = religion; islamism = political movement 18:38:05 ehird: it's what people use when they are pretending not to be against islam itself ;) 18:38:15 :-) 18:38:39 madbrain: the religion is definitely not called muslim, it's called islam 18:38:43 and its adherents are muslims 18:38:57 right 18:39:28 then it's islam vs islamism 18:39:46 pesky arab grammar, those are the same root... 18:40:08 ha true 18:40:12 how deep! indeed insanity does have the same root as religion 18:40:23 18:40:25 madbrain: i was refering to muslim as well there 18:40:25 ditto shit and science, IIRC 18:40:42 SimonRC: what, like, really? the words? 18:40:52 yeah 18:40:58 oearjan: true, islam and muslim are both "SLM" 18:40:58 xD 18:41:16 Shitty Lactating M— no, this acronym isn't working. 18:41:49 madbrain: why isn't muslim mslm? 18:41:55 which in those languages mean they're the same root... of course, that gets lost in loaning and they become two different morphemes 18:42:08 oklopol: it's M+SLM yes 18:42:17 oklopol: it's derived 18:42:24 oh you actually know something, i thought you just meant they have those consonants 18:42:36 Sadism, Loving, Masochism 18:42:45 (was just making sure i didn't imagine the m, basically) 18:43:07 oklopol: arab languages use sets of 3 consonants as roots, and derive them by adding different patterns of vowels and extra consonants 18:44:10 cool. 18:44:24 so there's only 17,576 valid roots in arabic 18:44:30 obviously english is mostly concatenative+various irregularities all over the place so that mechanism is lost in loans 18:44:44 WATCH OUT INDIANS! YER DERN ANTI-MERICAN LANGUAGE GONA COME TO AN END WHEN WE INVENT US SOME MORE WORDS! 18:45:19 ehird: that's kinda like in chinese: chinese has only about 5000 morphemes 18:45:20 ehird: they have 26 consonants? 18:45:22 ooh, that's another one to my list of crimes: speaking English natively 18:45:30 oklopol: oops :-D 18:45:38 which are combined into thousands of compound words 18:45:44 oklopol: also i hate you 18:45:46 why so 18:45:50 -!- Sgeo has joined. 18:45:51 RUINING MY JOKE 18:46:06 okay they have 18:46:17 one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen fourteen 18:46:21 fifteen sixteen seventeen 18:46:28 eighteen nineteen twenty twenty one twenty two twenty three 18:46:36 twenty four twenty five twenty six twenty seven 18:46:54 OKAY 7.62559758 * 10^12 ROOTS THEN 18:47:07 are those all english numbers? 18:47:08 SO WE HAVE TO MAKE UP A FEW MORE WORDS 18:47:09 SO WHAT?! 18:47:14 arab is weird 18:47:20 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_language#Consonants 18:47:24 hell of a lot of consonants 18:47:43 only two vowels too? 18:47:51 so 28, huh 18:47:51 "The Arabic alphabet has 29 basic letters." 18:47:55 28 consonants? 18:47:58 oh, must've misunderstood the table 18:48:03 27 i said? 18:48:05 21952 18:48:05 or is it 28 18:48:06 two? i thought it had 3 which could be long or short... 18:48:09 did i count wrong 18:48:15 a i u 18:48:18 oerjan: argh i am so confused 18:48:23 HOW MANY CONSONANTS DOES ARABIC HAVE 18:48:30 madbrain, ehird: i got 28 by a quick look, may be wrong. 18:48:42 i'm not sure what it means that there are two characters in each box 18:48:55 oops, I swapped my ^ arguments kekekekekeke 18:49:00 oklopol: one is ipa or english or w/e 18:49:01 i think 18:49:05 ehird: the arabic alphabet is basically consonantal and vowels are an afterthought iiuc 18:49:07 anyway 21,952 then 18:49:08 SO LIMITED 18:49:28 oerjan: langton's ant touches an infinite number of squares with any possible initial configuration, has this already been ruined for you? 18:50:09 i'm sure you love trying to solve my homework (this one i've solved) 18:50:22 ruined how 18:50:31 seen/found proof 18:50:38 wat. 18:50:39 english has, uhm, 24 consonants by comparison, not many less 18:50:47 oklopol: i'm not sure i may have seen it mentioned 18:50:49 ehird: it's a problem, you have to prove that 18:50:52 *, i 18:50:54 homework??? where?? 18:50:54 how is it ruining 18:50:55 :P 18:51:12 english has many more vowels though :D 18:51:14 if you know the solution, there's nothing to solve 18:51:17 * Sgeo convinced his dad that an Active Worlds subscription will help him with classes 18:51:19 fax: langton's ant 18:51:31 Sgeo: how? 18:51:54 Well, bots for AW can be written in C or C++, and I'm taking a C++ class, so.. 18:52:08 do you make bots? 18:52:20 Congratulations! You are either the best convincer ever or your dad is the most convincable ever. 18:52:39 oklopol, planning to 18:52:42 (BETTER THAN CONGRATULATIONS: Spatulations) 18:52:59 ehird, probably the latter 18:53:13 Well, kind of 18:53:25 He didn't really ask questions >.> 18:53:42 Orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr he just doesn't really care all that much 18:53:52 ehird: btw all those letters in the [[WP:Arabic alphabet]] table are consonants, it's just some double occasionally as vowels 18:54:04 ish 18:54:54 yeah, arabic doesn't put much emphasis on vowels 18:55:40 the number of possible vowel patterns is limited, so if you add enough extra information in the writing, they become unambiguous 18:55:49 that also works in hebrew 18:56:31 Dear Firefox: Please stop randomly freezing on me. Love, Sgeo 18:56:39 a language that's all vowels would be fun 18:56:46 (Yes, I know that technically nothing (or at least, very little) a computer does is random) 18:56:47 Sgeo: Stop using Firefox. —ehird 18:57:26 ehird: dunno if that's plausible, although you can definitely have a language with lots of vowels and not so many consonants for instance 18:57:44 the whole fun is that it's all vowels 18:57:50 so it sounds like you're just doing baby-style vocalisations! 18:58:55 ehird: ah, but then /i,u/ would turn into /j,w/, then probably /J\,b/ and eventually /t~k p/ 18:59:12 due to the speed at which you'd have to talk 18:59:14 Well, forbid any such pesky combinations then. 18:59:51 that's pretty much impossible, the vowel inventory would expand until one vowel changes into /i/ and one into /u/ 19:01:06 :< 19:01:12 In fact, once /i,u/ turned into consonants, then /e,o/ would raise to /i,u/ and then in turn become consonants too 19:01:14 Well, why would you have to talk quickly? 19:01:25 Just take it sloooooooowly. ooooooooooooooooooooooy. 19:01:29 -!- boily has joined. 19:01:34 * ehird boils boily 19:01:37 Now you're boilier. 19:01:37 well, the less possible different syllables you have, the faster you have to speak 19:01:54 madbrain: UNLESS YOU'RE RETARDED. 19:02:00 Just sayin' 19:02:16 ehird: I wonder what is my boiling point? 19:02:16 kinda like spanish, the have less possible vowels etc... so they speak twice as fast to compensate :D 19:02:20 Yep, that killed the conversation 19:02:27 but it works because they have less slow sounds 19:02:33 Bad timing for me to say that huh 19:02:43 and they have less slow sounds bevause they have less possible vowels etc.. :D 19:02:51 boily: Evidently <= room temperature, if you're boily now. 19:03:05 You could be in some sort of heating contraption though, technically. 19:03:14 My calculation is that you have to have about 50bits per second 19:03:19 Where do you get your durable keyboards and mice?! 19:03:40 madbrain: you're slowist. 19:03:52 so you have some languages with huge syllables full of information (say, 10 bits) that go slower (like 5 syllables/s) 19:03:55 apparently swedes talk much slower than danes, i seem to recall reading recently. i don't think the phoneme set sizes are that different... 