00:20:15 -!- ais523 has quit (Remote host closed the connection). 00:40:25 -!- pikhq has joined. 00:40:33 -!- pikhq_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds). 00:42:05 apparently there are functions in the C library that have locale-specific behavior except when in the "C" locale 00:42:09 * coppro baffles 00:43:16 -!- elliott has joined. 00:51:50 coppro: example? 00:52:17 newsham: I'm just quoting the standard 00:52:28 is that for backwards compat? 00:52:46 Those functions that 00:52:46 have locale-speciﬁc aspects only when not in the "C" locale are noted below. 00:52:59 how can you have locale-specific aspects only when not in the "C" locale 00:53:15 by definition, something that is only present in the "C" locale is locale-specific 00:59:58 hi 01:00:02 what is argument 01:00:38 an object that is passed to a function when invoking it 01:01:21 *a value that 01:02:30 14:08:37: romance in iwc? truly the world is coming to an end 01:02:37 oerjan: i sure hope this is the cause of the next fireball 01:03:10 elliott: it is looking disturbingly like dmm is wrapping up loose threads 01:03:27 :D 01:03:38 * elliott tries to find the dinosaur comics guest strip it reminded him of 01:04:55 http://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=1773 01:04:55 this one 01:05:46 oerjan: erm, if he's trying to end on the calvin and hobbes point it would be a bit premature 01:05:51 unless it'll take seven hundred pages to wrap up all the adventures 01:06:27 oerjan: btw have you tried the cunning tactic if he's planning to end the comic? :D 01:06:32 oerjan: btw have you tried the cunning tactic of asking if he's planning to end the comic? :D 01:06:49 seven hundred? i think you're off a bit 01:07:01 19:02:31: Okay, true. 01:07:02 19:02:47: That alone testifies that they shouldn't have freaking made LotR into a film series. 01:07:02 19:02:58: It's fundamentally incompatible. 01:07:02 19:08:30: pikhq_, by which you mean it was significantly better than the books 01:07:02 ++ 01:07:13 oerjan: er oh wait, that was the homestuck count when i compared them :) 01:07:17 how long was calvin and hobbes? 01:07:26 elliott: i have never dared to communicate with dmm 01:07:41 oerjan: is it because he's ~famous~ 01:07:57 19:09:21: pikhq_, the films were pretty good. 01:07:57 agree, and i couldn't get past the first hundred pages of Fellowship 01:08:23 there was no talking lion 01:08:25 3160 01:08:57 oerjan: ah. then start worrying. 01:09:04 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaa 01:09:07 although that's still almost a hundred pages of wrap-up :D 01:09:10 0x41414141 01:09:14 maybe Supers will return 01:09:27 i sure do know a lot about a comic I've never managed to archive binge 01:09:54 speaking of archive binge, i need to catch up on smbc 01:10:26 oerjan: i don't know how he'll wrap up the hugely intertwined tangle of plot threads that is the Nigerian Finance Minister theme 01:10:41 maybe that's what the remaining pages are 01:11:20 * oerjan suddenly wonders if he actually has read all of lotr, or is just imagining doing so 01:11:45 oerjan: knowing your attention span i doubt it :D 01:11:53 it's not implausible that i gave up somewhere in fellowship too 01:12:18 elliott: however i absorbed almost anything readable at that age 01:13:02 did you read the part where caspian was on the dawn treader? 01:13:06 oerjan: oh sweet, im gonna paste this big @ design document 01:13:15 (...i should write one) 01:13:16 so it's not implausible that i may actually have read it through 01:13:24 -!- elliott has left ("Leaving"). 01:13:29 -!- elliott has joined. 01:13:32 newsham: :D 01:13:34 newsham: funny guy, although i _definitely_ have read all the narnia books 01:13:40 i read the narnia books when i was a lil one, they were shit 01:13:44 i think i thought this because they are shit 01:14:11 maybe if i realised they were christian propaganda i would have realised WHY they were shit 01:14:14 but i just thought he was a bad writer 01:14:46 elliott: heck i even read some of his _openly_ christian fiction 01:15:02 (the great divorce) 01:15:08 i don't think he was a very clever writer 01:15:10 all this in norwegian translation, btw 01:15:27 -!- elliott has left ("Leaving"). 01:15:33 -!- elliott has joined. 