19:04:10 although pronunciation certainly is 19:04:40 inversely you have languages with small syllables (like ~6bit in japanese) but they can go faster since all the syllables are simple (say, 8 syllables/s) 19:05:34 madbrain: optimising a language for efficient bit transfer would be fun 19:05:41 So it would be hard to have a vowel set that is large enough while also being fast, since the faster the vowel, the less time you have to glide to the next one so the more approximative they become 19:05:51 that is, you can talk quickly (thus feeling like you're communicating faster) but with enough bits to be efficient 19:05:54 ehird: yes :D 19:06:00 voila, everyone feels like they're talking really quickly 19:06:11 and they are, just not by that much 19:06:56 So with vowels only, suppose you'd have to reach 64 syllables at least, can you do that? :D 19:07:43 No, but oklopol can. 19:08:02 I CAN! 19:08:18 64 syllables what 19:08:38 including diphthongs and triphthongs? 19:08:41 ~60 different possible syllables 19:09:00 oerjan: but that's dangerous, basically you're putting in /j,w/ with those :D 19:09:45 don't forget reversed "h" 19:09:47 madbrain: do you mean you'd have to speak @ 64 syllables/s? 19:09:52 * boily consults his sampa table... 19:09:56 so you want 64 pure vowels? i vaguely recall there's some south-east asian language which comes close 19:10:05 plus you'd have syllable boundary problems probably... still better than a fully pure vowel system 19:10:18 STOP CORRUPTING THIS FOLLY'S PURITY 19:10:37 oerjan: well, no, it could have diphthongs I guess :D 19:11:12 oh tones could help 19:11:21 ehird: no, not speak @ 64 syllable/s, you have to have at least 64 different possible syllables in your language 19:11:27 Ah. 19:11:31 oerjan: true! 19:11:46 madbrain: how fast would you have to speak then for 50 b/s? 19:11:48 er, wait 19:11:55 depends on how fast you can speak a syllable ofc 19:12:10 -!- Pthing has quit (Remote closed the connection). 19:12:11 what language doesn't have 64 syllables? 19:12:12 since that means 1 syllable = 6 bits 19:12:13 well, suppose you have 8 pure vowels only, that's 3 bits, so you'd have to speak at about 17 syll/s 19:12:18 oklopol: one only using vowels 19:12:20 maybe 19:12:27 madbrain: oklopol can do that! 19:12:29 *do that 19:12:30 (probably) 19:12:46 with 3 finnish vowels, 512 syllables 19:13:22 oklopol: hmm... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirah%C3%A3_language might have less than 64, or more... 19:13:38 oklopol: rotokas 19:14:04 7 consonants and 5 vowels 19:14:07 ah, yes, Pirahã... 19:14:15 Pirahã can be whistled, hummed, or encoded in music. <<< are you sure it's even a well-defined question? 19:14:19 hm wait 19:14:27 oerjan: and only one vowel per syllable? 19:14:31 it's not pure cv, as the final s shows 19:14:41 so probably won't work 19:14:50 oklopol: how many syllables of pure vowels can you speak per second 19:14:51 then it's <= 70 19:14:52 rotokas afaik has many non CV syllables too 19:15:21 madbrain: you're a linguist like augur? 19:15:29 conlanger i think 19:15:34 well, not professionally 19:15:35 augur is too, admittedly 19:15:37 ehird: 8 isn't too hard 19:15:44 err 19:15:46 it's more like a nerdy hobby to me :D 19:15:48 madbrain: does student count as professional, if not augur isn't either :P 19:15:50 that's 8 vowels 19:15:52 so... 19:16:02 madbrain: you're not boring like augur, thankfully! 19:16:03 i kinda put them in separate syllables if i just talk in vowels 19:16:06 um, don't tell augur i said t haht 19:16:08 *that 19:16:32 ehird: i'm sure augur doesn't know his linguism bored you 19:16:34 *bores 19:17:02 anyway i need to leave irc now, remember to love each other like i do 19:17:03 -> 19:17:32 a finn loving? ha! 19:19:20 the finns cannot love it would mess up the sauna culture 19:20:29 how about making a language with only 10 consonants and no consonant-vowel-consonant syllables but 5000+ syllables? :D 19:20:38 * ehird cries. my poor pixel font is being ruined by the impossibility of "m"! 19:20:59 m? 19:21:08 ehird: what is your char size? 19:21:09 yeah for m you have to compromise 19:21:14 you try making an m glyph with serifs that fits in 7x10 19:21:19 (8x12; rest of pixels used for spacing) 19:21:29 most fonts I've seen make the "m" with a only 1 pixel wide bar 19:21:30 especially one that fits in with my other characters... 19:21:36 this includes fixedsys 19:21:44 madbrain: yes, my non-bold chars don't have such doubled d lines 19:21:46 my bold chars do though 19:21:50 maybe i'll do bold m and debold it 19:21:59 -!- Rugxulo has joined. 19:22:19 k was a challenge too but i'm semi-satisfied with what i have 19:22:20 ehird: http://elinux.org/Kernel_Size_Tuning_Guide 19:22:25 like, fixedsys m is like: 19:22:34 Rugxulo: why thank you! 19:22:40 ###### 19:22:41 ## # ## 19:22:42 ## # ## 19:22:43 try 1110100 0101010 ... 0101011 19:22:43 ## # ## 19:22:48 Rugxulo: especially the list of config options 19:23:04 SimonRC: is each block vertical or horizontal 19:23:06 I guess vertical 19:23:13 wait, no 19:23:14 hmm 19:23:19 (repeat the middle bit) 19:23:21 also, unrelated, but I did hack that tiny DOS Befunge93 interpreter again, it's now 1024 bytes w/ simple LFN and 386 check (so it won't crash on older cpus) 19:23:24 ehird: also you can use the top contour of the letter as a cue 19:23:57 SimonRC: oh that's good 19:23:57 ehird: or use the "empty row" at the right of the char, making it 8 wide instead of 7 19:24:05 that 1 at the very end makes it look good 19:24:17 it's not fat at all like my other characters, but I have to compromise for m, it seems 19:24:18 thanks 19:24:21 madbrain: yes, I'm considering that too 19:24:31 ehird: uh, ok 19:24:32 madbrain: but it'd make the neighbouring character bash right into it 19:24:34 you said you wanted serigs 19:24:46 SimonRC: yeah, but I couldn't get them looking good 19:25:00 I didn't know how it would look, since I just typed it in 19:25:13 or you can reduce the spaces between the lines so that they touch, it should be readable still since you'll recognize it by density instead of by line configuration 19:26:02 another avenue to explore might be making the middle line shorter 19:26:05 it seems to look okay 19:26:28 i really like most of this font so far... 19:26:50 madbrain: making the lines touch would look very unlike the other characters; they're very thin 19:27:24 you're making it only 1 line thick? 19:27:39 yep, apart from the bold characters 19:27:44 the look so far is very distinctive 19:27:47 then m should not be a problem! 19:27:58 ah, but I need to make it fit — and the other characters look fit 19:28:00 plus, serifs 19:28:06 I think I have a very good candidate, though! 19:28:15 well, without bold you have ample space for that 19:28:26 #..#..# 19:28:30 ssh 19:28:33 stop sending for a sec 19:28:33 *shh 19:28:37 [[ 19:28:38 ### # 19:28:38 # # # 19:28:38 # # # 19:28:39 # # # 19:28:39 # # # 19:28:40 ### ### 19:28:42 ]] 19:28:44 it looks pretty good 19:28:48 think I should reduce those serifs though 19:29:08 ah, but you can also let the serif go into the empty line! 19:29:27 but none of my other characters do that; and the spacing is nice — it fits with the outlines; the characters breath a lot 19:29:29 so to speak 19:30:08 madbrain: you can continue sending that char you were sending now 19:31:07 how about 19:31:07 # # ## 19:31:07 ## # # 19:31:07 # # # 19:31:07 # # # 19:31:08 # # ## 19:31:30 the assymetry on row 2 isn't very nice 19:31:49 dude, this is serif country 19:31:54 we hate symmetry :P 19:32:18 I liked your one 19:32:19 madbrain: lemme copy that into my image editor 19:32:23 * Rugxulo finds compression funny yet weird ... 7za a -mx9 produces 1025-byte file from a 1024-byte .COM while aPACK -x produces 1023 bytes 19:32:34 madbrain: btw, my letters are mostly 6px high 19:32:37 I'll adjust for that 19:32:42 they aren't designed to work on things that small 19:32:52 obviously ;-) 19:32:57 SimonRC: ahh, but the serifs make my font what it is 19:32:57 also if you use half-solid pixels you can use to anti-alias the shape, too 19:33:02 it'd be bland otherwise 19:33:06 madbrain: half-solid? 