01:15:36 how does clos etab work 01:15:40 you're such a eustice 01:15:56 totes 01:16:21 If Aslan represented the immaterial Deity in the same way in which Giant Despair [a character in The Pilgrim's Progress] represents despair, he would be an allegorical figure. In reality however he is an invention giving an imaginary answer to the question, 'What might Christ become like, if there really were a world like Narnia and He chose to be incarnate and die and rise again in that world as He actually has done in ours?' This is not allegor 01:16:22 y at all. (Martindale & Root 1990) 01:16:26 cs lewis doesnt know what allegory means 01:16:34 also he thinks jesus is lit. a lion i guess 01:17:02 he was just writing books for kids 01:17:10 i think aslan turned into jesus at the end of the last battle 01:17:11 (while trying to keep em brainwashed appropriately) 01:17:32 he said he's known by other names in other worlds 01:18:10 like many movies and books, cs lewis's naria books made ugly pepole bad and bad people ugly and looked down on different people 01:18:13 -!- pikhq_ has joined. 01:18:17 pretty lame for a "christian" book 01:19:35 newsham: to be fair, it also lacked a lot of stoning 01:19:52 i'm pretty sure tumnus was constantly stoned 01:19:57 the "this isn't _true_ Christianity because it's not nice enough" kind of falls down if you take all the parts together 01:20:53 -!- pikhq has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds). 01:21:18 * oerjan snickers at "But it's so hard for me to meet new people!" 01:21:22 theyre making a sequel to narnia arent they 01:21:33 I think that Lewis is *capable* of writing good fiction. 01:21:33 movie wise? 01:21:45 newsham: yeah 01:21:46 Even within the framework of his "ZOMG MUST BE 120% CHRISTIAN" thing. 01:21:50 :( 01:21:54 He just seems to have let that framework take over. 01:22:14 didn't tolkein reconvert him by basically saying "hey christianity is p. cool dude" 01:22:21 Sounds about right. 01:22:36 and lewis was like "oh ok im christian now" 01:22:49 was lewis his precious? 01:22:52 Films directed by Andrew Adamson 01:22:53 Shrek (2001) · Shrek 2 (2004) · The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005) · The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian (2008) 01:22:56 good film career 01:23:00 lmao 01:23:06 He claims that it was some long, arduous journey, but, well... 01:23:53 To be perfectly honest, most Westerners who claim to have "struggled" with their faith are either saying "I keep thinking it's bullshit, but get pulled back in", or are bullshitting you. 01:24:05 http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2273 01:24:21 Depending on whether they mean "struggle" as in "questioned" or "suffered personal injury because of". 01:24:35 pikhq: or ".. but boy do I love sleeping with my wife's friends..." 01:25:10 newsham: Or variations thereof. 01:25:21 "Boy do I love cock" seems to be common as well. 01:25:35 yes 01:25:40 and "but the alcohol made me do it" 01:26:03 Which works better as an excuse with some denominations than others. 01:26:14 this sure is some productive debate 01:26:24 the important thing is if you check yourself into rehab and tell everyone that god forgives you 01:26:26 lets tell /r/circlejerk about it 01:26:41 I mean, you've got churches that claim the religion mandates you never drink, and churches that literally make beer and wine. 01:27:43 oh my god shut up 01:32:22 newsham: it would have been more fitting to the topic to link to the one where he uses bible stuff to justify sodomy and pedophilia... 01:33:47 -!- Slereah has quit. 01:35:20 do unto others as you woul dhave them do to you? 01:35:44 http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2281#comic 01:36:12 the votey comic is the more interesting one 01:39:24 hey i think my previous thoughts about the halting problem were wrong, cool 01:40:06 hmm 01:40:12 oh hey quint 01:40:19 are you gonna write that score system for jous 01:40:19 r 01:40:41 it's provably uncomputable. proof: find a point in time after which sgeo will never blog into this channel... 01:41:07 what, the score system? :D 01:41:32 the score system will happen when i learn that stupid fortran-based algebra system 01:41:46 it has the WORST NAMED FUNCTIONS MANKIND HAS EVER INVENTED 01:41:55 with THE MOST CONFUSING PARAMETER LISTS 01:42:18 quintopia: the haskell binding has a nice interface 01:42:19 but hu 01:42:20 uh 01:42:25 lapack functinos are named systematically 01:42:33 so you don't have to look them up if you know the base operation names :) 01:42:36 overloading 01:42:41 "In 2010, 25 LaRouche supporters protesting a new production of Richard Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen presented by the Los Angeles Opera carried signs that said, ""Wagner: Loved by Nazis, Rejected by Humans" and "L.A. County: $14 Million to promote Nazi Wagner, Layoffs for Music Teachers"." 