19:33:13 although 624 -s gets 1016 19:33:25 well, like, say, white-gray-black instead of just white-black 19:33:49 oops 19:33:53 madbrain: that m you showed has a problem many of my ms have had — a little dirt-looking artifact when zoomed out onn a high-res screen 19:34:02 madbrain: also, naw, don't have nothin' like that 19:34:16 I meant "Rugxulo: the compression programs aren't designed to work on anything that small" 19:34:21 ah :D 19:34:26 another option might be dropping serifs on m 19:34:31 yeah, nice ambiguity 19:34:49 madbrain: considered that; I definitely don't think a serif on the middle line is practical 19:35:18 * ehird considers something; tries it 19:35:30 -!- boily has quit ("leaving"). 19:36:12 nah 19:36:18 I'm gonna try a bold m and debold it 19:36:22 thanks for all the suggestions 19:36:24 really helps 19:36:37 oops, haven't done a bold l yet 19:36:38 in really tiny typefacse, you get M being things like 111 111 101, and it can work 19:36:59 SimonRC: yeah, I did something similar with my 4x3 typeface (with spacing 5x4) 19:37:00 is this a 1-bit font? 19:37:03 yes 19:37:10 The rfk86 m is "110 111 101"; n is "110 101 101". 19:37:15 you need sub-pixel rendering! 19:37:20 like what Apple do 19:37:42 fizzie: ouch 1-pixel difference 19:37:42 SimonRC: http://typophile.com/node/61920 :-) 19:38:07 they tend to look a bit rainbowy though 19:38:09 (as interesting for the font as it is for gawping at StoneCypher's serious mental illness) 19:38:33 also, Apple aren't the first nor last to do subpixel font rendering 19:38:37 even Microsoft do it (ClearType) 19:38:44 and it's the default in Ubuntu 19:38:54 SimonRC: Well... if you have ff3.5 or something that does font-embedding like that (and scripts on), you can see it "live" at http://zem.fi/rfk86/ [not a shameless plug at all] -- it's not so bad. And actually both had one "101" more, since it's 6x4-sized cells. 19:40:08 ehird: looks like Linux 2.4 got updated today (2.4.37.7) 19:40:37 * ehird realises he fucked up a character width in the bold font 19:40:38 f u c k 19:40:55 like, the VGA font has serifs only on some letters 19:40:56 for unlawful carnal knowledge 19:41:03 eh, I can sort it out later 19:41:22 when i enter them as bit arrays :-) 19:41:57 Is it meant for a terminal? 19:42:25 Mainly for English text, although I like it so much that I've considered using it for a terminal. 19:42:34 Admittedly monospaced is kinda crap for English. 19:42:45 linux-2.4.37.7.tar.bz2 -- 29.7 MB (ouch) 19:43:01 Yeah, a whole 30 MiB? I have to buy a new drive, man. 19:43:03 I'd go for a font with 2 pixel wide lines for terminal though 19:43:05 Because I'm from 1980, dude. 19:43:08 Which is why I'm saying man, dude. 19:43:16 Ie make bold the default 19:43:17 madbrain: Then use the bold variant. 19:43:26 But in the Unix world we don't do that crap. :D 19:43:47 linux-2.4.0.tar.bz218.9 MB1/3/01 6:00:00 PM 19:43:47 19:44:13 so it basically doubled in size 19:44:48 Yes, Rugxulo, technology is going down the drain, 10.8 MiB increase over eight years is basically the downfall of humanity, people who don't support the 286 are incompetent. 19:44:54 but not as bad as XP (1.5 GB) to Vista (16 GB) 19:44:55 Please stop complaining about it. 19:45:34 if it wasn't an epidemic, I wouldn't care 19:45:45 but when everything (Python, Perl, etc.) all bloats up ad nauseum, it gets annoying 19:45:46 If you *have* to complain, you should compare compiled images containing a mostly-identical set of compiled-in drivers; it's not like the source size is so terribly important. 19:46:02 Not only is the kernel getting bigger and bigger (including all the modules it uses) but they took years to add support for $obscure_hardware_that_noone_uses! 19:46:07 *cough* 19:46:22 IT INCREASES SIZE? Strip it out strip it out! 19:46:25 DAYS PASS 19:46:36 Why doesn't Linux boot on my IBM PC after updating? 19:46:40 sigh... 19:46:54 * Rugxulo found TinyPython, wonder if it's any good ... 19:47:28 I think I've found a sudden affinity for the #esoteric-should-be-about-esolangs-only folks. I announce the new creation of ##bloat-epidemic. 19:47:45 Gogogogogo 19:48:04 good no bloat, only one user :-) 19:48:06 but which would have the ColorForth discussion in it?> 19:48:13 #forth probably 19:48:23 Rugxulo: IT WILL NEVER BE BLOATED WITH MORE PEOPLE 19:48:25 thank god 19:48:45 woot, optimal size now ;-) 19:49:05 Rugxulo: you know what ColorForth is, right? 19:49:05 hmmm, making a hugely parallel cpu requires solving a few data routing problems: 19:49:15 (I) Routing problem (easy) 19:49:18 (Y) Routing problem (easy) 19:49:36 (reverse Y) Routing problem (harder) 19:49:47 (feedback) Routing problem (even harder) 19:50:15 huh? 19:50:18 madbrain: http://www.longnow.org/essays/richard-feynman-connection-machine/ 19:50:21 Memory address interference problem (even harder) 19:50:27 Feynman solved 'em :-P 19:51:06 SimonRC, I've heard (and seen) a few websites on ColorForth, never used it personally though 19:51:15 ehird, I'm having a nostalgia trip for OS 9 and older atm 19:51:19 hypercard yay! 19:51:22 AnMaster: k. 19:51:46 post-sys7 sucks hugely, post-sys6 sucks quite a bit 19:51:49 ooh I found something on called "adobe golive 4.0.1" on my ibook. Didn't remember that. 19:52:02 sorry, I just find it annoying that Linux now requires more RAM than Win95 did HD space :-/ 19:52:02 os 9 sucks in a colossal manner unsurpassed by any other OS, even Windows 19:52:11 doubt it 19:52:34 madbrain: care to give me fixedsys's m? 19:52:37 *fixedsys' 19:53:35 ###### 19:53:37 ## # ## 19:53:39 ## # ## 19:53:41 ## # ## 19:53:42 ## # ## 19:53:45 ## ## 19:53:52 Well that's simple :P 19:54:18 fixedsys has 2-px wide vertical lines 19:55:43 It's such a shame that optical illusion-style tricks don't really work at 7x10. 19:55:52 At 4x3 I even faked the slant on the n... 19:59:31 * ehird tweaks bold c and e and maybe d and g to make the metrics more similar to bold a (and thus more similar to roman a, c, d, e and g) 20:00:06 I think ehird's going to kill someone http://www.turtleflight.com/mbh/behavior_table.gif 20:00:19 Sgeo the great repeater. 20:00:34 ehird, I have both PPC and 68k emulated here :) 20:00:36 Last time, when I posted that, you weren't here, iirc 20:00:42 one is 7.5.5 the other being 9.0.4 20:00:43 AnMaster: I don't care. 20:00:45 Sgeo: I logread. 20:00:55 Tweaking my characters feels so wrong; destroying my wonderful babies! 20:01:11 Sgeo, what is that supposed to be? 20:01:20 When you logread, I can't see your reaction 20:01:29 AnMaster, Magsbot behavior table 20:01:31 -!- kar8nga has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:01:52 Magsbot: http://www.turtleflight.com/magine/mb.html 20:02:03 Sgeo: You can see my reaction if you logread too. 20:02:30 Ok, what day? 20:02:57 FOund it 20:03:09 My tweaked characters are slightly uglier but more consistent :( 20:03:30 Oh, there we go. 20:03:31 Same prettiness now, exce— 20:03:38 Oh, that must be why I tweaked them. 20:04:37 They are more consistent, granted; but they do not look fat any more. 20:04:51 The metrics are now matched, but the perceived metrics are ruined. 20:05:45 Maybe if I put them back, and tweak the a instead... 20:06:15 What's a bit strange is that in this gnome-screensaver, there's a "leave a message" option; the message is then shown when the actual user unlocks the screen. The strangeness is in that the dialog showing the message has no special labels, just the message you leave; and it has both "Cancel" and "OK" buttons in it. 20:06:26 http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/02/toxic-cities-pollution-lifestyle-real-estate-toxic-cities.html hm, maybe I shouldn't go to Pycon :/ 20:07:27 Yes, everyone in the cities listed there die days after arriving. 