01:43:14 -!- BeholdMyGlory has quit (Remote host closed the connection). 01:43:31 explain the naming system to me then 01:43:59 jfreadthedocumentation, anyway i was only asking so that i can take advantage of you not doing it by writing my own 01:44:37 Subroutines in LAPACK have a characteristic naming convention which makes the identifiers short but rather obscure. This was necessary as the first Fortran standards only supported identifiers up to six characters long, so the names had to be shortened to fit into this limit. 01:44:37 A LAPACK subroutine name is in the form pmmaaa, where: 01:44:37 p is a one-letter code denoting the type of numerical constants used. S, D stand for real floating point arithmetic respectively in single and double precision, while C and Z stand for complex arithmetic with respectively single and double precision. The newer version LAPACK95 use generic subroutines in order to overcome the need to explicitly specify the data type. 01:44:38 mm is a two-letter code denoting the kind of matrix expected by the algorithm. The codes for the different kind of matrices are reported below; the actual data are stored in a different format depending on the specific kind; e.g., when the code DI is given, the subroutine expects a vector of length n containing the elements on the diagonal, while when the code GE is given, the subroutine expects an n×n array containing the entries of the matrix. 01:44:45 aaa is a one- to three-letter code describing the actual algorithm implemented in the subroutine, e.g. SV denotes a subroutine to solve linear system, while R denotes a rank-1 update. 01:44:46 i've already done all the parts that don't involving compiling in lapack. i've even downloaded the libraries. i could probably finish it tomorrow with some focus. 01:44:48 For example, the subroutine to solve a linear system with a general (non-structured) matrix using real double-precision arithmetic is called DGESV. 01:44:51 quintopia 01:45:28 does it plug in to the existing report.c 01:45:35 and yeah but i was going to do it in haskell which means i could be finished in the same time :P 01:45:40 no, i had to modify report.c also 01:45:43 also "downloaded the libraries"? what, an apt-get line? 01:45:51 quintopia: um it should not require adding new files 01:45:58 if you are baking it into chainlance that is wrong 01:46:16 no, i had to modify both 01:46:25 but the scoring code is going in report.c 01:46:39 but if you want to do it and won't fuck it up, have at it. 01:46:57 i might fuck it up :) 01:47:04 quintopia: chainlance should require _no_ modifications 01:47:06 it reports only the raw score 01:47:24 -!- CakeProphet has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds). 01:47:32 it required modification, because i needed more than the raw score 01:47:57 um what else do you need 01:48:08 the number of wins of each program 01:48:39 can't you work that out from the reported raw score 01:49:37 anyway, i have some bf joust stuff i am already working on, so i will probably do the scoring system sometime too 01:50:08 no 01:50:14 the raw score is Ascore-Bscore 01:50:30 so 9-8 looks the same as 10-9 looks the same as 11-10 01:50:49 fair enough 01:50:51 it was a trivial modification tho 01:50:57 i like the phrasing in terms of betting, btw 01:51:30 if you want the modified lance and build your own report on top of it, i can send you that now 01:52:50 nah, it's ok, one of my other projects is lance 01:52:54 quintopia: also, plz [asterisk]chainlance 01:53:02 it's bad enough fizzie plagiarising my name without you abbreviating it to my name :) 01:53:18 i couldn't remember which lance it was i modified. *lance then 01:55:35 14:53:59: variable: emacs v. vi is *very* well-trodden 01:55:36 14:54:03: variable: vile vs. nedit would be fun 01:55:40 still want this flamewar, btw 01:56:22 i have an idea 01:56:36 quintopia: which idea 01:56:41 how about a language where the same word is used to mean both a word and the opposite word 01:56:50 it shall be called SARCLANG 01:57:06 thats called english 01:57:34 english gives you the option to be explicitly not sarcastic 01:57:42 in SARCLANG, you are always left guessing 01:58:27 15:17:42: i've got a great settlement in a hanging cliff, on a remote island 01:58:31 quintopia: it does? 01:59:44 yes. in english if you preface a statement with figuratively, like THAT WILL FIGURATIVELY CATCH ON FIRE IF YOU DO THAT! then everyone knows you are being serious and not sarcastic. 