20:07:29 I left some sort of "aaaggagagah zombies!" message on ineiros' laptop the other day, and it was a bit confusing to see a mostly unlabeled "zombies! ok or cancel?" popup as a result. 20:07:44 (Offensive, less sarcastic response: Translation: Hurrrrrrrrrr) 20:07:53 fizzie: :D 20:08:13 which did you click, be ehonest 20:08:19 *be honest 20:08:44 It was him doing the screen-unlocking (and clicking), but I think it was "OK". 20:09:08 ZOMBIES ARE NOT OK 20:10:00 Magnatune's end-of-track ads ruin Riding the Faders :( 20:10:09 ehird: I think he's a zombie sympathizer. 20:10:10 They're OK if cooked well and served on toast with saurkraut and Russian dressing. 20:10:53 Funny 20:10:54 All these tracks are supposed to be played without interuption 20:10:55 So is your mom 20:11:03 That was at Gregor 20:11:07 DO NOT GET OFFENDED SGEO :P 20:11:24 Although Sgeo's mom DOES ruin Riding the Faders. 20:11:35 ehird: See, here's a publicly available picture of him: http://irc-galleria.net/user/ineiros/picture/58380030 20:11:41 And Sgeo's mom is also supposed to be played without interruption. 20:11:51 SHE IS ALSO DEAD DID I MENTION 20:11:58 You must now feel bad like I felt bad. 20:12:07 (I did not feel bad for oerjan because nobody cares about oerjan.) 20:12:16 ((JOKE OKAY JOKE)) 20:12:49 fizzie: he looks ambiguously gendered 20:12:50 -!- puzzlet has quit (Remote closed the connection). 20:12:54 -!- puzzlet has joined. 20:14:35 ehird: Well, so's you! 20:16:32 -!- fungot has joined. 20:16:55 ^def source ul (http://git.zem.fi/fungot/blob/HEAD:/fungot.b98)S 20:16:56 Defined. 20:16:58 ^save 20:16:58 OK. 20:19:13 -!- Rugxulo has left (?). 20:22:56 -!- Gregor has quit ("Leaving"). 20:23:30 * ehird decides to go back to n later 20:24:08 but it's such an addictive game 20:24:19 What game? 20:24:21 har har har 20:24:22 N 20:24:23 n 20:24:25 Oh 20:24:42 dammit, someone link me to that unapproved-of swf'd N 20:24:53 ...you mean that's not the official N game? 20:24:55 need me some ninja-tappin' action ILLICITLY IN MY BROWSER 20:24:59 Sgeo: it's identical 20:25:01 extracted from the .exe thingy 20:25:23 I thought that the .swf ... I didn't realize that it was intended to be distributed as a .exe 20:25:57 Let me guess, I've shattered your infinite nostalgia and now your mind is blown in an incredibly profound way. 20:26:10 I don't have N related nostalgia 20:26:17 Somehow 20:27:46 madbrain: what do you think of my lowercase k, by the way? I think I did quite well 20:27:46 ## 20:27:47 # 20:27:47 # 20:27:47 # ## 20:27:48 # # 20:27:49 # # 20:27:51 # # 20:27:53 ## # 20:27:55 # # 20:27:57 ### ## 20:28:12 quite big 20:28:12 yeah looks good 20:28:23 my bold uppercase k is a bit more iffy, though 20:28:44 ### 20:28:44 ## 20:28:45 ## 20:28:45 ## 20:28:45 ## ### 20:28:46 ## ## 20:28:46 #### 20:28:48 ##### 20:28:50 ## ## 20:28:52 ### ### 20:29:09 specifically, the lower bit looks like it's curved 20:29:10 reverse serif looks weird 20:29:33 you should make the serif go into the "forbidden area" instead 20:29:51 but it's forbidden for a reason! :P 20:29:56 it doesn't really look weird zoomed out tbh 20:30:01 just a bit curvaceous 20:30:16 well, it'll connect a bit with the next letter, but that's ok actually 20:30:28 well, I'll consider it 20:30:41 1 pixel is ok 20:31:01 what doesn't work is when you have a whole line that connects :) 20:32:01 -!- zzo38 has joined. 20:32:10 my g having no serif looks weird next to my p 20:32:11 oh well 20:32:21 it's also wiider by one pixel in the maain area bit 20:32:21 eh 20:32:21 What are you going to use these letters on? 20:32:31 how abot replacing rows 8 and 9 with 0111100 0110110 ? 20:32:36 It's a little pixel font at the best size (in my opinion) for English text! 20:32:40 SimonRC: in which letter? 20:32:45 bold k? 20:32:45 bold k 20:32:59 would look less squashed 20:33:46 no, the lack of serifs makes it look very weird 20:34:03 huh? 20:34:14 tat keeps the serifs 20:34:32 umm, I'm not seeing it here 20:34:37 maybe I drew it wrong; make a .png? 20:35:22 wait, I think I see what you mean 20:35:35 umm, not sure 20:35:36 it looks jagged 20:35:43 and doesn't fit with the other chars. 20:37:13 I suppose it is ok for serifs to connect with other letters, because they are intended to keep the eye on the row 20:37:56 i'm just using them for flavour ;-) 20:38:04 *:-P 20:38:06 i hate ;-) 20:38:10 you think it'll work there 20:38:11 but nope 20:38:17 just looks shiteating and/or suggestive like always 20:39:46 know what'll be horrific? 20:39:47 italics 20:40:39 italics you could do by using the righmost row as spacing on the bottom, but the leftmost one on the top 20:40:55 interesting 20:41:29 onto r 20:43:00 my r seems a bit crooked at the end! oh well, I can fix it later 20:44:01 *gulp* 20:44:01 s 20:45:39 That was... worryingly easy. 20:46:51 computers must really infuriate typesetters in some ways. Now everyone thinks that slanted is the same as italic 20:47:04 Indeed. 20:47:18 Thankfully no systems nowadays ship with commonly-used fonts without proper italics. 20:50:44 Some guy thinks he's going to start a company that.. resells publishing from pfmpricing.com or something. I basically told him that I'll help him set up the sample site, but I'm not putting any money, or much time, into what I feel is a scam 20:51:14 Sgeo: offering help to people he thinks are scammers and then proceeding to tell us all about how he's not going to really try hard since 2009. 20:52:53 I don't think this person is a scammer, just an idiot. It's pfm pricing's services that make me think "scam" 20:54:05 * ehird decides to go onto italics 20:54:26 Sgeo: So why not tell him he's an idiot and... not help? 20:54:43 madbrain: what did you say about italic spacing? 20:55:11 Because it's very little effort to "help" in the way that I offered? 20:55:31 why do anything for him? 20:55:37 Sgeo: So helping an idiot in a scam-related activity is fine as long as you (a) don't do much work and (b) tell us all about it? 20:55:41 Dude, get a blog. 20:56:41 It's either I help him, or he pays $500 for the company to set something up.. although in the latter case, I suspect they'd tell him he misunderstands everything 20:57:27 Helping an idiot save $500 to set up an idiotic scheme related to a scam? And thus, in your opinion, preventing an opportunity that might make him stop? 20:57:44 Your logic keeps getting more and more robust! Wait, no, the other thing. Flimsy. 20:58:27 At any rate, I seem to have lost contact with him, so it may be a moot point 20:59:12 The bad thing about all this is, I was talking to him at the same time someone online was telling me about a project I support, so now my feelings about this guy have partially transferred over to the thing I support :/ 20:59:36 You have serious issues. 21:00:14 Sgeo: the curse of indisciminant associative memory 21:00:25 you should see what I have for some of the meeting roms in my office 21:00:27 SimonRC: You too. 21:00:58 it's mostly a case of remembering the one every time the other is experienced 21:02:05 * ehird attempts to draw an italic glyph, fails horribly 21:05:14 http://zzo38computer.cjb.net/dnd/raw_transcripts/Vyb_back_story.txt Now, if some people are more on than yesterday (when there was 8 hours with only join/quit), can you tell me if it is good, or if I missed anything? 21:05:51 The universe didn't exist ten thousand years ago, and there's only one God. Why do you have Christians? 21:05:58 (↑ Joke.) 21:06:23 It is a Forgotten Realms campaign setting for D&D game 21:07:37 * Sgeo doesn't play D&D, but would somewhat like to get started 21:07:44 * Sgeo has GMed Paranoia 21:08:21 heh 21:08:35 When I played it, I was.. not that good 21:08:52 * Sgeo put himself in danger to save another troubleshooter >.