02:00:13 they do? 02:00:17 15:25:52: The foundations of mathematics has a strange dogma that ... distilling the smallest possible set of elegant core axioms is both possible and profitable. From there, offering this set of axioms leaves the dirty business of making workable theories to blue-collar workaday mathematicians. 02:00:19 they do now] 02:00:26 i like this 02:01:48 i've started reading "Everything Is Obvious *Once You Know The Answer" and it is pretty awesome so far. 02:10:39 15:25:52: The foundations of mathematics has a strange dogma that ... distilling the smallest possible set of elegant core axioms is both possible and profitable. From there, offering this set of axioms leaves the dirty business of making workable theories to blue-collar workaday mathematicians. 02:12:36 quintopia: laugh 02:13:37 HAHAHAHAHA 02:13:44 that'll be six dollars 02:14:47 this confused me at first because I interpreted "laugh" as an action of elliott's rather than a command 02:15:57 I should probably stop talking in such a way that "laugh" would indeed be an action like that; I might get confused less 02:16:08 (I will never do this) 02:17:10 :) 02:17:13 monqy: did you laugh 02:17:27 monqy: because you have to laugh at its absurdity, so i can make you cry 02:17:53 but I don't want to cry 02:18:08 monqy: but did you laugh 02:18:19 what's a blue-collar workaday mathematician anyway 02:18:40 I am horribly out of jive with math culture 02:18:53 should get back in jive 02:19:08 monqy: ok here's what i modified that from 02:19:16 15:25:20: "Programming language design has a strange dogma that ... distilling the smallest possible set of elegant core axioms is both possible and profitable. From there, offering this set of axioms leaves the dirty business of making workable software to blue-collar workaday programmers." 02:19:20 monqy: time to cry 02:19:25 (this was from a serious blog post) 02:19:32 I'm crying 02:20:32 why would anyone write that. why would anyone think that. 02:20:55 monqy: perl user 02:21:50 so i have the new dark google top bar thing 02:21:52 i dont like it :( 02:21:53 programming languages suck because they're too elegant. perl forever. 02:22:11 monqy: http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2011/01/minimalism.html enjoy 02:22:38 this is why intercal is BEST LANGUAGE 02:22:44 -!- pikhq has joined. 02:23:22 oh wow what the google design just changed 02:23:27 but not when i search with the address bar 02:23:44 it eschews elegance, focusing instead on making things easy for the programmer. for instance, converting numbers to roman numerals or words takes effort on the programmer's part. they shouldn't have to do that. 02:25:14 http://i.imgur.com/SsaMu.png 02:25:18 what happened to be googles 02:25:22 my googls 02:25:25 ha;l 02:25:25 p 02:25:44 -!- pikhq_ has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds). 02:26:00 penguinofthegods? wtf? 02:26:07 thats my email 02:26:17 im a penguin deal with it 02:26:29 i wonder if there are any penguin furries (yes) 02:26:44 http://www.wdyl.com/#esoteric+programming+languages the one true google 02:27:02 what the fuck is that 02:27:07 the one true search engine 02:27:12 but its not a search engine 02:27:17 "See pictures of sex" --wdyl.com 02:27:27 "Alert me about sex" im such a child 02:27:29 "Find patents about sex" 02:27:32 "Explore sex in 3D" 02:27:36 "Measure popularity of sex on the web 02:27:36 " 02:27:41 "Organize a debate about sex" 02:27:43 "Start a fucking blog" 02:27:45 "Find sex nearby" 02:27:48 "king dedede rule 34 exists...don't ask me how i know" 02:27:52 "Call someone about sex" 02:27:56 "Plan your sex events" 02:28:00 "Search sex, on the move" 02:28:03 "Scour the earth for sex" 02:28:03 "Plan your fucking events" 02:28:06 "Access sex stuff on the web, faster" 02:28:58 Find wizards... nearby 02:29:01 Make a photo album about wizards... 02:29:07 Measure popularity of wizards... on the web 02:29:56 i have fifty-eight backlogged updates 02:30:14 * elliott applies 02:30:30 quintopia: was that quote just totally ooc btw 02:31:14 elliott: from a forum thread where someone was asking whether penguin furries exist 02:31:26 link 02:31:32 why do furries exist 02:31:32 why do furries exist ... i can't help but feel that furries are merely a sign of things to come in the next hundred years of history ... 02:31:43 for fucks sake why is something like this necessary furry fandom? more like cult of furrism, some wacked out 21st century meta religion with its own fucking intricate series of SUBSECTS 02:31:43 just search for penguin furries on google. you'll find it. 02:31:48 this article i s stupid 02:32:07 [[ 02:32:09 somewhere between final fantasy, dragon ball z, and quake three, the internet stopped being a place where everyone regarded each other as elites and instead resulting in a bunch of poorly misguided rules about "proper posting etiquette" 02:32:09 (to this very day i have yet to figure out what this phrase is supposed to mean beyond "be a faggot") 02:32:10 ]] 02:32:36 http://hell.oddwebsite.com/ well this is the worst webpage i hae ever visited 02:34:17 wow what is this 02:35:08 a bunch of people who have evidently mistaken pretending to be stupid with being stupid 02:35:12 also seen on irc 02:35:52 quintopia: lol at the first post in that penguinfurries thread 02:35:53 "I was just thinking about what they would feel like just now." 02:38:08 nice thread 02:38:24 -!- iamcal has quit (Read error: Operation timed out). 02:38:41 i hate the internet 02:38:42 and love it 02:38:49 im not sure which is stronger 02:39:16 it's a love-hate relationship 02:39:18 oh god its upgrading the kernel 02:39:22 monqy: why do iever upgrade my software 02:39:53 sometimes I upgrade my software and it looks ugly or breaks 02:40:18 uglier, that is 02:40:33 maybe ill just leave it the same version forever 02:40:35 until it breaks 02:40:41 and then install the new version and cry for a week 02:40:43 and then never upgrade it 02:40:43 repeat 02:43:21 Meet the Shen Project - the type-safe heir of Lisp (Qi) that has ambitious aims - from embedded to the Web - "a universal Assembly" (lambdassociates.org) 02:43:25 oh god dammit not the qi guy again 02:43:40 herp derp let me totally misuse "bipolar" to try and explain programmers being in bored in university 02:43:43 im a fucking genius look at me 02:43:56 fuck fuck shitty shit fuck fuck 02:44:01 heir of lisp? 02:44:14 yeah obviously qi is lisp 02:44:18 thats the reddit headliner though 02:44:36 so is it any good 02:44:50 qi itself? sure. 02:44:55 but the author is an idiot. 02:45:19 "For that reason I subtitled my talk Back to the Future (after Zemecki's classic time travel film)" 02:45:21 Zemecki's 02:45:34 hes like fucking kubrick 02:46:24 "This is not an OSI license, but a free$ license designed to hold the project together around a standard that is well documented and has 20 years R&D behind it." 02:46:33 apparently Qi is an award-winning functional programming language based on 20 years R&D that offers the advantages of pattern matching, l calculus consistency, optional lazy evaluation and static type checking. 02:46:39 theory: licensing is the easiest place to find if a software developer is a fucking egoist 02:46:55 elliott: I concur. 02:46:55 if he's selling it while talking about his ONE-MAN stunning achievement, he's a massive egoist 02:46:59 20 years r&d 20 years r&d 02:47:06 if he's avoiding using an open source license to protect his hard work, he's an egoist 02:47:16 sorry [asterisk]eir 02:47:23 if he's GPLing it and explicitly states this is to stop eir work being abused by corporations 02:47:26 e's an egoist, and delusional 02:47:29 [asterisk]e's 02:47:35 But at least not also a complete ass. 02:48:10 "I want to protect this from corporations, so I'm going to make it worse for everyone", however, is. 02:48:15 sometimes i worry that my complete lack of care with what someone does with my code would break down the moment someone "exploits" it and i'm just doing it to seem humble to myself 02:48:41 Shen has a great contribution to make in safety critical areas such as 02:48:41 space exploration, 02:48:41 nuclear plant maintenance 02:48:41 medicine 02:48:41 high integrity operating systems 02:49:25 I wonder if NASA uses formal-logic based software verification techniques? 