> 21:08:53 This is 3.5 edition, which I would recommend 21:09:26 I can give some hints on 3.5 edition if you would like it too, because I played it and am good at defensive play in D&D 21:09:42 http://imgur.com/PgUuU.jpg What's wrong with this picture? Answer via /msg. 21:10:50 I can see what's wrong 21:10:58 I can see what's wrong immediately 21:11:01 ditto 21:11:22 the newspaper pose is a more subtle way to show that 21:11:41 Bah, you're all too details-oriented. :P 21:11:58 ehird: ooh, ooh ooh, let me try testing detail orientation 21:12:02 * SimonRC finds the video 21:14:17 avoid spoilers until you are done watching: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voAntzB7EwE 21:14:51 -!- bsmntbombdood has quit (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)). 21:14:53 (also, ehird's picture has a seriously SBHJ level of jpeg artefacts) 21:15:02 Can you sent text messages by telephone by morse-code? 21:15:13 SimonRC, seen it 21:15:16 :-( 21:15:26 I got it from Phil Platt I think 21:15:32 *Plait 21:15:36 But I haven't found the issue with ehird's picture yet :/ 21:15:43 nobody tell him 21:15:44 zzo38: depends on the phone 21:15:51 ehird, I gave up 21:16:20 zzo38: if it's a pocket computer, you can just download a morse-to-sms app 21:16:51 Sgeo: ur unf fvk qvtvgf ba rnpu unaq 21:17:08 * ehird searches for a trackball 21:17:14 SimonRC: i said no telling 21:17:16 However, I wonder if you can tell me a proper answer for the Vyb_back_story question, like, do you like this?, and, did I forget anything?, and, is it good?, and, etc.? 21:17:23 SimonRC, um, no 21:17:26 * ehird decodes it 21:17:41 not that 21:17:41 I don't know how to assess campign settings 21:17:47 i didn't even notice that 21:18:10 odd 21:18:51 SimonRC: I meant, like, if you have no keyboard and are sending from a standard telephone, or, if you do the reverse, SMS text -> landline. First it should check for fax and TTY, and then, send to voice by morse code, text-to-speech, or spell out, or numeric, etc, depending on some options 21:18:58 grr, why aren't there more mice/trackballs with real third buttons as well as mousewheels 21:19:12 Ok, so either SimonRC didn't get it either, or he was messing with me 21:19:20 The latter 21:19:30 No 21:19:31 Former, I guess 21:19:46 well, I didi spot something odd 21:20:04 /msg it 21:20:12 The file is my character's background story text, in case you forgot or didn't know.. 21:20:29 no, I mean I did spot something odd that I then spelt out in rot-13 on the channel 21:20:35 ah. 21:20:38 well it's not what i meant 21:23:23 SimonRC: noticed none 21:23:27 don't see why i should've 21:24:09 no need to notice stuff you're not explicitly asked to notice 21:24:51 well, it can be helpful 21:25:19 oklopol, except when watching a magician 21:25:21 for example studies of "lucky" and "unlucky" people tend to show that the lucky ones notice irrelevant details more easily 21:25:44 heh 21:26:09 i'm a pretty stereotypical scientist, i have no idea what's going on 21:26:23 usually 21:28:12 O, I have not heard of those studies. But it seems correct, a bit 21:29:14 Sgeo: I'm just fucking with you, it's the fingers 21:29:33 ...oh 21:29:38 the finger thing was trivial 21:29:47 Sgeo: Quick! How much did I just shatter your world? 21:30:32 TBH all it did to me was give me that slight sick feeling I get when people make me feel stupid in certain specific ways. 21:30:37 SimonRC: your rot13 is wrong 21:30:39 Beyond my self-irritation that I didn't include that as a possibility when talking to SimonRC, not much 21:30:53 assuming i guessed the sentence correctly 21:31:00 SimonRC: You're crazy! Just like everyone else here. 21:31:04 i don't know rot-13 anymore, it seems 21:31:15 oklopol: it says "he has six digits on each hand" 21:31:23 oh digits, damn 21:31:34 your MOTHER has etc. 21:31:37 BRB 21:31:42 i forgot there are synonyms 21:31:47 grr, why aren't there any three button mice with separate wheels 21:32:01 I have see them 21:32:15 the wheel in the middle of the buton is a bit inconvinient 21:32:23 or, you need the openoffice mouse 21:32:26 that's why you put it at the very top 21:32:30 with about a zillion buttons on it 21:32:31 or to the side 21:32:50 lol@taht mouse 21:32:55 perfectly describes openoffice 21:32:56 *that 21:32:58 nice joke 21:33:21 Preferably it'd be a trackball for me 21:33:27 So, say, trackball on thumb, 21:33:36 three buttons on the next fingers 21:33:45 and a wheel below the third button, perhaps? 21:33:53 Or perhaps between the first button and the wheel. 21:33:59 This episode makes me recall the fucking Basil puzzle again, which made me lose my appetite a little for a day or two until I learnt to ignore it. Nevery again will I doubt plausibility when a character in some story become dangerously obsessed with something. 21:34:17 Wait. OpenOfficeMouse ISN'T a joke? 21:34:17 *Never again 21:34:19 Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 21:34:26 lol 21:34:32 SimonRC: See, no, you were right to be skeptic. 21:34:42 SimonRC: You just didn't account for the fact that you're crazy. :P 21:34:42 skeptic? when? 21:34:51 "Nevery again will I doubt plausibility when a character in some story become dangerously obsessed with something." 21:34:55 ok 21:35:04 well if I can be that mad, they can be more than that mad 21:35:25 it's the way that other people were finding it easy that I didn't like 21:35:36 Basil puzzle? 21:35:42 Terrible idea: Keyboardmouse. It's a keyboard you can move around! 21:35:49 And it tracks as a mouse. 21:38:38 Sgeo: might not exist now that nonlogic has gone down 21:38:52 who created it BTW? 21:39:23 'cause if that person didn't take backups of the website, they might want to contact me 21:39:51 the website was world-readable on nonlogic, and I took a copy 21:40:01 (then I told them it was world-readable) 21:40:17 and nonlogic went down, so I expect they might want a backup 21:40:49 if they didn't mak eone themselves 21:43:11 Rodger created it. 21:43:33 http://imgur.com/4OPEu.png I'd pay $100 for this trackball 21:43:44 -!- ehird has quit (Remote closed the connection). 21:44:00 -!- ehird has joined. 21:44:06 he said, before crashing and burning. 21:45:00 shouldn't amazon and he like had 100 differnt trackballs available? 21:45:10 *and the like 21:45:18 SimonRC: *have *different 21:45:26 yeah 21:45:28 Also, nope. Basically nobody makes trackballs any moree. 21:45:29 *more 21:45:44 And the ones that exist are either pre-scroll wheel, or one-button-scroll-wheel-another-button. 21:45:53 My design there is unique, as far as I can tell. 21:46:20 get out a hacksaw and some glue? 21:46:21 And far superior, too — you can use your... um... finger-right-of-thumb (I suck at the finger names) to scroll, which is much more comfortable than using your middle finger. 21:46:33 index finger 21:46:34 fore 21:46:35 And yet your other fingers can rest on the left and middle buttons. 21:46:45 So you can follow links and open new tabs in a web browser while scrolling and mousing. 21:46:46 On Thursday, I was writing something and made up something a bit strange: Matrix accounting. 21:46:48 or index 21:46:51 and I use my index finger on ordinary mice too 21:47:04 More comfortable, almost as easy to access, much better middle button usage. 21:47:07 SOMEONE MAKE IT QUICK 21:47:08 zzo38: sounds like Matrix management 21:47:21 Matrix accounting is accounting, but with matrix math. 21:47:28 tbh that design is inferior to what a real product would be; the trackball should be lower 21:47:28 right also first finger 21:47:30 But whatever, it's close enough. 21:47:35 weird 21:47:41 It is not very good for recording transactions, but everything else it does correctly 21:47:49 in what sense is it the first one 21:47:50 FAWN OVER IT, PEOPLE 21:47:51 zzo38: the concepts "creative" and "accounting" should not go together 21:47:55 Like, everything in normal accounting has conversions here 21:48:03 -!- Gregor has joined. 21:48:08 You would never actually use it for recording transactions and stuff. 21:48:14 i guess fingers are zero-indexed. 21:48:18 what would it do then? 21:48:18 SimonRC: also, a hacksaw and glue probably wouldn't help. 21:48:29 Gregor: are you the guy who nade the basil puzzle? 21:48:35 No. 21:48:36 It's Rodger. 21:48:37 I told you. 21:48:41 At first I wrote it to figure out how to represent partnership agreements in a matrix. And then I realized that everything in accounting can be represented this way. 21:48:41 ah, missed that 21:48:47 Or was it Roger 21:48:51 Rod?gerTheGreat 21:48:53 rodger the great 21:49:12 rodger the great edible mountain 21:49:25 -!- Sgeo has left (?). 21:49:32 -!- Sgeo has joined. 21:49:42 * Sgeo WTFs at his um, trackpad 21:50:06 I accidentally touch it, and it closes out of a tab 21:50:25 Also, ehird reminded me that I'm hungry >.> 21:50:38 I'm really hungry and really tired but too lazy to eat or sleep. 21:50:58 Oh, and the trackball ought to include a foam rest fit to the trackball's shape. 21:51:24 i'm so full it hurts, but i'm also very thirsty, which is not a good combination, and i'm also too lazy to sleep even though i'm tired 21:51:32 so i think i win 21:52:23 aw darnit. 21:52:23 is that really a bad combination? 21:52:26 dog gammit 21:52:38 SimonRC: can't drink but have to? 21:52:40 ofc 21:52:51 hmm, suppose 21:53:02 SimonRC: i can't drink. 21:53:10 the trick is not to eat that much 21:53:12 ooh, what a fun prompt 21:53:18 ": prompt goes here; " 21:53:22 SimonRC: but it's all-you-can-eat 21:53:25 you can execute it and it's just a nop 21:53:28 ah 21:53:30 and man can i eat 21:53:34 so copy-and-middle-click command repeating becomes easy 21:53:35 * Sgeo recalls people saying that human thirst is broken, but not sure what is meant by that 21:53:45 but also pizza, and that's why i'm so full. 21:54:07 I used to literally live on pizza 21:54:19 YOU MEAN YOU LIVED ON A GIANT... 21:54:21 nm 21:54:27 i've been there 21:54:50 I can't easily eat pizza until I'm full. I lack the practice to absorb that much fat at once and find myself not wanting to eat more even though there is room. 21:54:52 on my last year of high school i basically spent all my days sitting in my armchair eating pizza and watching tv series 21:55:05 I have a ridiculously fast metabolism 21:55:09 SimonRC: pussy 21:55:16 I guess my parent brought me up too healthily. 21:55:17 and so I am always so thin as to be considered dangerously underweight no matter how much I eat! 21:55:21 *parents 21:55:21 which is, uh, fun 21:55:25 if you like being bothered all the time 21:55:40 * Sgeo just doesn't have much of an urge to eat 21:55:47 I love eating. 21:55:58 yeah, food is awesome 21:56:03 people always miss out part of the energy equation... 21:56:06 well i wouldn't go that far 21:56:09 most food is crap 21:56:17 SimonRC: which part 21:56:23 well, then don't buy the crap food 21:56:25 let me rephrase that 21:56:27 what do you mean 21:56:33 delta fat = energy in * digestive efficiency - energy expended 21:56:35 madbrain: i don't 21:57:01 I often see people forgetting that differnet peopl absorb different amounts of energy from the same food 21:57:27 like, if you practice for an eating competition, your digention becomes faster therefore less effective 21:57:32 $ PS1='$(echo ~+)$ ' 21:57:32 feel free to say "wat" 21:57:34 erm 21:57:35 $ PS1='$(echo ~+)$ ' 21:57:37 /Users/ehird$ 21:57:44 "A ~ followed by a + or - is replaced by the value 21:57:44 of $PWD and $OLDPWD respectively." 21:59:08 What software do most people use to make those videos that are just pictures and music? 21:59:24 MS movie maker ;-) 21:59:35 -!- oerjan has quit ("Good night"). 21:59:36 I don't know if that is a good suggestion or not 22:00:02 Making such an annoying video is a bad idea in itself. 22:00:18 Also: 20 minute tribute video consisting of pictures and music: Good idea or bad idea? 22:00:47 depends on how well it is done and what it is about 22:01:03 Bad idea bad idea bad idea bad IDEA. 22:01:23 It's about a game called Mutation 22:01:49 arrgh IRC is such a fucking time-sink 22:02:02 Although the only reason it's 20min long is because that's the sum of how long all the music from the game as 22:02:03 *was 22:02:27 SimonRC: so go do something else. 22:03:09 SimonRC: do like me and try to do something useful on the side 22:03:18 and do unlike me and manage to actually do it 22:03:26 or should i say undo like me 22:04:54 * SimonRC goes 22:05:08 yeah that might work even better 22:05:16 * oklopol tries to go 22:29:19 -!- FireFly has joined. 22:36:43 * ehird decides that 22:36:44 [[ 22:36:44 Permission is granted to copy, modify and distribute this work. 22:36:45 22:36:45 THERE IS NO WARRANTY. 22:36:45 ]] 22:36:46 is the best license, or if the permission to use software really isn't implicit, then 22:36:48 [[ 22:36:50 Permission is granted to use, copy, modify and distribute this work. 22:36:52 22:36:54 THERE IS NO WARRANTY. 22:36:56 ]] 22:36:58 Copywrong! 22:55:12 the problem with madbrain is that he doesnt know what the fuck hes talking about 22:55:22 so while he may seem interesting, its only because he's full of shit 22:55:23 Decisive. Aggressive! 22:55:25 Popcorn. 22:55:33 i just bought a popcorn maker. 22:55:56 When you cause ehird to jump back in surprise at the offensiveness of an instance of insulting, you know you're on the edge. 22:56:07 Well, okay, I didn't *physically* jump back. 22:56:15 madbrain. Retort! 22:56:25 I suggest saying that augur is full of shit. 22:57:04 ehird, check it out 22:57:13 ive invented a cute little model of syntax, very simple 22:57:17 and stack based! 22:57:33 The problem with augur is that he presents everything really shittily. 22:57:36 and it manages to explain to largely inexplicable phenomena in one fell swoop 22:57:37 :o 22:57:43 So while he may seem really boring, it's only because he's not full of shit. 22:57:49 Wait, that didn't work. 22:57:54 :) 22:58:03 but true, i think 22:58:12 No, the latter statement failed. 22:58:18 Feynman was interesting and not full of shit. 22:58:18 but still true! 22:58:23 do you know madbrain from elsewhere, incidentally? 22:58:27 no. 22:58:28 just here. 22:58:33 or are you just really aggressive :P 22:58:55 he just has a really weird notion of what qualifies as the information content of a string of phonemes 22:59:05 the problem is that its incredibly difficult to compute that 22:59:20 is that relevant to whether it's a good model or not? 22:59:23 I don't think so 22:59:25 what? 22:59:32 is that really a problem 22:59:35 that it's hard to compute 23:00:23 its a problem if you're making claims about the information content of a string of phonemes, yes. 23:02:54 wanna know about my little model of syntax? x3 23:03:49 there are only three core operations! 23:05:53 i used to think the bit-measurement when people say things like "english gets 6 b/s" was actual informational content 23:06:00 like, it actually carries 6 bits of actual information 23:06:03 not just distinct elements of the language 23:06:10 but see thats very hard to quantify 23:06:14 and i kept wondering how people worked out the exact actual bit contents of some information 23:06:30 and also how come things on earth about humans can be 6 bits 23:06:36 i mean, we're enumerating the entire logical space here :P 23:06:56 so let me tell you my little mode 23:06:57 l 23:06:58 then i realised it was not that awesome 23:07:00 and it was so boring 23:07:02 and you're so boring 23:07:03 and shut up 23:07:05 thank you 23:07:10 :Have I written this spell good and correctly: http://zzo38computer.cjb.net/dnd/other_stuff/Suppress_Lycanthropy.txt 23:07:19 proably 23:07:21 *probably 23:07:27 i did not write that word good and correctly 23:09:17 oh ok here we go ehird 23:09:27 and shut up augur 23:09:30 here is my model of All Human Language Syntax 23:09:34 READY? 