02:49:41 naaaaaaaaaaah 02:49:55 -!- copumpkin has joined. 02:49:59 I have this horrible feeling that they instead rely on manuals of restrictive coding styles ... but can that really be true? NASA's code _works_ almost all the time, on the first actual run 02:50:01 -!- copumpkin has quit (Changing host). 02:50:02 -!- copumpkin has joined. 02:50:11 And style guides are _not_ a sufficient methodology to do this 02:50:17 [asterisk]achieve 02:50:23 monqy: Well, it's not like that's totally uncommon 02:50:28 monqy: Intel use a formally verified FPU unit 02:51:03 Probably because they don't want to repeat fdiv. 02:51:09 Yes, it started after that IIRC 02:51:14 A good decision 02:51:24 I really want to know how Intel processors are _designed_ 02:51:26 Most certainly. 02:51:28 Obviously it's not all raw chip design programs 02:51:38 Because that would be INSANELY huge 02:51:43 (The high-level layout of components is obviously that, though) 02:51:52 Like -- how do they specify the instruction->microcode transformations? 02:51:59 How do they "compile" this into the translator unit? 02:52:05 How do they write the microcode interpreter? 02:52:13 How do they "compile" this into chip design? 02:52:16 I really want to know. 02:52:20 It would be very fascinating. 02:52:56 Apparently Google's recent layout change is because of a new service. 02:52:58 "Google+". 02:53:06 google+ what 02:53:09 They're wanting to get into social networking stuff. 02:53:11 no thats just their social networking thing 02:53:14 why would that make them change the deign 02:53:15 design 02:53:17 -!- iamcal has joined. 02:53:18 btw i like the new design 02:53:23 i just didn't like the top bar with the old page 02:53:27 which i still get when searching w/ url bar for some reason 02:53:30 elliott: So it all integrates. 02:53:43 ugh what its gone back 02:53:49 oh hey 02:53:51 google.com has it 02:54:00 it is a nice redesign though? 02:54:01 it has more whitespace 02:54:10 although i don't like the url being above the summary 02:54:17 it sort of separated results before 02:54:31 pikhq: oh nice, they've unified all the serach 02:54:33 like patents 02:54:41 http://www.allgraphics123.com/ag/01/13042/13042.jpg 02:55:14 someone made this 02:55:47 i need a "HUG" 02:55:50 "HUG" "Me" 02:56:08 hey i have chrome twelve now 02:57:02 monqy: http://zwani.com/ oh good site 02:57:10 thanks for making "HUG" "Me" zwani 02:57:22 wow all of this 02:57:26 I wonder if NASA uses formal-logic based software verification techniques? <-- istr from somewhere (maybe ltu?) that they're based on _exceedingly_ thorough code review 02:57:51 oerjan: i guess it's just using humanpower but... 02:57:58 its hard to believe that it actually works as well as it does 02:58:32 "Also, while we're talking about Ambient Oriented Programming, what about Metaphor-Oriented Programming? See the brilliant Homespring language by Jeff Binder and Joe Neeman: http://xeny.net/H_Ot_M_Ef_S_P_R_Ib_N_G" 02:58:33 ltu: good 02:58:45 "I thought that this comment was generated by an intelligent SPAM generator. Maybe its passing the Turing test now?" 02:58:45 :( 02:58:59 "I was calling the post that parented your reply SPAM, according to my first-read filter. Actually, reading it again, I think you are correct, its not SPAM, just that the thoughts are enthusiastic but not very well organized yet. The parent poster could work on organizing and polishing their thoughts, it would be easier for us to understand what is going on and provide appropriate feedback." 02:59:01 oerjan: lol wow 02:59:04 they are taking homespring seriously 02:59:08 im very happy 02:59:13 joke 02:59:13 Homespring is a joke language. I think it's rather funny. 02:59:13 By tumble at Fri, 2011-03-11 05:20 | login or register to post comments 02:59:13 I didn't get it. I apologize 02:59:14 I didn't get it. I apologize for jumping to conclusions. 02:59:16 By Sean McDirmid at Fri, 2011-03-11 09:05 | login or register to post comments 02:59:23 im clapping 02:59:52 http://esolangs.org/wiki/PoGo 02:59:54 oh my god 02:59:59 why are you still making languages 03:00:01 -!- variable has quit (Remote host closed the connection). 03:00:08 [ and ] become a complicated and probably very arbitary mess of po's and go's and some other things 03:00:11 thats not a fucking isomorphism 03:00:14 is that by tehz oh madk 03:00:42 -!- variable has joined. 03:00:45 Make the coder laugh 03:00:45