23:09:41 and i hate you augur 23:09:43 and i really do 23:09:56 ehird, more than me? 23:09:58 :D 23:10:05 and i have thought of something i haven't actually tried, i'm going to put you on /ignore because i am like, fight or flight here 23:10:12 and i can't kill you over the internet 23:10:27 ehird, heh? you are ignoring augur? 23:10:28 :D 23:10:37 and so i am going to have to flight by which i mean /ignore goodbye temporarily please do not take it personally thank you i will probably logread because i have no self control bye 23:10:49 :( 23:10:51 okay logreading now./ 23:10:56 s/\/$// 23:10:58 XD 23:11:10 anmaster! wanna know about language? :o 23:11:17 you are sad don't be sad NO I NEVER READ THAT 23:11:20 i never read your lines 23:11:22 in the log 23:11:24 um, one line 23:11:25 youll LITERALLY be the first person other than me to know this stuff 23:11:26 i'm kinda tired. 23:11:26 :o 23:11:29 can't, you know 23:11:30 count 23:12:37 it's kinda lonely without augur babbling 23:12:40 feels lonely 23:12:47 i mean it's okay when it's just normal silence 23:12:52 but this is silence sans augur babbling 23:12:56 which is like... explicit silence 23:12:59 it is of my own doing 23:13:00 and it is my undoing 23:13:08 therefore my doing is my undoing and all my acts are wrong 23:13:20 i would jump out of a window but since that is a thing that i would do it is clearly the wrong thing to do 23:13:28 anmaster! wanna know about language? :o <-- noooooo 23:13:32 :( 23:14:29 AnMaster: i do not suggest /ignore as a remedy it causes extreme cancer of the sadness organ 23:14:34 (it's a church organ) 23:14:34 ehird, but isn't then not doing it something you would do? 23:14:37 as you just did it 23:14:41 NO 23:14:43 inaction is not action 23:14:45 i think 23:15:00 ehird, hehe I read that as "church oerjan" first 23:15:32 your most excellency augur, 23:15:45 please telepathically transdivinate whether me unignoring you would result in unpleasant babbling 23:15:53 or perhaps a return to serene silence, not this noisy, upsetting silence 23:15:57 yours truly sincerely, 23:16:00 ehird, conjecture: you can not decide (by free will) to do something you wouldn't do. 23:16:01 elliott hird 23:16:07 AnMaster: you ruined my beautiful letter 23:16:12 (you could be forced to though) 23:16:24 ehird, oops didn't see. I was busy writing it 23:16:27 now you are cluttering my name space and augur thinks my name is ehird, conjecture: you can not decide (by free will) to do something you wouldn't do. 23:16:28 elliott hird 23:16:48 your absolute excellent-champion augur, 23:16:48 ehird, XD 23:16:51 i am 23:16:52 ... 23:16:54 hah 23:16:56 please discard this letter 23:17:03 really? XD 23:17:06 I know this spell I wrote is an exception to the general rule for creating potions. But I made it like this anyways. 23:17:09 your above-excellent super-liminal superlative augur, 23:17:13 my name is in fact elliott hird 23:17:14 love, 23:17:16 elliott hird 23:17:16 ehird, I haven't laughed out 23:17:19 loud 23:17:21 all week before 23:17:30 love, 23:17:30 ehird, I haven't laughed out 23:17:30 elliott hird 23:17:31 hah! 23:17:39 it was fine at my end AND THAT IS ALL THAT MATTERS 23:17:42 for I am a solipsist 23:17:44 ehird, meh 23:17:46 an IRC solipsist 23:17:53 i am the only client that exists. 23:18:02 ehird, why are you still on irc then 23:18:14 it's the only game you can play on macs. 23:18:22 ehird, intel macs? 23:18:31 ehird, if you have classic you can play quite a few more at least 23:18:34 i use macintosh system software 5 23:18:34 no idea about intel ones 23:18:43 system 6 is too bloated for my meagre brain 23:18:50 ehird, never seen system 5 23:18:51 ever 23:18:51 i don't actually own a macintosh, i just execute the instructions in my head 23:18:55 system 1 and system 6 yes 23:18:59 and 7 8 and 9 23:19:09 ehird, I thought you did? 23:19:24 well the physical world isn't real either, so everything is in my head really 23:19:28 but it sounds better this way... 23:20:07 dear augury augur, 23:20:14 i substantiate the unignorance of your persona. 23:20:16 very lovely day time, 23:20:18 elliott hird 23:20:24 dear augury augur, 23:20:27 i mean night time. 23:20:30 ... 23:20:30 very lovely correction time, 23:20:32 elliott hird 23:20:33 nooooooo 23:20:34 not again 23:20:40 :( 23:20:41 :D 23:20:46 ... 23:20:46 very lovely correction time, 23:20:46 elliott hird 23:20:50 like that here 23:20:51 HOW ABOUT SUKKY SUKKY LOVE YOU LONG TIME? 23:21:00 augur, XD 23:21:06 thats awesome 23:21:09 :D 23:21:15 as a reply I mean 23:21:16 apostrophes are awesome 23:21:20 not the act in fact 23:21:21 NOT THAT YOU'D EVER KNOW THAT 23:21:24 because you didn't use them 23:21:43 ehird, you mean single-quotes? 23:21:56 "thats awesome" 23:21:58 YOU HATE THEM 23:21:58 ehird, anyway augur doesn't use them a lot either 23:22:05 yes, and i hate him too 23:22:06 HATE 23:22:11 anyway, now for a bout of semi-coheerency 23:22:13 really? 23:22:16 and why is that? 23:22:25 http://www.quadibloc.com/comp/images/enhpc.gif 23:22:26 ONE KEYBOARD TO RULE THEM ALL 23:22:28 ONE KEYBOARD TO FIND THEM 23:22:31 ONE KEYBOARD TO BRING THEM ALL 23:22:39 AND IN THE SCANCODES BIND THEM 23:22:40 http://wellnowwhat.net/linguistics/syntax.html 23:22:43 ... 23:22:45 ehird, hah 23:22:55 augur, nice link (as a contrast) 23:22:57 didn't open it 23:22:58 "One multi-function keyboard layout that tries to combine all the functions of: 23:22:59 The normal 104/105-key PC keyboard 23:22:59 The 122-key terminal emulation keyboard 23:22:59 The Sun keyboard (notice the HELP key on the left) 23:22:59 An APL keyboard (APL symbols are on the right half of the keys) 23:23:00 A LISP keyboard of the Space Cadet variety (Meta, Super, and Hyper... and the symbols on the left half of the keys, even unshifted (. ). and :)" 23:23:25 ehird, awesome 23:23:45 all it needs is a trackpoint, a trackpad, a trackball, a mousing surface and a tablet 23:23:47 ehird, "and :)"? 23:23:55 and you can just drop it on your desk and sit there FOREVER 23:24:06 AnMaster: unshifted ( ) : 23:24:10 it was in parens 23:24:15 ah 23:24:15 (Meta, Super, […] (. ). and :) 23:24:20 confusing I know 23:24:30 tbh I'd probably buy a keyboard like that 23:24:35 anmaster: INNIT AWESOME? 23:24:41 ehird, why are there two sysrq? 23:24:43 thats a whole theory of syntax right there. 23:24:45 seriously. 23:24:45 augur, didn't open it I said 23:24:49 AnMaster: one's print screen/sys req 23:24:50 you think im joking but 23:24:51 and won't 23:24:51 the regular key 23:24:53 oh 23:24:54 :( 23:24:54 and one's a one-key sysreq 23:25:03 AnMaster: just like there's shifted and unshifted () 23:25:07 ehird, hum 23:25:11 there'd be something satisfying about lobbing that thing on your desk 23:25:11 huge 23:25:17 like, the feeling of being able to control everything 23:25:18 all there 23:25:20 all you'd ever need 23:25:20 ehird, how do you set the "mode" or something? 23:25:28 AnMaster: shift or something, who cares 23:25:30 anyway 23:25:39 it'd have to be made with capacitive buckling springs, like the Model F 23:25:44 even older, and more clicky, than the Model M 23:25:53 ehird, it needs localised versions for all possible languages. ALL IN ONE 23:25:54 as in 23:25:59 and it'd have to have a huge bezel 23:25:59 all buttons has all languages 23:26:09 ehird, oh and both qwerty and dvorak 23:26:13 in that classic beige 23:26:14 it would be 23:26:15 GLORIOUS 23:26:53 [[ 23:26:53 23:26:54 super_merge ([F..., X......F, ...], H, P) = ([X...... → F... X......F, ...], H ∪ {F...}, P) 23:26:54
23:26:55 sub_merge ([F, X...F, ...], H, P) = ([X... → F X...F, ...], F, P ∪ {F...}) 23:26:55 ]] 23:26:58 augur: you fail at XML forever. 23:27:12 also HTML, also XHTML, also choosing sane markup formats, also at writing markup in said format 23:27:27 ehird, husuh 23:27:30 hush. 23:27:39 its supposed to be quick and dirty 23:27:40 and it works 23:28:02 then why is the fucking xml declaration there 23:28:05 or the / in
23:28:16 heck, firefox won't even render that 23:28:24 it'll take one look at it and spew out an XML error 23:28:39 :| 23:28:49 the declaration is there fore unicode. 23:28:56 23:29:08 congratulations, you fail at quick and dirty hacks! 23:29:20 ::shrug:: 23:29:59 fixe 23:30:00 d 23:30:01 happy? 23:30:13 doesnt work properly tho 23:30:50 yeah, you did it stupidly. 23:30:57 no i didnt 23:31:08 put as the first like, replace
with
, and it'll work juuuuuuuust fine. 23:31:10 *line 23:31:31 its the unicode that doesnt work, cuntface 23:32:10 Yes. 23:32:17 I retract my advice, though. Cuntface. 23:33:00 * augur fucks you up so hard 23:33:44 I was so much happier when I was ignoring you. 23:36:11 there ehird 23:36:13 no unicode at all 23:36:16 just ugly text :| 23:36:25 that is decidedly not an improvement. 23:36:29 its not! 23:36:30 but 23:36:38 its the best i can do :( 23:36:53 great, xhtml. 23:36:55 :D 23:36:59 now it's at least ten times as shitty as the last iteration. 23:37:01 NEXT ILL DO HTML5 23:37:15 funny, adding that to the start was all you needed to have valid html5. 23:37:21 and also to trigger standards mode 23:37:24 which would have fixed shit. 23:37:30 ehird, gave up the /ignore? 23:37:34 AnMaster: alas. 23:37:36 reconsidering. 23:37:37 except i did that ehird :( 23:37:40 and it didnt work :( 23:38:01 well fix your fucking server and get it to send the right content-type header, that is my suggestion 23:38:07 your mother. 23:38:29 -!- iamcal has quit. 23:39:18 how now 23:39:22 BETTER? 23:39:41 augur, link? 23:40:05 http://wellnowwhat.net/linguistics/syntax.html 23:40:24 augur, looks ok in konqueror? 23:40:27 super_merge [([F..., X......F, ...], H, P), ...] = [([X...... → F... X......F, ...], H ∪ {F...}, P), ...] 23:40:27 sub_merge [([F, X...F, ...], H, P), ...] = [([X... → F X...F, ...], F, P ∪ {F...}), ...] 23:40:27 adjoin [([Y, ...], Hi, Pi), ([X, ...], Hj, Pj), ...] = [([X → Y X, ...], Hj, Pj), ...] 23:40:33 if that is what it should look like 23:40:34 :) 23:40:36 however some font issues 23:40:47 looks correct when pasted in irc client 23:40:56 but has some boxes in konq 23:41:10 so yeh, thats the theory of syntax :o 23:41:29 augur, pretty. But I have no clue what it means 23:41:33 :) 23:41:59 ok the things that look like X...f with the ...f in subscripts, and nothing in superscripts 23:42:00 augur, and this is lynx: 23:42:03 super_merge [([F[...], X[...]^...F, ...], H, P), ...] = [([X[...]^... [...] X[...]^...F, ...], H F[...]}, P), ...] 23:42:03 sub_merge [([F, X[...F], ...], H, P), ...] = [([X[...] X[...F], ...], F, P F[...]}), ...] 23:42:03 adjoin [([Y, ...], H[i], P[i]), ([X, ...], H[j], P[j]), ...] = [([X X, ...], H[j], P[j]), ...] 23:42:07 that means "An X that needs an f" 23:42:22 well ok let me rephrase that 23:42:23 augur, I DIDN'T ASK WHAT IT MEANT 23:42:28 ok fine :| 23:42:29 I just said I didn't understand it 23:42:44 you're a lameface 23:43:03 augur, maybe. But I'm sure there are stuff I'm better at 23:43:44 grammar argh fix it 23:43:56 ehird, eh? 23:44:20 augur: it is manifestly inferior to anything else because it's xhtml. 23:44:30 not even that; inconsistently-capitalised xhtml 23:44:32 "PuBLIC" 23:44:35 "en-uS" 23:44:39 not even sure that's valid. 23:44:45 AnMaster: there is stuff i'm better at 23:44:45 not are 23:45:24 ehird, am you sure about that? 23:45:29 die die die 23:45:41 ehird, why are that? 23:45:48 FUCK DEATH DIE ARGH RAGE 23:45:51 SCREAMING FIRE 23:46:08 ehird, why is you reacting this strongly to it? 23:46:17 tiredness :D 23:46:20 and mirth 23:46:32 ah :D 23:46:34 oh god 23:46:37 you did it in that line 23:46:39 FUUUCK ARGH sfjgsdiofhgljh 23:46:43 i'm so tired i didn't notice 23:46:46 XD 23:46:48 i can't trust ANYTHING that happens until I sleep 23:46:52 am I even actually typing this? 23:46:56 ehird, yes 23:46:57 does my computer actually exist? 23:46:57 and no 23:46:59 :D 23:47:00 do *I* exist? 23:47:16 ehird, well you asserted you were the *only* thing existing before 23:47:31 maybe it is the reverse? 23:47:37 you are the only thing *not* exisiting 23:47:54 man i am freaking out! 23:47:59 would you tell that to someone on drugs? 23:48:00 no? 23:48:04 THEN DON'T TELL ME WHEN I'M TIRED 23:48:08 ehird, you are on drugs? 23:48:13 no, but same thing basically 23:48:40 ehird, maybe no one exists 23:48:48 and we are all dreaming that we exist 23:48:52 maybe nothing exists 23:48:58 ... 23:49:00 I said that 23:49:03 no one 23:49:05 is not nothing 23:49:09 you peoplecentricitythingy 23:49:10 indeed 23:49:22 I meant "nothing" though probably 23:49:45 i exist more than you 23:52:32 oklopol, except since ∀x(Human(x) → Existance(x) → 0) that "more" is insignificant 23:52:48 (note to self: don't mix syntax from different parts of math like that, it's confusing) 23:53:01 the second arrow is "limit" the first is "implies" 23:53:07 just to clarify 23:53:51 great what the hell. That wasn't supposed to happen. 23:53:52 note to AnMaster, don't futz together some random mathematical notation in a blatantly obvious "look at me i know mathematics" 23:53:54 bleh so tired 23:53:58 * AnMaster prods rythmbox 23:54:12 ehird, no it wasn't that. 23:54:38 rhythm. 23:54:43 yeah whatever 23:55:05 ehird, I think it fucked up anyway. Some sort of shuffle even when that was disabled 23:55:23 * AnMaster sighs and note he should go back to the command line alternative again. Works better. 23:55:44 i care, i really care, i'm trying to care, don't be a bastard 23:55:46 can't do it 23:55:49 i really don't care. 23:56:13 ehird, about? 23:56:20 [23:55] • AnMaster sighs and note he should go back to the command line alternative again. Works better. 23:56:24 you don'ts care about? 23:56:34 zgjk;' 23:56:34 ah 23:56:37 OW 23:56:38 ehird, what? 23:56:44 i rolled my finger along the home row 23:56:49 ehird, why? 23:56:51 and it hit the spiky edge of my enter key 23:56:57 propped up slightly 23:56:59 as it's a bit broken 23:57:01 ow ow ow ow ow 23:57:05 ehird, oooh nice spiky keyboard 23:57:05 (scissor-switch board = sharp key edges) 23:57:19 i think everyone is sleeping in this housees or something 23:57:20 so quiet 23:57:35 *house 23:58:10 "A trackball mouse with a foot pedal!" 23:58:14 what a wonderful idea! 23:58:15 i think 23:58:21 ehird, the pedal would be for? 23:58:25 clicking 23:58:25 clicking? 23:58:26 ah 23:58:26 presumably 23:58:53 Trackball mice for your toes. 23:59:00 ehird, would be trivial to wire up to the toe brakes of some flightsim rudder pedals 23:59:02 Get some use out of those buggers. 23:59:05 "In the Cool Accessories Dept., the TopTrack comes with a silver and gold fabric mouse cozy. A mouse cozy! My wife wonders why anyone would need to keep a mouse warm. Obviously she has no heart. Personally, I can see reasons for modem cozies as well." 23:59:06 ^___^ 23:59:07 then you would have left/right click 23:59:12 fizzie: No, heels! 23:59:14 ehird, just a few lines in the X config I expect 23:59:29 needs to be a good foot pedal though 23:59:32 no gradual action needed 23:59:36 needs to be tactile 23:59:45 ehird, well hm. ok 23:59:58 i sure am looking forward to never double-clicking again